<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: acquisition]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/acquisition</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Premature Update on Philadelphia Wi-Fi]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/95922e41bb691a60a525baab81a41942</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/95922e41bb691a60a525baab81a41942</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm not sure why this article was written, as there appears to be nothing particularly newsworthy in it: The News.com reporter Marguerite Reardon has covered muni-Fi for as long as I have, and after...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/muni_icon.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10033386-94.html"><strong>I'm not sure why this article was written, as there appears to be nothing particularly newsworthy in it:</strong></a> The News.com reporter Marguerite Reardon has covered muni-Fi for as long as I have, and after reading this in-depth piece, I'm left wondering whether it was assigned far too early, and she was meeting an editorial desk requirement instead of feeling like the story was ready to "print." The article looks at Network Acquisition Corp. (NAC), the allegedly interim name for the group that's taken over Phila-Fi. </p>

<p>One source at the Knight Center for Digital Excellence notes, "The new network owners are supposed to have a much more sustainable business model." <em>Supposed to.</em> Later, "Network Acquisition Company, which acquired the network, hasn't talked publicly about the details of its new plan, but it has hinted that its strategy will differ from EarthLink's." <em>Hasn't talked publicly.</em> Then, "[NAC and Tropos] spokespeople said the companies would talk more about the network later this month when details of the new business plan are ready." Huh.</p>

<p>Reardon explains digital divide issues and looks into what Wireless Philadelphia has been up to, although doesn't note that delays in EarthLink's deployment and other factors have led to just a few hundred individuals that have been assisted by the non-profit; numbers may have changed, but that was as of a few months ago. Still, Wireless Philadelphia has apparently diversified its funding sources--Reardon cites 30 now.</p>

<p>I think we're still coming off the doldrums of August.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network acquisition company">network acquisition company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network acquisition corp">network acquisition corp</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network owners">network owners</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless philadelphia">wireless philadelphia</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sustainable business model">sustainable business model</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/editorial desk requirement">editorial desk requirement</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plan">plan</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/digital excellence notes">digital excellence notes</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008431.html">Premature Update on Philadelphia Wi-Fi</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Fake Security Software Domains Serving Exploits]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a2ffa8d411dc417bdb5a774ee6ab5207</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a2ffa8d411dc417bdb5a774ee6ab5207</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Psychological imagination, &quot;think cybercriminals&quot; mentality or scenario building intelligence, seem to always produce the results they are supposed to. On Monday, I pointed out that

