<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: cracker]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/cracker</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Myspace Cracker Steals Firefox Passwords]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1a4072a96ea8dd94eda6fa2169ef914f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1a4072a96ea8dd94eda6fa2169ef914f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A &quot;Myspace Cracking tool&quot; has recently come to light, though if you're considering attempting to crack some Myspace accounts with this





then you might want to think again, on account of it not...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        A "Myspace Cracking tool" has recently come to light, though if you're considering attempting to crack some Myspace accounts with this:<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mscrkff1.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff1.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="87" width="67" /></span></div><br /> <div><br />....then you might want to think again, on account of it not being quite what it seems. This "cracking tool" is only after one persons details: yours. Run it, and you'll see the following (somewhat bizarre) message, which should be your first clue that all is not quite right here:<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mscrkff2.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="125" width="229" /><br />
  <br />
  <br />
</span></div>
At this point, your CD tray may well pop open - perhaps in tribute to the Trojans of old that did pretty much the same thing. At any rate, you're certainly not cracking any Myspace accounts, and after a faint grinding from your PC you're left to sit and stare at your desktop, wondering what went wrong. Here's a clue - have a poke around inside the EXE, and some lines of code will likely start to give the game away:<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mscrkff3.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff3.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="44" width="308" /></span></div><br /><br />..."Firefox password grabber"? Oh dear.<br /><br />The observant end-user will notice a .txt file appears on their C Drive, and itcontains all the stored passwords saved via Firefox on their computer:<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff51.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff51.html','popup','width=563,height=282,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/mscrkff5-thumb-363x181.jpg" alt="mscrkff5.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="181" width="363" /></a></span><br /><br />Click to Enlarge<br /></div><br />As you can see, the bad guys here seem to be exploiting a well known password recovery tool for nefarious purposes - in this case, <a href="http://www.security-hacks.com/2007/05/01/firepassword-decrypt-firefox-password-manager">Firepassword</a>. You're probably wondering what happens with the stored login details at this point - well, do some more digging in the code and you'll see this:<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/stolen.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/stolen.html','popup','width=574,height=377,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/stolen-thumb-374x245.jpg" alt="stolen.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="245" width="374" /></a></span><br /><br />Click to Enlarge<br /></div><br />The stolen Firefox passwords are sent to an FTP drop set up by the hacker, and every login you had stored in Firefox at that point is immediately at risk. Of course, if you're foolish enough to play around with hacking tools then there's a good chance you're going to get burned sooner or later...<br /><br />We detect this as <a href="http://www.spywareguide.com/spydet_32576_foxpass.html">FoxPass</a>.<br /></div><div><br /></div>
        
    ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/firefox">firefox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/firefox passwords">firefox passwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/myspace">myspace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tool">tool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/myspace accounts">myspace accounts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/firefox password grabber">firefox password grabber</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/password recovery tool">password recovery tool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ftp drop set">ftp drop set</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/login details">login details</category>
      <source url="http://blog.spywareguide.com/2008/08/myspace-cracker-steals-firefox.html">Myspace Cracker Steals Firefox Passwords</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Gallery: Images From the 16th Annual DefCon]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fb7d8c7afe69bef6c3f3ee2131da03a6</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fb7d8c7afe69bef6c3f3ee2131da03a6</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com
LAS VEGAS -- Last weekend, more than 9,000 hackers, freaks, feds and geeks gathered for the 16th annual DefCon, the world's largest computer security convention
Wired.com...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_2_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>LAS VEGAS -- Last weekend, more than 9,000 hackers, freaks, feds and geeks gathered for the 16th annual DefCon, the world's largest computer security convention. </p>

<p>Wired.com brought you <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/defcon/index.html">live coverage</a> of the most newsworthy events at DefCon 16. Here are some photos from the lighter side of the conference.</p>

<p><strong>Left:</strong> South Korean hackers compete in the Capture the Flag competition. The goal is to hack into and keep control of targeted servers.</p>
<img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_3_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>Mr. Sinister and Dragon Cracker battle it out in a round of <cite>Guitar Hero</cite> -- one of DefCon's newest competitions.</p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_1_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>Bringing-your-own-booze supply ensures optimal buzz at DefCon. Shortly after this picture was taken, hotel security escorted this backpack-hacker to his room.</p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_4_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>Computer geeks from the National Institute of Standards and Technology set up a network secured with quantum encryption in a conference room at DefCon. The quantum-entangled photons are being used to encrypt a video stream across a line-of-site network.</p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_5_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>A compact optical bench and an atomic clock (left) are used to secure a network with quantum encryption.   </p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_6_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>In the Lock Pick Pavilion, DefCon attendees Dustin, Jennalynn and Kunfoozball practice their lock-picking skills. </p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_7_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>DefCon founder and organizer Jeff Moss, aka Dark Tangent, at the conference's closing ceremony Sunday.</p>

