<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: ipv4]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Links List 10.3.08]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bfa12b1f280cc26f4ffcd92a791acc11</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bfa12b1f280cc26f4ffcd92a791acc11</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Well finally, an upside to the financial crisis more students in computer science. After the dot-com crash, enrollment went down in computer science, almost 50% since 2003. Many students shifted their...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 5px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/africa-map.jpg" border="0" alt="africa-map" width="204" height="240" align="left" /> Well finally, an upside to the financial crisis – more students in computer science. After the dot-com crash, <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9066659" target="_blank">enrollment went down</a> in computer science, almost 50% since 2003. Many students <a href="http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/33584-1.html" target="_blank">shifted their interest from the technology field</a> to banking and finance because they thought they’d make more money. And now the financial crisis could scare them into <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9115616&amp;source=rss_news" target="_blank">choosing majors and careers that are “safer alternatives”</a>, like IT. And perhaps the trend is reversing for those already on Wall Street as well. Ben Worthen writes about the influx of resumes Kodiak Venture Partners has been getting: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/?s=wall+street+jobs" target="_blank">from financial-services vets who want to work at tech startups</a>, – not to “strike it rich” this time around, but just to make a living. And it’s not just the tech workers. Seems like the ones that don’t even have any real IT experience are looking too – for jobs as VPs of marketing (harrumph). (<a href="http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/docs/rst/Sect6/africa-map.jpg" target="_blank"><em>img from www.fas.org</em></a>)</p>
<p>I’m sure you already know about the other “network management” – where ISPs and carriers get their hands publicly slapped for limiting bandwidth to high-traffic offenders. But when is this kind of “network management” a good thing? At a panel sponsored by the FCC in DC, reps from carriers and ISPs discussed what steps they’ve been taking <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/091808-telcos-pandemic.html?hpg1=bn" target="_blank">to prepare for a pandemic</a> or other major global crisis – that would force workers to stay at home or work from more remote locations to limit exposure.</p>
<p>Are people paying attention to ICANN? They’re saying that IPv4 will be fully <a href="http://blog.icann.org/?p=365" target="_blank">allocated in the next two or three years</a>. Does anyone care? In their bid to make people care, ICANN talks about the state of IPv6 adoption and <a href="http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/30/africa-faster-adopting-ipv6-according-icann">touts Africa as the most rapid adopter</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=1187" target="_blank">SOA soon part of the ‘cloud’</a>? No, please no.</p>
<p>Microsoft – The Silver Lining in Every Cloud. Joe Wilcox over at eWeek’s Microsoft Watch, has been <a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/corporate/steve_ballmer_sure_has_lots_to_say.html?kc=EWWHNEMNL10022008STR4" target="_blank">following Steve Ballmer</a> around and collecting some nice quotes on how the company is transitioning. “For many years, we had kind of what I would call the all-encompassing mission, vision and scorecard statement: a computer on every desk and in every home. …Well, our footprint and portfolio is broader than that. “ [In every hand and of course, in every cloud…] “So, as a vision statement we talk about creating seamless experiences that combine the magic of software, the power of the Internet across a world of devices.” The magic of software – something I haven’t thought about for a while. And:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You need a real platform in the cloud. When we wanted to go after the PC, we built an operating system. When we wanted to go after the phone, we built an operating system. When we wanted to go after the enterprise, we built an operating system. We&#8217;ll announce a new operating system, one that runs in the cloud and has a wide variety of capabilities.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer">computer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer science">computer science</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people care">people care</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/financial crisis">financial crisis</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network management">network management</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/care">care</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eweeks microsoft">eweeks microsoft</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/links-list-10308/10/2008">Links List 10.3.08</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Links List 8.22.08]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e37289e3f28c0134060472b8a33b4f97</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e37289e3f28c0134060472b8a33b4f97</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Ah, the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. How spectacular. Is that Li Ning running in the sky with the torch? Oooh, aah. And wait, whats that image on the wall behind him? Looks kinda familiaroops,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="170" alt="bsod_nest_main2" src="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/bsod-nest-main2.jpg" width="244" align="left" border="0"> Ah, the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. How spectacular. Is that Li Ning “running” in the sky with the torch? Oooh, aah. And wait, what’s that image on the wall behind him? Looks kinda familiar…oops, it’s an <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/robertxcringely/archives/2008/08/geek_week_tk_tk_1.html?source=NLC-NOTES&amp;cgd=2008-08-18" target="_blank">XP blue screen of death</a>….I wonder how much Microsoft paid for advertising during the Olympics?
