<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Security Uncorked]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/feed/ac6c21e623099c931c58de45e59e8dd9</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Blog Moved!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/38dceb8583767ff4153faf47151927db</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/38dceb8583767ff4153faf47151927db</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Blog Moved
The SecurityUncorked blog has moved to a new hosting location. The domains www.SecurityUncorked.com and .net will still take you to the blog site, but please discontinue use of this link (...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P><strong>Blog Moved!</strong></P>
<P>The SecurityUncorked blog has moved to a new hosting location. The domains <A href="http://www.SecurityUncorked.com">www.SecurityUncorked.com</A> and .net will still take you to the blog site, but please discontinue use of this link (<A href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com">http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com</A>).</P>
<P>For now, this old location will remain active until all/most incoming links have been updated but please be sure to update your favorites or links to <A href="http://www.SecurityUncorked.com">www.SecurityUncorked.com</A> </P><br>
<P>thanks!</P>
<P>jj</P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog">blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog moved">blog moved</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/moved">moved</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog site">blog site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remain active">remain active</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/location">location</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/links">links</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/favorites">favorites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/link">link</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/8/14/blog-moved.html">Blog Moved!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Your 3 Favorite Linux Commands?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e67c509e7acd7499f31f094c69c7584b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e67c509e7acd7499f31f094c69c7584b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Heres a fun Friday post
Some of you may know Ive been preparing to brush up on my *nix skills. A couple of our new solutions are running on Linux platforms and I feel compelled to understand any...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Here&#8217;s a fun Friday post&#8230; </P>
<P>Some of you may know I&#8217;ve been preparing to brush up on my *nix skills. A couple of our new solutions are running on Linux platforms and I feel compelled to understand any platform I&#8217;m working with inside and out&#8230; I know, it&#8217;s a bit OCD. </P>
<P>But to be honest, I haven&#8217;t really touched a Linux platform for about 10 years, since I was one of the three students running the Sun network over at <A class=offsite-link-inline title=NCSSM href="http://www.ncssm.edu/" target=_blank>NCSSM</A>. I still remember the humorous &#8216;root&#8217; &#8216;of all evil&#8217; admin name that we used and the password, <em>iaceo</em> (in mixed caps), which was a Latin word for (I think) to lie dead. (Please correct me if you know what it means).&nbsp; When you&#8217;re 17, these things are amusing. </P>
<P>I&#8217;ve kept my ls-ing and cd-ing over the years, but will be brushing up on the grep-ing and tail-ing ;)</P>
<P>So with any system, I think we all have our favourite commands that we use daily and are part of our daily arsenal. I&#8217;m working out mine but wanted to hear from you&#8230; </P>
<P>
<blockquote>
<P><strong>What are your 3 favorite Linux commands? <br><br>And is there 1 obscure one you really love (or hate)?</strong><br><br><br></P></blockquote>
<br>
<P># # #</P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/favorite linux commands">favorite linux commands</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daily">daily</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/linux platform">linux platform</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daily arsenal">daily arsenal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/platform">platform</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fun friday post">fun friday post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/evil admin">evil admin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mixed caps">mixed caps</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun network">sun network</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/25/your-3-favorite-linux-commands.html">Your 3 Favorite Linux Commands?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Not-So-Sweet Life of Supplicants]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a7513e6c4a71a61081c2aa1aef143439</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a7513e6c4a71a61081c2aa1aef143439</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[There are plenty of integration and configuration challenges when we look at 802.1X , but one of the most notable issues is choosing the right supplicant to best serve your end users
