<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] Lattest Articles]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Its Mothers Day, be thankful you have a mom to call - so do it.]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/10d4bb77ec8c014e612bdbd9bbafe513</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/10d4bb77ec8c014e612bdbd9bbafe513</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Mothers Day is always a tough one for me. My mom passed away 25 years ago and though time has passed to cover up a never healed wound, every Mothers Day the scab is torn off a bit and the regret and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mothers Day is always a tough one for me. My mom passed away 25 years ago and though time has passed to cover up a never healed wound, every Mothers Day the scab is torn off a bit and the regret and pain ooze through. Having our kids celebrate Mothers Day with my wife has made it better, but nothing takes the place of your own Mom. Fred Wilson reminded me of that today with <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/05/call-your-mothe.html">this post</a> about a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/opinion/11friedman.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">Tom Friedman piece</a> in the NY Times today. <br><br>Tom just lost his mom last year after a long bout with dementia it seems. She was 89. Tom reflects on her remarkable life and how she influenced him to be what he is. Can any of us say any differently? Weren't all of our Moms special to each of us. Isn't so much of the people we are today directly related to that woman who raised and nourished us? Of course. So on this day honoring Mothers everywhere, if you are lucky enough to have your Mom available to thank, do so and don't miss the chance because you never know when you might not be able to.<br><br>Happy Mothers Day Bonnie and to all of you mothers everywhere!</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=6hITPg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=6hITPg" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=pbb5BH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=pbb5BH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Zgpr3H"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Zgpr3H" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=0PofRH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=0PofRH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=zGJt4H"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=zGJt4H" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=CXhU5h"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=CXhU5h" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=HUqd8h"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=HUqd8h" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/288207084" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 10:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mothers day">mothers day</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mothers">mothers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/day">day</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mom">mom</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tom">tom</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tom friedman piece">tom friedman piece</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tom reflects">tom reflects</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pain ooze">pain ooze</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/moms special">moms special</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/288207084/its-mothers-day.html">Its Mothers Day, be thankful you have a mom to call - so do it.</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DARPA Wants Matrix-style Virtual World for Cybergeddon]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fdf865e648ea48396693de9a76ac07b9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fdf865e648ea48396693de9a76ac07b9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The US military's famed scientific wingnut farm, DARPA*, has released full details of its planned &quot;National Cyber Range&quot; - a mighty network which could be configured to simulate the cyberspace...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The US military's famed scientific wingnut farm, DARPA*, has released full details of its planned "National Cyber Range" - a mighty network which could be configured to simulate the cyberspace battlefields of the future. This would allow America's fighting nerds to train for the net conflicts of tomorrow, mounting attacks on simulated enemies..]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/national cyber range">national cyber range</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mighty network">mighty network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyberspace battlefields">cyberspace battlefields</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/net conflicts">net conflicts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/darpa">darpa</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attacks">attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/military">military</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/america">america</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/details">details</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/DARPA_Wants_Matrix_style_Virtual_World_for_Cybergeddon">DARPA Wants Matrix-style Virtual World for Cybergeddon</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security Flaw Turns Gmail into Open-Relay Server]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/988cb018dac0cd8cfc9f755d232671db</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/988cb018dac0cd8cfc9f755d232671db</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A newfound flaw in Google's Gmail allows would-be spammers to treat the service as an open-relay server. Compounding the issue is the fact that services such as Hotmail and Yahoo &quot;trust&quot; Gmail. This...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A newfound flaw in Google's Gmail allows would-be spammers to treat the service as an open-relay server. Compounding the issue is the fact that services such as Hotmail and Yahoo "trust" Gmail. This may facilitate e-mail delivery, but it also makes it easier for spammers to reach their intended targets.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 00:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/open-relay server">open-relay server</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gmail">gmail</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/would-be spammers">would-be spammers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spammers">spammers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/e-mail delivery">e-mail delivery</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/newfound flaw">newfound flaw</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/reach">reach</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/treat">treat</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Security_Flaw_Turns_Gmail_into_Open_Relay_Server">Security Flaw Turns Gmail into Open-Relay Server</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Swingtown - This ain't your mother's CBS]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/614784c85cc82f9950da6e62e9a02e6a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/614784c85cc82f9950da6e62e9a02e6a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I was reading a review in the NY Times today about a new summer time show coming to CBS. It is called Swingtown and I was originally attracted to it because it is a look back at the mid 70's. That was...