<p><em>(</em><a href="http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/08/bsod_nest_main2.jpg" target="_blank"><em>Photo Credit: Gizmodo</em></a><em>)</em>
<p>You lose some. You win some: Of course as NBC’s online partner, Microsoft gets a least a cut of the <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-online-ad-spend-tied-to-olympics-expected-to-reach-100-million/" target="_blank">$100 million dollars in online advertising</a> spent around the Olympics. And the millions of <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2008/tc20080820_627259.htm?campaign_id=rss_daily" target="_blank">downloads of Silverlight</a> aren’t too shabby either.
<p>The Internet is Falling! Arbor Networks, a security and network management company, partnered with ninety network services and content providers from around the world to publish an extensive <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88181_largest_study_of_ipv6_traffic/" target="_blank">study of IPv6 traffic</a> on the Internet. Craig Labovitiz, Arbor Networks chief scientist, stated that <a href="http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/8/the-end-is-near-but-is-ipv6/" target="_blank">only 900 days were left until the end of the Internet</a>, or at least the exhaustion of IPv4 registry allocations. For the past year, the study shows very little IPv6 traffic – something like 1/100<sup>th</sup> of 1% of Internet traffic. Craig credits this to money issues. “The department of commerce estimates it will cost $25 billion for ISPs to upgrade to native IPv6.”
<p>Blogger <a href="http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/08/cloud-computing-bill-of-rights.html" target="_blank">James Urquhart created a bill of rights for cloud computing</a>. The purpose of the bill is to “help guide would-be cloud customers to those clouds best able to guarantee their freedom.” The blogosphere is a great place to get some open debate going, and I applaud James for trying to make something yet so “cloudy” a bit more clear and concrete. But what’s up with the creating a PAC for this?? (Check out the comments.)
<p>Trying to get by on limited resources? Need more money, staff and the freedom to focus on long-term projects? Sound familiar? Then you just might be in <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/08/21/life-is-tough-for-midsize-tech-departments/?mod=djemTECH" target="_blank">IT at a midsize company</a>. (or in marketing at a young but rapidly growing IT company <img src='http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) Arrow Enterprise Computing Solutions conducted a survey of 200 tech leaders at midsize companies (500 to 3000 employees). The upside: 61% of those surveyed think they’ll be spending more on IT next year – is this bullish thinking about the economy or how much their own business (rev) will be growing?
<p>Bill Snyder calls Dell “<a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/tech-bottom-line/archives/2008/08/michael_dell_is.html?source=NLC-DAILY&amp;cgd=2008-08-21" target="_blank">Bozo of the Month</a>” for trying to trademark “cloud computing”. Yikes. Maybe not a “bozo” move but certainly inadvisable given how ubiquitous the term is. Here’s <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/no-trademark-for-cloud-computing/08/2008" target="_blank">our take</a> on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network management company">network management company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet traffic">internet traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company">company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nbcs online partner">nbcs online partner</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6 traffic">ipv6 traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/online">online</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blogger james urquhart">blogger james urquhart</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ninety network services">ninety network services</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/links-list-82208/08/2008">Links List 8.22.08</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[It's Router Upgrade Time As AS Numbers Expand]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8857b04f9e540556370f9261972cda72</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8857b04f9e540556370f9261972cda72</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The fact that we're running out of IPv4 addresses is reasonably well-known by now, but it's not the only declining network resource on the Internet. 'AS' or Autonomous System numbers, which uniquely...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The fact that we're running out of IPv4 addresses is reasonably well-known by now, but it's not the only declining network resource on the Internet. 'AS' or Autonomous System numbers, which uniquely identify networks for the Internet's BGP routing infrastructure, are also running out, and on a similar timeline. AS numbers, like IP addresses, are allocated by RIRs (Regional Internet Registries) and the last one, based on current trends, will be gone in early 2011.

