<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: administrative]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[News Report on Non Vulnerability in Windows Vista]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3a7950aaea1375ea46dc4f0439559b20</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3a7950aaea1375ea46dc4f0439559b20</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Are editors so excited to use the headline Vulnerability in Windows Vista in their SEO URLs that they will have their reporters write a story on a non-issue
IDG News has published a news report...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are editors so excited to use the headline &#8220;Vulnerability in Windows Vista&#8221; in their SEO URLs that they will have their reporters write a story on a non-issue? </p>
<p>IDG News has published a news report titled, &#8220;<a href="http://www.itworld.com/windows/58144/researchers-find-vulnerability-windows-vista">Researchers find vulnerability in Windows Vista</a>&#8220;. The report says:</p>
<blockquote><p>An Austrian security vendor has found a vulnerability in Windows Vista that it says could possibly allow an attacker to run unauthorized code on a PC.</p>
<p>The problem is rooted in the Device IO Control, which handles internal device communication. Researchers at Phion have found two different ways to cause a buffer overflow that could corrupt the memory of the operating system&#8217;s kernel.</p>
<p>In one of the scenarios, a person would already have to have administrative rights to the PC. In general, vulnerabilities that require that level of access somewhat undermine the risk since the attacker already has permission to use to the PC.</p></blockquote>
<p>Somewhat undermine the risk? If you need admin rights to exercise a bug it is not a security issue since you could already run any code with whatever privilege you wanted.  Microsoft is not issuing a patch, but creating a bug fix in a service pack, yet this is newsworthy?  This story has no comment from anyone but the finder of the bug.  Let&#8217;s see if other news outlets pick up on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/windows vista">windows vista</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/news report">news report</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/report">report</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bug fix">bug fix</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bug">bug</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/headline vulnerability">headline vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/austrian security vendor">austrian security vendor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/news outlets pick">news outlets pick</category>
      <source url="http://www.veracode.com/blog/2008/11/news-report-on-non-vulnerability-in-windows-vista/">News Report on Non Vulnerability in Windows Vista</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[6 Months And Counting For Microsoft On CVE-2008-1436]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/630af6ad6042b9974b3ce04fba8e2039</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/630af6ad6042b9974b3ce04fba8e2039</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In April of this year Microsoft issued what seemed to be a rather serious security advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (951306) . Microsoft never provides gory...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In April of this year Microsoft issued what seemed to be <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/951306.mspx">a rather serious security advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (951306)</a>.

Microsoft never provides gory details to vulnerabilities even after they've been patched, but by following <a href="http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1436">the CVE entry from it</a> you can get links to sites like <a href="http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/41880">IBM's ISS</a> which are willing to say more, or even to get <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/data/vulnerabilities/exploits/28833.zip">proof-of-concept exploit code from SecurityFocus</a>. The vulnerability allows authenticated attackers potentially to elevate privileges to LocalSystem.

Here we are, 6 months later, and Microsoft still has not patched this vulnerability. What's up with that? "Dustin" from the Microsoft Security Response Center <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2008/10/13/questions-about-microsoft-security-advisory-951306.aspx">recently addressed the question in a blog on Technet</a>, following an update to the advisory to note the availability of the proof-of-concept code.

It's worth noting that this vulnerability isn't really near the top of the scare list. Most of those 3rd parties you see linked on the CVE page rank it down a few notches. Even the usually hyperbolic Secunia calls it "Less Critical" (2 out of 5, 1 step up from "Not Critical"). Furthermore, back in April Microsoft provided workarounds which it says are effective against the proof-of-concept, at the cost of some administrative burden. They also say that they are unaware of any real-world attacks on this vector. You can find more details from Microsoft on the bug <a href="http://blogs.iis.net/nazim/archive/2008/10/14/token-kidnapping-in-windows.aspx">in Nazim's IIS Security Blog</a> and <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/10/13/service-isolation-explanation.aspx">the Security Vulnerability Research & Defense blog</a>.

Still, 6 months! What Dustin said was "...we began our investigation and immediately realized it would not be trivial to address this issue without introducing new risks." They're still testing and developing a fix. 6 months later. It would seem that the obvious fixes all cause some serious problem, perhaps breaking 3rd party code.

Is this inherently unreasonable? It's getting there. The list of affected software includes most of the important versions of Windows. It may be that some of the time this has taken has gone to working with my speculative 3rd parties to update their own software, so that the fix won't have the same impact.

