<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: cisco]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/cisco</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Follow-Up Webinar on Information Risk]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d12858571eeccc423c70ef42ac02b634</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d12858571eeccc423c70ef42ac02b634</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hey everybody! Quick post this morning to let you know you guys and Cisco have been kind enough to want us to give a follow on WebEx presentation that builds on the content from the first webEx we...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey everybody!  Quick post this morning to let you know you guys and Cisco have been kind enough to want us to give a follow on WebEx presentation that builds on the content from the first webEx we just did. And so we&#8217;re going to be doing that on  July 31, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. EDT.  The link to sign up is <a href="https://ciscosales.webex.com/ciscosales/onstage/g.php?d=929845289&amp;t=a&amp;EA=miradiga%40cisco.com&amp;ET=d5be1b551672ee32df7260c6418042ca&amp;ETR=b92381359a9255da61ca95ac83ae2f0e"><strong>&lt;&lt;&lt;here&gt;&gt;&gt;</strong></a>.  Note that the last preso was really well attended, filling the slots Cisco gave us.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re calling this part II - and it&#8217;s being advertised as:</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8220;How to conduct a risk analysis and produce a high impact deliverable to senior management.&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>With topics:</p>
<ul>
<li>The life-cycle of a quantitative risk analysis</li>
<li>Key control opportunities against targeted attacks</li>
<li>Getting senior management to understand the risk posed to the business</li>
</ul>
<p>I got to do the Q&amp;A backchannel on the last presentation, and there were great questions asked.  I think this presentation will be even more exciting, as it&#8217;ll cover both analyst and management considerations.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a regular reader of the blog, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll have to have attended the last one for this one to be worth your while.</p>
<p><strong>REPEAT PERFORMANCES OF THE FIRST WEBEX ARE AVAILABLE</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had a some folks who attended the original WebEx ask us to do a &#8220;private&#8221; performance for just their  infosec group and/or other members of their organization (like audit and ERM).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been given the OK to do these provided that there are a minimum of 5 attendees.  Leave me a comment to this post if you&#8217;re interested (be sure to include your email in the submission - it won&#8217;t be made public but we&#8217;ll need it to contact you to set this up), or just email me:  alexh -shift2- riskmanagementinsight:dot:com.</p>
<p>And if you missed it the first time, the playback of the first preso is <a href="https://ciscosales.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&amp;SP=EC&amp;rID=25693942&amp;rKey=5A9EF2E7F1B062BC"><strong>here</strong></a>, and the slides are <a href="http://www.riskmanagementinsight.com/media/documents/Risk_Evolution.pdf"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/webex">webex</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/original webex">original webex</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/webex presentation">webex presentation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/risk analysis">risk analysis</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantitative risk analysis">quantitative risk analysis</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/presentation">presentation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/senior management">senior management</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post">post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/slots cisco">slots cisco</category>
      <source url="http://riskmanagementinsight.com/riskanalysis/?p=367">Follow-Up Webinar on Information Risk</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Same Letters, New Acronym]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e4ff5ab903eb1a85e8ff7fe960083b83</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e4ff5ab903eb1a85e8ff7fe960083b83</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[On 26 June, Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft announced the formation of the Industry Consortium for the Advancement of Security on the Internet ( ICASI ). The major goal of the consortium is...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[On 26 June, Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft announced the formation of the Industry Consortium for the Advancement of Security on the Internet (<a href="http://www.icasi.org">ICASI</a>). The major goal of the consortium is to be a forum where technology vendors can work together to share information and address new threats that have common impacts across their product lines. This is markedly similar to the goals of another consortium that all five vendors belong to, the Information Technology Information Sharing and Analysis Center (IT-ISAC), established way back in 2001 and largely ineffective.<br />
<br />
There are some differences, though. ISACs were always U.S.-centric with the U.S. government trying to be involved. ICASI is supposed to be more global, but since it is being established by North American vendors, there is no real difference there, but at least it is government-neutral. The IT-ISAC had many member companies that were security product vendors and security services vendors, while ICASI is currently limited to five of the biggest infrastructure vendors, with Oracle and Sun and any telecom vendors noticeably missing.<br />
<br />