As <a href="http://www.apnic.net/news/2008/0725.html">this release from APNIC (the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre, the RIR for the far east) explains</a>, the old AS numbers were 16-bits. A new standard exists for 32-bit AS numbers and, as of January 1, 2009 these 32-bit numbers will be the ones allocated by default, unless a 16-bit number is specifically requested.

But routers and network management software on networks using the new numbers need to be updated. Surprisingly, and impressively, routers on older, 16-bit AS-numbered routes can still communicate with the new 32-bit AS-numbered networks, and vice-versa. <a href="http://wiki.icons.apnic.net/display/ASN/Operational+Implications">Click here for more on how they accomplished this neat bit of backward-compatibility.</a><br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=790d7e30004bad5f77629ff851e284c7" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=790d7e30004bad5f77629ff851e284c7" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/349004785" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/regional internet registries">regional internet registries</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4 addresses">ipv4 addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/32-bit">32-bit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network management software">network management software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/addresses">addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/16-bit">16-bit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/similar timeline">similar timeline</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/349004785/its_router_upgrade_time_as_as_numbers_expand.html">It's Router Upgrade Time As AS Numbers Expand</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[It's Router Upgrade Time as AS Numbers Expand]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/35b4be07d8f9be854ac723f32a0cb44d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/35b4be07d8f9be854ac723f32a0cb44d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The fact that we're running out of IPv4 addresses is reasonably well-known by now, but it's not the only declining network resource on the Internet. &quot;AS,&quot; or Autonomous System, numbers, which uniquely...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The fact that we're running out of IPv4 addresses is reasonably well-known by now, but it's not the only declining network resource on the Internet. "AS," or Autonomous System, numbers, which uniquely identify networks for the Internet's BGP routing infrastructure, are also running out, and on a similar timeline. AS numbers, like IP addresses, are allocated by RIRs (Regional Internet Registries), and the last one, based on current trends, will be gone in early 2011.

As <a href="http://www.apnic.net/news/2008/0725.html">this release from APNIC (the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre, the RIR for the Far East) explains</a>, the old AS numbers were 16 bits. A new standard exists for 32-bit AS numbers and, as of Jan. 1, 2009, these 32-bit numbers will be the ones allocated by default, unless a 16-bit number is specifically requested.

But routers and network management software on networks using the new numbers need to be updated. Surprisingly, and impressively, routers on older, 16-bit AS-numbered routes can still communicate with the new 32-bit AS-numbered networks, and vice versa. <a href="http://wiki.icons.apnic.net/display/ASN/Operational+Implications">Click here for more on how they accomplished this neat bit of backward compatibility.</a><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/DLryqtFAaHU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/regional internet registries">regional internet registries</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4 addresses">ipv4 addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/32-bit">32-bit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network management software">network management software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/addresses">addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/backward compatibility">backward compatibility</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/16-bit">16-bit</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/DLryqtFAaHU/its_router_upgrade_time_as_as_numbers_expand.html">It's Router Upgrade Time as AS Numbers Expand</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Links List 7.25.08]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/630a1fc26c11310563527f51eaebf464</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/630a1fc26c11310563527f51eaebf464</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reports that the military is taking Tech Lessons . It seems that over the last few years, the DISA CIO has been visiting different tech companies to learn about cutting-edge...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal reports that the military is taking “<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/07/24/the-military-takes-tech-lessons/?mod=djemTECH" target="_blank">Tech Lessons</a>”. It seems that over the last few years, the DISA CIO has been visiting different tech companies to learn about cutting-edge technologies that might be able to help soldiers in the battlefield. CIO Garing identified social networks and mashups as great technologies for smaller projects with potentially more immediate impact than the traditional years-long IT projects of the past. He should check out NAPA and the Collaboration Project [link to Dan Munz Q&amp;A] which highlights just how government agencies and orgs are already doing what he’s talking about.
<p>Just what I was waiting for, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-9996318-16.html" target="_blank">open source takes on cloud computing</a>. <img src='http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
<p>We had a very interesting call this week with analyst firm, <a href="http://www.the451group.com/report_view/report_view.php?entity_id=54199" target="_blank">The 451 Group</a>, about the cloud and who is really doing what in this space now. Trying to separate the hype from reality, just like everyone else.