Some of the major...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>There are plenty of integration and configuration challenges when we look at <A title="802.1X Primer" href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/4/2/what-is-8021x-heres-a-technology-primer-for-you.html">802.1X</A>, but one of the most notable issues is <strong>choosing the right <A title="What is a supplicant?" href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/6/5/know-the-difference-between-a-nac-client-and-a-1x-supplicant.html">supplicant</A> to best serve your end users</strong>. </P>
<P>Some of the major obstacles we face with 802.1X center around creating a smooth end user experience.&nbsp; We, as integrators, have the distinct ability to make &#8216;whatever&#8217; work- we find a way. But, what I hear most from my customers is &#8220;<em>it has to be easy for the end user.&#8221;</em>&nbsp; (Sometimes they go on a little further, but I&#8217;ll leave it at that.)</P>
<P><strong>Why does it matter?</strong> </P>
<P>Wireless, wireless, wireless. Although&nbsp;wired 1X is&nbsp;popular&nbsp;with our customer-base, the world isn&#8217;t quite flocking to it yet. However, 802.1X is certainly the best way to increase security and ease management of wireless networks. It&#8217;s standard, it&#8217;s flexible, it&#8217;s widely-supported by devices and endpoints and it eliminates the need for pre-shared keys or secondary passwords. It&#8217;s what most enterprises, government&nbsp;and educational organizations are implementing now, so it&#8217;s important. </P>
<P><strong>What are some of the problems?</strong> </P>
<P>The end user will have some adjustments to make, and network admins and support desks aren&#8217;t always thrilled with the propect of re-training users for these expectations.</P><span>
<ul>
<li>First of all, the <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">time to authenticate</span> and connect to the network is going to drastically increase. I say drastically- it&#8217;s only a few seconds- but I&#8217;m sure it feels like minutes to a new 1X end user. 
<li>In addition, we&#8217;re in a transition and growing period where we&#8217;re trying to integrate and authenticate multiple pieces- the machine and/or user as well as any other clients residing on the endpoint, so there can be <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">single-sign-on issues</span>. Not SSO in the traditional sense, but single-1X-sign-on vs logging in to authenticate and open the port, logging in again to get to network resources (such as Novell). 
<li>There may also be issues supporting <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">multiple profiles</span>, so end users may need to understand the concept of enabling 802.1X on an interface at their office, then disabling it when they go home. 
<li>Or perhaps, in a shared or lab-type environment, we may have multiple unique users logging in to the same endpoint device, so we have to make it easy for end users to <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">log off so there&#8217;s a forced re-auth</span> for the next user. </li>
</ul>
<P>There are plenty more, but this hits on the major concerns of most organizations planning to implement 802.1X (wired or wireless).</span></P>
<P><strong>How do we address the issues?</strong></P>
<P>There are different ways to deal with the complexity of supplicant and end-user interactions. First and foremost, a good <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">end user training</span> program will be needed. There&#8217;s a learning curve, but eventually end users will get it- we just have to make sure the transition for &#8216;now&#8217; to &#8216;got it&#8217; is smooth and doesn&#8217;t overwhelm help desk resources. </P>
<P>As the operating systems and clients progress, we&#8217;re seeing <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">more integration</span> and the ability to share 802.1X information between disparate pieces of the endpoint. </P>
<P>In the meantime, there are also <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">3rd-party supplicants</span> that can ease several of the pains. <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Cisco SSC" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps7034/index.html" target=_blank>Cisco&#8217;s&nbsp;Secure Services&nbsp;Client</A>&nbsp; (acquired from Meetinghouse&#8217;s Aegis supplicant) and <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Juniper OAC" href="http://www.juniper.net/products_and_services/aaa_and_802_1x/odyssey/index.html" target=_blank>Juniper&#8217;s Odyssey Access Client</A>&nbsp; (acquired from Funk) both offer options and configurations not currently available in native OS supplicants. (For example, both offer the GINA shim for integrating Windows 1X login with Novell as well as multiple profile support.) Although I haven&#8217;t tried it, my understanding is you can still operate both of these clients independent of the controllers provided from the same vendor. </P>
<P><strong>Is it a deal-killer?</strong> </P>
