This is cache of http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bloginfosec/krfr/~3/249641499/. Cache is the snapshot of article that we took when we index feed.
To see original page click here.
We are not affiliated with the authors of this article and not responsible for its content.
MISTI InfoSec World 2008: Conference Note Highlights, Part 1
2008-03-11 18:00:30 by Kenneth F. Belva in BlogInfoSec.com
 

MISTI’s InfoSec World 2008 is a great conference. It’s one of the most enjoyable I’ve been to in a long time.

In addition to excellent sessions, I’ve made a number of excellent networking contacts.

Since I’ve been quite busy (in a good way) over the past few days, it’s taken me a bit to revise my conference notes. While there were so many excellent points made over the course of the last few days, here are some of (what I consider) the highlights.

You can expect more to be published over the course of the week. Here are my notes:

  • If breached, get law enforcement to tell you cannot disclose in order to keep name out of the news
  • Best possible security controls at lowest possible costs
  • Certain controls are like hygiene - anything above threshold is subject to scrutiny
  • Qualitative business case analysis - good times and in bad
  • Striking the right balance between productivity, controls and quality
  • Demonstrate that it’s a myth that security professionals are not good financially
  • If you focus on controls and quality, then productivity follows
  • Help desk calls as metrics to show impact of security change
  • Help desk calls as metrics about where security issue are
  • Bring in-house to squeeze commodities out of processes to optimize performance and cut costs, combine functionality with IT and automate
  • Trade-off people for capital - take people and use them on higher order analysis - automate data gathering and use people to analyze it
  • Focus on collateral processes to find procedural inefficiencies
  • Eliminate variance from the environment
  • Move from manual assessments to continuous assessments and automate where possible
  • Data gathering automated: spend time on fixing and analysis
  • Prioritize on reducing potential velocity for data leakage: data leaving firm, portable media, widely available
  • Wherever possible, auto provision instead of a manual request
  • Businesses should be able to take as much risk as possible without putting the firm at risk
  • IT security is the execution and risk management is the governance and strategy
  • Start thinking like a front office business person
  • Forced shift to data centric controls from network security controls
  • Information Security professionals are defenders of shareholder money
  • make sure data flows are appropriate for relationship: no extra data in transmission
  • Do third parties have insurance and are you named as beneficiary
  • lot of fraud over instant messaging
  • Beware of SMS messaging outside of the corporate network to commit fraud (ex., picture of screen [issue of volume])
  • Physical Security controls for devices that may leak data: call center employees lock everything in locker before go into data center (physical control)
  • Media disposal: all types of media - test environments, how do PCs get wiped - CD, DVD, cell phones and blackberries, fax, multi-function printers
  • Beware of legitimate service contractors who may repair live, damaged drives. They have potential to bypass data wiping controls by leaving premises with damaged drive
  • Metrics to communicate risks: loss magnitude, loss frequency (probable)
  • Detection is key to controlling impact of loss: time
  • In order to help make control third-party answers to information security questionnaires more certain: 1. Make it a legal document, and 2. Explain the criteria they need to demonstrate (are you doing x,y,z) in order to answer affirmatively
  • Attackers are in tune with the inner working of the company: phishing attacks coincide with internal practices: ex., employee 401K choices
  • Communicate vulnerabilities and risk without using FUD: use cold, hard data and financial impact
  • Risks are real and becoming more apparent with public cases such as SocGen and TJX
  • End point, data in transit, third parties, decommissioned equipment all areas with risk
  • Determine best level for encryption: transport (SSL), entire DB, just certain fields, etc.
  • Use a small footprint for storing sensitive data (centralize it)
  • Security requirements depend on competitive position and legal/regulatory compliance standpoint
  • Deploy controls concurrently with development due to scope of public nature of web code: don’t retrofit
  • Know what projects are coming down SDLC pipe in order to get involved
  • Concentrate on how vulnerabilities map to various types of risk (business, reputation, financial, etc.): 1.) Not all vulnerabilities are created equal; and 2. Some vulns map to more than one type of risk

Copyright © 2008 BlogInfoSec.com. This feed is copyrighted by bloginfosec.com. The feed may be syndicated only with our permission. If you feel that this feed is being syndicated by a website other than through us or one of our partners, please contact bloginfosec.com immediately at copyright()bloginfosec.com. Thank you! Again, please contact copyright@bloginfosec.com so we can take legal action immediately.

 
 
 
 
 
 
TOP SEARCH
Expand / MinimizeClose Widget
  •  
RECENT SEARCH
Expand / Minimize
  •  
RELATED VIDEO
Expand / Minimize
SecurityRatty FAQ
Sergey Zarubin, 31yo
CISSP, CCSP
Moscow, Russia