<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: google]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/google</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Android puts out call to mobile security gurus]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/278ef51c66de86a722b570a3fb4f046f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/278ef51c66de86a722b570a3fb4f046f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Developers of Android, the Linux mobile platform spearheaded by Google, are asking security experts for...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Developers of Android, the Linux mobile platform spearheaded by Google, are asking security experts for input.<p><A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=15901?">
<IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=15901?" border="0" width="468" height="60"></A>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/linux mobile platform">linux mobile platform</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security experts">security experts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/android">android</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/developers">developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/input">input</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/082008-android-puts-out-call-to.html?fsrc=rss-security">Android puts out call to mobile security gurus</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Compromised Cpanel Accounts For Sale]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6228ebb081126296ff70b5f6268fd2a3</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6228ebb081126296ff70b5f6268fd2a3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Is the once popular in the second quarter of 2007, embedded malware tactic on the verge of irrelevance, and if so, what has contributed to its decline? Have SQL injections executed through botnets...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKlq1uSeDFI/AAAAAAAACDM/l4bxcru-BQk/s1600-h/cpanel_multiple_domains1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKlq1uSeDFI/AAAAAAAACDM/ho301JgoMUs/s200-R/cpanel_multiple_domains1.png" /></a> Is the once popular in the second quarter of 2007, embedded malware tactic on the verge of irrelevance, and if so, what has contributed to its decline? Have SQL injections executed through botnets turned into the most efficient way to infect hundreds of thousands of legitimate web sites? Depends on who you're dealing with.<br />
<br />
A cyber criminal's position in the "underground food chain" can be easily tracked down on the basis of tools and tactics that he's taking advantage of, in fact, some would on purposely misinform on what their actual capabilities are in order not to attract too much attention to their real ones, consisting of high-profile compromises at hundreds of high-profile web sites.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKmDVdDGnPI/AAAAAAAACDU/qNbLBUKlHp0/s1600-h/cpanel_multiple_domains3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKmDVdDGnPI/AAAAAAAACDU/ZsmcK9HMeUs/s200-R/cpanel_multiple_domains3.jpg" /></a>Embedded malware may not be as hot as it used to be in the last quarter of 2007, but thanks to the oversupply of stolen accounting data, certain individuals within the underground ecosystem seem to be abusing entire portfolios of domains on the basis of purchasing access to the compromised accounts. In fact, the oversupply of compromised Cpanel accounts is logically resulting in their decreasing price, with the sellers differentiating their propositions, and charging premium prices based on the site's page ranks and traffic, measured through publicly available services, or through the internal statistics.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKmMyr4CWEI/AAAAAAAACDc/UafOTCKAb-0/s1600-h/cpanel_multiple_domains22.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SKmMyr4CWEI/AAAAAAAACDc/7IRBMNndy-w/s200-R/cpanel_multiple_domains22.JPG" /></a><br />
SQL injections may be the tactic of choice for the time being, but as long as stolen accounting data consisting of Cpanel logins, and web shells access to misconfigured web servers remain desired underground goods, goold old fashioned embedded malware will continue taking place.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, from an economic perspective, the way the seller markets his goods, can greatly influence the way they get abused given he continues offering after-sale services and support. It's blackhat search engine optimization I have in mind, sometimes the tactic of choice especially given its high liquidity in respect to monetizing the compromised access.<br />
<br />
The bottom line - for the time being, there's a higher probability that your web properties will get SQL injected, than IFRAME-ed, as it used to be half a year ago, and that's because what used to be a situation where malicious parties would aim at launching a targeted attack at high profile site and abuse the huge traffic it receives, is today's pragmatic reality where a couple of hundred low profile web sites can in fact return more traffic to the cyber criminals, and greatly extend the lifecycle of their campaign taking advantage of the fact the the low profile site owners would remain infected and vulnerable for months to come.<br />
<br />