<P>It can be. The struggle to provide a smooth transition for end users is often a deal-killer for organizations looking at deploying 802.1X. Although there are ways to combat most of these obstacles; often the time, planning and money required to&nbsp;proceed make it unattractive enough to abandon the project. In most cases, the more heterogeneous the endpoint environment is, the less attractive the solution becomes. In an all-Microsoft environment, you can have an 802.1X framework up in a matter of hours. With a mix of authentication directories, endpoint OSs and user expectations, you could spend weeks or&nbsp;months ironing out the details.</P>
<P><strong>The good news.</strong></P>
<P>Yes, there&#8217;s some good news here. The increased adoption of 802.1X is continually leading to increased integration of the software, operating systems and clients on endpoints. While 802.1X may never reach &#8216;plug-and-play&#8217; status, pretty soon the integration will reach a point where configuration is simplified enough for more wide-spread adoption, even in the most diverse environments. </P>
<P>Just hang tight, we&#8217;ll get there!</P>
<P># # #</P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user">user</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/end-user interactions">end-user interactions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user experience">user experience</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/machine andor user">machine andor user</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/users">users</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/multiple unique users">multiple unique users</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user expectations">user expectations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/endpoint">endpoint</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/expectations">expectations</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/23/the-not-so-sweet-life-of-supplicants.html">The Not-So-Sweet Life of Supplicants</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wired 802.1X and Windows XP SP3- Yes you can!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0178304882a872ac541258a4d798bda7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0178304882a872ac541258a4d798bda7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Ive gotten a lot of questions recently about using 802.1X on the wired interface with Windows XP SP3. In the past few weeks Ive also stumbled across a lot of forum posts, blogs and articles stating...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>I&#8217;ve gotten a lot of questions recently about using 802.1X on the wired interface with Windows XP SP3. In the past few weeks I&#8217;ve also stumbled across a lot of forum posts, blogs and articles stating you <em>&#8216;can&#8217;t do wired 802.1X with XP SP3</em>.&#8221;</P>
<P>Well, sure you can! There is a little trick now, though. </P>
<P><strong>As part of the move to the Microsoft NAP integration, they&#8217;ve broken out the wired and wireless supplicant management</strong> into two pieces. Until SP3, all 1X was handled in the Wireless Zero Configuration (WZCSVC)&nbsp;service. The wired 1X supplicant is handled now by a different service and must be <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">manually started</span>. </P>
<P>
<blockquote>
<P>In Windows XP SP3, the supplicants are each handled separately by these services&#8230;<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; •&nbsp; Wireless 802.1X: WZCSVC service <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; •&nbsp; Wired 802.1X:&nbsp;Wired AutoConfig service (DOT3SVC)</P></blockquote><strong>How do you start the Wired AutoConfig service?</strong> Two ways, the end user (or admin) can do it manually on the endpoint, or you can push it out with group policies. <br>
<P>Instead of duplicating a lott&#8217;a text, you can find detailed instructions for manual and pushed wired 1X configurations on <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Microsoft KB Article" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/953650" target=_blank>Microsoft KB article 953650</A>. </P>
<P>You can also learn more about Microsoft NAP integration in the <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Microsoft NAP Q&amp;A" href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/nap/napfaq.mspx" target=_blank>Network Access Protection Q&amp;A site</A>. </P>
<P># # #</P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wired">wired</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wzcsvc service">wzcsvc service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wzcsvc">wzcsvc</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service">service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wired autoconfig service">wired autoconfig service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wired interface">wired interface</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sp3">sp3</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft nap integration">microsoft nap integration</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/23/wired-8021x-and-windows-xp-sp3-yes-you-can.html">Wired 802.1X and Windows XP SP3- Yes you can!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Coming Up: NAC Sauces & 1X Vulnerabilities]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e0b7495fadd39033d01edf84bb0b88a3</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e0b7495fadd39033d01edf84bb0b88a3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Per requests, and as part of the ask JJ responses, Ive been working on a couple of blog post series for you