Back in 2001, I commented that the IT-ISAC could make a difference only if it was driven by the vendors' corporate security officers, not by product managers, and if it focused on inward-looking improvements in security and not outward-bound marketing and press releases. The IT-ISAC never really met those goals and was largely ineffective. ICASI will have to take the same behind-the-scenes focus, or it will end up being just another multivendor acronym that goes nowhere.<br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security officers">security officers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security services vendors">security services vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vendors">vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology vendors">technology vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/infrastructure vendors">infrastructure vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security product vendors">security product vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/north american vendors">north american vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vendors belong">vendors belong</category>
      <source url="http://blog.gartner.com/blog/security.php?x=0&amp;itemid=3656">Same Letters, New Acronym</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft fight cyber terror together ]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2bc3d83c208e98b4072f230539e44063</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2bc3d83c208e98b4072f230539e44063</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Five major network hardware, software and services vendors are banding together to improve IT security by promoting faster responses to...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Five major network hardware, software and services vendors are banding together to improve IT security by promoting faster responses to threats.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/major network hardware">major network hardware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/faster responses">faster responses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/services vendors">services vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/improve">improve</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/threats">threats</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/062707-icasi-cyber-terror.html?fsrc=rss-security">Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft fight cyber terror together </source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Live from the 20th Annual FIRST Conference]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8f5b32eca2e471054acd118ae718ad31</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8f5b32eca2e471054acd118ae718ad31</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I've been at the FIRST conference in Vancouver, BC this week presenting , attending great presentations, and meeting a fantastic group of people
I'd like to applaud some great presenters I've seen so...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I've been at the <a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/">FIRST</a> conference in Vancouver, BC this week <a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/program/#p875">presenting</a>, attending great presentations, and meeting a fantastic group of people.<br />I'd like to applaud some great presenters I've seen so far, including Par Osterberg Medina (<a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/program/#p865">Detecting Intrusions</a>), Anton Chuvakin (<a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/program/#p864">Log Analysis</a>), Raffael Marty (<a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/program/#p876">Applied Security Visualization</a>), and Steve Mancini (<a href="http://www.first.org/conference/2008/program/#p886">RAPIER</a>).<br />I've also been advised of some tools for your consideration, to aid in the security analysis / incident response cause, as well as possible topics for <span style="font-style:italic;">toolsmith</span>. <br />Take a look at these, if you aren't already familiar with them:<br /><a href="http://bitblaze.cs.berkeley.edu/">BitBlaze</a> - Binary Analysis for COTS Protection and Malicious Code Defense<br /><a href="http://www.f-response.com/">F-Response</a> - The First Truly Vendor Agnostic Solution for Remote Forensics and eDiscovery<br /><a href="http://www.paterva.com/maltego/">Maltego</a> - Maltego is an open source intelligence and forensics application. It allows for the mining and gathering of information as well as the representation of this information in a meaningful way. <br /><a href="https://www.volatilesystems.com/default/volatility">The Volatility Framework</a> - Volatile memory artifact extraction utility framework<br />Thanks to Richard Bejtlich for pointing out F-Response and Volatility and Steve Mancini for BitBlaze and Maltego.<br /><br />On another front, in support of Eva Chen's (Trend Micro) recent <a href="http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/06/22/trend_micro_eva_chen/">claim</a> that the anti-virus industry <span style="font-weight:bold;">sucks</span>, John Stewart of Cisco, in his keynote this morning, reiterated the premise that the fight against malware is a lost cause. The point he was really driving at is the downfall of blacklisting and that whitelisting is essential given that "the total good is smaller than the total unknown and bad". This, as his fourth postulate of many good postulates this morning, truly supports my own beliefs. I'm more focused on whitelisting in the web application security space,   but the premise is the same. If the vast majority of requests to secured elements of your applications are <span style="font-style:italic;">bad</span>, then simply deny all, and allow only that which you trust.<br /><br />More to come...