<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: german]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/german</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Keylogger Or False Positive Detected in Wall-E Demo?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bdaaa16ca0ffbacb4a405b5a248888de</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bdaaa16ca0ffbacb4a405b5a248888de</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I woke this morning to find an interesting set of blog entries regarding the Wall-E demo game from THQ - someone downloaded the demo and found their AV scanner flagging it as potentially dangerous

A...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        I woke this morning to find an interesting set of blog entries regarding the Wall-E demo game from THQ - someone downloaded the demo and found their AV scanner flagging it as potentially dangerous.<br /><br />A quick roundup of posts:<br /><br /><b>1)</b> Security researcher Timeless Prototype downloads the Wall-E demo, only to find his <a href="http://www.timelessprototype.com/tpdc/blog/post/2008/08/Keylogger-Detected-in-Wall-E-Demo-PC-Game.aspx">antivirus software going crazy</a>. It has detected <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2004-052616-5512-99">Spyware.Ardakey</a>.<br /><br /><b>2)</b> Over at Spyware Sucks, Sandi Hardmeier decides to try <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/spywaresucks/archive/2008/08/03/1643166.aspx">downloading versions of the game from different regions</a>, only to find the French, German ,Danish and Italian versions are all 177MB in size, whereas the US version is "only" 133MB. Furthermore, the 177MB versions all have different filenames. Note that (so far) it's the UK version (clocking in at 177MB) that has been snagged by an antivirus program. As Sandi notes, there is no way an extra 40-odd MB are needed for a keylogger, so why the extra filesize?<br /><br />3) Wayne Porter <a href="http://www.wayneporter.com/2008/08/02/keyloggers-games/">contacted Cachefly</a> (who manage the servers the game is downloading from), and they said this:<br /><br /><i>"I can confirm that our servers were not compromised, beyond that I can't offer much else.<br /><br />Obviously we'd like to be as helpful as possible, but since it's related to customer data we're rather limited in what we can discuss. I've opened a ticket to make THQ aware of this, and we can/will work them on tracking stuff down if we need to (we do have a history of all versions of a file w/ filesizes/md5 checksums, and the dates/times/src ip of all revisions)."</i><br /><br />The 177MB file is still available to download, I grabbed it a little earlier on today:<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="walle3.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/walle3.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="186" width="380" /></span>
<br /><br />What we <i>really</i> need to know, is if this is anything to be worried about or not. I would have contacted THQ UK directly, but they <a href="http://www.thq-games.com/uk/pages/contact">don't seem to be available</a> on a Sunday. Until this is resolved one way or another, I'd have to advise people not to download this demo as a precaution until THQ (or Norton, whose AV program flagged the file) have clarified exactly what is going on here. We're currently running some more antivirus / antispyware scans against the download in question, but as you can imagine, this takes some time. A particular problem here is that there are issues submitting a file like this to sites such as <a href="http://www.virustotal.com/">Virustotal.com</a>, because of their 10MB file size limit.<br /><br />Sorting this one out might take a while...<br /><br />/ Update - some people are saying AVAST <a href="http://games.internode.on.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1844560">flags the file</a>, too.<br />
        
    ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 07:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/demo">demo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wall-e demo">wall-e demo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/177mb versions">177mb versions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/versions">versions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wall-e demo game">wall-e demo game</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/177mb">177mb</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/file">file</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/177mb file">177mb file</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/10mb file">10mb file</category>
      <source url="http://blog.spywareguide.com/2008/08/walle.html">Keylogger Or False Positive Detected in Wall-E Demo?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[World War II Deception Story]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ffeef2b2ecdc9709d491f4a4c3ecd7f5</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ffeef2b2ecdc9709d491f4a4c3ecd7f5</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Great security story from an obituary of former OSS agent Roger Hall: One of his favorite OSS stories involved a colleague sent to occupied France to destroy a seemingly impenetrable German tank at a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/obituaries/20080723_Roger_Hall___Poked_fun_at_spies__89.html">security story</a> from an obituary of former OSS agent Roger Hall:</p>

<blockquote>One of his favorite OSS stories involved a colleague sent to occupied France to destroy a seemingly impenetrable German tank at a key crossroads. The French resistance found that grenades were no use. 