Im juggling blog-moving with blog-posting and trying to find the happy medium. Coming soon...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>Per requests, and as part of the <A href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/6/6/jjs-security-qa-month.html">&#8216;ask JJ&#8217;</A> responses, I&#8217;ve been working on a couple of blog post series for you.</P>
<P>I&#8217;m juggling blog-moving with blog-posting and trying to find the happy medium. Coming soon though, are two NAC/1X series I hope you&#8217;ll enjoy&#8230;</P>
<P><STRONG>NAC Vendor Sauce Series: Fishing out Features<br></STRONG> Each NAC solution on the market has it&#8217;s own special NAC <EM>&#8216;sauce&#8217;</EM> , a feature that sets it apart, or makes it better for certain situations, than others. This series highlights the advantages of each solution and includes <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Juniper Networks" href="http://www.juniper.net" target=_blank>Juniper</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title=Cisco href="http://www.cisco.com" target=_blank>Cisco</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title=Symantec href="http://www.symantec.com" target=_blank>Symantec</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title=Enterasys href="http://www.enterasys.com" target=_blank>Enterasys</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title="ProCurve Networking by HP" href="http://www.procurve.com" target=_blank>ProCurve</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title=StillSecure href="http://www.stillsecure.com" target=_blank>StillSecure</A>, <A class=offsite-link-inline title=Napera href="http://www.napera.com" target=_blank>Napera</A> along with a few&nbsp;others. </P>
<P><STRONG>802.1X Vulnerabilities: Designing for Security</STRONG><br>Often, users put too much stake in 802.1X, relying on it too heavily&nbsp;in many circumstances. There are vulnerabilities with 1X, but most can be mitigated or avoided with smart planning. This series describes various vulnerabilities with 802.1X, gives you details on each and provides information on how to protect yourself from them. To get started, check out my <A title="802.1X Primer" href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/4/2/what-is-8021x-heres-a-technology-primer-for-you.html">802.1X Technology Primer</A>. </P>
<P># # #</P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/special nac sauce">special nac sauce</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/solution">solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac solution">nac solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog post series">blog post series</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology primer">technology primer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/series describes">series describes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/happy medium">happy medium</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/includes juniper">includes juniper</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/23/coming-up-nac-sauces-1x-vulnerabilities.html">Coming Up: NAC Sauces &amp; 1X Vulnerabilities</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[HP's NAC- What I've Been Wanting to Tell You (but couldn't)]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6314f59af5298d2d86c804d96c34fce9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6314f59af5298d2d86c804d96c34fce9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Well everyone- theres something Ive been wanting to tell you and now, after a year , I can
Because of non-disclosure and other confidentiality contracts with various partners, vendors and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P><strong>Well everyone- there&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been wanting to tell you and now, after a <em>year</em>, I can!</strong></P>
<P>Because of non-disclosure and other confidentiality contracts with various partners, vendors and manufacturers, we&#8217;ve had sealed lips for almost exactly 12 months. Now that it&#8217;s been made public by the media, I can share a little information with you and explain why I think you should be excited. </P>
<P><strong>What cat is out of the bag now?</strong> HP ProCurve&#8217;s network access control solution&nbsp;leverages endpoint management technology from StillSecure&#8217;s Secure Access solution. Information Week&nbsp;spilled the beans, so to speak, in Mike Fratto&#8217;s recent <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Information Week's 2008 NAC Report" href="http://nac.informationweek.com/" target=_blank>2008 NAC Survey Analytic Report</A>. (See page 32)</P>