<b>Related posts:</b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/03/embedding-malicious-iframes-through.html">Embedding Malicious IFRAMEs Through Stolen FTP Accounts</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/03/injecting-iframes-by-abusing-input.html">Injecting IFRAMEs by Abusing Input Validation</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/money-mule-recruiters-use-asproxs-fast.html">Money Mule Recruiters use ASProx's Fast-flux Services</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/05/malware-domains-used-in-sql-injection.html">Malware Domains Used in the SQL Injection Attacks</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/obfuscating-fast-fluxed-sql-injected.html">Obfuscating Fast-fluxed SQL Injected Domains</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/sql-injecting-malicious-doorways-to.html">SQL Injecting Malicious Doorways to Serve Malware </a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/05/yet-another-massive-sql-injection.html">Yet Another Massive SQL Injection Spotted in the Wild</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/05/malware-domains-used-in-sql-injection.html">Malware Domains Used in the SQL Injection Attacks</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/07/sql-injection-through-search-engines.html">SQL Injection Through Search Engines Reconnaissance</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/05/google-hacking-for-vulnerabilities.html">Google Hacking for Vulnerabilities</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1122">Fast-Fluxing SQL injection attacks executed from the Asprox botnet</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1394">Sony PlayStation's site SQL injected, redirecting to rogue security software</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1118">Redmond Magazine Successfully SQL Injected by Chinese Hacktivists</a><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=ExzKaK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=ExzKaK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=AgwoKK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=AgwoKK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5JjO7k"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5JjO7k" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5Z85mk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5Z85mk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=s4xhGK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=s4xhGK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=ReebmK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=ReebmK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=T0yjTk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=T0yjTk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/368194376" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql">sql</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql injections">sql injections</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql injection attacks">sql injection attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/massive sql injection">massive sql injection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/profile site">profile site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/site">site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/site sql">site sql</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql injection">sql injection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tactic">tactic</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/368194376/compromised-cpanel-accounts-for-sale.html">Compromised Cpanel Accounts For Sale</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Beware of Rogue Anti-Malware]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/56bc0c383527b10009c2841b8cf095c1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/56bc0c383527b10009c2841b8cf095c1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Rogue anti-virus and anti-spyware products are not a new story, but they are a relatively growing threat. One of these threats made some news this week and taught some lessons about just how...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Rogue anti-virus and anti-spyware products are not a new story, but they are a relatively growing threat. One of these threats made some news this week and taught some lessons about just how suspicious you have to be of them.

We had heard of <i>XP Antivirus</i>&#151;also known by a plethora of name variants, including <i>Antivirus XP</i> and year variants like <i>Antivirus XP 2008</i>. <a href="http://research.sunbelt-software.com/threatdisplay.aspx?name=Antivirus XP 2008 (Winifixer)&threatid=310434"target="_blank">Click here for a description from Sunbelt Software.</a> Last week, <a href="http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/2008/08/googlesyndicated_malware_ads_h.php"target="_blank">advertisements for this product started appearing on CNET</a> (specifically their Download.com service) through syndicated Google ads. Not to pick on CNET specifically; Google ads are likely to be appearing elsewhere, but we were referred to them on that site.

The hallmark of such malware is to start with a free version. This version conducts a fake malware scan that finds lots of malware on the system, and the user is told to pay for the "premium" version in order to remove the malware that doesn't really exist in the first place. Often rogue anti-malware software such as this is not strictly malicious in the sense of spreading itself to other systems or hiding any functions; it is simply a scam. Of course, by buying the product you may also expose personal and credit card details to untrustworthy people.

Later last week, GlobalSign, the certificate authority that had issued a code signing certificate for use with Antivirus XP 2008, <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/16/certified_malware/"target="_blank">revoked that certificate after complaints that the software was malicious</a>. They verified that the company existed but couldn't contact them. The investigation is ongoing.

