<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Wi-Fi Networking News]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/feed/a7c6b2c61078e1a2ac3c3e7383728bdd</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: Wi-Fi Robot Attack; Silicon Valley Plan Proceeds]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a73229a533aa9f53897566105f7e6501</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a73229a533aa9f53897566105f7e6501</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Spykee is a $300 Wi-Fi Skype robot: Lots of strange coolness here. I don't know how I missed hearing about this before, but apparently an actual customer got his hands on the thing and recorded a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><strong><a href="http://www.robotsrule.com/html/spykee.php">The Spykee is a $300 Wi-Fi Skype robot:</a></strong> Lots of strange coolness here. I don't know how I missed hearing about this before, but apparently an actual customer got his hands on the thing and recorded a video. It's cute. You can access its video through control software or a remote Skype video connection. It's got a speaker and microphone, and can be used for VoIP calls. The control software allows it to move around, play sound effects, and produce music. Like the computer in Superman III (or a Roomba), it craves power, and knows to return to its charger.</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/spykee_1.jpg" alt="spykee_1.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="200" /></p>

<p>The name reveals some of its creepy appeal: Spykee = Spy Camera. I suppose the nanny you're trying to make sure isn't shaking your baby might be freaked out when it suddenly starts emitting Star Wars music, or such like. Made by Meccano under the Erector brand, its control software is Mac and Windows compatible. </p>

<p>I, for one, welcome our new Spykee overlords--on 15-Oct-2008 when it starts to ship generally.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20080924/bs_ibd_ibd/20080924tech01">Silicon Valley project finally gets underway:</a></strong> It's a still a pilot, small, with no promised outcome. And after all this time, a switch of partners, and new parameters, they've still mounted just 20 of 28 access points.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/control software">control software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spykee">spykee</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spykee overlords">spykee overlords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/suddenly starts">suddenly starts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi skype robot">wi-fi skype robot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon valley project">silicon valley project</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/star wars music">star wars music</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play sound effects">play sound effects</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starts">starts</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008460.html">Wee-Fi: Wi-Fi Robot Attack; Silicon Valley Plan Proceeds</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Clarity on Qantas' Plans: OnAir and Aeromobile]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d054a83a986c1d357ea394b9721e5121</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d054a83a986c1d357ea394b9721e5121</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Trade mag Flightglobal gets the full story on Qantas' in-flight calling, texting, and Internet plans: A few days ago, it seemed to come out that Qantas had dropped Aeromobile (its test partner last...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/plane.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2008/09/24/316457/qantas-reveals-connectivity-plans-for-a380s-a330s-and.html"><strong>Trade mag Flightglobal gets the full story on Qantas' in-flight calling, texting, and Internet plans:</strong></a> A few days ago, it seemed to come out that Qantas had dropped Aeromobile (its test partner last year) for OnAir, and was moving to Internet service on A380s instead of in-flight cell calling and texting. Flightglobal clears the air, and reveals that Qantas will offer all of the above. (I wrote about this in "<a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008448.html"><strong>Sorry, Qantas, No Unfettered Broadband</strong></a>.")</p>

<p>OnAir was chosen for A380 service, with the initial rollout--especially for international flights--using the 64 Kbps Inmarsat satellite offering, which is too paltry for anything but limited text communication. When the recently launched Pacific satellite is active--which may take up to a year--OnAir and Qantas can upgrade to the luxurious nearly 500 Kbps per channel service. </p>

<p>The head of OnAir is pushing some mighty serious horsehockey, however, when he says as quoted by Flightglobal that he "is confident that once the full service is up and running, passengers will be able to access the Internet 'in exactly the same way as they can on the ground.'" That may be the case in terms of access, but not in terms of cost. The cost will be enormously high unless OnAir has a magic deal with Inmarsat that's previously undisclosed. I suspect a per MB charge will be in effect that will discourage much use. Calls and texting could be carried over the same system, of course.</p>