<p>The OSS man, fluent in German and dressed like a French peasant, walked up to the tank and yelled, "Mail!" </p>

<p>The lid opened, and in went two grenades.</blockquote></p>

<p>Hall's book about his OSS days, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Youre-Stepping-Cloak-Dagger-Bluejacket/dp/1591143535/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1"><i>You're Stepping on My Cloak and Dagger,</i></a> is a must read.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=urokhJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=urokhJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=TBL5AJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=TBL5AJ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/oss">oss</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/oss days">oss days</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/favorite oss stories">favorite oss stories</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/grenades">grenades</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/french resistance">french resistance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/french peasant">french peasant</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/key crossroads">key crossroads</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security story">security story</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dagger">dagger</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/world_war_ii_de.html">World War II Deception Story</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Monday merger-mania in security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bce33b1277b9cd2ece821973cc19a401</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bce33b1277b9cd2ece821973cc19a401</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it. Today...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it.&nbsp; Today saw two meaningful deals announced that could have an impact on the security landscape:</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3761786/Sophos+Utimaco+Buy+Targets+Endpoint+Security.htm">Sophos buys Utimaco</a> - Saw this one when I woke up today, as it is a European deal.&nbsp; UK based <a class="zem_slink" title="Sophos" href="http://www.sophos.com/" rel="homepage">Sophos</a> is buying German based Utimaco, makers of the SafeGuard line of data encryption/protection/DLP product line.&nbsp; Sophos is paying cash $340 million US for in this deal.&nbsp; This means they are substantially dipping into the credit market, as this is far more than they reported cash on hand. So like the Brocade/Foundry deal, the acquiring company feels strong enough about the acquisition to mortgage the house to get it.&nbsp; In this case, I think Sophos is making a smart deal. They clearly say that to compete with <a class="zem_slink" title="Symantec" href="http://www.symantec.com/" rel="homepage">Symantec</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="McAfee" href="http://www.mcafee.com/" rel="homepage">McAfee</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/" rel="homepage">Microsoft</a> they are going to need a full endpoint security suite. AV alone is not just going to cut it. This gives Sophos a real play in DLP and data storage space.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Yes they could have just done a partner deal for this type of technology, but I applaud them for going out and buying the technology.&nbsp; I wondered if they would use this as a reverse merger entry to the public markets but it doesn't look like that.&nbsp; In any event it looks like Sophos is making the play and spending the bucks to be a player in the endpoint security suite game.</p>

<p>2. <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30411">Motorola buys AirDefense</a> - Well one of the air brothers finally found a taker. I always thought that for all of the press AirDefense, AirTight and AirMagnet receive, the revenue just didn't match the hype. Stand alone wireless security was a tweener.&nbsp; Would traditional security cover wireless or would traditional wireless cover wireless security.&nbsp; In any event a stand along wireless security play is a tough road.&nbsp; So with this answer <a class="zem_slink" title="Motorola" href="http://www.motorola.com/" rel="homepage">Motorola</a> says wireless handles wireless security.&nbsp; </p>