But let's not forget that this is not an easily exploitable bug. It's not wormable in any way and by the time it's invoked other serious breaches of security have to have happened. So I guess it's worth it for Microsoft to take their time doing it right.
<p><a href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/RrBOYL-vi28uTXzJfQn7Myh9IXc/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/RrBOYL-vi28uTXzJfQn7Myh9IXc/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/YD0XPCfBCKk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defense blog">defense blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog">blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/iis security blog">iis security blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vulnerability research">security vulnerability research</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/april microsoft">april microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/april">april</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/YD0XPCfBCKk/6_months_and_counting_for_microsoft_on_cve20081436.html">6 Months And Counting For Microsoft On CVE-2008-1436</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Researcher finds evidence of massive site compromise]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d81e4009f2c14388fee11506aa494a40</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d81e4009f2c14388fee11506aa494a40</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Several criminal gangs have acquired administrative log-in credentials for more than 200,000 Web sites -- including the one used by the U.S. Postal Service -- and have used the compromised domains to...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Several criminal gangs have acquired administrative log-in credentials for more than 200,000 Web sites -- including the one used by the U.S. Postal Service -- and have used the compromised domains to attack unsuspecting users' PCs with a notorious hacker exploit kit, a researcher said today.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative log-in credentials">administrative log-in credentials</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web sites">web sites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/criminal gangs">criminal gangs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/researcher">researcher</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/postal service">postal service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attack">attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/users">users</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/domains">domains</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pcs">pcs</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/100308-researcher-finds-evidence-of-massive.html?fsrc=rss-security">Researcher finds evidence of massive site compromise</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/faa1c491c2560f03d26087ce540dd0ef</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/faa1c491c2560f03d26087ce540dd0ef</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: 3PAR) The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: 3PAR)</b> The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI, enables end users or their hosting providers to provision and manage hundreds of individual, virtual desktops from a set of centrally administered, consolidated servers. This approach delivers a number of potential benefits, including lower administrative and maintenance costs, higher levels of security, and increased user mobility and flexibility. 3PAR has introduced Thin Copy Desktop for VMware VDI, a storage solution designed for virtualized desktop infrastructures. This offering meets all the requirements for a VDI Optimized Storage solution, which we have outlined in this document. 3PAR Thin Copy Desktop significantly decreases physical disk space requirements for virtual desktop images and enables the rapid, simultaneous booting of hundreds  or even thousands  of virtual machines (VMs).
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=OqJXst"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=OqJXst" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/383300985" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vdi">vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storage solution">storage solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop infrastructure">virtual desktop infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vmware vdi">vmware vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thin copy desktop">thin copy desktop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/3par">3par</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/manage hundreds">manage hundreds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop images">virtual desktop images</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hundreds">hundreds</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/383300985/whitepapers.do">3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/16989dfab02bffbda4d73e938dc0852d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/16989dfab02bffbda4d73e938dc0852d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: 3PAR) The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: 3PAR)</b> The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI, enables end users or their hosting providers to provision and manage hundreds of individual, virtual desktops from a set of centrally administered, consolidated servers. This approach delivers a number of potential benefits, including lower administrative and maintenance costs, higher levels of security, and increased user mobility and flexibility. 3PAR has introduced Thin Copy Desktop for VMware VDI, a storage solution designed for virtualized desktop infrastructures. This offering meets all the requirements for a VDI Optimized Storage solution, which we have outlined in this document. 3PAR Thin Copy Desktop significantly decreases physical disk space requirements for virtual desktop images and enables the rapid, simultaneous booting of hundreds - or even thousands - of virtual machines (VMs).<br style="clear: both;"/>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:f4f34ae1a56fad240bc637717ae98a3e:Q0uxw8yNx8poQ%2FQKxJQtAycZkRBw4pO4%2F2AGV5i1QMLMpEg2wgSl974RKBrmsuGEkQ5WWxAA3cO0rmN8tY2Dc8t9mmhNJA%2BfmXpVhaXj9Wc%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to digg' alt='Add to digg' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/digg.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:2f92a7c011d256cf733e878cbfad9e42:zmYgYG2YKzzlSqg0dKBU4vOJ6SzSo2bX5p2jt5xYGjnjyCfcQrfayiFgom7WLp%2BcZVbH3mNXyPHe0ntOxt6o17HTWmmqsd4nmzytBBrlCiA%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to StumbleUpon' alt='Add to StumbleUpon' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/stumbleit.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:2686fa7fc02e8dc83fc49f23561537a8:7HFkUgKP22vzQQhW%2BPfraFFlO08ySGGz%2FvdMs1d9Yi%2FVBWxq9bNZDFJuucs1na7awgkKYmUxiPuHMq%2FNWwlgnbmxz50Ko9%2Bdgq7tudSyk6w%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Twitter' alt='Add to Twitter' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/twitter.png'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:03149008a954edb6eaba5c5cab76cee9:Y%2F7m6%2BnHXo6F8t5s1q5N10fSXIUjiQ6dP8bwkLrOfzikRIkKy%2Br8XNGAK6%2F1FF8LUtdQNIBbHyx84L%2Fpv0CIYzHFSmkdR1qeozC7xPY7aSM%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Slashdot' alt='Add to Slashdot' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/slashdot.png'/></a>