<p><a href="http://vmblog.com/archive/2008/07/23/forbes-interviews-vmware-ceo-paul-maritz-after-financial-analyst-call.aspx" target="_blank">After a disappointing (to analysts and the street) financial analyst call on Tuesday, VMware&#8217;s stock reached an all time low, almost back to the IPO stage</a>. In a follow-up interview, Forbes asked the new CEO what he thinks about the stock price, the analysts saying VMware doesn&#8217;t have a solid or innovative growth plan for the future, and whether <a href="http://vmware.com/" target="_blank">VMware</a> should be <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/22/vmware-maritz-qa-tech-intel-cx_wt_0722techvmware.html" target="_blank">part of EMC or not</a> (their backhand way of bringing up the whole Diane Greene thing…he didn’t fall for it).&nbsp;
<p>Wait for it…wait for it…we have been waiting for it. VMware announced plans to <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Infrastructure/VMwares-ESXi-Hypervisor-for-Free/?kc=EWKNLNAV07242008STR1" target="_blank">launch a free version of its ESXI hypervisor</a> starting July 28. I have to question the timing on this one. <a href="http://redmondmag.com/news/rss.asp?editorialsid=10067" target="_blank">Why didn’t they do this before Hyper-v came out</a> and try to at least undercut the Microsoft announcement? VMware is and should be the leader in this space but they act like they’re playing from behind. And to Wall Street, perception counts for a lot.
<p>Surprisingly, there hasn’t been a lot of coverage after the June 2008 OMB mandate on IPv6 readiness. But one interesting follow-up, <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/072108-ipv6nat.html" target="_blank">a feature is set to be added to IPv6 which the upgrade was supposed to eliminate</a>. One of the <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/nat_just_say_no/">design goals</a> for IPv6 was that it would rid the Internet of network address translation (NAT), gateways that match increasingly scarce public IPv4 addresses with private IPv4 addresses used inside corporations, government agencies and other organizations.&nbsp; NAT adds complexity and cost, but due to the length of time it’s taken to migrate from IPv4 to IPv6, engineers may create special NAT devices to translate between IPv4-only and IPv6-only hosts and hopefully nudge along the transition to IPv6. IEEE is all set to meet on this topic later this month.</p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=abc&amp;publisher=ea11358c-69de-4e80-9804-e964a8930b70&amp;title=Links+List+7.25.08&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.sciencelogic.com%2Flinks-list-72508%2F07%2F2008">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6-only hosts">ipv6-only hosts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6 readiness">ipv6 readiness</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nat">nat</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/special nat devices">special nat devices</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/financial analyst call">financial analyst call</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/government agencies">government agencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4 addresses">ipv4 addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4">ipv4</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/links-list-72508/07/2008">Links List 7.25.08</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Ghost in Your Machine: IPv6 Gateway to Hackers]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/530dad428253058c464d5e1be1576707</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/530dad428253058c464d5e1be1576707</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It may be years before the new internet protocol IPv6 takes over from the current IPv4, but a security researcher is warning that many systems -- corporate and personal -- are already open to attack...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[It may be years before the new internet protocol IPv6 takes over from the current IPv4, but a security researcher is warning that many systems -- corporate and personal -- are already open to attack through channels that have been enabled on their machines to support IPv6 traffic.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=7bd53c1b0a9eecd2b98435e82fd737fb" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=7bd53c1b0a9eecd2b98435e82fd737fb" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=AxFUaJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=AxFUaJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=V0if5j"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=V0if5j" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=d4YPXj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=d4YPXj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=sodBcJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=sodBcJ" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=TIk2xJ"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=TIk2xJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=NbY3Cj"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=NbY3Cj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=PaLJpj"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=PaLJpj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=FeZoIJ"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=FeZoIJ" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/340124004" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/340124005" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/support ipv6 traffic">support ipv6 traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/current ipv4">current ipv4</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security researcher">security researcher</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/machines">machines</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/channels">channels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/systems">systems</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attack">attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal">personal</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/340124005/the-ghost-in-yo.html">The Ghost in Your Machine: IPv6 Gateway to Hackers</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Feds Ready for IPv6 D-Day]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/7cc8fed44faf0df7c1eb7dfb1bb8ad2f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/7cc8fed44faf0df7c1eb7dfb1bb8ad2f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In August 2005 the White House issued a policy &quot;... directing all Federal government agencies to transition their network backbones to the next generation of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), by...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In August 2005 the White House issued <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/b-1-information.html">a policy</a> "... directing all Federal government agencies to transition their network backbones to the next generation of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), by June 30, 2008." That would be this Tuesday.