<P>Now, at this point, I can probably lump you into one of three groups&#8230;<strong> 1)</strong> You don&#8217;t care or have no clue what this means <strong>2)</strong> You care but think this means HP &#8216;has no NAC&#8217;&#8230; or group <strong>3)</strong> You know about StillSecure&#8217;s success and ProCurve&#8217;s integration and think this is a great combination.</P>
<P><strong>I&#8217;m sure everyone will have their own opinion</strong>- I happen to be in Group 3. Why? Because HP has taken the power of their servers, leveraged a very solid endpoint management tool and incorporated a variety of other management and security features by way of their identity management solution. </P><strong>
<ul>
<li>The endpoint security</strong>. StillSecure&#8217;s Safe Access solution has been winning awards and earning stars for years. You can probably Google it, or check out some of <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Alan's Blog" href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com" target=_blank>Shimel&#8217;s blog</A>&nbsp; posts, such as <A class=offsite-link-inline href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/when-is-4-out-o.html" target=_blank>this one</A>, with 4- and 5-star <A class=offsite-link-inline href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/StillSecure-Safe-Access/Review/2460/" target=_blank>reviews from SC Magazine</A>. In fact, just this year (and in previous years) Safe Access was voted Best Endpoint Security Solution by SC Magazine and has won numerous other awards and accolades from various analysts and media firms. They have a clean, user-friendly GUI, a solid Linux platform and a variety of testing methods, deployment options and switch integrations. (And no, you don&#8217;t need ProCurve switches, the NAC integration is ready for your Cisco, Extreme, or whatever you have). </li>
</ul><strong>
<ul>
<li>User management.</strong> Combine one of the highest-rated endpoint security solutions with ProCurve switches, the #2 leader in the switching market (and Magic Quadrant resident) and the full integration with <A class=offsite-link-inline title="ProCurve IDM" href="http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/management/idm/overview.htm" target=_blank>ProCurve&#8217;s Identity Driven Manager</A> platform and you have one amazingly capable access control system. With ProCurve IDM, you can integrate directly with their NAC 800 appliance to offer per-user (or per-group) ACLs, QoS, restrictions or priviliges. Rules can be identity-based, time-based, location-based, or a combination of all. And, IDM eases 802.1X integration by offering users a central management and repository for user settings and VLAN assignments; it really is ProCurve&#8217;s special sauce and a distinguishing feature. </li>
</ul><strong>
<ul>
<li>Switch security</strong>. The integration of advanced switch security functions, such as DHCP snooping, Dynamic ARP protection and dynamic IP lockdown gives ProCurve another leg-up to fight common known attacks for both in-line and out-of-band NAC deployments. </li>
</ul><strong>
<ul>
<li>Zero-day protection</strong>. It gets better, the new Dynamic Configuration Arbiter (DCA) functions in ProCurve&#8217;s Pro-vision switches gives customers the unique advantage of integrating the NAC and IDM with ProCurve&#8217;s <A class=offsite-link-inline title="ProCurve NIM" href="http://www.hp.com/rnd/products/management/ProCurve_Network_Immunity_Manager_1.0/overview.htm" target=_blank>Network Immunity Solution</A> (NIM). NIM uses flow analysis from sFlow and&nbsp;network behaviour anomaly detection (NBAD) to detect and automatically remediate on the edge. In English, that means we can use ProCurve&#8217;s NIM to detect attacks and take action at the edge port, such as blocking the port, locking out the MAC address of the offender, rate-limiting, or even mirroring the traffic to an IDS for further inspection. The super-nice part is, all the sFlow and NBAD works on wireless too. (Hey <A class=offsite-link-inline title="Stiennon on Security, NWW" href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/stiennon" target=_blank>Stiennon</A>, did you hear that?) </li>
</ul><strong>
<ul>
<li>Full integration.</strong> Unlike some of the other network-based NAC vendors, ProCurve has done an exceptional job of integrating these features and we&#8217;ll continue to see more integration in future revisions of the softwares and as more TNC/TCG integration frameworks are released (such as IF-MAP). </li>
</ul>
<P>I think the strong integration with the infrastructure and the ability to leverage a mature endpoint integrity will make HP a &#8216;real&#8217; player in the NAC market moving forward. </P>
<P>Not to knock other NAC solutions- Choosing a NAC is like selecting the perfect wine for your dish- there&#8217;s no 1 &#8216;right&#8217; choice for all occasions. Each have their advantages and disadvantages. There are several that have special sauces and you&#8217;ll actually be seeing more on that soon&#8230; </P>