<p>Qantas plans to continue to work with Aeromobile for domestic service, with calls and texting available, on their Boeing 767-300s and Airbus A330-200s, Flightglobal reports. Aeromobile has plans to launch a full Internet service later this year using cached and live content. [link via <a href="http://www.setteb.it/"><strong>Fabio Zambelli</strong></a>]</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plans">plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/qantas">qantas</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service">service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/channel service">channel service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet service">internet service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/qantas plans">qantas plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/onair">onair</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flightglobal">flightglobal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/trade mag flightglobal">trade mag flightglobal</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008458.html">Clarity on Qantas' Plans: OnAir and Aeromobile</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Minneapolis Find It's All about the Utility Poles]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/83875215579209596607d6a7e1d7e283</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/83875215579209596607d6a7e1d7e283</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Those dang poles add $1m to Wi-Fi network expense: US Internet Wireless couldn't install service in a large remaining area of Minneapolis because the decorative utility poles in the upscale...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/muni_icon.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_10541252?source=rss"><strong>Those dang poles add $1m to Wi-Fi network expense:</strong></a> US Internet Wireless couldn't install service in a large remaining area of Minneapolis because the decorative utility poles in the upscale neighborhoods--paid through homeowner assessments--lack the strength to hold the Wi-Fi nodes. Minneapolis has opted to pick up the tab for replacing the 145 poles and putting in temporary wood poles to complete the network--a cool $1m. While unfortunate for the overall city cost savings, it doesn't seem out of line for which entity has the responsibility.</p>

<p>Without replacing these poles, the city would be unable to use the municipal services from which it still plans to save $3.5m over the 10-year contract life, and thus it would be pennywise and pound foolish to leave the status quo. </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/poles">poles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/temporary wood poles">temporary wood poles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/decorative utility poles">decorative utility poles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dang poles">dang poles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/minneapolis">minneapolis</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city">city</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi network expense">wi-fi network expense</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city cost savings">city cost savings</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008457.html">Minneapolis Find It's All about the Utility Poles</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: London Calling, Again; T-Mobile Offers Android Phone; Iraq Base-Fi]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d4d41fc1eac2c2262c924eec3d64a960</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d4d41fc1eac2c2262c924eec3d64a960</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[London mayor proposes Wi-Fi city, no fees: No details, naturally, just an optimistic statement. Boris, can I introduce you to Gavin
First Android phone revealed by T-Mobile, Google: The first...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7631163.stm"><strong>London mayor proposes Wi-Fi city, no fees:</strong></a> No details, naturally, just an optimistic statement. Boris, can I introduce you to Gavin?</p>

<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7631163.stm"><strong>First Android phone revealed by T-Mobile, Google:</strong></a> The first smartphone based on the Google-sponsored, Open Handset Alliance-backed Android platform was announced by T-Mobile today. The G1 will cost $180 in the U.S., has a slide-out keyboard, and has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and GPS built in. The phone should start shipping 22-Oct-2008 in the U.S. and November in the UK. The monthly American fee will be $25 to $35 for data on top of a two-year voice plan commitment.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/wifiwimax/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210603399"><strong>Soldiers at Joint Base Balad get Wi-Fi network:</strong></a> 20,000 American soldiers at this base in Iraq can now use a secure mesh Wi-Fi network for personal access. The description of how the network can self-heal is perhaps particularly apt in a country torn by insurgency.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/base">base</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/android phone">android phone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/phone">phone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/joint base balad">joint base balad</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile">t-mobile</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi network">wi-fi network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/monthly american fee">monthly american fee</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008454.html">Wee-Fi: London Calling, Again; T-Mobile Offers Android Phone; Iraq Base-Fi</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Eye-Fi Adds Upgrade Track at Yearly Fee]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3e1647519eaf22ed342316fc64fccf49</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3e1647519eaf22ed342316fc64fccf49</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Wi-Fi sharing digital memory card Eye-Fi adds another option for its product line: If you've purchased or plan to purchase an Eye-Fi, starting 5-Oct-2008, you can upgrade the model of card you...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.eye.fi/news/press-releases/">The Wi-Fi sharing digital memory card Eye-Fi adds another option for its product line:</a></strong> If you've purchased or plan to purchase an Eye-Fi, starting 5-Oct-2008, you can upgrade the model of card you purchased by paying a yearly subscription fee. This provides more of a try-and-see mode for Eye-Fi's slightly more expensive offerings.</p>