The requirements in that directive were not especially difficult, and <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/062608-ipv6-federal-government.html">it appears that it will be met</a>. Agencies are not required to move their traffic to IPv6 at this stage, just to demonstrate that they can properly handle IPv6 traffic on their backbones. So it's more an issue for routers than for servers, for example. There are no requirements in place for further adoption of IPv6.

Such requirements and such adoption are inevitable for the next administration though, as the depletion of the IPv4 address pool is scheduled to happen on its watch.
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=f7628feabaf2dd08ffc2987b9152d366" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=f7628feabaf2dd08ffc2987b9152d366" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/321247612" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/agencies">agencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/federal government agencies">federal government agencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4 address pool">ipv4 address pool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/requirements">requirements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network backbones">network backbones</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet protocol version">internet protocol version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/backbones">backbones</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/adoption">adoption</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/321247612/feds_ready_for_ipv6_dday.html">Feds Ready for IPv6 D-Day</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Feds Ready for IPv6 D-Day]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/7dd75c16ab7c2ddd38d390cd97621930</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/7dd75c16ab7c2ddd38d390cd97621930</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In August 2005 the White House issued a policy &quot;... directing all Federal government agencies to transition their network backbones to the next generation of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), by...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In August 2005 the White House issued <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/b-1-information.html">a policy</a> "... directing all Federal government agencies to transition their network backbones to the next generation of the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), by June 30, 2008." That would be this Tuesday.

The requirements in that directive were not especially difficult, and <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/062608-ipv6-federal-government.html">it appears that it will be met</a>. Agencies are not required to move their traffic to IPv6 at this stage, just to demonstrate that they can properly handle IPv6 traffic on their backbones. So it's more an issue for routers than for servers, for example. There are no requirements in place for further adoption of IPv6.

Such requirements and such adoption are inevitable for the next administration though, as the depletion of the IPv4 address pool is scheduled to happen on its watch.
<br style="clear: both;"/>
      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?s=b742e944cce30dd076f123598f0d122f"><img alt="" style="border: 0;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?s=b742e944cce30dd076f123598f0d122f"/></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=b742e944cce30dd076f123598f0d122f" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/338277693" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/agencies">agencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/federal government agencies">federal government agencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4 address pool">ipv4 address pool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/requirements">requirements</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network backbones">network backbones</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet protocol version">internet protocol version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/backbones">backbones</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/adoption">adoption</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/338277693/feds_ready_for_ipv6_dday.html">Feds Ready for IPv6 D-Day</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Directly connect to your corpnet with IPsec and IPv6]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8fa825adcf64d7fa728dd4b170277578</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8fa825adcf64d7fa728dd4b170277578</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Contrary to popular belief, the rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Well, ok, no actual rumors, but hey, one can dream, huh? My spring calendar was full of events in Asia and Australia,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to popular belief, the rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Well, ok, no <em>actual</em> rumors, but hey, one can dream, huh? My spring calendar was full of events in Asia and Australia, then TechEd US seemed to suddenly appear out of nowhere! So I've been kinda swamped. I've missed writing here; it's good to get back into the swing.</p>  <p>At TechEd this year, I gave a presentation called <strong>&quot;21st century networking: time to throw away your medieval gateways.&quot;</strong> (Actually, I've given this same talk before, at events in Amsterdam, Brussels, Oslo, and numerous on-campus customer meetings. It's time to bring the knowledge to the masses.)</p>  <p>I described an idea of using IPv6, IPsec, NAP, and group policy to build a pretty slick replacement for clunky VPN gateways. Turns out we've been piloting this very idea on our internal corpnet. Like a good little bunny I got myself enrolled in the thing and -- pardon the unattractive gushing -- this thing <em>rawks!