The bottom line and moral of the story is that rogue anti-malware vendors are merciless and shameless when it comes to masquerading as legit software. Ads on legit sites don't prove anything, and code-signing certificates don't prove anything. You still need to use common sense and exercise precautions, like running well-known and respected anti-malware, like Sunbelt Software's. They have a lot of special in-house expertise on rogue products like this.<img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/r_W79eeC5GM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anti-malware">anti-malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rogue anti-malware vendors">rogue anti-malware vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/legit software">legit software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sunbelt software">sunbelt software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware">malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rogue anti-malware software">rogue anti-malware software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fake malware scan">fake malware scan</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google ads">google ads</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/r_W79eeC5GM/beware_of_rogue_antimalware_1.html">Beware of Rogue Anti-Malware</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Will Passwords Become Obsolete?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f7dd714962f1e8f812f0f43645c379ba</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f7dd714962f1e8f812f0f43645c379ba</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I cant keep track of how many different passwords I have, although I know its not nearly enough I tend to be lazy like most people and re-use the same passwords for many different accounts
But heres a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t keep track of how many different passwords I have, although I know it&#8217;s not nearly enough &#8212; I tend to be lazy like most people and re-use the same passwords for many different accounts.<br />
But here&#8217;s a new idea &#8212; what if passwords for online accounts were replaced entirely by cryptographic keys that sat on our desktops like icons, and functioned in the background, so we wouldn&#8217;t need to remember a string of letters or numbers?</p>
<p>An interesting <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.novainfosecportal.com/2008/08/14/bye-bye-passwords-maybe/">blog post </a>this morning discusses the obstacles and implications of this kind of technology, in part quoting a recent New York Times article &#8212; </p>
<blockquote><p>
In short, we need a log-on system that relies on cryptography, not mnemonics. As users, we would replace passwords with so-called information cards, icons on our screen that we select with a click to log on to a Web site. The click starts a handshake between machines that relies on hard-to-crack cryptographic code.</p></blockquote>
<p>An obstacle to this kind of system are the current initiatives toward Open ID and single-sign on services, strategies that are backed by large industry players such as the Equifax, Google, Novell, Microsoft, Oracle, etc. In the open ID system, you would log in to a session on the web with one password, which would be accepted by any application/account supporting the open ID infrastructure. </p>
<p>To me Open ID sounds like a step backwards, toward less security&#8230;<br />
then again, I would think that encrypting everything could also make your system run significantly slower, and that it wouldn&#8217;t prevent all the risks either&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/passwords">passwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/log-on system">log-on system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/log">log</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/replace passwords">replace passwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web site">web site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/click starts">click starts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/york times article">york times article</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/online accounts">online accounts</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/itsecurity/~3/366003641/">Will Passwords Become Obsolete?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security is bigger than finding and fixing bugs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/9c8ebf47be004fc532a7e7de3eceed48</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/9c8ebf47be004fc532a7e7de3eceed48</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Ive been catching up on various security-related articles that Ive been meaning to read, and the following article was on the list...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>I’ve been catching up on various security-related articles that I’ve been meaning to read, and the following article was on the list <A href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/73635,google-shares-its-security-secrets.aspx">http://www.itnews.com.au/News/73635,google-shares-its-security-secrets.aspx</A> about Google’s “security secrets.” <BR>&nbsp;<BR>Quoting from the article: </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>“In order to keep its products safe, Google has adopted a philosophy of 'security as a cultural value'. The programme includes mandatory security training for developers, a set of in-house security libraries, and code reviews both by Google developers and outside security researchers."</P></BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>I think it is great that Google has a security program they are willing to talk about and I could not agree more with the ‘security as a cultural value’ philosophy. But isn’t there something really fundamental missing here? Design? There is a lot more to software engineering other than coding and testing. <BR>&nbsp;<BR>The SDL has a very large set of implementation-related requirements, but there are many design-related requirements also.</P>
<P>Computer security experts have known since the early 1970s that you have to get the design right; and our experiences with the SDL over the last 5 years have taught us that you need to consider security and privacy (but remember, you have to ship too!) very early in the design phase and have a consistent end-to-end process if you truly hope to reduce vulnerabilities and create more secure software. This is how the SDL is helping to create ‘security as a cultural value’ at Microsoft. </P>
<P>We’ve seen a general trend downward in security vulnerabilities in Microsoft products, and the IBM X-Force 2008 mid-year <A href="http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/iss/xforce/midyearreport/xforce-midyear-report-2008.pdf" mce_href="http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/iss/xforce/midyearreport/xforce-midyear-report-2008.pdf">report</A> backs the assertion that we’re making progress; according to the report Microsoft’s share of total vulnerabilities decreased from 3.7% in 2007 (1st place) to 2.5% (that’s 2.5% for <STRONG><U>all</U></STRONG> Microsoft products; a more appropriate comparison might be Windows vs Linux vs Mac OSX, or SQL Server vs Oracle vs DB2) in the first 6 months of 2008 (3rd place.) This is an encouraging signal that the SDL is working on a large scale… of course, it might also show that vulnerability researchers are moving to easier targets, which, to me shows the SDL is working too.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>What do you think?<BR></P><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8867829" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security researchers">security researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vulnerabilities">security vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer security experts">computer security experts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/googles security secrets">googles security secrets</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/in-house security libraries">in-house security libraries</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security program">security program</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft products">microsoft products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sdl">sdl</category>