Ironically, the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaDCa0a4yI/AAAAAAAACIU/V4NpXSLdBEA/s1600-h/fake_software_client_side_exploits.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaDCa0a4yI/AAAAAAAACIU/6N2G2L2h2-0/s200-R/fake_software_client_side_exploits.png" /></a>Psychological imagination, "think cybercriminals" mentality or scenario building intelligence, seem to always produce the results they are supposed to. On Monday, <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/08/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security_25.html">I pointed out that</a> :<br />
<br />
"<i>Ironically, the participant in the affiliate program whose original objective was to drive traffic to the fake security software's site, may in fact start receiving so much traffic due to the combination of traffic acquisition tactics, that <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/serving-malware-through-advertising.html">introducing client-side exploits courtesy of a third-party affiliate network</a>, may in fact prove more profitable then the revenue sharing partnership with the rogue security software's vendor at the first place.</i>"<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaJ9G1B_YI/AAAAAAAACIk/WVx1enYkT0E/s1600-h/fake_security_client_side.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaJ9G1B_YI/AAAAAAAACIk/XSe4BHhrt2w/s200-R/fake_security_client_side.JPG" /></a>The next day, <a href="http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/xp-antivirus-2008-now-with-sploits.html">client-side exploits start getting introduced</a> "in between" the fake security software sites :<br />
<br />
"<i>I've blogged before about the problem of Google Adwords pushing Antivirus XP Antivirus 2008. The situation is still ongoing.&nbsp; However, it's taken a turn for the worse, as these XP Antivirus pages are pushing exploits to install malware on the users system. This will also affect the many syndicators of Google Adwords.</i>"<br />
<br />
The domain in question <b>bestantivirus2009.com</b> - (68.180.151.21) is hosting the binary at <b>bestantivirus2009 .com</b>/setup_1096_MTYwM3wzNXww_.exe and has an IFRAME pointing to <b>huytegygle .com</b>/index.php (200.46.83.246).<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaOX5IUu2I/AAAAAAAACIs/UmA8sFcQCIA/s1600-h/antivirus0003.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLaOX5IUu2I/AAAAAAAACIs/YL8oDzvUAeY/s200-R/antivirus0003.png" /></a>Here's another example <b>antivirus0003.net</b> with an IFRAME pointing to a different location - <b>124.217.250.85 /~ave/etc/count.php?o=16</b>.<br />
<br />
Despite that these domains are part of the "International Virus Research Lab" fake domains portfolio, it remains to be seen whether others will start multitasking as well.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=yRDO0K"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=yRDO0K" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=mEJFVK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=mEJFVK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=74vKNk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=74vKNk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=FMF6wk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=FMF6wk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=fnoShK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=fnoShK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5q8hIK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5q8hIK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=GNqd3k"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=GNqd3k" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/377056323" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exploits">exploits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/domains">domains</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/client-side exploits courtesy">client-side exploits courtesy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/client-side exploits start">client-side exploits start</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/start">start</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fake security software">fake security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/antivirus">antivirus</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google adwords">google adwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fake domains portfolio">fake domains portfolio</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/377056323/fake-security-software-domains-serving.html">Fake Security Software Domains Serving Exploits</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[HP Hires 140,000 to Get Rid of Your Job]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1b40a911042fda84f13e9dbc287cf501</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1b40a911042fda84f13e9dbc287cf501</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[HP completed its $13.25 billion acquisition of EDS today
Can HP-EDS put its money where its mouth is? EDS profit margin, pre-acquisition, was under 6%. The former EDS CEO, now heading the combined...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP completed its $13.25 billion acquisition of EDS today. </p>
<p>Can HP-EDS put its money where its mouth is? EDS profit margin, pre-acquisition, was under 6%. The former EDS CEO, now heading the combined outsourcing unit, expects to leverage HP automation tools to cut costs and improve that margin.</p>