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I was reading a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/arts/television/11stei.html?partner=rssyahoo&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">review in the NY Times</a> today about a new summer time show coming to CBS.&nbsp; It is called Swingtown and I was originally attracted to it because it is a look back at the mid 70's.&nbsp; That was the age of my adolescence, so it naturally attracted me.&nbsp; Well this show is about the mid-70's OK, but the wilder side. It is set in a suburb of Chicago and is about wife swapping, partying and other hedonistic activity that is supposed to sum up the era.&nbsp; And on CBS yet!&nbsp; That's right, the folks who give us 60 Minutes, Murder She Wrote and Touched by an Angel, now bring us the swingers of the 70's.&nbsp; </p> <p>I grew up in a suburb in the 70's and while I do remember our parents hanging out drinking Harvey Wallbangers and some of them getting divorced, I don't think they were the type to pass around Quaaludes and engage in orgies, like depicted in this show.&nbsp; But hey, maybe I am just naive. This certainly sounds more like an HBO series to me, but I have to admit I will watch and see it what it is about. Just the 70's clothes and hairstyles should be entertaining for me. I am You Tubing the official trailer: </p> <p> <div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:5737277B-5D6D-4f48-ABFC-DD9C333F4C5D:0b1597e7-bb8c-48af-a127-26ed4b749755" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px"><div id="93ff18db-4eee-4bd3-a263-3980ffffbbae" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline;"><div><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTZPsWJNHU8&amp;hl=en" target="_new"><img src="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/WindowsLiveWriter/video7d6a8f833527.jpg" galleryimg="no" onload="var downlevelDiv = document.getElementById('93ff18db-4eee-4bd3-a263-3980ffffbbae'); downlevelDiv.innerHTML = &quot;&lt;div&gt;&lt;object width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;movie\&quot; value=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WTZPsWJNHU8&amp;hl=en\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;param name=\&quot;wmode\&quot; value=\&quot;transparent\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/param&gt;&lt;embed src=\&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/WTZPsWJNHU8&amp;hl=en\&quot; type=\&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash\&quot; wmode=\&quot;transparent\&quot; width=\&quot;425\&quot; height=\&quot;355\&quot;&gt;&lt;\/embed&gt;&lt;\/object&gt;&lt;\/div&gt;&quot;;" alt=""></a></div></div></div></p> <p>If you like this trailer, <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=METb02UNDKg&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">here is a link</a> to a longer video showing more highlights. Let me warn you that this one is a bit racy! </p></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=4L59Hk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=4L59Hk" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=K6ygkH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=K6ygkH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=zjTQxH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=zjTQxH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=zYBaMH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=zYBaMH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=aYPMHH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=aYPMHH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=vdnhhh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=vdnhhh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=LgkVph"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=LgkVph" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/287846813" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cbs">cbs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/trailer">trailer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/official trailer">official trailer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/harvey wallbangers">harvey wallbangers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hedonistic activity">hedonistic activity</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/suburb">suburb</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/swingtown">swingtown</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hbo series">hbo series</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mid">mid</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/287846813/swingtown---thi.html">Swingtown - This ain't your mother's CBS</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A Brief Intro To Cryptographic Hashes/MD5]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/acf1f762820b5cf2109040052e884e8f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/acf1f762820b5cf2109040052e884e8f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[New Video: A Brief Intro To Cryptographic Hashes/MD5
A cryptographic hash function takes an input and returns a fixed size string that corresponds to it, called a hash. Cryptographic hashes have a lot...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>New Video:</b>
<a href="http://irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/cryptographic-hash-md5">A Brief Intro To Cryptographic Hashes/MD5</a><br>
A cryptographic hash function takes an input and returns a fixed size string 
that corresponds to it, called a hash. Cryptographic hashes have a lot of uses, 
some of which are: detecting data changes, storing or generating passwords, 
making unique keys in databases and ensuring message integrity. This video will 
mostly cover detecting file changes, but I hope it gets your mind going in the 
right direction for how hashes can be used. Specifically covered will be tools 
for creating MD5 hashes in Windows and Linux.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cryptographic hashes">cryptographic hashes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hashes">hashes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/md5 hashes">md5 hashes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/message integrity">message integrity</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/video">video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unique keys">unique keys</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/intro">intro</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cryptographic hashesmd5">cryptographic hashesmd5</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lot">lot</category>
      <source url="http://irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/cryptographic-hash-md5">A Brief Intro To Cryptographic Hashes/MD5</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Get the feeling youre being had?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3acd3503c7874c478bef2629afdb0dee</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3acd3503c7874c478bef2629afdb0dee</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Used to be the business strove to please the customer. Not so any more except in rare cases


