<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: dbas]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/dbas</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[So, you think youve removed that sensitive data]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3aa780ad16748abf3e229b89747c299a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3aa780ad16748abf3e229b89747c299a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I had an interesting conversation with Alexander Kornbrust yesterday about cloning databases. Most DBAs I know copy database files from production to create staging, integration and test environments....]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I had an interesting conversation with Alexander Kornbrust yesterday about cloning databases. Most DBAs I know copy database files from production to create staging, integration and test environments. Those environments contain a lot of sensitive information (PII, CC, etc.) which is usually either deleted, scrambled or truncated. The problem with these solutions is that most [...]<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/slaviks-blog/WxxD?a=UBvwhH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/slaviks-blog/WxxD?i=UBvwhH" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/copy database files">copy database files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/alexander kornbrust yesterday">alexander kornbrust yesterday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/environments">environments</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/test environments">test environments</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sensitive information">sensitive information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lot">lot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pii">pii</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/databases">databases</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/solutions">solutions</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/slaviks-blog/WxxD/~3/298326768/">So, you think youve removed that sensitive data</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Guardium upgrade aims to block rogue DBAs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0cde6bc2e059368822e99a323e6f4010</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0cde6bc2e059368822e99a323e6f4010</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Guardium readies database protection software that aims to put controls on privileged users, including database administrators, who would otherwise have the ability to create and change...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Guardium readies database protection software that aims to put controls on privileged users, including database administrators, who would otherwise have the ability to create and change accounts.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/change accounts">change accounts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/database administrators">database administrators</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/aims">aims</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/users">users</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/controls">controls</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ability">ability</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/052308-guardium-database-administrators.html?fsrc=rss-security">Guardium upgrade aims to block rogue DBAs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Two-thirds of Oracle DBAs don't apply security patches]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/203e83eb36bb7f1468daf312f9dc5b05</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/203e83eb36bb7f1468daf312f9dc5b05</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Oracle issues dozens of security patches every quarter, but that doesn't mean database administrators are necessarily implementing...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Oracle issues dozens of security patches every quarter, but that doesn't mean database administrators are necessarily implementing them.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security patches">security patches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/oracle issues dozens">oracle issues dozens</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/database administrators">database administrators</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/necessarily">necessarily</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quarter">quarter</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/011408-two-thirds-of-oracle-dbas-dont.html?fsrc=rss-security">Two-thirds of Oracle DBAs don't apply security patches</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