<br /><br /><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://holisticinfosec.blogspot.com/2008/06/live-from-20th-annual-first-conference.html&title=Live%20from%20the%2020th%20Annual%20FIRST%20Conference " title="Live from the 20th Annual FIRST Conference">del.icio.us</a> | <a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://holisticinfosec.blogspot.com/2008/06/live-from-20th-annual-first-conference.html" title="Live from the 20th Annual FIRST Conference ">digg</a>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/steve mancini">steve mancini</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/volatility">volatility</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/volatility framework">volatility framework</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anti-virus industry sucks">anti-virus industry sucks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/total unknown">total unknown</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/maltego">maltego</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/par osterberg medina">par osterberg medina</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vendor agnostic solution">vendor agnostic solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/total">total</category>
      <source url="http://holisticinfosec.blogspot.com/2008/06/live-from-20th-annual-first-conference.html">Live from the 20th Annual FIRST Conference</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Avaya, Cisco and Nortel face VoIP vulnerabilities]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/4b72816b4ab5098febf61ab4b095ad5f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/4b72816b4ab5098febf61ab4b095ad5f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Patches expected for issues that affect voice servers -- VoIP PBXes -- and softphone software that runs on laptops and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Patches expected for issues that affect voice servers -- VoIP PBXes -- and softphone software that runs on laptops and desktops.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=DoqGSC"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=DoqGSC" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/319852927" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/affect voice servers">affect voice servers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/voip pbxes">voip pbxes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/softphone software">softphone software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/issues">issues</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laptops">laptops</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/runs">runs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/patches">patches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/desktops">desktops</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/319852927/article.do">Avaya, Cisco and Nortel face VoIP vulnerabilities</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A Hot Cloudless Computing Day in Florida]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/b81fb70f1fd9cdfcfb0287c075a854d5</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/b81fb70f1fd9cdfcfb0287c075a854d5</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[From the Gartner IT Infrastructure, Operations &amp; Management Summit in balmy Florida
First of all, Id like to point out a major difference between the Gartner conference and the big Cisco Live user...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=603107" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.gartner.com');" target="_blank">Gartner IT Infrastructure, Operations &amp; Management Summit</a> in balmy Florida…</p>
<p>First of all, I’d like to point out a major difference between the Gartner conference and the big <a href="http://www.cisco-live.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.cisco-live.com');" target="_blank">Cisco Live</a> user conference going on down here at the same time. Keynotes start at 8am at the Gartner show – and before that is breakfast, networking, etc. etc. John Chambers’ keynote over at Cisco Live starts at 10am. 8am versus 10am. I knew there was a reason I should have been a network engineer&#8230;</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/cloud-question-mark-cloud-computing.jpg" border="0" alt="cloud-question-mark-cloud-computing" width="156" height="244" align="left" />But here’s something they don’t have at Cisco Live – <a href="http://agendabuilder.gartner.com/str24/WebPages/SessionList.aspx?Speaker=85" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/agendabuilder.gartner.com');" target="_blank">VP &amp; Distinguished Analyst Thomas Bittman</a> talking about Cloud Computing and the Future of Infrastructure.</p>
<p><em>(</em><a href="http://www.watblog.com/2008/03/25/yahoo-computational-research-laboratories-team-up-for-cloud-computing-research/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.watblog.com');" target="_blank"><em>Picture credit: WATBlog</em></a><em>)</em></p>
<p><strong>Point:</strong> The idea is that <a href="http://opensource.sys-con.com/read/585485.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/opensource.sys-con.com');" target="_blank">it’s complex to create computing power</a> so we should centralize it among a few providers (Google, Amazon, ebay) to gain economies of scale. Ability to drive down price by centralizing and getting to scale is just too compelling. In this scenario, computing is a commodity; IT is a commodity. Remember Nick Carr’s controversial book, “Does IT Matter”?</p>
<p><strong>Gartner Counterpoint:</strong> IT is not a commodity because of constant innovation. So it’s not about a big investment in old/stagnating technology but more about developing and investing in agility. <a href="http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/tve/?p=285" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.itbusinessedge.com');" target="_blank">There will be not a few cloud computing providers</a> but thousands.</p>
<p><strong>A quick definition of Cloud Computing by Gartner</strong>: a style of computing where massively scalable IT-enabled capabilities are delivered as a service to external customers using Internet technologies.</p>