<p>Eye-Fi divided its Wi-Fi SD card line-up into three parts earlier in the year: Home, which transfers to a computer ($80); Share, which uploads to a computer and to Eye-Fi's servers, which relay them to gallery, print, and social services ($100); and Explore, which ties in Wi-Fi positioning and one year of a Wayport hotspot subscription for uploads ($130). I wrote <strong><a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008418.html">a long review of the Eye-Fi Explore</a></strong> on 12-Aug-2008.</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/eye-fi_cards_sharer_sm.jpg" align="right"/>If you bought a Home, you can upgrade to the Share service for $10 per year, and if you bought either a Home or Share, you can add geotagging for $15 per year and hotspot access for $15 per year. It's a smart move, since original Eye-Fi card buyers already had a firmware upgrade that converted their card into a Share model; they'll now be able upgrade to the full featureset. This is something I thought the company was offering at launch months ago, and I speculated it would be easy to add.</p>

<p>Eye-Fi also added two new photo sharing services: Apple's MobileMe and AdoramaPix. I cannot think of any other firm that Apple has partnered with to allow direct MobileMe uploads, although this may be technically less a big deal than it sounds. But I believe it's unique--only the iPhone and iPhoto software can transfers images into MobileMe's galleries; I'll need to investigate further. It's a good feather in Eye-Fi's cap.</p>

<p>Finally, Eye-Fi says they'll release tweaked firmware on 5-Oct as well that will double the speed of photo transfers from their cards to a computer on the local network.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eye-fi">eye-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/upgrade">upgrade</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eye-fi explore">eye-fi explore</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/explore">explore</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/direct mobileme uploads">direct mobileme uploads</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/share service">share service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mobileme">mobileme</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/share">share</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/transfers">transfers</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008453.html">Eye-Fi Adds Upgrade Track at Yearly Fee</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: CSIRO Wins Patent Appeal; Zune-Fi in SF; Kodak ESP 9]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/95aa70e977b254cabeb9c3b2679b4b8d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/95aa70e977b254cabeb9c3b2679b4b8d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Australian tech office wins appeal: Buffalo sinks further into the hole as it loses its appeal against a judgement over its use of what the Australian CSIRO technical agency asserts is its patented...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/hardware/soa/CSIRO-victorious-in-Wi-Fi-appeal/0,130061702,339292134,00.htm?omnRef=1337"><strong>Australian tech office wins appeal:</strong></a> Buffalo sinks further into the hole as it loses its appeal against a judgement over its use of what the Australian CSIRO technical agency asserts is its patented technology used in all 802.11 implementations. The case, in the patent-holder-friendly US Eastern District Court of Texas--a venue that may be dethroned as a <em>forum coveniens</em> for patentholders' suits in new legislation--prevents Buffalo from importing or selling gear in the US with Wi-Fi technology embedded. In Japan, the patent office threw out CSIRO's patent. While Cisco paid CSIRO as the result of an acquisition of an Australian company a few years ago, most US-based technology giants are involved in resisting the patent's continued validation and enforcement. I've read the patent and some of the suits, and as a non-patent expert, it's clear CSIRO original invention didn't cover what's at stake. However, CSIRO was allowed in a subsequent filing to extend its patent to cover already-in-use technology in a way that seems odd to me, but happens in patents all the time. Many millions of dollars and many more years may be expended before a resolution happens. CSIRO apparently isn't asking for insane fees, although anything paid to them would be passed along to consumers. If companies settled, this might result in an increase of 1 to 5 percent on retail prices. It may ultimately effect WiMax, too, though no suits in that area have been filed.</p>