<p>But Rod Bourgeois, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein says, &#8220;It&#8217;s not like HP has automation tools that weren&#8217;t at <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121971997812971951.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">EDS&#8217;s disposal before</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>But this brings up a good point. EDS and 140,000 new bodies notwithstanding, HP seems to be positioning itself to do a big <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/08/26/the-key-to-h-p-eds-automation/?mod=djemTECH">automation push in the marketplace</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/13/What-does-the-HP-EDS-deal-really-mean_1.html?source=fssr">Of course this makes sense</a> &#8211; we&#8217;ve talked before about what a critical role automation is going to have in managing the rapidly evolving &#8220;dynamic&#8221; data center. Technologies like virtualization and cloud computing needs are pushing out the limits of real-time resources management in the data center; management tools must perform faster, integrate with more solutions across the spectrum of IT infrastructure and be smart enough to do much of this on their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eds">eds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hp-eds">hp-eds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eds ceo">eds ceo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eds profit margin">eds profit margin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/margin">margin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dynamic data center">dynamic data center</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data center">data center</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/automation tools">automation tools</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/real-time resources management">real-time resources management</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/hp-hires-140000-to-get-rid-of-your-job/08/2008">HP Hires 140,000 to Get Rid of Your Job</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Software Security Market]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0adbf216425dc6d24bde35c8640002aa</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0adbf216425dc6d24bde35c8640002aa</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Information Security budgets are pretty crufty , they are an accumulation of decisions but the analysis that led to these decisions is rarely revisited, it just snowballs. So the normal Information...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Information Security budgets are pretty <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft">crufty</a>, they are an accumulation of decisions but the analysis that led to these decisions is rarely revisited, it just snowballs. So the normal Information Security budget is just a legacy artifact of when the network was the greatest vulnerability. <a href="http://www.cigital.com/~gem/">Gary McGraw&#160;</a><a href="http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1237978">took a pass</a> at reviewing the numbers in software security, breaking down software security sectors like tools and services (note to Gary - I think <a href="http://www.aspectsecurity.com/">Aspect</a> does more than just training!). This is great work by Gary to get these numbers to see the real changes occuring in software security. Here were his findings on software security tools:</p><div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;; line-height: 19px; ">One of the most important developments in the software security market can be seen in the tools space which, combined, almost doubled to $150-180 million. Top of list are two major acquisitions that closed in 2007: Watchfire&#39;s purchase by IBM (somewhere in the range of $120-150 million on 2006 revenue of $26 million) and SPI Dynamics&#39;s purchase by HP (for around $100 million on 2006 revenue of $21.2 million).</span></p></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;; line-height: 19px;">...</span></p></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;; line-height: 19px; ">The black box space was flat in 2007, with IBM/Watchfire checking in at $24.1 million and HP/SPI Dynamics earning $22.3 million. Smaller companies in the space, including Cenzic, Codenomicon, WhiteHat and the like had combined revenues around $12.5 million (a growth of 25%, though Cenzic grew 16% and WhiteHat 52%). Most of the growth &quot;hiccup&quot; in the black box market can be attributed to the serious challenges posed by any acquisition. So far 2008 looks to be back on track from a growth perspective in the black box testing space. The global reach that IBM and HP offer are already making a big difference.</span></p></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;; line-height: 19px;"><br /></span><span style="font-family: &#39;Lucida Grande&#39;; line-height: 19px; ">On a more positive note, static analysis tools for code review grew at a healthy clip in 2007 into a $91.9 million dollar market. Fortify was up 83% to $29.2 million. Klocwork grew over 60% to $26 million. Coverity grew over 50% to $27.2 million. Ounce Labs tripled their revenue to $9.5 million.</span></p></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote><div><br /><div>These are very nice growth numbers, what company doesn&#39;t want 83% growth? However, the total picture is not so good. Gary&#39;s estimate shows the software security space coming in at $150 Million total, yet we see a company like Checkpoint that won the network security war in 1995 with earnings of around $900 Million! One single network security vendor is 6 times bigger than the entire software security space?!? Complete UTTER Madness!</div><br /><div>This is the stupefying, stultifying effects of budget cruft, where the decisions made in <a href="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2007/10/network-securit.html">The People&#39;s Republic of Information Security</a> have no bearing on reality of threats or even a business case.</div><br /><div>Let&#39;s look at networks. Obviously Cisco is the biggest, they earned $39.5 Billion last year. Pretty stellar. So spending $900 Million (Checkpoint) to defined $39.5 Billion seems like a pretty good deal.</div><br /><div>Except, let&#39;s compare software security spending - last year Microsoft earned $60 Billion, SAP $16 billion, and Oracle $22 Billion. So that is about $98 Billion and you are going to &quot;defend&quot; that with allocating $150 Million worth of software security tools?</div><br />