<img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_9_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>A collection of black badges awaits the winners of the various competitions. These badges give their holders lifetime entry to DefCon.</p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_11_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>One of DefCon's logos, the smiley-faced skull and crossbones, is welded inside a yellow sphere. The sphere is the primary stage of one of the most difficult competitions at DefCon: <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/the-defcon-16-m.html">The Mystery Challenge</a>. </p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_15_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>Unbeknownst to attendees, this laptop is sniffing RFID tags and taking photos of their owners when they pass in front of the detectors. RFID tags are used in everything from building access to some credit cards.</p><img src='http://www.wired.com/images/slideshow/2008/08/gallery_defcon16/defcon_gallery_12_t.jpg'></img>: Photo: Dave Bullock/Wired.com<p>At the closing ceremony, DefCon organizers turn off the lights while the attendees wave their <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/exclusive-defco.html">high-tech badges</a> back and forth.</p><br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=68dd26e52adb5b467e7c3e6137cda635"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=68dd26e52adb5b467e7c3e6137cda635"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=68dd26e52adb5b467e7c3e6137cda635" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=5LS6EK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=5LS6EK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=K4FTfk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=K4FTfk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=IRLAWk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=IRLAWk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=NFFkrK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=NFFkrK" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=oS38eK"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=oS38eK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=qIurlk"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=qIurlk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=TG21wk"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=TG21wk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=n3oFWK"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=n3oFWK" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/362249101" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/362249108" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defcon">defcon</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/16th annual defcon">16th annual defcon</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defcon founder">defcon founder</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attendees wave">attendees wave</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attendees">attendees</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defcon organizers">defcon organizers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defcon attendees dustin">defcon attendees dustin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/photo">photo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dave">dave</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/362249108/gallery_defcon16">Gallery: Images From the 16th Annual DefCon</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[You Can Hide So SOA Won't Run]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6460c5acbcb399b0f314d3e693696aa1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6460c5acbcb399b0f314d3e693696aa1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[As stated in my previous blog entry, one of the best ways to secure SOA services is to hide them behind a port knocking firewall. Port knocking makes your system appear as if it offers no services at...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[As stated in my previous blog entry, one of the best ways to secure SOA services is to hide them behind a port knocking firewall. Port knocking makes your system appear as if it offers no services at all. Any cracker who comes a-knocking' will either conclude that nobody is home, or that your administrators are smart enough to make access so difficult it's not worth the trouble to try to break in.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/services">services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/secure soa services">secure soa services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/previous blog entry">previous blog entry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/port">port</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hide">hide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worth">worth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart">smart</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/offers">offers</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/080608-you-can-hide-so-soa.html?fsrc=rss-security">You Can Hide So SOA Won't Run</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Malaysian Kaspersky Antivirus Website Has Been Hacked In An SQL Injection Attack]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0f4519940a36a454b6d9ce93d479b28f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0f4519940a36a454b6d9ce93d479b28f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[According to Zone-h.org, the official Malaysian Kaspersky Antivirus website has been hacked yesterday by a Turkish cracker. Along with it, the same cracker hacked the official Kaspersky online shop...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[According to Zone-h.org, the official Malaysian Kaspersky Antivirus website has been hacked yesterday by a Turkish cracker. Along with it, the same cracker hacked the official Kaspersky online shop and its several other subdomains. The attacker reported &#8220;patriotism&#8221; as the reason behind the attack. It seems that SQL injection was the technical way the intrusion [...]]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql injection">sql injection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cracker">cracker</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/turkish cracker">turkish cracker</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attack">attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/patriotism">patriotism</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/org">org</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/reason">reason</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/zone-h">zone-h</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/intrusion">intrusion</category>