<p><strong>Cloud Computing Drivers:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>connections are becoming pervasive (anywhere, anytime)</li>
<li>response time expectations are shrinking</li>
<li>relationships are online and short-lived</li>
</ul>
<p>Tom Bittman shared a view of the <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2008/06/microsoft_to_pu.php" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.roughtype.com');" target="_blank">evolution of the data center</a> – from “Silos to Clouds”. Prior to about 2002, data centers were sprawled siloed organizations focused on component management. Over time, <a href="http://blogs.eweek.com/masked_intentions/content/systems_management/it_management_in_the_age_of_cloud_computing.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.eweek.com');" target="_blank">hardware cost went down, flexibility is up spurred by technologies like virtualization</a> and creating fluid pools of capacity that can be moved around intelligently. What we are <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Gardner/?p=2685" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/blogs.zdnet.com');" target="_blank">moving towards is automated, services-oriented environment in data centers</a> that are focused on enabling agility. Ecco Cloud Computing!</p>
<p><strong>Gartner predictions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>By 2012, 80% of the Fortune 100 will be paying for some cloud computing services, and</li>
<li>30% will be paying for cloud computing infrastructure services.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.5.1&amp;publisher=ea11358c-69de-4e80-9804-e964a8930b70&amp;title=A+Hot+Cloudless+Computing+Day+in+Florida&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.sciencelogic.com%2Fa-hot-cloudless-computing-day-in-florida%2F06%2F2008" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/sharethis.com');">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gartner">gartner</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gartner counterpoint">gartner counterpoint</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ecco cloud">ecco cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gartner predictions">gartner predictions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/8am versus 10am">8am versus 10am</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/infrastructure services">infrastructure services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/services">services</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/a-hot-cloudless-computing-day-in-florida/06/2008">A Hot Cloudless Computing Day in Florida</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[PCI compliance kit for NAC - do you believe it?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/eea08d4a2ddfe35a1d81e5128594469b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/eea08d4a2ddfe35a1d81e5128594469b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Tim Greene makes the point again in his column that NAC is a great tool to help with PCI compliance. He is right on. Here at StillSecure we have several customers who are using NAC to help with PCI....]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Tim Greene makes the <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/vpn/2008/062308nac1.html">point again in his column</a> that NAC is a great tool to help with PCI compliance. He is right on. Here at StillSecure we have several customers who are using NAC to help with PCI.&nbsp; My issue is Tim highlights some recent spin fed to him from the &quot;<a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/the-used-car-sa.html">used car salesman of NAC</a>&quot;. They claim to have a &quot;PCI kit&quot; that will help with 8 out of 12 PCI requirments.&nbsp; A kit sounds like something you put on your car to help with gas mileage or something and for all I know is just more snake oil.&nbsp; They claim to have an &quot;unnamed customer&quot; who is already using it.&nbsp; Who could that be, LVHH again?&nbsp; Or maybe they found a Cisco or Juniper customer that they say uses them for NAC now too.&nbsp; The <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/the-used-car-sa.html">BNBB</a> advises to take anything they say or write with a grain of salt.&nbsp; Remember Caveat Emptor!</p></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=PiIKlz"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=PiIKlz" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=bIsVsI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=bIsVsI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=KXbTBI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=KXbTBI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=MCFmFI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=MCFmFI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=7oJYKI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=7oJYKI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=KVv8ni"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=KVv8ni" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=v3cjWi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=v3cjWi" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/318838718" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pci">pci</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nac">nac</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pci kit">pci kit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pci compliance">pci compliance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pci requirments">pci requirments</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recent spin fed">recent spin fed</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remember caveat emptor">remember caveat emptor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/juniper customer">juniper customer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/car">car</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/318838718/pci-compliance.html">PCI compliance kit for NAC - do you believe it?