</div><table border="1">
<tbody><tr>
<td>
</td>
<td><span style="background-color: #d0d0d0; font-family: &#39;Trebuchet MS&#39;; ">
Network
</span></td>
<td><span style="background-color: #d0d0d0; font-family: &#39;Trebuchet MS&#39;; ">
Software
</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Asset Value
</td>
<td>
$39.5 billion
</td>
<td>
$98 billion
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Security Investment
</td>
<td>
$900 Million
</td>
<td>
$150 Million
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
Security Investment <br />&#160;as a percentage of asset value
</td>
<td>
2.28%
</td>
<td>
0.15%
</td></tr></tbody></table>

<br /><div>This table greatly disturbs me. From a prioritization standpoint The People&#39;s Republic of Information Security is misaligned by orders of magnitude. Next time you read about a data breach, or see an auditor&#39;s report with thousands of findings you won&#39;t have to wonder how it happened. It happened because Information Security doesn&#39;t have its eye on the ball.</div><br /><div>Consider that software security tools could grow 50% a year for five years and still be half of where Checkpoint is today!</div><br />I see the outcomes of backwards looking, crufty decisions by Information Security every day - one or two software security sherpas heading out to work with thousands of developers, meanwhile the network security people sit around and read the newspaper and go home every day at 5.</div><br /><div>The optimistic way of looking at all this data is that there is major room for growth for software security, if you take Checkpoint as a target, then the software security space should evolve to around 2% of the software space meaning that it should evolve into a $2 billion space <span style="font-style: italic;">around fifteen times larger</span> than it is today. Unprotected assets will either be protected or will cease to be assets, VCs get your check books ready.</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software security market">software security market</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software security sectors">software security sectors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/space">space</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tools space">tools space</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/compare software security">compare software security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software security sherpas">software security sherpas</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software security space">software security space</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software security">software security</category>
      <source url="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2008/08/software-security-market.html">Software Security Market</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A Diverse Portfolio of Fake Security Software - Part Four]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/89e92ac703db317a9f2d0ad0ae004a56</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/89e92ac703db317a9f2d0ad0ae004a56</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks to the affiliate based business model that's driving the increase of fake security software and rogue codecs serving domains, the very same templates, but with different domain names, continue...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLKFy9dsYiI/AAAAAAAACHE/DiRDPArpb4A/s1600-h/fake_security_software_august.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLKFy9dsYiI/AAAAAAAACHE/jlXrnI7ApPo/s200-R/fake_security_software_august.JPG" /></a>Thanks to the affiliate based business model that's driving the increase of fake security software and rogue codecs serving domains, the very same templates, but with different domain names, continue appearing in blackhat SEO, spam, and malicious doorways redirection campaigns.<br />
<br />
Moreover, with the "time-to-market" of a fake security software decreasing due to the efficiency approach introduced in the form of tips for abuse-free hosting services provided by the "known suspects", and the freely available templates, we're slowly starting to see the upcoming peak of this approach. <br />
<br />
In a true proactive spirit, the domains parked at 216.195.56.88 are all upcoming fake security software, to be introduced anytime soon.<br />
<br />
<b>fast-pc-scanner-online .com</b> - (92.62.101.41; 91.203.92.48; 91.203.92.106; 58.65.238.171)<br />
<b>top-pc-scanner .com<br />
buy-secure-protection .com<br />
security-scan-pc .com<br />
pc-scanner-online .com<br />
viruses-scanonline .com<br />
virus-scanonline .com<br />
antivirus-scanonline .com<br />
topvirusscan .com<br />
virusbestscan .com<br />
best-security-protection .com<br />
infectionscanner .com<br />
virusbestscanner .com<br />
full-protection-now .com</b><br />
<br />
<b>Pwrantivirus .com</b> - 91.208.0.246<br />
<b>vav-x-scanner .com<br />
vav-scanner .com<br />
scanner.vavscan .com<br />
malware-scan .com<br />
Scanner-Pwrantivirus .com<br />
Xpertantivirus .com<br />
Scanner-xpertantivirus .com</b><br />
<br />
<b>spyware-quickscan-2008 .com</b> - (216.195.56.88)<br />
<b>virus-quickscan-2008 .com<br />
spyware-quickscan-2009 .com<br />
virus-quickscan-2009 .com<br />
winmalwarecontrol .com<br />
antispyware-quick-scan .com<br />
virus-quick-scan .com<br />
antivirus-quick-scan .com<br />
winprivacytool .com</b><br />
<br />
<b>topantispyware2008 .com</b> - (216.195.56.86)<br />
<b>cleanermaster .com</b> - (216.195.56.85)<br />
<b>antivirus777 .com</b> - (67.228.120.3)<br />
<b>pcsecuritynotice .com </b>- (67.228.120.3)<br />
<br />
Whereas the average Internet users are falling victims into this type of fraud, what I'm more concerned about is the large traffic the malicious domains receive in general due to all the different traffic acquisition tactics the people behind them apply. This anticipated traffic can then be greatly used as valuable metrics for the many other malicious ways in which it can be monetized.<br />
<br />
Ironically, the participant in the affiliate program whose original objective was to drive traffic to the fake security software's site, may in fact start receiving so much traffic due to the combination of traffic acquisition tactics, that <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/serving-malware-through-advertising.html">introducing client-side exploits courtesy of a third-party affiliate network</a>, may in fact prove more profitable then the revenue sharing partnership with the rogue security software's vendor at the first place.<br />
<br />