      <source url="http://blogs.msdn.com/sdl/archive/2008/08/14/security-is-bigger-than-finding-and-fixing-bugs.aspx">Security is bigger than finding and fixing bugs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: Meraki Modifies, Drops Standard; Tempe's Phoenix?; Remote Wake, Wi-Fi Need Not Apply]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a930349b033e6f56c6098e0b152daddf</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a930349b033e6f56c6098e0b152daddf</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Meraki reworks product line, drops new sales of community flavor: The cheap mesh router company has mutated slightly once again. The partly-Google-backed firm founded by MIT RoofNet &quot;graduates&quot; built...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://meraki.com/"><strong>Meraki reworks product line, drops new sales of community flavor:</strong></a> The cheap mesh router company has mutated slightly once again. The partly-Google-backed firm founded by MIT RoofNet "graduates" built the company on the notion that they could sell $50 routers that could mesh with each other, and use a robust central management system they developed. Over time, the $50 price didn't hold up for commercial networks of scale. Last October, the <a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007973.html"><strong>company mishandled a change</strong></a> in its business model when they abruptly announced a $100 increase in price for newly purchased nodes under their Meraki Pro level for any network that wanted to control whether or not ads appeared, have user accounts, and charge for service. (They eventually <a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007979.html"><strong>recovered, apologized, and reworked</strong></a> some of the transition details.) <img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/meraki_indoor.jpg" alt="meraki_indoor.jpg" border="0" width="175" height="111" align="right" />The company continued to offer a $50 indoor and $100 outdoor Standard level nodes for networks that required ads and had other limits. As of a few days ago, Standard is dead, and the Meraki mini has been upgraded to the <a href="http://meraki.com/products_services/hardware/indoor/"><strong>Meraki Indoor</strong></a> ($150). The Indoor has signal strength LEDs on the side for better help in placing units, an internal antenna, and better resilience against power fluctuations. The company <a href="http://meraki.com/support/faq/"><strong>explains its move</strong></a> in eliminating Standard by noting that most customers moved to Pro. It's not precisely the end of idealism (nor did that happen last October), as Meraki is still one of the major commercial mesh vendors, and their products are still vastly easier and a fraction of the cost of higher-end competitors.<br clear="all"></p>

<p><a href="http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/123037"><strong>New life for dead Tempe network?</strong></a> Another firm has expressed interest in buying the pennies on the dollar assets that remain of the former Kite Networks installation in Tempe from the firm that financed the venture as long as they can negotiate a new, more favorable deal with the city for mounting and removal rights. CTC, Inc., which the East Valley Tribune reports runs networks in the Kansas City, Mo., area, thinks there's an opportunity. The article notes that reception problems were due in part to the prevalence of stucco in Tempe, common in the southwest. Stucco walls layer plaster or other materials on a wire mesh for strength that turns a house into a bit of an accidental <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage"><strong>Faraday cage</strong></a>, partially shielding the home from electromagnetic radiation. (Could I go so far to say that Tempe's network could be a phoenix? Ouch.)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2008-08-14-intel-wake-up-pcs_N.htm"><strong>Wake up, you darn computer:</strong></a> Intel's new Remote Wake motherboards won't work with Wi-Fi, it's important to note. The feature, announced today, will let an incoming VoIP call (the articles all say "phone call over the Internet") to wake a computer, as long as the call comes from a particular source. Of course, the standard SIP protocol for VoIP doesn't have the kind of security and integrity that would allow this; Intel has to overcome the problem with network address translation that renders most computer unreachable from outside the local network without a separate service like GoToMyPC or LogMeIn; and it will only work for computers connected via Ethernet to a local network, because Wi-Fi is off when a computer sleeps, while Ethernet can remain lightly active. I don't have the protocol details yet, but there's long been a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wake-on-LAN"><strong>Wake on LAN protocol</strong></a> that required support in a router, operating system, and Ethernet card; Intel may be leveraging this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki">meraki</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network address translation">network address translation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dead tempe network">dead tempe network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dead">dead</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tempe">tempe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/standard">standard</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki indoor">meraki indoor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki mini">meraki mini</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008420.html">Wee-Fi: Meraki Modifies, Drops Standard; Tempe's Phoenix?; Remote Wake, Wi-Fi Need Not Apply</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Google acknowledges tracking behavior without consent ]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f0a529d395f35a6f0ba42e82f264912c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f0a529d395f35a6f0ba42e82f264912c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Several Internet and broadband companies have acknowledged using targeted-advertising technology without informing customers, according to letters released Monday by the House Energy and Commerce...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Several Internet and broadband companies have acknowledged using targeted-advertising technology without informing customers, according to letters released Monday by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Google stated that it had begun using Internet tracking technology that enabled it to precisely follow Web-surfing behavior across affiliates.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/commerce committee">commerce committee</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/behavior">behavior</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/house energy">house energy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology">technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/precisely follow">precisely follow</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/broadband companies">broadband companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/letters">letters</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Google_acknowledges_tracking_behavior_without_consent">Google acknowledges tracking behavior without consent </source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New spam and virus trends from Enterprise]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ecd17c809af327b45b4ff7c2e1191722</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ecd17c809af327b45b4ff7c2e1191722</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Written by Amanda Kleha, Google Apps Security &amp; Compliance team