</em> Here's a brief rundown of the parts you'd configure on <strong>managed clients</strong>:</p>  <ul>   <li>Windows Vista Business (with Software Assurance), Enterprise, or Ultimate editions</li>    <li>That are domain-joined</li>    <li>Users run as <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aaron_margosis/" target="_blank">non-admin</a></li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/grouppolicy/default.aspx" target="_blank">Group policy</a> applies numerous settings</li>    <li><a href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/0d75f774-8514-4c9e-ac08-4c21f5c6c2d91033.mspx?mfr=true" target="_blank">UAC</a> is enabled</li>    <li><a href="http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/c61f2a12-8ae6-4957-b031-97b4d762cf311033.mspx?mfr=true" target="_blank">BitLocker</a> is configured to protect confidential information stored offline</li>    <li>The <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb545423.aspx" target="_blank">Windows Firewall</a> is enabled</li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb545879.aspx" target="_blank">NAP</a> is used for checking health</li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/forefront/clientsecurity/default.aspx" target="_blank">Forefront Client Security</a> for keeping malware off the box</li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb742533.aspx" target="_blank">Smart cards</a> for strong authentication of users</li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb531150.aspx" target="_blank">IPsec</a> is required for connection authentication and traffic encryption</li>    <li><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb530961.aspx" target="_blank">IPv6</a> is required for worldwide Internet connectivity</li>    <li>A DNS suffix search list represents the data center name space</li>    <li>Static IPv6 DNS servers provide name resolution for hosts in the data center</li> </ul>  <p>What does this give you? True <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/anywhereaccess/default.mspx" target="_blank">anywhere access</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/execmail/2007/02-06secureaccess.mspx" target="_blank">anywhere in the world</a>, directly to corpnet resources from managed and secure client PCs. The Internet has replaced private WAN links for good reason: enormous cost benefits. The only thing holding us back from fully utilizing this development has been a lack of way to enforce and monitor the security of clients not physically located within the corpnet. Well, those days are over. Now you can build PCs that are trusted just as if they were on the corpnet, without knowing or caring anything about the underlying network connections. And let me tell you, it's as addictive as a few other substances I could mention, but will refrain, since this is (I hope) a family blog :)</p>  <p>Maybe you've heard of the notion of &quot;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-perimeterisation" target="_blank">deperimeterization</a>.&quot; Taken to its extreme, I think it's a bit silly. To put a SQL Server directly on the Internet is just plain stupid -- not because I don't think I could keep it protected, but simply because that's unnecessary risk. Only my web server -- and no one else -- should be talking to my SQL Server. But that web server will be in the same subnet as the SQL Server, and IPsec policies used also here will govern who can connect to the SQL Server. <strong>Warning to any and all network DMZs: your days are numbered!</strong></p>  <p>Shrink your perimeter to that which really matters -- your data center. <em>All</em> your clients live (as we would say in the olden days) &quot;on the outside of the firewall.&quot; Now then, there are two kinds of clients. Managed clients, as I described above, establish IPsec-authenticated/encrypted, group-policy-configured, NAP-enforced IPv6 connections directly to corpnet resources without going through any kind of access gateway. The router connecting you to your ISP is fully sufficient for blocking denial of service attempts. Be sure to follow my advice in &quot;<a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2006/07/10/Configure-your-router-to-block-DOS-attempts.aspx" target="_blank">Configure your router to block DOS attempts</a>,&quot; and then add two more rules to permit incoming port udp/500 and IP protocol 50 over IPv6. That's it. No NATing or other unnatural network acts are required (finally, you can stop lying to your significant other about why you squirrel yourself away in the computer room all those weekend nights).</p>  <p>Unmanaged clients will continue to use IPv4 to access published Web and Win32 applications through a gateway like <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/forefront/edgesecurity/bb687299.aspx" target="_blank">IAG</a>. Since you can't trust these clients nor can you trust the data they're throwing at you, you have to inspect and validate at the perimeter. You can take advantage of IAG's <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/edgesecurity/iag/whitepapers.mspx" target="_blank">application-modifying capabilities</a> to &quot;wrap&quot; security around poorly-written web apps; you can even download an ActiveX control to unmanaged clients to perform some basic health checking, policy enforcement, and cache clearing. None of these eliminates the final requirement to continue inspecting and removing malware from servers where users store data: <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/forefront/serversecurity/bb734822.aspx" target="_blank">Exchange</a>, <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/forefront/serversecurity/bb734828.aspx" target="_blank">SharePoint</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/serversecurity/ocs/default.mspx" target="_blank">Office Communications Server</a>, and <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/forefront/clientsecurity/default.aspx" target="_blank">file servers</a>.