<b>Related posts:</b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/08/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security_20.html">A Diverse Portfolio of Fake Security Software - Part Three</a><b> </b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/08/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security.html">A Diverse Portfolio of Fake Security Software - Part Two</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/04/localized-fake-security-software.html">Localized Fake Security Software</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/12/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security.html">Diverse Portfolio of Fake Security Software</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/05/got-your-xpshield-up-and-running.html">Got Your XPShield Up and Running?</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/05/fake-pestpatrol-security-software.html">Fake PestPatrol Security Software</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/rbns-fake-security-software.html">RBN's Fake Security Software</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/lazy-summer-days-at-ukrtelegroup-ltds.html">Lazy Summer Days at UkrTeleGroup Ltd</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/geolocating-malicious-isps.html">Geolocating Malicious ISPs</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/06/malicious-isps-you-rarely-see-in-any.html">The Malicious ISPs You Rarely See in Any Report</a><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=T4pWXK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=T4pWXK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=fUdxLK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=fUdxLK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=wfXZZk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=wfXZZk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=DNdBTk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=DNdBTk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=A69ooK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=A69ooK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=kvp7rK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=kvp7rK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=PdsGMk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=PdsGMk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/374177616" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fake security software">fake security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/traffic">traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/drive traffic">drive traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/diverse portfolio">diverse portfolio</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/traffic acquisition tactics">traffic acquisition tactics</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malicious">malicious</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malicious isps">malicious isps</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/due">due</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/traffic due">traffic due</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/374177616/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security_25.html">A Diverse Portfolio of Fake Security Software - Part Four</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Symantec buys nSuite for virtualization security, management]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/5cf9d2145a6a8ed6f582583915da0e61</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/5cf9d2145a6a8ed6f582583915da0e61</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Symantec Tuesday announced the acquisition of nSuite Technologies for an undisclosed price as part of its strategy for virtualization security and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Symantec Tuesday announced the acquisition of nSuite Technologies for an undisclosed price as part of its strategy for virtualization security and management.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtualization security">virtualization security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nsuite technologies">nsuite technologies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/management">management</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/symantec tuesday">symantec tuesday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/strategy">strategy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acquisition">acquisition</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/price">price</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/080508-symantec-nsuite.html?fsrc=rss-security">Symantec buys nSuite for virtualization security, management</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Check Point IPS-1 fills a gap in its product line ]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/adde1d27d778eba5673e28f6fac83b64</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/adde1d27d778eba5673e28f6fac83b64</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Check Point has finally delivered some useful fruit of its December 2006 acquisition of NFR...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Check Point has finally delivered some useful fruit of its December 2006 acquisition of NFR Security.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/check">check</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nfr security">nfr security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/december">december</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acquisition">acquisition</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fruit">fruit</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2008/080408-test-checkpoint-ips.html?fsrc=rss-security">Check Point IPS-1 fills a gap in its product line </source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Upping The IPS Ante]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/81aa745b480141b489146432f5c59ee0</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/81aa745b480141b489146432f5c59ee0</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[My colleague at Forrester, Chris Silva, recently commented upon the recent Air Defense acquisition by Motorola. Looking at the deal through the security lens, I completely agree with Chris that this...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My colleague at Forrester, Chris Silva, recently commented upon the recent Air Defense acquisition by Motorola.&nbsp; Looking at the deal through the security lens, I completely agree with Chris that this will help ease integration of wireless security into wireless infrastructure.&nbsp; It's good to see one of the major wireless brands step up and take wireless security seriously.&nbsp; Perhaps that other major wireless vendor will get the hint...</p>