<p>My question is what does the future hold for Motorola.&nbsp; They are reportedly getting out of the cell phone business.&nbsp; Is their wireless business, even a secure one enough to support this giant?&nbsp; I don't know but there is a bit of &quot;dead man walking&quot; over there if you ask me.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I think the play is clear though that wireless providers are going to snap up wireless security companies. The real issue is at what prices.&nbsp; If anyone hears a price on this one, let me know. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Manta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10000548-83.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Sophi's bids on Utica to strengthen endpoint security</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html">Sophi's plans to acquire data security company</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security play">wireless security play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play">play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos buys utimaco">sophos buys utimaco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos">sophos</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deal">deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart deal">smart deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security">wireless security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brocadefoundry deal">brocadefoundry deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/motorola">motorola</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/monday-merger-m.html">Monday merger-mania in security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Monday merger-mania in security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c19f4a038131d5dec9a148005e6b400e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c19f4a038131d5dec9a148005e6b400e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it. Today...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Not sure if it is because of the slumping market and economy or in spite of it, but there pace of merger activity has been picking up lately and the security industry has not been immune to it.&nbsp; Today saw two meaningful deals announced that could have an impact on the security landscape:</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3761786/Sophos+Utimaco+Buy+Targets+Endpoint+Security.htm">Sophos buys Utimaco</a> - Saw this one when I woke up today, as it is a European deal.&nbsp; UK based <a class="zem_slink" title="Sophos" href="http://www.sophos.com/" rel="homepage">Sophos</a> is buying German based Utimaco, makers of the SafeGuard line of data encryption/protection/DLP product line.&nbsp; Sophos is paying cash $340 million US for in this deal.&nbsp; This means they are substantially dipping into the credit market, as this is far more than they reported cash on hand. So like the Brocade/Foundry deal, the acquiring company feels strong enough about the acquisition to mortgage the house to get it.&nbsp; In this case, I think Sophos is making a smart deal. They clearly say that to compete with <a class="zem_slink" title="Symantec" href="http://www.symantec.com/" rel="homepage">Symantec</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="McAfee" href="http://www.mcafee.com/" rel="homepage">McAfee</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/worldwide/" rel="homepage">Microsoft</a> they are going to need a full endpoint security suite. AV alone is not just going to cut it. This gives Sophos a real play in DLP and data storage space.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Yes they could have just done a partner deal for this type of technology, but I applaud them for going out and buying the technology.&nbsp; I wondered if they would use this as a reverse merger entry to the public markets but it doesn't look like that.&nbsp; In any event it looks like Sophos is making the play and spending the bucks to be a player in the endpoint security suite game.</p>

<p>2. <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30411">Motorola buys AirDefense</a> - Well one of the air brothers finally found a taker. I always thought that for all of the press AirDefense, AirTight and AirMagnet receive, the revenue just didn't match the hype. Stand alone wireless security was a tweener.&nbsp; Would traditional security cover wireless or would traditional wireless cover wireless security.&nbsp; In any event a stand along wireless security play is a tough road.&nbsp; So with this answer <a class="zem_slink" title="Motorola" href="http://www.motorola.com/" rel="homepage">Motorola</a> says wireless handles wireless security.&nbsp; </p>

<p>My question is what does the future hold for Motorola.&nbsp; They are reportedly getting out of the cell phone business.&nbsp; Is their wireless business, even a secure one enough to support this giant?&nbsp; I don't know but there is a bit of &quot;dead man walking&quot; over there if you ask me.&nbsp; </p>

