This is cache of http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/318501451/stay-current--.html. Cache is the snapshot of article that we took when we index feed.
To see original page click here.
We are not affiliated with the authors of this article and not responsible for its content.
Stay Current? - I don't think so
2008-06-23 19:57:12 by HASH0x8c193d4 in StillSecure, After All These Years
 

A Google alert caught my eye today about an article entitled "The Essential Guide to NAC", in ITSecurity.com.  It is by John Edwards and dated June 23, 2008.  It was pretty much the usual about NAC.  In line, out of band, agent based and agentless, yada, yada, yada.  At the end of the article was a list of "market leaders" including Vernier Networks and a few other smaller NAC vendors.  Now as we all know Vernier ain't Vernier no more and is not really in the NAC business.  I would not hold it against John Edwards or ITSecurity.com except at the head of the article it said, "Stay Current, Features - The Essential Guide to NAC"

Not exactly what I would call keeping current, would you?

Zemanta Pixie

 
 
 
 
 
 
TOP SEARCH
Expand / MinimizeClose Widget
  •  
RECENT SEARCH
Expand / Minimize
  •  
RELATED VIDEO
Expand / Minimize
SecurityRatty FAQ
Sergey Zarubin, 31yo
CISSP, CCSP
Moscow, Russia