<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: flagship]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/flagship</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Opera patches 7 bugs, but keeps one secret]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/4b997653100bca02cc00354a6ada4462</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/4b997653100bca02cc00354a6ada4462</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Opera Software ASA patched seven vulnerabilities in its flagship browser, but omitted information on one of the fixes, hinting that other software remains at risk from a cross-site scripting...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Opera Software ASA patched seven vulnerabilities in its flagship  browser, but omitted information on one of the fixes, hinting that other software remains at risk from a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=J1MU0i"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=J1MU0i" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/370220193" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/opera software asa">opera software asa</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software remains">software remains</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flagship browser">flagship browser</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cross-site">cross-site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fixes">fixes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/risk">risk</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/370220193/article.do">Opera patches 7 bugs, but keeps one secret</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Symantec says security software needs speed]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ccc80cb82d7c187804132bdb9fc2550b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ccc80cb82d7c187804132bdb9fc2550b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Pointing to significant improvements in performance, Symantec Corp. has posted preview versions of its flagship Windows security...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Pointing to significant improvements in performance, Symantec Corp. has posted  preview versions of its flagship Windows security software.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=pHMGqt"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=pHMGqt" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/336399197" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/preview versions">preview versions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/significant improvements">significant improvements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/symantec corp">symantec corp</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/performance">performance</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/336399197/article.do">Symantec says security software needs speed</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Symantec says security software needs speed]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a2ec27fc6093e4201fa09a0849ea6dec</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a2ec27fc6093e4201fa09a0849ea6dec</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Symantec released beta versions of its flagship Windows software Tuesday, citing significant improvements in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Symantec released beta versions of its flagship Windows software Tuesday, citing significant improvements in performance.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/significant improvements">significant improvements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/symantec">symantec</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/beta versions">beta versions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/performance">performance</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071508-symantec-says-security-software-needs.html?fsrc=rss-security">Symantec says security software needs speed</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[You dont think they would install Vista do you?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a6adede95a24680736503522afb1701f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a6adede95a24680736503522afb1701f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[For the love of all thats holy, dont install Vista


clipped from www.theregister.co.uk
Upgrade drags Stealth Bomber IT systems into the 90s


While it might seem odd to some readers that the US Air...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div > For the love of all thats holy, dont install Vista! </div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/4FA614C4-DCE2-495F-928E-1722E6706F8D/" title="go to this clipmark"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_icon/4858925a-f32e-4ded-9d67-2d43d00d22c9/4FA614C4-DCE2-495F-928E-1722E6706F8D/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/11/stealth_bomber_upgrades/" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/11/stealth_bomber_upgrades/" style="font-size: 11px;">www.theregister.co.uk</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/11/stealth_bomber_upgrades/ --><H2>Upgrade drags Stealth Bomber IT systems into the 90s</H2></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/11/stealth_bomber_upgrades/ --><P>While it might seem odd to some readers that the US Air Force&#8217;s multibillion dollar flagship plane is only now &#8220;upgrading&#8221; to fairly basic tech, this is commonplace in advanced aerospace and military kit. The space shuttle&#8217;s flight computers, similarly critical to it remaining under control, are likewise basic. In the early years of the 21st century, the main battle computer of a Royal Navy destroyer was still based around two 24-bit, 1 MHz processors each with 25KB of RAM.</P></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;">
<table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td>
<td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/4FA614C4-DCE2-495F-928E-1722E6706F8D/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/install vista">install vista</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/royal navy destroyer">royal navy destroyer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/main battle computer">main battle computer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fairly basic tech">fairly basic tech</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/military kit">military kit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/likewise basic">likewise basic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/similarly critical">similarly critical</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mhz processors">mhz processors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/21st century">21st century</category>