</p>  <p><strong>Machines are mobile, data is mobile.</strong> The mainframes and large desktop PCs of the past posses an effective security attribute: the heaviness of the machines. You couldn't easily saunter out the front door with a PC-AT in your pocket! These days, we all line our pockets with tiny little mobile phones stuffed with 16GB of storage. It's now a fact: data moves. And like water, data moves wherever it can, as rapidly as it can, often beyond your control if you don't prepare for that. With properly-configured and managed clients we can enjoy a single access and authentication experience no matter where the computer is physically located. For example: I can sit in my house and enter '&quot;http://internal-web-site-name&quot; in my browser. The DNS suffix search list adds the appropriate suffix, my browser's resolver performs an IPv6 name lookup, and my computer makes an authenticated and encrypted connection, after it meets the NAP policy, directly to that internal server. Very nice. As far as I'm concerned, there's no difference between the Internet and my corpnet. It's all <em>just there.</em></p>  <p>For a while now many of you know I've been speaking and writing, mostly at the conceptual level, about the day when such a way of remote computing will arise. Well, my friends, that day is now. You can indeed build it now, with the products you have. I won't admit it's all peaches and cream: there's a fair number of moving parts here, it's true. But most of these moving parts are parts you're already familiar with: I'm simply encouraging you to move them in a specific way. You'll need to do some custom scripting for client-side connection diagnostics, but that's about it.</p>  <p>My next step is to create a more detailed guide, which I plan to publish through TechNet Magazine. I'm targeting (but not promising) the October issue. The article will include greater details about configuring your infrastructure to support the managed clients I describe.</p>  <p>I've lost track of the swelling number of individual conference attendees and the plethora of email writers who've expressed a desire to build this in their own environments. The one common thread from everyone is &quot;I want to do it now!&quot; Folks, it's really pretty exciting for me to see so many of you ready to cross the chasm from the perdition of paleo-networking (layer upon endless, complex layer of DMZs) into the paradise of flat, simple, cheap, and secure access to information. If you haven't yet, please take the time to read through some of our information (especially Scott Charney's paper) on <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/twc/endtoendtrust/default.mspx" target="_blank">end-to-end trust</a>. Friends, the idea I describe above is the plumbing for realizing the end-to-end trust vision.</p><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3078070" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/directly">directly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/corpnet">corpnet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sql server directly">sql server directly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data center">data center</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/trust">trust</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/end-to-end trust vision">end-to-end trust vision</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/users store data">users store data</category>
      <source url="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2008/06/25/directly-connect-to-your-corpnet-with-ipsec-and-ipv6.aspx">Directly connect to your corpnet with IPsec and IPv6</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Internet Protocol Version 6]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/de3abd31ad8fcfc01fcd4cc0d0b6ccef</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/de3abd31ad8fcfc01fcd4cc0d0b6ccef</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[With the explosion of the World Wide Web and email the 32-bit addresses Internet Protocol version 4 used would run out in the not-so-distant future. In 1994, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[With the explosion of the World Wide Web and email the 32-bit addresses Internet Protocol version 4 used would run out in the not-so-distant future. In 1994, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) established a working group to define the successor to IPv4, IPv6. In March 2008 the US government issued a memorandum requiring that by June 2008 "all agencies' infrastructure must be using IPv6. This article provides the rationale for the US government's edict, along with the technical features that distinguish IPv6 from its predecessor, IPv4.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=604100278109fe27e92c10757bff8821" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=604100278109fe27e92c10757bff8821" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/distinguish ipv6">distinguish ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/world wide web">world wide web</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technical features">technical features</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/task force">task force</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/government">government</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv4">ipv4</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/not-so-distant future">not-so-distant future</category>
      <source url="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?i=604100278109fe27e92c10757bff8821">Internet Protocol Version 6</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
