<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: daisy]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/daisy</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/574e62a66ed6f9890011069da999356d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/574e62a66ed6f9890011069da999356d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Reference
Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering by Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720, USA...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reference:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ireneos/publications/courses/cs262a.pdf" target="_blank">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</a> by Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley CA 94720, USA.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Abstract. Recently, wireless sensor devices have been widely deployed in various application settings (including environmental research, control systems, etc.). Because of the inherent unreliability of sensor readings, any kind of reasoning in sensor environments needs to carefully account for noise.  The key goal of pcet is to build an infrastructure that can automatically infer and reason about the probabilities of triggered events, using a principled probabilistic model for the underlying sensor data. Through such probabilistic reasoning, pcet can incorporate uncertainly factors and make finer – grain decisions on event occurrences. This is achieved through the use of a Bayesian Network to directly model and exploit correlations across different sensors and the definition of a complex – event language, which allows users / applications to create hierarchies of higher-level events. As experimental results verify, pcet simplifies the development process and boosts the efficiency of any system dealing with inherently uncertain data streams.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/probabilistic">probabilistic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/probabilistic complex event">probabilistic complex event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/probabilistic model">probabilistic model</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pcet simplifies">pcet simplifies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pcet">pcet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daisy zhe wang">daisy zhe wang</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/complex event language">complex event language</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless sensor devices">wireless sensor devices</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer science division">computer science division</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/09/21/probabilistic-complex-event-triggering-2/">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Counting What Really Counts]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2e806fac5cceab967c815ce141f11e22</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2e806fac5cceab967c815ce141f11e22</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Counting What Really Counts Adapted from an article by Harry Robinson, Six Sigma test productivity program manager at Microsoft and sent to me by Daisy Huss on the ACE Team The original article was...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Counting What Really Counts 
Adapted from an article by Harry Robinson, Six Sigma test productivity program manager at Microsoft and sent to me by Daisy Huss on the ACE Team
The original article was published in Interface in December 2001.
Scene one. You are picnicking by a river. You notice someone in distress in the water. You [...]]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/original article">original article</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/article">article</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/harry robinson">harry robinson</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daisy huss">daisy huss</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/counts">counts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ace team">ace team</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scene">scene</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/distress">distress</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/water">water</category>
      <source url="http://securitybuddha.com/2008/06/10/counting-what-really-counts/">Counting What Really Counts</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cd64d42036278624a678f60a3b4de1fd</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cd64d42036278624a678f60a3b4de1fd</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting paper, Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering , Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, circa...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>Here is an interesting paper, <a href="http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ireneos/publications/courses/cs262a.pdf" target="_blank">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</a>, Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, circa 2005.</p>
<p>One of the first things I noticed about the paper was the discussion of probability in the content of complex event processing, including Hidden Markov processes, Bayesian Belief Networks, and inference models.  </p>
<p>The second thing I noticed was that <a href="http://www.complexevents.com" target="_blank">David Luckham&#8217;s work on CEP</a> at Stanford was not referenced anywhere in the Berkeley paper.</p>
<p> </p>
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eventprocessing.wordpress.com/250/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thecepblog.com&blog=1100533&post=250&subd=eventprocessing&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/complex event">complex event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/probabilistic complex event">probabilistic complex event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/berkeley">berkeley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/berkeley paper">berkeley paper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/paper">paper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daisy zhe wang">daisy zhe wang</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bayesian belief networks">bayesian belief networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer science division">computer science division</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/liviu tancau">liviu tancau</category>
      <source url="http://thecepblog.com/2008/06/08/probabilistic-complex-event-triggering/">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fc05f99a7640669720c96104dd547c33</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fc05f99a7640669720c96104dd547c33</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting paper, Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering , Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, circa...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting paper, <a href="http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ireneos/publications/courses/cs262a.pdf" target="_blank">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</a>, Daisy Zhe Wang, Eirinaios Michelakis, and Liviu Tancau, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, circa 2005.</p>
<p>One of the first things I noticed about the paper was the discussion of probability in the content of complex event processing, including Hidden Markov processes, Bayesian Belief Networks, and inference models.  </p>
<p>The second thing I noticed was that <a href="http://www.complexevents.com" target="_blank">David Luckham&#8217;s work on CEP</a> at Stanford was not referenced anywhere in the Berkeley paper.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/complex event">complex event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/probabilistic complex event">probabilistic complex event</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/berkeley">berkeley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/berkeley paper">berkeley paper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/paper">paper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/daisy zhe wang">daisy zhe wang</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bayesian belief networks">bayesian belief networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer science division">computer science division</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/liviu tancau">liviu tancau</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/06/08/probabilistic-complex-event-triggering/">Probabilistic Complex Event Triggering</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