<blockquote><p><span style="color: #636363;"><a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/it_infrastructure/2008/07/upping-the-ips.html">Upping The IPS Ante</a></span></p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">	
Motorola <a href="http://www.airdefense.net/newsandpress/07_28_08.php">announced</a> this week its intentions to acquires Wireless IDS/IPS vendor <a href="http://www.airdefense.net/">AirDefense</a>.
The acquisition may provide a bit of deja vu to readers who recall the
acquisition of Network Chemistry's wireless IDS/IPS assets by Aruba
Networks <a href="http://www.arubanetworks.com/company/news/release.php?id=25">in 2007</a>. 

</span></p>

<p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">Meru Networks, eschewing acquisition for product introduction made <a href="http://www.merunetworks.com/news/press_releases/index.php?articleID=072808">its own announcement</a>
on Monday, announcing the company's RF Barrier, an active RF management
solution that aims to solve the problem of what the vendor is calling
&quot;leaky RF.&quot; The Meru solution actively blocks 802.11 RF from escaping
the physical confines of a WLAN deployment to thwart external &quot;parking
lot&quot; attacks by closing Wi-Fi based attack avenues. </span></p>

<p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">In fact, 2007 - 2008 has been a time focused on shoring up the security
of the WLAN as the networks become more critical to <a href="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/0,7211,42451,00.html">over 50%</a>
of
enterprises Forrester sees investing in the networks today. As the
networks are more pervasive, moving toward covering the entire physical
environment, and more employees are relying on Wi-Fi to access
corporate data and applications, it's high-time to secure the WLAN.</span></p>

<p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">In the case of Motorola, the Wi-Fi network is especially critical. As the vendor embarks on selling its message of the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/converence/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206904190">all-wireless enterprise</a>,
where WLANs will interconnect not only users to the network, but
networke edge devices -- such as WLAN access points -- to the network
along with storage, printers and other peripheral devices, the WLAN is
citical and, therefore, a major focus for security. </span></p>

<p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">In markets such as retail, standards like the Payment Card
Industry's Data Security Standard dictate wireless security, but
compliance and regulation aside, it is becoming easier to secure the
WLAN, regardless of the industry you are in. Vendors are rapily working
to close security gaps with product enhancements and new product
introductions. Look for a broader suite of solutions to address
security coming from your primary network vendor; while this won't
negate the need to&nbsp; integrate these add-on network elements, the single
source should ease integration to some degree. </span></p>

<p><span style="color: #8a8a8a;">How secure do you feel your organization's WLAN is today? What are
your concerns either about securing the network or its current lack of
security?</span></p></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/address security">address security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security lens">security lens</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data security standard">data security standard</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi network">wi-fi network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security">wireless security</category>
      <source url="http://blogs.forrester.com/srm/2008/07/upping-the-ips.html">Upping The IPS Ante</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Monday merger-mania in security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bce33b1277b9cd2ece821973cc19a401</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bce33b1277b9cd2ece821973cc19a401</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it. Today...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it.&nbsp; Today saw two meaningful deals announced that could have an impact on the security landscape:</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3761786/Sophos+Utimaco+Buy+Targets+Endpoint+Security.htm">Sophos buys Utimaco</a> - Saw this one when I woke up today, as it is a European deal.&nbsp; UK based <a class="zem_slink" title="Sophos" href="http://www.sophos.com/" rel="homepage">Sophos</a> is buying German based Utimaco, makers of the SafeGuard line of data encryption/protection/DLP product line.&nbsp; Sophos is paying cash $340 million US for in this deal.&nbsp; This means they are substantially dipping into the credit market, as this is far more than they reported cash on hand. So like the Brocade/Foundry deal, the acquiring company feels strong enough about the acquisition to mortgage the house to get it.&nbsp; In this case, I think Sophos is making a smart deal. They clearly say that to compete with <a class="zem_slink" title="Symantec" href="http://www.symantec.com/" rel="homepage">Symantec</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="McAfee" href="http://www.mcafee.com/" rel="homepage">McAfee</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/" rel="homepage">Microsoft</a> they are going to need a full endpoint security suite. AV alone is not just going to cut it. This gives Sophos a real play in DLP and data storage space.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Yes they could have just done a partner deal for this type of technology, but I applaud them for going out and buying the technology.&nbsp; I wondered if they would use this as a reverse merger entry to the public markets but it doesn't look like that.&nbsp; In any event it looks like Sophos is making the play and spending the bucks to be a player in the endpoint security suite game.</p>

<p>2. <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30411">Motorola buys AirDefense</a> - Well one of the air brothers finally found a taker. I always thought that for all of the press AirDefense, AirTight and AirMagnet receive, the revenue just didn't match the hype. Stand alone wireless security was a tweener.&nbsp; Would traditional security cover wireless or would traditional wireless cover wireless security.&nbsp; In any event a stand along wireless security play is a tough road.&nbsp; So with this answer <a class="zem_slink" title="Motorola" href="http://www.motorola.com/" rel="homepage">Motorola</a> says wireless handles wireless security.&nbsp; </p>