      <source url="http://cyberinsecure.com/malaysian-kaspersky-antivirus-website-has-been-hacked-in-an-sql-injection-attack/">Malaysian Kaspersky Antivirus Website Has Been Hacked In An SQL Injection Attack</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Assessing the Security Benefits of Cloud Computing]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1e09e5c89f15d3a4df4ea921f9230c2d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1e09e5c89f15d3a4df4ea921f9230c2d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[With all this talk and reporting about security concerns, lets change the channel for a moment and assess the potential security benefits of Cloud Computing
In my view, there are some strong technical...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Is the glass half empty or half full?" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/94094843@N00/2292559560/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0; float: right; margin: 3px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3004/2292559560_378f226531_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Is the glass half empty or half full?" /></a></p>
<p>With all this <a href="http://cloudsecurity.org">talk</a> and <a href="http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=685308">reporting</a> about security concerns, lets change the channel for a moment and assess the <strong>potential security benefits</strong> of Cloud Computing.</p>
<p>In my view, there are some strong technical security arguments in favour of Cloud Computing - assuming we can find ways to manage the risks.</p>
<p>With this new paradigm come challenges <strong>and </strong>opportunities.  The challenges are getting plenty of attention - I&#8217;m regularly afforded the opportunity to <a href="http://www.gridtoday.com/grid/2422309.html">comment</a> on them, plus obviously I cover them on this blog.  However, lets not lose sight of the potential upside.</p>
<p>In this post, I walk through seven technical security benefits.  Some are immediate, others may arise over time and have conditions attached (some unstated for the sake of brevity).  However, I&#8217;m including the longer-range benefits now to raise awareness.  Some of the outcomes listed are available today without the Cloud, but they are either complex and slow to implement (and thus less likely to happen) or prohibitive for capital cost reasons.  I don&#8217;t claim this is a definitive list - it reflects where my thinking is today.</p>
<p>Some benefits depend on the Cloud service used and therefore do not apply across the board.  For example; I see no solid forensic benefits with SaaS.  Also, for space reasons, I&#8217;m purposely not including the &#8216;flip side&#8217; to these benefits, however if you read this blog regularly you should <a href="http://cloudsecurity.org/2008/04/24/cloud-stacks-please-mind-the-gap/">recognise some</a>.</p>
<p>On a sidenote, I believe the Cloud offers Small and Medium Businesses major potential security benefits.  Frequently SMBs struggle with limited or non-existent in-house INFOSEC resources and budgets.  The caveat is that the Cloud market is still very new - security offerings are somewhat foggy - making selection tricky.  Clearly, not all Cloud providers will offer the same security.</p>
<h4>Seven Technical Security Benefits of the Cloud</h4>
<h4>1. Centralised Data</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduced Data Leakage</strong>: this is the benefit I hear most from Cloud providers - and in my view they are right.  How many laptops do we need to lose before we get this?  How many backup tapes?  The data &#8220;landmines&#8221; of today could be greatly reduced by the Cloud as thin client technology becomes prevalent.  Small, temporary caches on handheld devices or Netbook computers pose less risk than transporting data buckets in the form of laptops.  Ask the CISO of any large company if all laptops have company &#8216;mandated&#8217; controls consistently applied; e.g. full disk encryption.  You&#8217;ll see the answer by looking at the whites of their eyes.  Despite best efforts around asset management and endpoint security we continue to see embarrassing and disturbing misses.  And what about SMBs?  How many use encryption for sensitive data, or even have a data classification policy in place?</li>
<li><strong>Monitoring benefits</strong>: central storage is easier to control and monitor.  The flipside is the nightmare scenario of <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/most-attractive-targets-saas/">comprehensive data theft</a>.  However, I would rather spend my time as a security professional figuring out smart ways to protect and monitor access to data stored in one place (with the benefit of situational advantage) than trying to figure out all the places where the company data resides across a myriad of thick clients!  You can get the benefits of Thin Clients today but Cloud Storage provides a way to centralise the data faster and potentially cheaper.  The logistical challenge today is getting Terabytes of data to the Cloud in the first place.</li>
</ul>
<h4>2. Incident Response / Forensics</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Forensic readiness</strong>: with Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers, I can build a dedicated forensic server in the same Cloud as my company and place it offline, ready for use when needed.  I would only need pay for storage until an incident happens and I need to bring it online.  I don&#8217;t need to call someone to bring it online or install some kind of remote boot software - I just click a button in the Cloud Providers web interface.  If I have multiple incident responders, I can give them a copy of the VM so we can distribute the forensic workload based on the job at hand or as new sources of evidence arise and need analysis.  To fully realise this benefit, commercial forensic software vendors would need to move away from archaic, physical dongle based licensing schemes to a network licensing model.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease evidence acquisition time</strong>: if a server in the Cloud gets compromised (i.e. broken into), I can now clone that server at the click of a mouse and make the cloned disks instantly available to my Cloud Forensics server.  I didn&#8217;t need to &#8220;find&#8221; storage or have it &#8220;ready, waiting and unused&#8221; - its just there.</li>