clipped from www.crime-research.org

Microsoft didnt crush Storm, counter researchers



By the companys...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div > Used to be the business strove to please the customer.<br/>Not so any more except in rare cases. </div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/130A8237-CA06-40FC-8E8A-63AA954028F0/" title="go to this clipmark"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_icon/d233d537-9112-4aad-9c14-f98b47033cbf/130A8237-CA06-40FC-8E8A-63AA954028F0/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/" href="http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/" style="font-size: 11px;">www.crime-research.org</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/ -->
<div style="margin: 4px 0px; color: #000000; font-size: 20px;">Microsoft didn&#8217;t crush Storm, counter researchers
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/ --><DIV><br />
By the company&#8217;s count, the MSRT cleaned more than 526,000 Storm-infected PCs in the final four months of last year. After some back and forth between the Storm bot herders and Microsoft, the former gave up, said Jimmy Kuo, a senior security architect at the company.</DIV></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/ --><DIV><br />
Not so fast, said Trend Micro.</DIV></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/ --><DIV><br />
More important, though, is the big picture, said Ferguson and Yaneza. Storm is certainly diminished, they agreed, but not simply because of Microsoft and its MSRT.</DIV></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.crime-research.org/news/03.05.2008/3345/ --><DIV><br />
&#8220;Storm is still out there,&#8221; he said. And active. &#8220;We&#8217;ve seen campaigns to renew their [botnet] body count within the last 48 hours,&#8221; Ferguson said.</DIV></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;">
<table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td>
<td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/130A8237-CA06-40FC-8E8A-63AA954028F0/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm">storm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm bot herders">storm bot herders</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/crush storm">crush storm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/botnet body count">botnet body count</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/senior security architect">senior security architect</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/jimmy kuo">jimmy kuo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/companys count">companys count</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/msrt">msrt</category>
      <source url="http://spywarebiz.com/spywarebizblog/?p=450">Get the feeling youre being had?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Insider Threats: the biggest Information Security risk]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/94738166477b3697ee3d387b7722021b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/94738166477b3697ee3d387b7722021b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It's a fact that most crimes are committed by people known to their victims. Similarly, businesses are most at risk from former and current employees. Most commonly when thinking about information...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      It's a fact that most crimes are committed by people known to their victims. Similarly, businesses are most at risk from former and current employees. Most commonly when thinking about information security we consider how to prevent intrusion into our business from the outside. The facts and statistics tell a different story. 62% of large businesses in the UK (source: DTI/PWC Insider Threat Report 2006) have dealt with a security incident instigated by a current or former employee.

I've been writing up some of my research into insider threats in the form of a paper describing the risks posed to a fictional multinational company, Acme Widgets plc. 

You can download the paper for free <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/stuart_king/StuartKing_InsiderThreatRisk_0508.pdf">here</a>. If you'd like to leave me feedback or would like more information about insider threats, write to the email address within the digital signature at the end of the document.

If you'd like to make a donation in return for downloading the paper, please give to <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pudsey/donate/">Children in Need</a>.

      
   ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/insider threats">insider threats</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information security">information security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/current">current</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/paper">paper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fictional multinational company">fictional multinational company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acme widgets plc">acme widgets plc</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/current employees">current employees</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/risks posed">risks posed</category>
      <source url="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/stuart_king/2008/05/insider-threats-the-biggest-in.html">Insider Threats: the biggest Information Security risk</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[IE8 ActiveX Improvements]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c545b949f77cb223b6ef519a70a7e1a3</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c545b949f77cb223b6ef519a70a7e1a3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The IE team has announced some more about ActiveX improvements in Internet Explorer 8. Some of the blog is about old features, but there are some new ones: Per-User (Non-Admin) ActiveX, available only...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/05/07/ie8-security-part-ii-activex-improvements.aspx">The IE team has announced some more about ActiveX improvements in Internet Explorer 8.</a>

Some of the blog is about old features, but there are some new ones: Per-User (Non-Admin) ActiveX, available only on Vista, means that it's possible for users to install an ActiveX control only for their own user context, not for the machine. It sounds like this will be on by default, but administrators can turn it off through Group Policy. You can already see from the comments to the blog entry that some people wanted this, and I guess it's a good thing.