<p>I think the play is clear though that wireless providers are going to snap up wireless security companies. The real issue is at what prices.&nbsp; If anyone hears a price on this one, let me know. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Manta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10000548-83.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Sophi's bids on Utica to strengthen endpoint security</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html?source=rss&amp;url=http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/28/Sophos_plans_to_acquire_data_security_company_1.html">Sophi's plans to acquire data security company</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=b28c9731-f42d-42a3-b409-5a5c5b38b751" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ujW6ul"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ujW6ul" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=9LTeDJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=9LTeDJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=yIFCWJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=yIFCWJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=skJxZJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=skJxZJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=6vZwXJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=6vZwXJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=IQfuGj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=IQfuGj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=pYiVbj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=pYiVbj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/349022019" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security play">wireless security play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play">play</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos buys utimaco">sophos buys utimaco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sophos">sophos</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deal">deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart deal">smart deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless security">wireless security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brocadefoundry deal">brocadefoundry deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/motorola">motorola</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/349022019/monday-merger-m.html">Monday merger-mania in security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Sophos plans to acquire German data security company]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/4c68143813033e1f42986b7a6b3338cc</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/4c68143813033e1f42986b7a6b3338cc</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Security vendor Sophos plans to acquire Utimaco, a German company specializing in software that aims to prevent sensitive data from escaping corporate networks, an increasing focus with the rise in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Security vendor Sophos plans to acquire Utimaco, a German company specializing in software that aims to prevent sensitive data from escaping corporate networks, an increasing focus with the rise in data breaches.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prevent sensitive data">prevent sensitive data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/german company">german company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data breaches">data breaches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acquire utimaco">acquire utimaco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/focus">focus</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/aims">aims</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072808-sophos-plans-to-acquire-german.html?fsrc=rss-security">Sophos plans to acquire German data security company</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities in Antivirus Software - Conflict of Interest]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/99630b84f67151661d9187260dcf552f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/99630b84f67151661d9187260dcf552f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Vulnerabilities within security solutions -- antivirus software in this case -- are a natural event, however, the conflict of interests and failure of communication between those finding them and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="text-align: center; clear: both;"><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SIg38-WOQQI/AAAAAAAAB9M/PHaw4e4SYmo/s1600-h/nruns_mcafee_av_vulnerabilities.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="border: 0pt none ; background-color: transparent; clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; margin-right: 1em;"><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SIg38-WOQQI/AAAAAAAAB9M/xp4nOKjGb1Q/s200-R/nruns_mcafee_av_vulnerabilities.JPG" style="border: 0pt none ;" /></a></div>Vulnerabilities within security solutions -- antivirus software in this case -- are a natural event, however, the conflict of interests and failure of communication between those finding them and those failing to acknowledge them as vulnerabilities in general, harms the customer. How they get count, and how is their severity measured in a situation where a vulnerability bypassing the scanning method of an antivirus software allowing malware to sneak in, is less important than a remote code execution through the antivirus software, is a good example of short sightedness. Here's a related development regarding a recent study regarding vulnerabilities in antivirus software - "<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1538">McAfee debunks recent vulnerabilities in AV software research, n.runs restates its position</a>" :<br />
<br />
"<i>Several days after blogging about a research conduced by n.runs AG that managed to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1445" title="Approximately 800 vulnerabilities discovered in antivirus products">discover approximately 800 vulnerabilities in antivirus products</a>, McAfee issued a statement basically <a href="http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2008/07/10/vulnerabilities-in-av-software/" title="Vulnerabilities in AV software">debunking the number of vulnerabilities found</a>, and providing its own account into the number of vulnerabilities affecting its own products :</i><br />
<br />
<i>“A recent <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1445">ZDnet blog</a> discusses a large number of vulnerabilities German research team N.Runs says it found in antimalware products from nearly every vendor. The ZDNet posting includes scary graphs to frighten users of security products. We researched the N.Runs claims by analyzing the raw data and found their claims to be somewhat exaggerated. We will discuss our findings (and make available our source data) in the attached <a href="http://vil.nai.com/images/AvertBlog_Vulnerabilities%20in%20AV%20software.pdf">document</a>. We have also provided our <a href="http://vil.nai.com/images/AvertBlog%20-%20800%20vulns.xls">source data</a> for anyone who wishes to examine it.”</i><br />
<br />