<P># # #<br></P>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac">nac</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/integration">integration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tnctcg integration frameworks">tnctcg integration frameworks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac integration">nac integration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac vendors">nac vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac solutions-">nac solutions-</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/procurve">procurve</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/procurve idm">procurve idm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac market">nac market</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/22/hps-nac-what-ive-been-wanting-to-tell-you-but-couldnt.html">HP's NAC- What I've Been Wanting to Tell You (but couldn't)</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Update on the DNS Vulnerability: 0-day]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/97c0254b6458384e28848f21728d341e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/97c0254b6458384e28848f21728d341e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A quick update on the DNS vulnerability

Based on posts and Twitters last night from Dan and the snippits of information I gleaned from fellow Security Twits and bloggers I think we are all aware that...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick update on the <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/10/the-dns-issue-of-2008.html">DNS vulnerability.</a> <br></p><p>Based on posts and Twitters last night from Dan and the snippits of information I gleaned from fellow Security Twits and bloggers&#8230; I think we are all aware that the DNS vulnerability is now out in the open. <br></p><br><p>The team that discovered the vulnerability was due to release details of 
the exploit at <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" href="http://www.blackhat.com">BlackHat</a> (in 2 weeks). However, someone has reverse-engineered 
the vulnerability and released the details. The contents, or portions of the exploit were accidentally posted on a very prominent security blog yesterday then quickly removed. (Don&#8217;t ask, that&#8217;s a whole &#8216;nother story). <br><br>If your DNS server has not 
been patched, you are vulnerable now. More info on <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" href="http://www.doxpara.com/%20">Dan&#8217;s (discoverer&#8217;s) site</a> .&nbsp; You&#8217;ll notice his<strong> 13 &gt; 0 post.</strong>.. letting us 
know instead of 13 days you now have 0.&nbsp;</p><p>If you haven&#8217;t patched your DNS server(s), please see my previous <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/10/the-dns-issue-of-2008.html">DNS vulnerability</a> post, follow the links included for more information and instructions. Consider yourself now at risk. <br></p><p># # #<br> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns vulnerability">dns vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns server">dns server</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/details">details</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/release details">release details</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fellow security twits">fellow security twits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exploit">exploit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nother story">nother story</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/22/update-on-the-dns-vulnerability-0-day.html">Update on the DNS Vulnerability: 0-day</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Don't-Miss NAC Events This Week]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/5103aff88fcf95fa28427084698dc33c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/5103aff88fcf95fa28427084698dc33c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[FYI, thanks for bearing with me these couple of weeks. I spent a week in a lab with no Internet access at all, which made blogging life (and actually ALL life) very difficult. Upon returning, Ive been...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[FYI, thanks for bearing with me these couple of weeks. I spent a week in a lab with no Internet access at all, which made blogging life (and actually ALL life) very difficult. Upon returning, I&#8217;ve been in the process of following up on the <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/10/the-dns-issue-of-2008.html">DNS vulnerability</a> which has now been accidentally released. And, as I mentioned in an earlier post, I&#8217;m smack in the middle of <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/8/a-better-blog-coming-up.html">moving this blog</a><p> to a new, fuller-featured platform.&nbsp;</p><p><br></p><p>I did want to make sure you have a couple of important links and info! There are a couple of don&#8217;t-miss webcasts and events <span style="text-decoration: underline;">this week</span> if you&#8217;re interested in NAC technologies. <br></p><ul><li><strong>Live Debate from Network World: </strong>Snyder vs Stiennon- Duel of the NAC Experts<br>Tuesday, July 22nd, 3:00pm Eastern <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" title="Network World Live NAC Debate" href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30152">More info</a></li>