Through Per-Site ActiveX a control may be restricted to use only in the context of specific sites. If a control is run by a site not in the list, the user gets an information bar asking whether they want to allow it to run in that context. Administrators can control all of this, including pre-polulating a list of controls and permitted sites.

That's it for the really new stuff, although the blog reiterates some other powerful security features. For instance, MS already announced that <A href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/04/ie8_will_have_dep_on_by_defaul.php">IE8 will have DEP on by default</A>, which will defeat a huge proportion of vulnerabilities.<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=5609b4b9f6d03278ccf14cb53e48c80e"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=5609b4b9f6d03278ccf14cb53e48c80e"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=5609b4b9f6d03278ccf14cb53e48c80e" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/287465793" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/activex">activex</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/control">control</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/site">site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/activex control">activex control</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/per-site activex">per-site activex</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/activex improvements">activex improvements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user context">user context</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/context">context</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog entry">blog entry</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/287465793/ie8_activex_improvements.html">IE8 ActiveX Improvements</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[NSA Attacks West Point! Relax, It's a Cyberwar Game]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f11d60d6da0ea55d61cdb03f3578daa6</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f11d60d6da0ea55d61cdb03f3578daa6</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Five hours into their assault on West Point, the hackers got serious
The SQL [structured query language] inserts that came earlier were just pablum intended to lull the Army cadets into a false sense...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five hours into their assault on West Point, the hackers got serious. 
</p>

<p>
The SQL [structured query language] inserts that came earlier were just pablum intended to lull the Army cadets into a false sense of security. But then the bad guys unleashed a stealthy kernel-level rootkit that burrowed into one workstation, started scraping data and "calling home."
</p>

<p>
It was a highly sophisticated attack, but this time the bad guys were really good guys in wolves' clothing.
</p>

<p>
For four days in late April, the National Security Agency -- the nation's most secretive repository of spooks, snoops and electronic eavesdroppers -- directed coordinated assaults on custom-built networks at seven of the nation's military academies, including West Point, the Army university 50 miles north of New York City.
</p>

<p>
It was all part of the seventh annual Cyber Defense Exercise, a training event for future military IT specialists. The exercise offered a rare window into the NSA's toolkit for infiltrating, corrupting or destroying computer networks.
</p>

<p>
The 34 Army cadets comprising the West Point IT team operated in a different kind of battlefield, but their combat skills and instincts need to be every bit as sharp. Like George Washington said: "There is nothing so likely to produce peace as to be well prepared to meet the enemy."
</p>

<p>
The SQL injections, targeting their Fedora Core 8 Web server, were a piece of cake for these IT combatants. Each injection tried to smuggle malicious code inside the seemingly harmless language used by the network’s MySQL software. The cadets handily defended with open source Apache web server modules, plus some manual tweaking of the SQL database to "avoid any surprises," in the words of Lt Col. Joe Adams, a West Point instructor who helped coach the team.
</p>

<p>
But the kernel-level rootkit was much more dangerous. This stealthy operating-system hijacker can open unseen "back doors" into even highly protected networks. When they detected the rootkit's "calls home" the cadets launched Sysinternal's security software to find the hijacker, then they manually scoured the workstation to find the unwelcome executable file. 
</p><p>
Then they terminated it. With extreme prejudice.
</p>
<p>
"This was probably the most challenging part of the exercise, since it required them to use some advanced techniques to find the rootkit," Adams says. And rooting it out helped boost the West Point team to the top of the pile when, in the aftermath of the exercise, the referees rated all the universities' network defenses.
</p>
<p>
For the second year in a row, the Army placed first over the Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard and others, winning geek bragging rights and the privilege of holding onto a gaudy, 60-pound brass trophy festooned with bald eagles and American flags. Adams credits the team’s thorough preparation and their excellent teamwork despite the round-the-clock schedule.
</p>
<!--pagebreak-->