<i>Today, n.runs AG has issued <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/aps-av/nruns/prweb1134004.htm" title="Over 800 Vulnerabilities in Anti-Virus Software -- Reaction to the McAfee Statement">a response to McAfee’s statement</a>, providing even more <a href="http://www.nruns.com/_downloads/PR-08-02_Reaction_to_McAfee_statement.pdf" title="Response to McAfee Statement">insights into the vulnerabilities they’ve managed to find</a>, how they found them, and why are the affected antivirus vendors questioning the number of flaws in general.</i>"<br />
<br />
Consider going through the <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1538">interview with Thierry Zoller</a> as well. <br />
<br />
<b>Related posts:</b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2005/12/0bay-how-realistic-is-market-for.html">0bay - how realistic is the market for security vulnerabilities?</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/01/was-wmf-vulnerability-purchased-for.html">Was the WMF vulnerability purchased for $4000?!</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/03/wheres-my-0day-please.html">Where's my 0day, please?</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/07/scientifically-predicting-software.html">Scientifically Predicting Software Vulnerabilities</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/09/zero-day-initiative-upcoming-zero-day.html">Zero Day Initiative "Upcoming Zero Day Vulnerabilities"</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/05/delaying-yesterdays-0day-security.html">Delaying Yesterday's "0day" Security Vulnerability</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/05/shaping-market-for-security.html">Shaping the Market for Security Vulnerabilities Through Exploit Derivatives</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/zero-day-vulnerabilities-market-model.html">Zero Day Vulnerabilities Market Model Gone Wrong</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/07/zero-day-vulnerabilities-auction.html">Zero Day Vulnerabilities Auction</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/01/zero-day-vulnerabilities-cash-bubble.html">The Zero Day Vulnerabilities Cash Bubble</a><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=uv22wJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=uv22wJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=tablsJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=tablsJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=vwps8j"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=vwps8j" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5n0xGj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5n0xGj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=JzfTJJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=JzfTJJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=iUBJIJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=iUBJIJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=MwfvGj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=MwfvGj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/344429091" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/day vulnerabilities">day vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vulnerabilities">security vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/antivirus software">antivirus software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/day vulnerabilities auction">day vulnerabilities auction</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software vulnerabilities">software vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/products">products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/runs claims">runs claims</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security products">security products</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/344429091/vulnerabilities-in-antivirus-software.html">Vulnerabilities in Antivirus Software - Conflict of Interest</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: Germans Can Leave Networks Open; Belkin Announces Wireless High-Def]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ab835f6a5c216960e3543aadfe5ce5d5</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ab835f6a5c216960e3543aadfe5ce5d5</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A German appeals court says an open Wi-Fi network isn't equivalent to the owner's responsibility for actions over that network: This decisions overturns a lower court's ruling in a peer-to-peer file...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080710-open-wifi-network-viable-defense-against-infringement-chargeat-least-in-germany.html"><strong>A German appeals court says an open Wi-Fi network isn't equivalent to the owner's responsibility for actions over that network:</strong></a> This decisions overturns a lower court's ruling in a peer-to-peer file sharing copyright infringement case that the owner of a Wi-Fi network was de facto culpable for any activity that could be tracked back to the network's IP address. The appeals court said without specific evidence that the person charged had committed the infringement there's no case--and no requirement to lock down the network to avoid such lawsuits. If the decision had been upheld, it would have likely led to more broadside charges worldwide, as well as a vast reduction in open networks.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080710005104&newsLang=en"><strong>Belkin gives us plenty of time to get ready for streaming high def:</strong></a> FlyWire uses an adapted form of Wi-Fi in the 5 GHz band to stream HD without having the HD set in close proximity. They're not shipping until October, which could give you some time to get used to the price tag. A $1,000 model is designed to cover a home, and has various infrared and wireless options to control current A/V gear, some of which might be hidden in cabinets away from view. A cheaper $700 option covers just one room, Belkin says, and excludes the IR help. The transmitter has 3 HDMI jacks, including DVI support with audio inputs, along with two component and one composite video and audio input panels. The receiver has a single HDMI output. All HD resolutions are supported. These devices are aimed at people who buy large HDTVs and want to wall mount them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi network">wi-fi network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/appeals court">appeals court</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/german appeals court">german appeals court</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/belkin">belkin</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/audio input panels">audio input panels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/broadside charges worldwide">broadside charges worldwide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/infringement">infringement</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008392.html">Wee-Fi: Germans Can Leave Networks Open; Belkin Announces Wireless High-Def</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Simple oversight at TNS Infratest exposes participant information]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ca9bbb88145ecdbedb20b4a7aa81936a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ca9bbb88145ecdbedb20b4a7aa81936a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: Security Breach