<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10046542-75.html"><strong>Finding Zune-Fi:</strong></a> Ina Fried of News.com wanders the polite streets of San Francisco in search of Zune connections over Wi-Fi. She finds a few, and has a good experience. One cafe owner sees the ease with which she can stream music and calls it cool. She can't connect at the long-running Google-sponsored free Wi-Fi at Union Square, however, which means the Wi-Fi likely has an accept button that must be pressed. Surely Microsoft could insert a little technology that would allow a browser-free acceptance of terms? Probably involves Yet Another Protocol: the Wi-Fi Terms Browser-Free Presentation Protocol (WTBFPP).</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/kodakesp9.jpg" alt="kodakesp9.jpg" border="0" width="150" height="120" align="right" /><a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=13572&pq-locale=en_US"><strong>Kodak adds interesting Wi-Fi enabled all-in-one:</strong></a> The new Kodak ESP 9 is a multi-function printer (fax, scan, print, copy) that connects to a network via Wi-Fi or Ethernet. The $300 device spits out 30 pages per minutes in color, 32 ppm in black only. Kodak claims that the model line to which the ESP belongs uses ink in a vastly more efficient manner than the "average of comparable consumer inkjet printers." </p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/csiro">csiro</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/patent">patent</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cover">cover</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cover already-in-use technology">cover already-in-use technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi">free wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/kodak">kodak</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology">technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi technology">wi-fi technology</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008452.html">Wee-Fi: CSIRO Wins Patent Appeal; Zune-Fi in SF; Kodak ESP 9</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sprint May Launch WiMax in Baltimore 6-October]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f06a6b1aba46ec417e5ba7fda223fddd</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f06a6b1aba46ec417e5ba7fda223fddd</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[DSLReports has a tip that Sprint will launch its WiMax service in its first commercially available market on 6-Oct-2008: The site for the service should go live on 26-Sept, allowing sign ups. Pricing...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Xohm-Baltimore-Launch-October-6-97821"><strong>DSLReports has a tip that Sprint will launch its WiMax service in its first commercially available market on 6-Oct-2008:</strong></a> The site for the service should go live on 26-Sept, allowing sign ups. Pricing will likely be sub-$50. Speeds will likely be advertised as 2 to 4 Mbps with higher bursts. Long-time market watcher Karl Bode writes that backhaul issues appear to be sorted out, with Sprint having signed a number of new deals to ensure that their high-bandwidth WiMax sites can be fed with enough bites.</p>

<p>Baltimore is one of what I believe are still three test markets that will go into commercial availability, albeit as much as a year after initial plans, and then months delayed after revised plans were announced. Still 2 to 4 Mbps is far above the level that current cell technology can achieve as a consistent range.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sprint">sprint</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wimax service">wimax service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/high-bandwidth wimax sites">high-bandwidth wimax sites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service">service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/current cell technology">current cell technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plans">plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/initial plans">initial plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sign ups">sign ups</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/commercial availability">commercial availability</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008450.html">Sprint May Launch WiMax in Baltimore 6-October</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lexar Sells Branded Eye-Fi]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c5371dd68561484ef360c6d16841e3bc</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c5371dd68561484ef360c6d16841e3bc</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm running a link to this story solely to avoid confusion among readers: Eye-Fi signed a partnership deal with Lexar several months ago that should lead to Eye-Fi technology being embedded in Lexar...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lexar.com/digfilm/sd_wifi.html"><strong>I'm running a link to this story solely to avoid confusion among readers:</strong></a> Eye-Fi signed a partnership deal with Lexar several months ago that should lead to Eye-Fi technology being embedded in Lexar cards. Lexar works closely with so many camera makers and others that it was a smart move for Eye-Fi to link up, as Eye-Fi is selling its smarts as the value-add, not so much the hardware that the smarts are embedded in for now. </p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/lexar_shoot_n_sync.jpg" alt="lexar_shoot_n_sync.jpg" border="0" width="125" height="150" align="right" />Obviously, as a practical stage one, Lexar is selling a private-label Eye-Fi Share as the Lexar Shoot-n-Sync using. Same price, same features.</p>