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Cisco Unified Communications Manager review quiz]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a48f186f2f0590911000a630aed07cb7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a48f186f2f0590911000a630aed07cb7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This section provides review questions on the material covered in the previous sections of the chapter...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[This section provides review questions on the material covered in the previous sections of the chapter excerpt.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WhatisEnterpriseItTipsAndExpertAdvice/~4/318255994" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/previous sections">previous sections</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/review questions">review questions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chapter excerpt">chapter excerpt</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/section">section</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/material">material</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WhatisEnterpriseItTipsAndExpertAdvice/~3/318255994/0,295582,sid100_gci1317815,00.html">Cisco Unified Communications Manager review quiz</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Taking a second look at Rohati]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6473a18d588db2e7115028a3818a3bea</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6473a18d588db2e7115028a3818a3bea</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Last week in response to Richard Stiennon's glowing write up , I questioned what it is exactly that Rohati does. Well someone from Rohati must have seen it and I was contacted by the Rohati team and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Last week in response to<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28837"> Richard Stiennon's glowing write up</a>, <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/if-rohati-is-ki.html">I questioned</a> what it is exactly that Rohati does. Well someone from Rohati must have seen it and I was contacted by the Rohati team and offered a peek and a deep explanation of exactly what Rohati does.&nbsp; So today I had a chance to speak with Shane Buckley, CEO, Prashant Ghandi VP of product management and strategy and Steven Wastie, VP of marketing.&nbsp; I was impressed that such a triumvirate of power players from the Rohati team took the time to speak to me.&nbsp; But I guess after I wrote what I did, it was followed up by <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/6/15/network-based-entitlement-a-rose-by-any-other-name.html">JJ writing her article</a> on it and than <a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-june-17-2008">Rothman piling on</a> with his own two cents.&nbsp; </p>

<p><a onclick="window.open(this.href, '_blank', 'width=800,height=617,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/20/rohati_2.png"><img title="Rohati_2" height="231" alt="Rohati_2" src="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/images/2008/06/20/rohati_2.png" width="300" border="0" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px 5px" /></a> Give the Rohati team credit for recognizing the power of blogs to influence the influencer and reaching out to stem the tide.&nbsp; It just goes to show you how far blogging has come. But enough about the power of blogs, lets talk about Rohati.</p>

<p>The best way for me to describe Rohati is that it is layer 7 ACLs to control access to applications.&nbsp; Where we already have security at the perimeter and at the edge, Rohati is about controlling access at the server/application.&nbsp; The diagram on the left (click on it to get a bigger version), is a good illustration of how Rohati works. By integrating with LDAPs Rohati can assign you an access policy to any application.&nbsp; Based upon that Rohati gives a very fine grain level of access control at the application layer.&nbsp; It acts as a proxy to the app server for both regular and encrypted traffic.&nbsp; Because the ACLs are on the Rohati box itself, there really is not any integration with switches per say and so no integration worries.</p>

<p>The only problem is that the Rohati box has to be able to handle the traffic flow.&nbsp; Hence the box is a big honker.&nbsp; The cheap one is about 20k list I believe and the industrial size version is 80k. This product is aimed squarely at the data center space and is sold through channels. </p>

<p>Will Rohati succeed.&nbsp; Yes, I think it will.&nbsp; I think they have taken a unique approach to a security issue that will continue to grow in years to come.&nbsp; Application access is an area that I think is still up and coming.&nbsp; In a period of nothing is ever new in security, the Rohati team seems to have found something that has not been done before in a packaged dedicated way like this.&nbsp; If nothing else, with all of the ex-Cisco folks there, Cisco will eat its young and buy the technology back in.</p>

<p>We will watch Rohati's progress in the months to come.&nbsp; At the very least, it seems they are blog savvy enough to navigate the waters of social media.