</ul><ul><li><strong>2008 NAC Survey from Information Week</strong>: Mike Fratto reviews the 2008 Report<br>Wednesday, July 23rd, 2:00pm Eastern <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" title="Mike Fratto Reviews the NAC Report 2008" href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/07/2008_nac_survey.html">More info</a></li>
</ul><br><p>If you want to read the report, you can download the entire <a class="offsite-link-inline" target="_blank" title="2008 NAC Report by Mike Fratto" href="http://www.nac.informationweek.com/">Information Week 2008 NAC Report by Mike Fratto </a>free, for a limited time. The report covers all the main NAC vendor offerings and contains a variety of interesting survey results. You&#8217;ll be hearing from me soon about the contents of the report and my thoughts on the product details, roadmaps and features.&nbsp;</p><p>Enjoy!<br></p><p># # #<br></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/week">week</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information week">information week</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/entire information week">entire information week</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/report">report</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/report covers">report covers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac report">nac report</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/00pm eastern">00pm eastern</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/info">info</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mike fratto free">mike fratto free</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/22/dont-miss-nac-events-this-week.html">Don't-Miss NAC Events This Week</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA['The' DNS Issue of 2008]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8315adcbb13e33219dfe0b230098982c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8315adcbb13e33219dfe0b230098982c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Its been a day since the public announcement, so by now youve probably heard about the DNS issue. The bug was found earlier this year, but the discoverer ( Dan Kaminsky ) and team worked fervently...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a day since the public announcement, so by now you&#8217;ve probably heard about <em>the</em> DNS issue. The bug was found earlier this year, but the discoverer (<a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.doxpara.com/" target="_blank">Dan Kaminsky</a>) and team worked fervently with leaders of the technology industry to create patches for all platforms before the big announcement. <em>And- kudos to them all for keeping zipped lips until the problem could be contained (despite all the heckling and harassing).</em> </p><p><strong>You can find out a little more right now</strong>- I&#8217;m including some links below for you to read more. </p><p><strong>If you don&#8217;t know what DNS is</strong> or why you care, see the bottom of this post for a little background info.</p><p><strong>As for the real deal on disclosure</strong>- you&#8217;ll have to wait for <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.blackhat.com/" target="_blank">Black Hat</a>&nbsp;in August. I&#8217;ll be there, along with other members of the <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://networks.feedburner.com/Security-Bloggers-Network" target="_blank">Security Bloggers Network</a>&nbsp;(a (<em>non-exclusive but highly visible and well-respected)</em> security bloggers channel for Black Hat and RSA). I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll see *plenty* of post-Black Hat blogs, tweets and podcasts recapping the story. </p><blockquote><p>Hear the buzz&#8230;</p><ul><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.doxpara.com/?p=1162" target="_blank">Dan Kaminsky&#8217;s (discoverers)&nbsp;site</a></div></li><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113" target="_blank">US Cert Vulnerability Note</a></div></li><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208808229" target="_blank">InformationWeek Article: Security Community Comes Together</a></div></li><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/09/more-on-the-dns-vulnerability/" target="_blank">Rich Mogull helps spread the word to CIOs</a></div></li><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Massive-DNS-security-problem-endangers-the-internet--/news/111070" target="_blank">Heise Securiy Blog: Nice overview</a></div></li><li><div><a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121557348238938533.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></div></li></ul></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>What is a DNS Server?</strong> DNS are servers throughout the Internet (and inside networks) that resolve domain names (ie <a href="http://www.securityuncorked.com/">www.SecurityUncorked.com</a>) to the IP address of the hosting server. The idea is, if you can trick a DNS server, your request for ESPN.com may just take you to a malicious site where you&#8217;ll be immediately infected with a virus, malware or other undesirable creepy Internet-bred monster. They&#8217;ve found a bug that could be exploited to do just that. </p><p><strong>What do we do?