<p>What I'm waiting for, which will likely take into 2009, is for Lexar and Eye-Fi to announce partnerships with a major camera maker or two that will allow the Lexar or Eye-Fi card to talk directly to the camera to control battery savings mode, as well as other details. Conceivably, a camera that supports an external GPS (like the new Nikon D90) could allow the Eye-Fi to retrieve coordinates and perform assistive GPS using its Wi-Fi positioning software, and so forth. There's a lot of potential.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eye-fi">eye-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lexar">lexar</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eye-fi card">eye-fi card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eye-fi technology">eye-fi technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lexar shoot-n-sync">lexar shoot-n-sync</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/private-label eye-fi share">private-label eye-fi share</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lexar cards">lexar cards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/camera makers">camera makers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/camera">camera</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008449.html">Lexar Sells Branded Eye-Fi</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sorry, Qantas, No Unfettered Broadband]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e46bb700b1a972d41bfd64aba65817f9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e46bb700b1a972d41bfd64aba65817f9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Qantas backs off from earlier plans, changes provider for in-flight broadband: The Sydney Morning Herald somewhat erratically and incompletely reports that Qantas has delayed and modified its...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/plane.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/travel/qantas-limits-access-to-web/2008/09/17/1221330929870.html"><strong>Qantas backs off from earlier plans, changes provider for in-flight broadband:</strong></a> The Sydney Morning Herald somewhat erratically and incompletely reports that Qantas has delayed and modified its in-flight broadband plans. Aeromobile was the provider when the service <a href="http://www.breakingtravelnews.com/article.php?story=2007081609481129&query=qantas"><strong>was tested in second quarter 2007</strong></a>, but OnAir is now described as the airline's partner. This was noted by colleague Fabio Zambelli, who emailed me the news, and <a href="http://www.setteb.it/content/view/4742"><strong>has his own account</strong></a> at 7BIT (in Italian).</p>

<p><a href="http://www.onair.aero/index.php?pid=123"><strong>OnAir</strong></a> has so far tested their calling/texting-only service on two aircraft--one operated by Air France, one by TAP Portugal--even though RyanAir announced plans that its planes would started being unwired with the service by late 2007. Still no word on that fleet progress.</p>

<p>Qantas will apparently launch cached Web browsing and limited Web email (probably through a proxy) along with instant messaging, with full Internet service coming "later in 2009." This is clearly due to a lack of satellite coverage that was just remediated a few weeks ago (see below). The first plane with limited service, a new A380, should be in flight 20-October-2008.</p>

<div style="float:right; margin:0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-bottom: 0px;"><p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/SorryQantas.jpg" alt="SorryQantas.jpg" border="0" width="100" height="152"></p><p style="font-size: 10px">I hate in-flight<br/>broadband</p></div>To Qantas' credit, note that each seat on the plane will have a laptop opower socket, a USB port, and a multimedia system that can show 100 movies and 500 TV show episodes, play the contents of 1,000 CDs and 20 radio stations, and offer 80 games. 

<p>The Morning Herald seems to overstate the importance and scope of a complaint filed by the union representing American Airlines' flight attendants. The detailed coverage in the U.S. had more to do with the potential for issues, and likely attendants lack of interest in policing yet another media on the plane. Filtering doesn't work, the attendants probably already know, and this may just be a negotiating point with the airline.</p>

<p>On why Qantas is waiting until late 2009? This requires unwinding how OnAir gets its signal.</p>

<p>Aeromobile and OnAir both rely on Inmarsat satellites for their service. Both companies had several years ago staked their futures on the fourth-generation network Inmarsat was to inaugurate with three satellites that would use beamforming to allow precise delivery of nearly 500 Kbps per receiver, with hundreds or thousands of regions being able to be targeted from a single satellite. Inmarsat's third-gen network--don't confuse this with 3G cellular ground-based networks--can deliver about 64 Kbps per channel.</p>

<p>Now, unfortunately, Inmarsat was three years late on launching its trans-Pacific bird. While the company <a href="http://www.inmarsat.com/About/Newsroom/Press/00021465.aspx?language=EN&textonly=False"><strong>claims 85 percent coverage of the earth</strong></a> and 98 percent coverage of population, there's a big gap over the Pacific that also prevents them from having good overlap between the U.S. and Japan/China/Korea, as well as the southern Pacific, covering Australia. Since the biggest market for long-haul flights would likely be Australia, Japan, and China, traveling trans-Pacific or trans-hemispheric routes, that gap is rather large.</p>