<p>My question is what does the future hold for Motorola.&nbsp; They are reportedly getting out of the cell phone business.&nbsp; Is their wireless business, even a secure one enough to support this giant?&nbsp; I don't know but there is a bit of &quot;dead man walking&quot; over there if you ask me.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I think the play is clear though that wireless providers are going to snap up wireless security companies. The real issue is at what prices.&nbsp; If anyone hears a price on this one, let me know. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Manta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10000548-83.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Sophi's bids on Utica to strengthen endpoint security</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html">Sophi's plans to acquire data security company</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security play">wireless security play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play">play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos buys utimaco">sophos buys utimaco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos">sophos</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deal">deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart deal">smart deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security">wireless security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brocadefoundry deal">brocadefoundry deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/motorola">motorola</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/monday-merger-m.html">Monday merger-mania in security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Monday merger-mania in security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c19f4a038131d5dec9a148005e6b400e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c19f4a038131d5dec9a148005e6b400e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it. Today...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it.&nbsp; Today saw two meaningful deals announced that could have an impact on the security landscape:</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3761786/Sophos+Utimaco+Buy+Targets+Endpoint+Security.htm">Sophos buys Utimaco</a> - Saw this one when I woke up today, as it is a European deal.&nbsp; UK based <a class="zem_slink" title="Sophos" href="http://www.sophos.com/" rel="homepage">Sophos</a> is buying German based Utimaco, makers of the SafeGuard line of data encryption/protection/DLP product line.&nbsp; Sophos is paying cash $340 million US for in this deal.&nbsp; This means they are substantially dipping into the credit market, as this is far more than they reported cash on hand. So like the Brocade/Foundry deal, the acquiring company feels strong enough about the acquisition to mortgage the house to get it.&nbsp; In this case, I think Sophos is making a smart deal. They clearly say that to compete with <a class="zem_slink" title="Symantec" href="http://www.symantec.com/" rel="homepage">Symantec</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="McAfee" href="http://www.mcafee.com/" rel="homepage">McAfee</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/" rel="homepage">Microsoft</a> they are going to need a full endpoint security suite. AV alone is not just going to cut it. This gives Sophos a real play in DLP and data storage space.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Yes they could have just done a partner deal for this type of technology, but I applaud them for going out and buying the technology.&nbsp; I wondered if they would use this as a reverse merger entry to the public markets but it doesn't look like that.&nbsp; In any event it looks like Sophos is making the play and spending the bucks to be a player in the endpoint security suite game.</p>

<p>2. <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30411">Motorola buys AirDefense</a> - Well one of the air brothers finally found a taker. I always thought that for all of the press AirDefense, AirTight and AirMagnet receive, the revenue just didn't match the hype. Stand alone wireless security was a tweener.&nbsp; Would traditional security cover wireless or would traditional wireless cover wireless security.&nbsp; In any event a stand along wireless security play is a tough road.&nbsp; So with this answer <a class="zem_slink" title="Motorola" href="http://www.motorola.com/" rel="homepage">Motorola</a> says wireless handles wireless security.&nbsp; </p>

<p>My question is what does the future hold for Motorola.&nbsp; They are reportedly getting out of the cell phone business.&nbsp; Is their wireless business, even a secure one enough to support this giant?&nbsp; I don't know but there is a bit of &quot;dead man walking&quot; over there if you ask me.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I think the play is clear though that wireless providers are going to snap up wireless security companies. The real issue is at what prices.&nbsp; If anyone hears a price on this one, let me know. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Manta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10000548-83.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Sophi's bids on Utica to strengthen endpoint security</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html">Sophi's plans to acquire data security company</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ujW6ul"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ujW6ul" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=9LTeDJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=9LTeDJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=yIFCWJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=yIFCWJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=skJxZJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=skJxZJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=6vZwXJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=6vZwXJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=IQfuGj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=IQfuGj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=pYiVbj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=pYiVbj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/349022019" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security play">wireless security play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play">play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos buys utimaco">sophos buys utimaco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos">sophos</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deal">deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart deal">smart deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security">wireless security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brocadefoundry deal">brocadefoundry deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/motorola">motorola</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/349022019/monday-merger-m.html">Monday merger-mania in security</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