<li><strong>Eliminate or reduce service downtime</strong>: Note that in the above scenario I didn&#8217;t have to go tell the COO that the system needs to be taken offline for hours whilst I dig around in the RAID Array hoping that my physical acqusition toolkit is compatible (and that the version of RAID firmware isn&#8217;t supported by my forensic software).  Abstracting the hardware removes a barrier to even doing forensics in some situations.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease evidence transfer time</strong>: In the same Cloud, bit fot bit copies are super fast - made faster by that replicated, distributed filesystem my Cloud provider engineered for me.  From a network traffic perspective, it may even be free to make the copy in the same Cloud.  Without the Cloud, <strong>I </strong>would have to a lot of time consuming and expensive provisioning of physical devices.  I only pay for the storage as long as I need the evidence.</li>
<li><strong>Eliminate forensic image verification time</strong>: Some Cloud Storage implementations expose a cryptographic checksum or hash.  For example, Amazon S3 generates an MD5 hash <a href="http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/index.html?RESTObjectPUT.html">automagically</a> when you store an object.  In theory you no longer need to generate time-consuming MD5 checksums using external tools - its already there.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease time to access protected documents</strong>: Immense CPU power opens some doors.  Did the suspect password protect a document that is relevant to the investigation?  You can now test a wider range of candidate passwords in less time to speed investigations.</li>
</ul>
<h4>3. Password assurance testing (aka cracking)</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Decrease password cracking time</strong>: if your organisation regularly tests password strength by running password crackers you can use Cloud Compute to decrease crack time and you only pay for what you use.  Ironically, your cracking costs go up as people choose better passwords ;-).</li>
<li><strong>Keep cracking activities to dedicated machines</strong>: if today you use a distributed password cracker to spread the load across non-production machines, you can now put those agents in dedicated Compute instances - and thus stop mixing sensitive credentials with other workloads.</li>
</ul>
<h4>4. Logging</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>&#8220;Unlimited&#8221;, pay per drink storage</strong>: logging is often an afterthought, consequently insufficient disk space is allocated and logging is either non-existant or minimal.  Cloud Storage changes all this - no more &#8216;guessing&#8217; how much storage you need for standard logs.</li>
<li><strong>Improve log indexing and search</strong>: with your logs in the Cloud you can leverage Cloud Compute to index those logs in real-time and get the benefit of <a href="http://blogs.splunk.com/thewilde/2008/06/24/splunk-ninja-inside-the-cloud/">instant search results.</a> What is different here?  The Compute instances can be plumbed in and scale as needed based on the logging load - meaning a true real-time view.</li>
<li><strong>Getting compliant with Extended logging</strong>: most modern operating systems offer extended logging in the form of a C2 audit trail.  This is rarely enabled for fear of performance degradation and log size.  Now you can &#8216;opt-in&#8217; easily - if you are willing to pay for the enhanced logging, you can do so.  Granular logging makes compliance and investigations easier.</li>
</ul>
<h4>5. Improve the state of security software (performance)</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Drive vendors to create more efficient security software</strong>: Billable CPU cycles get noticed.  More attention will be paid to inefficient processes; e.g. poorly tuned security agents.  Process accounting will make a comeback as customers target &#8216;expensive&#8217; processes.  Security vendors that understand how to squeeze the most performance from their software will win.</li>
</ul>
<h4>6. Secure builds</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Pre-hardened, change control builds</strong>: this is primarily a benefit of virtualization based Cloud Computing.  Now you get a chance to start &#8217;secure&#8217; (by your own definition) - you create your Gold Image VM and clone away.  There are ways to do this today with bare-metal OS installs but frequently these require additional 3rd party tools, are time consuming to clone or add yet another agent to each endpoint.</li>
<li><strong>Reduce exposure through patching offline</strong>: Gold images can be kept up securely kept up to date.  Offline VMs can be conveniently patched &#8220;off&#8221; the network.</li>
<li><strong>Easier to test impact of security changes</strong>: this is a big one.  Spin up a copy of your production environment, implement a security change and test the impact at low cost, with minimal startup time.  This is a big deal and removes a major barrier to &#8216;doing&#8217; security in production environments.</li>
</ul>
<h4>7. Security Testing</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduce cost of testing security: </strong>a SaaS provider only passes on a portion of their security testing costs.  By sharing the same application as a service, you don&#8217;t foot the expensive security code review and/or penetration test.  Even with Platform as a Service (PaaS) where your developers get to write code, there are potential cost economies of scale (particularly around use of code scanning tools that sweep source code for security weaknesses).</li>
</ul>
<h4>Your Thoughts?</h4>
<p>What benefits do you see that I haven&#8217;t included in the above list?  Where do you agree/disagree and importantly, why?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~4/341289594" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/benefits">benefits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technical security benefits">technical security benefits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/based">based</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtualization based cloud">virtualization based cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/efficient security software">efficient security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security software">security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud market">cloud market</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~3/341289594/">Assessing the Security Benefits of Cloud Computing</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