</strong> It&#8217;s not the end of the world.&nbsp;For now, know that almost all DNS servers need to have a patch installed to protect them from this vulnerability. It&#8217;s pretty universal and every manufacturer is on board and offering a patch as of yesterday, July 8th. </p><p># # #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns">dns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns issue">dns issue</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns servers">dns servers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/servers">servers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post-black hat blogs">post-black hat blogs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/black hat">black hat</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns server">dns server</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/server">server</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post">post</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/10/the-dns-issue-of-2008.html">'The' DNS Issue of 2008</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Techie Travels- What Do YOU Look for in a Hotel Room?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/178018c516b7e9b8545727cad074913a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/178018c516b7e9b8545727cad074913a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Im on the road again. After some really great (and a few really crappy) hotel stays in the past few weeks, I started thinking about what makes a good hotel
Recently I spent one week at a customer in a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on the road&#8230; again. After some really great (and a few really crappy) hotel stays in the past few weeks, I started thinking about &#8216;what makes a good hotel&#8217;. </p><p>Recently I spent one week at a customer in a hotel&nbsp;where the staff obviously was hosting nightly parties down at my end of the hall- from about 2:00am - 5:30am each (yes- every) night I was there. The hotel&nbsp;I&#8217;m in tonight has no elevator. Yeah. @#$! That&#8217;s what I&nbsp;said. Twice in the past 10 days or so, I&#8217;ve been in really nice resort-hotels, so I&#8217;ve had the whole spectrum this month and last. </p><p><strong>For me, sometimes it&#8217;s the little things&#8230; </strong>I really like it when hotels have <strong>conditioner</strong>, instead of just shampoo. I like <strong>space</strong>- so a nice work area is important to me. Of course a <strong>big soft bed</strong> and plenty-o-pillows is a key ingredient. A <strong>whirlpool</strong> or jetted tub (in the room) is icing on the cake. <strong>Exercise </strong>rooms are good, although half the time I&#8217;m too tired when traveling or have work to do&nbsp;(I know- excuses, excuses ;). <strong>Convenience</strong> is also a biggie- I had a run in Las Vegas where *every* room I had felt like it was a 10-minute walk just to the elevators. When I&#8217;m on-site for a customer, I also love the hotels with the&nbsp;<strong>do-it-yourself breakfast</strong>- I can go when I want and grab something before heading out for the day. I love the little lighted makeup <strong>mirrors</strong>&#8230; and of course a<strong> full-length</strong> for checking out the wardrobe. <strong>Plugs</strong>! I love lots of plugs. I like hotels that <strong>secure the outer doors</strong> early and require a key for access to various parts of the building. </p><p><strong>Sometimes it&#8217;s the bigger things&#8230;</strong> Hotels with <strong>outside-facing doors</strong> make me paranoid, and obviously those in neighborhoods where your rims may disappear is not good either. I hate hotels that <strong>MAKE me valet </strong>park my car. It&#8217;s my car, my keys, I park it and I keep the keys- that&#8217;s my rule. (My Dad taught me a little trick of telling the valet boys that it&#8217;s a company car and against corporate policy for valet- it works!)</p><p>Traveling techies sometimes have unique needs or requests, and many of the &#8216;good list&#8217; is universal for all traveler types. </p><p>So, those are some items from my little list&#8230; What about you-<strong> what do YOU look for in a good hotel?</strong></p><p><strong># # #</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotel">hotel</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nice resort-hotels">nice resort-hotels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nice">nice</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotels">hotels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotel stays">hotel stays</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/love">love</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/love lots">love lots</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/car">car</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company car">company car</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/7/8/techie-travels-what-do-you-look-for-in-a-hotel-room.html">Techie Travels- What Do YOU Look for in a Hotel Room?</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