      <source url="http://spywarebiz.com/spywarebizblog/?p=500">You dont think they would install Vista do you?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New SDL Website]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0ac129425f76ea795015d9b0bf55a6a0</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0ac129425f76ea795015d9b0bf55a6a0</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all, Dave here
Im pleased to announce the availability of new resources for the Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL
We have recently launched a dedicated SDL website at...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Hi all, Dave here…</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">I’m pleased to announce the availability of new resources for the Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL).&nbsp; </SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">We have recently launched a dedicated SDL website at <A href="http://www.microsoft.com/sdl">www.microsoft.com/sdl</A>. This website will serve as the main online presence for all SDL related communications and resources from Microsoft. </SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">For several years now the SDL has been at the heart of Microsoft’s strategy for making security and privacy an integral part of the software development culture at Microsoft. As a result of the SDL, we have seen significant security improvements across many flagship Microsoft products including Windows, SQL Server and others. These security improvements have been widely recognized by security analysts, researchers and other experts. However, despite the significant improvements and recognition, we believe that our connections to our broad technical audiences (developers and IT Pros) are not equating the SDL to the progress we have made with our technologies and services.</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Given that, our goal is to help illustrate SDL processes and tooling in a structured and consistent manner – by providing <EM>actionable</EM> guidance for the different job roles within a development organization.</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">We welcome your feedback – on the site, and on other information you’d find useful in evaluating the SDL. </SPAN></P><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8718816" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sdl">sdl</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sdl website">sdl website</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security analysts">security analysts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/significant security improvements">significant security improvements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sdl processes">sdl processes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/website">website</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security improvements">security improvements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <source url="http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/07/10/new-sdl-website.aspx">New SDL Website</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Opera patches multiple bugs in flagship browser]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/b748b7e635b7934e3b11505e44c531ad</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/b748b7e635b7934e3b11505e44c531ad</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Opera Software has patched the newest version of its flagship browser, releasing Opera 9.5.1 to fix several...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Opera Software has patched the newest version of its flagship browser, releasing Opera 9.5.1 to fix several flaws.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=b3RzlI"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=b3RzlI" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/325873033" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/opera">opera</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flagship browser">flagship browser</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/opera software">opera software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fix">fix</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version">version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flaws">flaws</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/325873033/article.do">Opera patches multiple bugs in flagship browser</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security - Passive versus active response]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/84888d9fd6b0b675d70d2dda34e6b84c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/84888d9fd6b0b675d70d2dda34e6b84c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here at the well-heeled Gartner IT Security Conference at the brand new, spectacular Gaylord National hotel. The hotel is only 2 months old or so, but it is supposedly the largest on the East coast...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Here at the well-heeled Gartner IT Security Conference at the brand new, spectacular <a href="http://www.gaylordhotels.com/gaylord-national/" target="_blank">Gaylord National</a> hotel.&nbsp; The hotel is only 2 months old or so, but it is supposedly the largest on the East coast and really first rate.&nbsp; Also, the Gartner folks put on a first rate show, though it is on the pricey side for everyone from exhibitors to attendees. Vendors who really want to have a big presence are in for big bucks reaching a relatively small number of customers.&nbsp; It was good to run into a number of StillSecure customers here at the show.&nbsp; Even though we did not exhibit our presence was felt in several of the tracks discussing security solution areas that we offer products in.</p>

<p>While at the show I had a chance to catch up with several other security vendors.&nbsp; One fellow I spoke to was Phil Neray of <a href="http://www.guardium.com/" target="_blank">Guardium</a>.&nbsp; Guardium is best known for providing database security to many of the largest financial institutions and other large companies.&nbsp; They recently announced a <a href="http://www.guardium.com/index.php/pr/368" target="_blank">major new release</a> of their flagship product with something they call &quot;S-GATE&quot;. I won't bore you with all of the details but the gist of it is that for the first time database security can move from passively reporting or alerting of data access violations to actively blocking such violations.&nbsp; </p>