<p>Aeromobile opted to build out a service, deployed only by Emirates airline as far as I can tell, that uses the 3G service since it was available, and most necessary equipment is already installed on most over-water planes. OnAir was waiting for 4G, which has necessitated a long wait, but allowed them to launch in Europe with a seemingly next-generation service. Given that OnAir is controlled by an airline-owned integration firm, SITA, and by Airbus, they're not going anywhere.</p>

<p>Inmarsat finally <a href="http://spaceflightnow.com/proton/i4f3/"><strong>lofted its third satellite on Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan</strong></a> on 19-August-2008, and the launch and separation was reported as successful. Previously, the company has needed up to a year to verify and deploy its 4G satellites. (You can <a href="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=12380.105"><strong>read extremely close coverage of the launch</strong></a> at a Web site devoted to space enthusiasm.)</p>

<p>However, the dirty little secret about Inmarsat's BGAN is that it costs a fortune to heft bandwidth across it. Thus, in-flight broadband over BGAN, if it's ever available, is going to be changed on an extremely high per-MB rate. None of the providers want to say this. This is in contrast to Row 44 (and, once, Connexion by Boeing), which relies on leased Ku-band transponders where they can fix costs and they require high volumes to keep per-bit costs efffectively low.</p>

<p>OnAir's launch of calling on Air France's service involves paying a few euros per minute for calls, which might help you understand what data costs could ultimately run.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/satellite coverage">satellite coverage</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/coverage">coverage</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service">service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service involves">service involves</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet service">internet service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/in-flight broadband plans">in-flight broadband plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plans">plans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/inmarsat satellites">inmarsat satellites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/inmarsat">inmarsat</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008448.html">Sorry, Qantas, No Unfettered Broadband</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Post Your Questions for Philadelphia Wireless Panelists]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/4ffaea55de6513864702705b92a352d0</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/4ffaea55de6513864702705b92a352d0</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Organizers of day-long discussion about ubiquitous mobile broadband want to know what you want to ask: In Philadelphia on 22-Sept-2008, panelists from AT&amp;T, Comcast, Sprint XOHM, The Wharton School,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/muni_icon.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://momo-ma.com/?p=28"><strong>Organizers of day-long discussion about ubiquitous mobile broadband want to know what you want to ask:</strong></a> In Philadelphia on 22-Sept-2008, panelists from AT&T, Comcast, Sprint XOHM, The Wharton School, and Network Acquisition Corporation (the folks who will be operating the former EarthLink network in Phila.) will be on one stage at 6 pm at The Franklin Institute's Planetarium (free, $5 contribution requested, advance registration recommended).</p>

<p>The panel will discuss fourth-generation (4G) networks, including both LTE and WiMax, and discuss what these networks might deliver, as well as how Wi-Fi networks fit into this future. </p>

<p>One of the organizers asked if I'd solicit questions--you can post them below--which they'll try to ask during the panel. The group would then write up responses which could posted in turn here.</p>

<p>The powerhouse that is <a href="http://werbach.com/about.html"><strong>Kevin Werbach</strong></a>, a professor at The Wharton School, is moderating the event. Werbach has been part of interesting thinking about spectrum for many years, a former editor of Release 1.0, and a former FCC staffer. He'll share the stage with a fairly high-powered crowd, including AT&T's enterprise architect for mobility, the president of NAC, and senior people from Comcast and Sprint Xohm.</p>

<p>The event is part of the Mid-Atlantic Chapter series called MobileMonday, an interesting business group that's trying to provoke discussion and development around mobile technology and access. This particular event is sponsored by local business development organization Select Greater Philadelphia.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi networks fit">wi-fi networks fit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sprint xohm">sprint xohm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wharton school">wharton school</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/philadelphia">philadelphia</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mid-atlantic chapter series">mid-atlantic chapter series</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/event">event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network acquisition corporation">network acquisition corporation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/kevin werbach">kevin werbach</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008447.html">Post Your Questions for Philadelphia Wireless Panelists</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