The Google Apps Security &amp; Compliance team, which provides email and web security for more than 40,000 companies, regularly tracks...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="byline-author">Written by Amanda Kleha, Google Apps Security &amp; Compliance team<br /></span><br /><br />The <a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/index.html">Google Apps Security &amp; Compliance</a> team, which provides email and web security for more than 40,000 companies, regularly tracks trends in spam, viruses, and other threats. Check out some of our latest findings over on the <a href="http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2008/08/security-spotlight-july-virus-attacks.html">Enterprise blog</a>. Also, on Friday, August 15, at 10:00 am PT, we'll be hosting a <a href="http://w.on24.com/r.htm?e=116483&amp;s=1&amp;k=E679E434ECD09EFE9AB299E6B4E16A3B&amp;partnerref=blog_security">webinar</a> on keeping your business safe from web and email threats -- tune in if you'd like to learn more.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog?a=CIWUTK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog?i=CIWUTK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog?a=ymSiAk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog?i=ymSiAk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog/~4/363283445" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google apps security">google apps security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/compliance team">compliance team</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email">email</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email threats">email threats</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web security">web security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/threats">threats</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web">web</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/regularly tracks trends">regularly tracks trends</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/enterprise blog">enterprise blog</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GoogleOnlineSecurityBlog/~3/363283445/new-spam-and-virus-trends-from.html">New spam and virus trends from Enterprise</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Estonia, Google Help Cyberlocked Georgia]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c8e97c0be30cef00529ce7f85511cbb1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c8e97c0be30cef00529ce7f85511cbb1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Georgia's news and government websites are under &quot;permanent attack.&quot; They're turning to their Estonian neighbors -- and to Google's Blogspot service -- for...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Georgia's news and government websites are under "permanent attack." They're turning to their Estonian neighbors -- and to Google's Blogspot service -- for help.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=1ab466052bffc4d00001e204a450c48e" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=1ab466052bffc4d00001e204a450c48e" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=WkYRLK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=WkYRLK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=LqRCQk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=LqRCQk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=PEPGgk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=PEPGgk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=ealnfK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=ealnfK" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=7f7poK"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=7f7poK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=sDuZRk"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=sDuZRk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=cUdZ4k"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=cUdZ4k" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=wRRJDK"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=wRRJDK" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/362249102" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/362249109" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/georgia">georgia</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blogspot service">blogspot service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/estonian neighbors">estonian neighbors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/government websites">government websites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/permanent attack">permanent attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/news">news</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/362249109/civilge-the-geo.html">Estonia, Google Help Cyberlocked Georgia</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[New Tool to Automate Cookie Stealing from Gmail, Others]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d48c344c1134ff10497a80866fe7ad02</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d48c344c1134ff10497a80866fe7ad02</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[If you use Gmail and haven't yet taken advantage of a feature Google unveiled last week to prevent hackers from hijacking your inbox, now would be an excellent time to do that.A security researcher at...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[If you use Gmail and haven't yet taken advantage of a feature Google  unveiled last week to prevent hackers from hijacking your inbox, now would be an excellent time to do that.A security researcher at the Defcon hacker conference in Las Vegas demonstrated a tool he built that allows attackers to break into your inbox ..]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defcon hacker conference">defcon hacker conference</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prevent hackers">prevent hackers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/feature google">feature google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/las vegas">las vegas</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/inbox">inbox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tool">tool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/excellent time">excellent time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security researcher">security researcher</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gmail">gmail</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/New_Tool_to_Automate_Cookie_Stealing_from_Gmail_Others">New Tool to Automate Cookie Stealing from Gmail, Others</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