<p>For me the active versus passive mode of security is one that transcends different layers of security.&nbsp; Whether we are talking about IDS passive response versus IPS active response, vulnerability scanning passively assessing and reporting to NAC testing and blocking access, to now database access, ultimately security follows a similar route. First comes the ability to actually detect.&nbsp; Often times the ability to detect is a major step up from what was available before.&nbsp; The next evolutionary phase is to be able to prevent or block the dangerous or malicious event from taking place.</p>

<p>This active blocking mode though is often not as readily accepted at first by the market.&nbsp; Everyone is always afraid of blocking the wrong user, the wrong email message or other request.&nbsp; I think it is part of human nature that we inherently distrust our technology to block, always thinking it will block legitimate traffic.&nbsp; This has been true in every security technology I have seen.&nbsp; Eventually active response does win out, but it takes time and there are always doubters.&nbsp; It will be interesting if what Guardium has done here is viewed with the same suspicions at first and than catches on or not.&nbsp; We will have to watch.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security conference">security conference</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security technology">security technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security solution">security solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time database security">time database security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vendors">security vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/database security">database security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data access violations">data access violations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/violations">violations</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/security---pass.html">Security - Passive versus active response</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security - Passive versus active response]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/77f35ab7df9439fe7cffddb3716d58a9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/77f35ab7df9439fe7cffddb3716d58a9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here at the well-heeled Gartner IT Security Conference at the brand new, spectacular Gaylord National hotel. The hotel is only 2 months old or so, but it is supposedly the largest on the East coast...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Here at the well-heeled Gartner IT Security Conference at the brand new, spectacular <a href="http://www.gaylordhotels.com/gaylord-national/" target="_blank">Gaylord National</a> hotel.&nbsp; The hotel is only 2 months old or so, but it is supposedly the largest on the East coast and really first rate.&nbsp; Also, the Gartner folks put on a first rate show, though it is on the pricey side for everyone from exhibitors to attendees. Vendors who really want to have a big presence are in for big bucks reaching a relatively small number of customers.&nbsp; It was good to run into a number of StillSecure customers here at the show.&nbsp; Even though we did not exhibit our presence was felt in several of the tracks discussing security solution areas that we offer products in.</p> <p>While at the show I had a chance to catch up with several other security vendors.&nbsp; One fellow I spoke to was Phil Neray of <a href="http://www.guardium.com" target="_blank">Guardium</a>.&nbsp; Guardium is best known for providing database security to many of the largest financial institutions and other large companies.&nbsp; They recently announced a <a href="http://www.guardium.com/index.php/pr/368" target="_blank">major new release</a> of their flagship product with something they call "S-GATE". I won't bore you with all of the details but the gist of it is that for the first time database security can move from passively reporting or alerting of data access violations to actively blocking such violations.&nbsp; </p> <p>For me the active versus passive mode of security is one that transcends different layers of security.&nbsp; Whether we are talking about IDS passive response versus IPS active response, vulnerability scanning passively assessing and reporting to NAC testing and blocking access, to now database access, ultimately security follows a similar route. First comes the ability to actually detect.&nbsp; Often times the ability to detect is a major step up from what was available before.&nbsp; The next evolutionary phase is to be able to prevent or block the dangerous or malicious event from taking place.</p> <p>This active blocking mode though is often not as readily accepted at first by the market.&nbsp; Everyone is always afraid of blocking the wrong user, the wrong email message or other request.&nbsp; I think it is part of human nature that we inherently distrust our technology to block, always thinking it will block legitimate traffic.&nbsp; This has been true in every security technology I have seen.&nbsp; Eventually active response does win out, but it takes time and there are always doubters.&nbsp; It will be interesting if what Guardium has done here is viewed with the same suspicions at first and than catches on or not.&nbsp; We will have to watch.</p></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=DBbfoA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=DBbfoA" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=m2FyxI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=m2FyxI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=1EKWlI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=1EKWlI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=xTyIxI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=xTyIxI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=GcRP4I"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=GcRP4I" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ReX3ii"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ReX3ii" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Ee92Xi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Ee92Xi" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/304033131" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security conference">security conference</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security technology">security technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security solution">security solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time database security">time database security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vendors">security vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/database security">database security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data access violations">data access violations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/violations">violations</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/304033131/security---pass.html">Security - Passive versus active response</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Parliament, Spy Agency Contracts Exempted From Ombudsmans Gaze]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0317ed628b327ca4495ddc4bee31d829</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0317ed628b327ca4495ddc4bee31d829</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[From the Canadian Press