<p>At the network control room on the second floor of West Point’s 200-year-old engineering building (which once was an indoor horse corral and still smells like it in some remote corners, according to one instructor), the IT team set up cots and, just for the hell of it, camouflaged netting. They worked in shifts, with one team member always monitoring incoming and outgoing traffic. He or she would alert other cadets -- "router guys" -- to block any suspicious addresses. Meanwhile, off-shift cadets would make food and coffee runs to keep everyone fueled up and alert. Together, the team was "faster than anyone else," Adams says.
</p>

<p>
But the way the cadets designed their network was a big factor in their victory, too. The NSA dictated some terms: All networks had to be capable of e-mail, chat and other services and had to be up and running at all times despite any attacks or defensive measures. Beyond that, the teams were free to come up with their own designs.
</p>

<p>
West Point's took three weeks to build. The cadets settled on a fairly standard Linux and FreeBSD-based network with advanced routing techniques for steering incoming traffic in directions of the IT team's choosing.
</p>

<p>
The choices in software tools for responding to any attack really boiled down to "automatic" versus "custom," says Eric Dean, a civilian programmer and instructor. He adds that while automatic tools that do most of their own work are certainly easier, custom tools that allow more manual tweaking are more effective. "I expect one of the 'lessons learned' will be the use of custom tools instead of automatics."
</p>

<p>
Even with a solid network design and passable software choices, there was an element of intuitiveness required to defend against the NSA, especially once it became clear the agency was using minor, and perhaps somewhat obvious, attacks to screen for sneakier, more serious ones.
</p>

<p>
"One of the challenges was when they see a scan, deciding if this is it, or if it’s a cover," says Dean. Spotting "cover" attacks meant thinking like the NSA -- something Dean says the cadets did quite well. "I was surprised at their creativity."
</p>

<p>
Legal limitations were a surprising obstacle to a realistic exercise. Ideally, the teams would be allowed to attack other schools' networks while also defending their own. But only the NSA, with its arsenal of waivers, loopholes, special authorizations (and heaven knows what else) is allowed to take down a U.S. network.
</p>

<p>
And despite the relative sophistication of the NSA's assaults, the agency told Wired.com that it had tailored its attacks to be just "a little too hard for the strongest undergraduate team to deal with, so that we could distinguish the strongest teams from the weaker ones."
</p>

<p>
In other words, grasshopper, nice work -- but the NSA is capable of much craftier network take-downs.
</p><br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=0eebae201dd1f9c87fb47b2629d1bf60"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=0eebae201dd1f9c87fb47b2629d1bf60"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=0eebae201dd1f9c87fb47b2629d1bf60" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=PBGxjH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=PBGxjH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=wwsfeh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=wwsfeh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=HcZiLh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=HcZiLh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=MnJ3rH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=MnJ3rH" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=54tGLH"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=54tGLH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=CP1KJh"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=CP1KJh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=ieiu4h"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=ieiu4h" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=rCn1GH"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=rCn1GH" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/287200226" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/287200227" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/army university">army university</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/army">army</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/custom-built networks">custom-built networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nsa">nsa</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/army cadets">army cadets</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/west">west</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cadets">cadets</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/287200227/nsa_cyberwargames">NSA Attacks West Point! Relax, It's a Cyberwar Game</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Facebook, states agree to boost efforts to protect children]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/867f35c1b5b452e1599c2ebc60919ab2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/867f35c1b5b452e1599c2ebc60919ab2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Social networking site Facebook Thursday announced that it is boosting its privacy protections as part of an ongoing effort to work with 49 state attorneys general to protect children...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Social networking site Facebook Thursday announced that it is boosting its privacy protections as part of an ongoing effort to work with 49 state attorneys general to protect children online.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/site facebook thursday">site facebook thursday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy protections">privacy protections</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/protect">protect</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attorneys">attorneys</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/effort">effort</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/social">social</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/online">online</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/050808-facebook-states-agree-to-boost.html?fsrc=rss-security">Facebook, states agree to boost efforts to protect children</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