Date Reported
7/4/08

Organization
Taylor Nelson Sofres plc (TNS

Contractor/Consultant/Branch
TNS Infratest

Victims
Survey participants

Number Affected
41,000
...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/security+breach" rel="tag">Security Breach</a><br><br>
<img src="http://breachblog.com/images/95781-88451/tns.jpg" width="98" align="right" height="98"><font size="2"><b>Date Reported: </b><br>7/4/08<br><br><b>Organization: </b><br><a href="http://www.tnsglobal.com/">Taylor Nelson Sofres plc (TNS)</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Contractor/Consultant/Branch:</span><br><a href="http://www.tns-infratest.com/">TNS Infratest</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Victims:</span><br>Survey participants<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Number Affected:</span><br>41,000<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Types of Data:</span><br>"Name and address, date of birth, email address and phone numbers", "Some of the data included monthly income, education, bank account information, health insurance data, and which credit cards are used"<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Breach Description:</span><br>"The scientific journal of the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), Die Datenschleuder, reports that market research firm TNS Infratest/Emnid has lost 41,000 private data records of their survey participants."<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Reference URL:</span><br><a href="http://www.ccc.de/updates/2008/umfragetief?language=en">Chaos Computer Club e.V.</a> <br><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/07/07/hackers-claim-survey-outfit">The Inquirer</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Report Credit:</span><br>Chaos Computer Club e.V.<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Response:</span><br>From the online sources cited above:<br><br>TOP MARKET RESEARCH firm TNS Infratest/Emnid has 'lost' 41,000 private data records of its survey participants, the Chaos Computer Club (CCC) has revealed in its official organ Die Datenschleuder.<br><br>As the magazine reports [1], it was possible for participants to read master data records and consumer profiles without bypassing even basic security measures.<br><br>Access to the comprehensive survey results could be gained by simply changing the customer ID number in the browser's address bar.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] This type of development mistake too common.&nbsp; The vulnerability is very easy to find by good pen testers and the bad guys.&nbsp; Actually, I am surprised that we don't hear about more of these types of breaches.</span><br><br>Besides name and address, the data records included date of birth, email address and phone number.<br><br>Many records also included very sensitive information: monthly income, education, bank account information, health insurance data, if and which credit cards are used, which electronic devices are used in the household, children's ages and yet more private data.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] Clearly this is some very sensitive information, all provided by people completing surveys.</span><br><br>"TNS Infratest made a beginner's mistake in their software development. This is unprofessional, grossly negligent and above all deeply worrying," commented CCC spokesman Dirk Engling regarding the incident.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] Mr. Engling is dead on.&nbsp; I couldn't have said it better myself.</span><br><br>"As this information is very sensitive, where abuse such as identity theft or its use in connection with burglary cannot be excluded, THS Infratest needs to inform the victims immediately," he continued<br><br>This case continues a disastrous, never-ending series of information leaks of data held by public and private sector organisations.<br><br>The need for more strict control of sensitive data collections is evidenced by the recent snooping affairs by German Telecom as well as the data leaks from the "Meldeämtern" (registration of address offices). <br><br>It is obvious here that data security only plays a minor role in companies.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] Very sad, but very true.&nbsp; Too many organizations still take the wrong view of information security as a "cost center" instead of a business driver.&nbsp; Well designed and managed information security programs, the ones that are aligned with the business and not IT, can actually provide value to the business.</span><br><br>"Especially for companies surveying the most confidential data, the highest security standards have to apply," said Engling.<br><br>The press team of the Chaos Computer Club is available for questions at the following addresses: <br></font><ul><li><font size="2">presse@ccc.de (preferred)</font></li><li>0700-CHAOSFON (0700 - 24267366)<br></li></ul><font size="2"><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Commentary:</span><br>TNS is a large company, a large company with resources to hire good management, programmers, and information security personnel.&nbsp; What is the excuse for making such a significant, yet simple oversight?&nbsp; There are a number of controls that could have reduced the risk of this occurring.<br><br>One a secondary note, but no less important in my opinion.&nbsp; It seems that people (in general) provide too much information willingly, without understanding what the risks could be.&nbsp; Personally, I rarely complete surveys that ask me for personally identifiable information (name, address, etc.).&nbsp; I suggest that you give some serious thought to providing any of your personal information.&nbsp; Ask yourself if you trust the organization collecting your information.