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his cabinet have exempted contracts with Parliament and Canadas spy agency from oversight by a new ombudsmans post that was central to the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/impotence.jpg" alt="impotence" title="impotence" width="350" height="466" /></center></p>
<p>From the Canadian Press:</p>
<blockquote><p>Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his cabinet have exempted contracts with Parliament and Canada&#8217;s spy agency from oversight by a new ombudsman&#8217;s post that was central to the 2006 Conservative election campaign.</p>
<p>The government slipped the exemptions through last week in regulations that empower the contract procurement ombudsman under the Accountability Act - flagship legislation the government introduced as its first bill soon after taking office.</p>
<p>Opposition MPs were taken by surprise at the exemptions, saying they were unaware the Senate, the House of Commons and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service would be excluded from the ombudsman&#8217;s statutory duty to review contracts for &#8220;fairness, openness and transparency.&#8221;</p>
<p>The exemptions also mean anyone who has a complaint about contracts to supply goods or services to Parliament - including contracts with offices of MPs, senators or CSIS, will be unable to have them reviewed by the ombudsman.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, now that seems reasonable. (insert <b><i>heavy</i></b> sarcasm)</p>
<p><a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5hJS90PcsLEdcvOpNpQ7UeeFE3E3g">Article Link</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?a=sVUfWP"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?i=sVUfWP" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=J3mkvH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=J3mkvH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=JDcMQh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=JDcMQh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=CZll9h"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=CZll9h" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=50H8gh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=50H8gh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=XO40Kh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=XO40Kh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~4/293942369" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 22:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/contracts">contracts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/review contracts">review contracts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ombudsman">ombudsman</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/parliament">parliament</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/contract procurement ombudsman">contract procurement ombudsman</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/opposition mps">opposition mps</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ombudsmans statutory duty">ombudsmans statutory duty</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/canadas spy agency">canadas spy agency</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/insert heavy sarcasm">insert heavy sarcasm</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~3/293942369/">Parliament, Spy Agency Contracts Exempted From Ombudsmans Gaze</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lavasoft Releases Ad-Aware 2008 Beta]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/868d79d92ed36777f0b6cc0a1d699e8a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/868d79d92ed36777f0b6cc0a1d699e8a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Gothenburg, Sweden (April 22, 2008) Well-known security software company Lavasoft, today announced the beta release of Ad-Aware 2008, the latest version of the pioneer anti-spyware solution, now also...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span lang="EN-US">Gothenburg, Sweden (April 22, 2008) Well-known security software company Lavasoft, today announced the beta release of Ad-Aware 2008, the latest version of the pioneer anti-spyware solution, now also featuring integrated anti-virus protection. The new version of their flagship product features an extended engine designed to address the growing complexities of today&#8217;s spyware, viruses and other malware threats. Ad-Aware&#8217;s new engine boosts detection to include over one million additional cyber threats.</span></p>
<p><span lang="EN-US">The Ad-Aware 2008 Beta is now available for download at </span><a href="http://www.lavasoft.com/"><span lang="EN-US">www.lavasoft.com</span></a><span lang="EN-US"> in the Lavasoft Security Center.</span></p>
<p>You can buy the 2007 version at</p>
<p><a title="SpywareBiz AntiSpyware Page for Ad- Aware 2007" href="http://www.spywarebiz.com/spyantispy.htm" target="_blank">http://www.spywarebiz.com/spyantispy.htm</a> for $ 24.95</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lavasoft">lavasoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/beta">beta</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lavasoft security center">lavasoft security center</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ad-aware">ad-aware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/engine">engine</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/engine boosts detection">engine boosts detection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pioneer anti-spyware solution">pioneer anti-spyware solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flagship product features">flagship product features</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version">version</category>
      <source url="http://spywarebiz.com/spywarebizblog/?p=437">Lavasoft Releases Ad-Aware 2008 Beta</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