<br style="clear: both;"/>  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vdi">vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storage solution">storage solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop infrastructure">virtual desktop infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vmware vdi">vmware vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thin copy desktop">thin copy desktop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/3par">3par</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/manage hundreds">manage hundreds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop images">virtual desktop images</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hundreds">hundreds</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/click.phdo?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa">3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Storm Worm's Lazy Summer Campaigns]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e155e33c098c672d2c7846d029362254</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e155e33c098c672d2c7846d029362254</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Storm Worm-ers seem to be lacking their usual creativity in respect to the usual social engineering attacks taking advantage of the momentum we're used to seeing. These days they're not...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="text-align: left; clear: both;"><a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJGcBUK9GWI/AAAAAAAAB-s/q19bj3vUnhc/s1600-h/ff.gif" imageanchor="1" style="border: 0pt none ; background-color: transparent; clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; margin-right: 1em;"><img src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJGcBUK9GWI/AAAAAAAAB-s/r6me1CKXkVc/s200-R/ff.gif" style="border: 0pt none ;" /></a></div>The Storm Worm-ers seem to be lacking their usual creativity in respect to the usual social engineering attacks taking advantage of the momentum we're used to seeing. These days they're not piggybacking on real news items, <a href="http://honeyblog.org/archives/197-New-Storm-Campaign-Amero.html">they're starting to come up with new ones</a>.<br />
<br />
Storm's latest "FBI vs Facebook" campaign is an example of very badly executed one, lacking their usual fast-flux, any kind of social engineering common sense,&nbsp; as well as client side exploits next to centralizing all the participating domains on a single nameserver.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="text-align: center; clear: both;"></div>Domains used :<br />
<b>wapdailynews .com<br />
smartnewsradio .com<br />
bestvaluenews .com<br />
toplessnewsradio .com<br />
companynewsnetwork .com<br />
goodnewsgames .com<br />
marketgoodnews .com<br />
fednewsworld .com<br />
toplessdailynews .com<br />
stocklownews .com</b><br />
<a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJGc5mMmHPI/AAAAAAAAB-0/YX-edkoIqeU/s1600-h/stormworm_fbi_facebook.png" imageanchor="1" style="border: 0pt none ; background-color: transparent; clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; margin-right: 1em;"><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJGc5mMmHPI/AAAAAAAAB-0/ZkZhjt1csUA/s200-R/stormworm_fbi_facebook.png" style="border: 0pt none ;" /></a><br />
DNS servers :<br />
<b>NS.BRPRBGOK6 .COM</b><br />
<b>NS2.BRPRBGOK6 .COM</b><br />
<b>NS3.BRPRBGOK6 .COM&nbsp;</b><br />
<b>NS4.BRPRBGOK6 .COM</b><br />
<b>NS5.BRPRBGOK6 .COM</b><br />
<b>NS6.BRPRBGOK6 .COM</b><br />
<br />
Strangely, the domain has been registered using an email hosted on a known Storm fast-flux node used in the recent <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1440">4th of July campaign</a> and the <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/storm-worms-us-invasion-of-iran.html">U.S's invasion of Iran</a> :<br />
<br />
<i>Administrative Contact:<br />
<b>Lee Chung lee@likethisone1.com</b><br />
+13205897845 fax: <br />
1743, 34<br />
Los-Angeles CA 321458<br />
us</i><br />
<br />
This Storm Worm sample is also "phoning back home" over HTTP next to the P2P traffic, and trying to obtain the rootkit from the now down, <b>policy-studies.cn /getbackup.php</b> using already known Storm nameservers :<br />
<br />
<b>ns2.verynicebank .com</b><br />
<b>ns3.verynicebank .com</b><br />
<b>ns.likethisone1 .com</b><br />
<b>ns2.likethisone1 .com</b><br />
<b>ns3.lollypopycandy .com</b><br />
<b>ns4.lollypopycandy .com</b><br />
<br />
Someone's bored, definitely, making it look like it's almost someone else managing a Storm Worm campaign on behalf of them.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=X5UfaJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=X5UfaJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=UdrqvJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=UdrqvJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5V52Cj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5V52Cj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=vMsoHj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=vMsoHj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=CVV77J"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=CVV77J" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=3J26GJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=3J26GJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=OzKbLj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=OzKbLj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/351463114" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm">storm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/campaign">campaign</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm worm campaign">storm worm campaign</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm nameservers">storm nameservers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm worm sample">storm worm sample</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storm fast-flux node">storm fast-flux node</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brprbgok6">brprbgok6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/usual social">usual social</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lee chung leelikethisone1">lee chung leelikethisone1</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/351463114/storm-worms-lazy-summer-campaigns.html">Storm Worm's Lazy Summer Campaigns</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[One risky point]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/000beffe4de55a7417ccc558d002e38e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/000beffe4de55a7417ccc558d002e38e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Single point of failure. That's the right term for talking about the mess in San Francisco, where last week the city government finally regained control of its backbone network. Terry Childs, the net...