&nbsp; If so, question what your trust is based on.&nbsp; Do NOT hesitate to ask questions and err on the side of caution. <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Past Breaches:</span><br>Unknown<br></font><br><br><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Es/breachblog?i=http://breachblog.com/2008/07/09/tns.aspx" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/records">records</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/master data records">master data records</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sensitive information">sensitive information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sensitive">sensitive</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information leaks">information leaks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal information">personal information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bank account information">bank account information</category>
      <source url="http://breachblog.com/2008/07/09/tns.aspx">Simple oversight at TNS Infratest exposes participant information</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Setting up a Tarpit (Teergrube) to slow worms and network scanners using LaBrea (The "Sticky" Honeypot and IDS)]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8be009c22d1de6d686445b07de6edceb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8be009c22d1de6d686445b07de6edceb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[New Video: Setting up a Tarpit (Teergrube) to slow worms and network scanners using LaBrea (The &quot;Sticky&quot; Honeypot and IDS
A network Tarpit, sometimes know by the German word Teergrube, is a service or...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>New Video:</b><a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/setting-up-a-tarpit-teergrube-to-slow-worms-and-network-scanners-using-labrea-the-sticky-honeypot-and-ids">Setting up a Tarpit (Teergrube) to slow worms and network scanners using LaBrea (The "Sticky" Honeypot and IDS)</a><br>
A network Tarpit, sometimes know by the German word Teergrube, is a service or set of hosts that deliberately try to slow malicious network connections down to a crawl. The idea is to put up unused hosts or services on the network that respond to an attacker, but do things to waste their time and greatly slow their scanning (or spreading in the case of Worms). For this video I’ll be using a package called LaBrea by Tom Liston and tarpitting unused IP addresses on my home LAN.
<p>Also, <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=security/decaffeinatid-simple-ids-arpwatch-for-windows">DecaffeinatID Intrusion Detection System ver. 0.07</a> is out.
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/IrongeeksSecuritySite?a=qbrqI2"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/IrongeeksSecuritySite?i=qbrqI2" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~4/320259217" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tarpit">tarpit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/teergrube">teergrube</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/slow worms">slow worms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network scanners">network scanners</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worms">worms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network tarpit">network tarpit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/labrea">labrea</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/german word teergrube">german word teergrube</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~3/320259217/i.php">Setting up a Tarpit (Teergrube) to slow worms and network scanners using LaBrea (The "Sticky" Honeypot and IDS)</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Trip Report: PH-Neutral]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/16f4b3a55157f829576693064e2b93d2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/16f4b3a55157f829576693064e2b93d2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I spent the weekend in Berlin attending a conference called PH-Neutral, run primarily by the Phenoelit crew. This was the first European security conference Ive attended and I found it quite different...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent the weekend in Berlin attending a conference called PH-Neutral, run primarily by the <a href="http://www.phenoelit.de/">Phenoelit</a> crew.  This was the first European security conference I&#8217;ve attended and I found it quite different from any North American security gathering I&#8217;ve been to, such as <a href="http://blackhat.com">BlackHat</a>, <a href="http://cansecwest.com/">CanSecWest</a>, <a href="http://www.sourceboston.com/">SOURCE Boston</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bluehat/default.mspx">BlueHat</a>, or <a href="http://rsaconference.com/">RSA</a>.  Everything was far more casual and laid back, which is something I had heard about European conferences but hadn&#8217;t experienced until now (even EUSecWest is held in a club whereas CanSecWest is in a Marriott).</p>
<p><a href='http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2525962901_6c15d2f291_o.jpg'><center><img src="http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2525962901_6c15d2f291_o-300x225.jpg" alt="PH-Neutral Bridge" title="2525962901_6c15d2f291_o" width="300" height="225" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-103 photoborder" /></center></a></p>