&nbsp; Maybe they will start their own blog soon. </p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/34d1a82e-ac7c-4b2a-93de-e36fb04203ba/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=34d1a82e-ac7c-4b2a-93de-e36fb04203ba" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati">rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati team credit">rohati team credit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati team">rohati team</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/describe rohati">describe rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ldaps rohati">ldaps rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati box">rohati box</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access">access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/application layer">application layer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/application">application</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/taking-a-second.html">Taking a second look at Rohati</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Taking a second look at Rohati]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8cd98e832330dcae9c2a3d41890525b1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8cd98e832330dcae9c2a3d41890525b1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Last week in response to Richard Stiennon's glowing write up , I questioned what it is exactly that Rohati does. Well someone from Rohati must have seen it and I was contacted by the Rohati team and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Last week in response to<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28837"> Richard Stiennon's glowing write up</a>, <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/if-rohati-is-ki.html">I questioned</a> what it is exactly that Rohati does. Well someone from Rohati must have seen it and I was contacted by the Rohati team and offered a peek and a deep explanation of exactly what Rohati does.&nbsp; So today I had a chance to speak with Shane Buckley, CEO, Prashant Ghandi VP of product management and strategy and Steven Wastie, VP of marketing.&nbsp; I was impressed that such a triumvirate of power players from the Rohati team took the time to speak to me.&nbsp; But I guess after I wrote what I did, it was followed up by <a href="http://securityuncorked.squarespace.com/security-uncorked/2008/6/15/network-based-entitlement-a-rose-by-any-other-name.html">JJ writing her article</a> on it and than <a href="http://securityincite.com/blog/mike-rothman/the-daily-incite-june-17-2008">Rothman piling on</a> with his own two cents.&nbsp; </p>

<p><a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/19/rohati.gif"><img title="Rohati" height="231" alt="Rohati" src="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/images/2008/06/19/rohati.gif" width="300" border="0" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px 5px" /></a> Give the Rohati team credit for recognizing the power of blogs to influence the influencer and reaching out to stem the tide.&nbsp; It just goes to show you how far blogging has come. But enough about the power of blogs, lets talk about Rohati.</p>

<p>The best way for me to describe Rohati is that it is layer 7 ACLs to control access to applications.&nbsp; Where we already have security at the perimeter and at the edge, Rohati is about controlling access at the server/application.&nbsp; The diagram on the left (click on it to get a bigger version), is a good illustration of how Rohati works. By integrating with LDAPs Rohati can assign you an access policy to any application.&nbsp; Based upon that Rohati gives a very fine grain level of access control at the application layer.&nbsp; It acts as a proxy to the app server for both regular and encrypted traffic.&nbsp; Because the ACLs are on the Rohati box itself, there really is not any integration with switches per say and so no integration worries.</p>

<p>The only problem is that the Rohati box has to be able to handle the traffic flow.&nbsp; Hence the box is a big honker.&nbsp; The cheap one is about 20k list I believe and the industrial size version is 80k. This product is aimed squarely at the data center space and is sold through channels. </p>

<p>Will Rohati succeed.&nbsp; Yes, I think it will.&nbsp; I think they have taken a unique approach to a security issue that will continue to grow in years to come.&nbsp; Application access is an area that I think is still up and coming.&nbsp; In a period of nothing is ever new in security, the Rohati team seems to have found something that has not been done before in a packaged dedicated way like this.&nbsp; If nothing else, with all of the ex-Cisco folks there, if nothing else Cisco will eat its young and buy the technology back in.</p>

<p>We will watch Rohati's progress in the months to come.&nbsp; At the very least, it seems they are blog savvy enough to navigate the waters of social media.&nbsp; Maybe they will start their own blog soon. </p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/34d1a82e-ac7c-4b2a-93de-e36fb04203ba/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=34d1a82e-ac7c-4b2a-93de-e36fb04203ba" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=kBt7Rt"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=kBt7Rt" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=h6I1RI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=h6I1RI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=QOyNKI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=QOyNKI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=AB2KYI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=AB2KYI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=BpPKxI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=BpPKxI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=t5Hrei"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=t5Hrei" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=96guNi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=96guNi" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/315941778" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati">rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati team credit">rohati team credit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati team">rohati team</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/describe rohati">describe rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ldaps rohati">ldaps rohati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rohati box">rohati box</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access">access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/application layer">application layer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/application">application</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/315941778/taking-a-second.html">Taking a second look at Rohati</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