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Single point of failure. That's the right term for talking about the mess in San Francisco, where last week the city government finally regained control of its backbone network. Terry Childs, the net admin jailed for locking down administrative access, turned over the passwords during a secret visit from Mayor Gavin Newsom.<p><A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=3499?">
<IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=3499?" border="0" width="468" height="60"></A>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mayor gavin newsom">mayor gavin newsom</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative access">administrative access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/terry childs">terry childs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/net admin">net admin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city government">city government</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/backbone network">backbone network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/secret visit">secret visit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/san francisco">san francisco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/passwords">passwords</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072808-one-risky.html?fsrc=rss-security">One risky point</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[San Francisco's mayor gets back keys to the network]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/66bab0249e19f51feab0ed7a34f8682f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/66bab0249e19f51feab0ed7a34f8682f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom met with jailed IT administrator Terry Childs Monday, convincing him to hand over the administrative passwords to the city's multimillion-dollar wide area...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom met with jailed IT administrator Terry Childs Monday, convincing him to hand over the administrative passwords to the city's multimillion-dollar wide area network.<p><A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=9930?">
<IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=9930?" border="0" width="468" height="60"></A>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative passwords">administrative passwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city">city</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hand">hand</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wide">wide</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072308-san-francisco-childs.html?fsrc=rss-security">San Francisco's mayor gets back keys to the network</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Questions abound as San Francisco tries to repair network]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3c67abab0bfc19c6115073ad0004880e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3c67abab0bfc19c6115073ad0004880e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[IT managers and analysts are expressing surprise at the amount of time it appears to be taking officials at the City of San Francisco to regain full control of the city's FiberWAN network after a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[IT managers and analysts are expressing surprise at the amount of time it appears to be taking officials at the City of San Francisco to regain full control of the city's FiberWAN network after a disgruntled network administrator allegedly locked access to it by resetting administrative passwords to its switches and routers.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/san francisco">san francisco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network administrator allegedly">network administrator allegedly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city">city</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative passwords">administrative passwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fiberwan network">fiberwan network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/routers">routers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/officials">officials</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access">access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072208-questions-abound-as-san-francisco.html?fsrc=rss-security">Questions abound as San Francisco tries to repair network</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Opinion: How to protect your network from rogue IT employees]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/66ae33a18f7c1883af76dcd3dffe25f4</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/66ae33a18f7c1883af76dcd3dffe25f4</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Several basic network security principles appear to have been ignored in the city of San Francisco's IT department, resulting in a rogue network admin creating a &quot;superpassword&quot; that blocked everyone...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Several basic network security principles appear to have been ignored in the city of San Francisco's IT department, resulting in a rogue network admin creating a "superpassword" that blocked everyone else's administrative functions -- and his arrest.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=BWoMhf"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=BWoMhf" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/341590039" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rogue network admin">rogue network admin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/administrative functions">administrative functions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/san francisco">san francisco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/department">department</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/city">city</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/superpassword">superpassword</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/341590039/article.do">Opinion: How to protect your network from rogue IT employees</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