<p>The event was held at <a href="http://www.insel-berlin.net/">Die Insel</a>, on a tiny island a few kilometers outside of Berlin&#8217;s city center, near Treptower Park.  The venue is mostly used for live music so basically it feels like a dark, somewhat dingy club (certainly the bathrooms are reminiscent of a club).  The presentations were on the 3rd floor in a room that probably held about 60 people in close quarters; to handle overflow, a closed-circuit feed was being simulcast on the 4th floor, which was a bit less crowded and, more importantly, opened out onto a rooftop deck which meant better ventilation.  The bottom floor led out to a Biergarten with tables, beach chairs, and a stage which was used for DJing.  The layout was actually pretty efficient for allowing around 200 people to mill about and socialize/network while not having to stray too far from where the talks were presented.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2525962813_b842faf96d_o.jpg'><center><img src="http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2525962813_b842faf96d_o-225x300.jpg" alt="Bridge to Die Insel" title="2525962813_b842faf96d_o" width="225" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-102 photoborder" /></center></a></p>
<p>As far as the event itself, when I said &#8220;laid back&#8221; earlier, don&#8217;t interpret that to mean disorganized or watered down in any way.  It was run with stereotypical German efficiency, from badging to presentations to the after-hours parties.  The presentations were just as technical and relevant as any of the more &#8220;corporate&#8221; conferences.  Unfortunately for me, I don&#8217;t know that many people in European security circles, and most of the ones I do know weren&#8217;t in attendance.  Those I did meet, however, were impressively smart and well-versed.  Nobody was trying to conduct business transactions or slip away for meetings, which is inevitably what happens when only technical folks are present!</p>
<p><a href='http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2526783152_fed88680d4_o.jpg'><center><img src="http://www.veracode.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2526783152_fed88680d4_o-225x300.jpg" alt="PH-Neutral Registration" title="2526783152_fed88680d4_o" width="225" height="300" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-101 photoborder" /></center></a></p>
<p>For me, a few talks stood out.  Fukami and BeF&#8217;s talk on <a href="https://www.flashsec.org/mediawiki/images/5/57/SWF_and_the_Malware_Tragedy.pdf">SWF and the Malware Tragedy</a> discussed methods for automated static detection of malware in Flash movies.  Much of it centered on heuristics related to inconsistencies in the file format or tag structure, abnormal concentrations of strings in the constant pool, or the existence of various obfuscation techniques.  Ultimately, there are false positive issues to be addressed but that is just a fact of life with static analysis, and it will be an iterative process to refine those heuristics as the attack vectors evolve.  I thought this talk was particularly timely given the increasing prevalence of Flash as a conduit for exploits/malware, such as the most recent <a href="http://trailofbits.com/2008/05/28/flash-zero-day-attacks-wow/">Flash 0day</a> that made the news (granted, this was an exploit against Flash itself, not just using Flash as a delivery mechanism, but close enough).</p>
<p>I also enjoyed pierre&#8217;s talk on counterintelligence, basically a mélange of wiretapping and other bugging devices discovered in the wild.  War stories are always interesting, particularly when it comes to the realm of physical security.  One of the x-ray images he showed of a bugged pen was identical to a pen that I own (minus the bugging device of course&#8230; I hope).  The feel of the talk reminded me a bit of James Atkinson&#8217;s talk at SOURCE, &#8220;Telephone Defenses Against the Dark Arts&#8221; (video: <a href="http://sourceboston2008.blip.tv/file/799027/">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://sourceboston2008.blip.tv/file/800299/">Part 2</a>), which also got rave reviews.  </p>
<p>Mike Eddington&#8217;s presentation on the <a href="http://peachfuzz.sourceforge.net/">Peach 2</a> fuzzing framework was also quite interesting.  Peach 2 was released several months back but I haven&#8217;t really been paying much attention to it or any other fuzzing tool for some time.  In fact the last time I really had to implement a protocol fuzzer, I was using SPIKE 2.9, so that gives you some indication of how long it&#8217;s been.  Peach 2 includes some powerful built-in capabilities such as node relationships (e.g. field 1 represents the length of field 2; field 10 is a CRC-32 of fields 1 through 9), data transforms (those with battle scars from ASN.1 will be happy), state machines (packets 1 and 2 have to be normal in order to fuzz packet 3), monitoring agents (detecting when a crash happens and under what conditions), and much more.  I am itching to go fuzz something now just so I can tinker with Peach.</p>
<p>All in all, it was a good trip and I enjoyed the opportunity to see how things are done across the pond, and to do a little sightseeing in a historic and beautiful city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/talk">talk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/james atkinsons talk">james atkinsons talk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flash">flash</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flash movies">flash movies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recent flash 0day">recent flash 0day</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/befs talk">befs talk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dingy club">dingy club</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/conference">conference</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/european security conference">european security conference</category>
      <source url="http://www.veracode.com/blog/?p=98">Trip Report: PH-Neutral</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
