<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: outbound]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/outbound</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/daf41722d6d77279c1bc458efdecdb78</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/daf41722d6d77279c1bc458efdecdb78</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[New Video: Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand John Strand of Black Hills Security sent me an awesome video on using Metasploit to create an EXE with the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[New Video:<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/metasploit-create-reverse-meterpreter-payload-executable">Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand</a><br/><a href="http://www.john-strand.com/">John Strand</a> of <a href="http://www.blackhillsinfosec.com">Black Hills Security</a> sent me an awesome video on using Metasploit to create an EXE with the Meterpreter payload that creates a reverse TCP connection outbound, blowing through many NAT boxes and firewalls. This goes great with a previous video I did on <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/binders-iexpress-trojans">EXE Binders/Joiners</a>.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exe">exe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/video">video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/previous video">previous video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/metasploit">metasploit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meterpreter payload">meterpreter payload</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/black hills security">black hills security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awesome video">awesome video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exe bindersjoiners">exe bindersjoiners</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nat boxes">nat boxes</category>
      <source url="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/metasploit-create-reverse-meterpreter-payload-executable">Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/b82f9c517552472a8fa61746d0fd6310</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/b82f9c517552472a8fa61746d0fd6310</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[New Video: Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand John Strand of Black Hills Security sent me an awesome video on using Metasploit to create an EXE with the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[New Video:<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/metasploit-create-reverse-meterpreter-payload-executable">Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand</a><br/><a href="http://www.john-strand.com/">John Strand</a> of <a href="http://www.blackhillsinfosec.com">Black Hills Security</a> sent me an awesome video on using Metasploit to create an EXE with the Meterpreter payload that creates a reverse TCP connection outbound, blowing through many NAT boxes and firewalls. This goes great with a previous video I did on <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/binders-iexpress-trojans">EXE Binders/Joiners</a>.
<p><a href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/erZrUDRIOq4zsS9m5NFICMysxkc/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/erZrUDRIOq4zsS9m5NFICMysxkc/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~4/_FvdkQLGdgY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exe">exe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/video">video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/previous video">previous video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/metasploit">metasploit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meterpreter payload">meterpreter payload</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/black hills security">black hills security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awesome video">awesome video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exe bindersjoiners">exe bindersjoiners</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nat boxes">nat boxes</category>
      <source url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~3/_FvdkQLGdgY/i.php">Using Metasploit to create a reverse Meterpreter payload EXE by John Strand</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security Briefing: June 10th]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8fbd92f7b4993b63db6d1dcb0b3307ac</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8fbd92f7b4993b63db6d1dcb0b3307ac</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Finally the iPhone is coming to Canada! Yes, I know I could have a cracked one. Im just glad to see it officially released here. A question that remains. What kind of data rates are Ted Rogers and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src='http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/newspapera.jpg' alt='newspapera.jpg' /></center></p>
<p>Finally the iPhone is coming to Canada! Yes, I know I could have a cracked one. I&#8217;m just glad to see it officially released here. A question that remains. What kind of data rates are Ted Rogers and company going to charge?</p>
<p>Click here to <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Liquidmatrix">subscribe to Liquidmatrix Security Digest!</a>. Welcome to all of our new subscribers yesterday! Thanks for joining!</p>
<p>And now, the news&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2218636/bug-exposed-web-security">Bug exposed in web security standard</a> | vnunet</li>
<li><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-9962106-38.html">How safe is instant messaging? A security and privacy survey</a> | CNET</li>
<li><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-immig10-2008jun10,0,2775632.story">Bush widens immigration checks</a> | LA Times</li>
<li><a href="http://secunia.com/advisories/29293/">Apple QuickTime Multiple Vulnerabilities</a> | Secunia</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/blind-teenage-h.html">FBI Charges Blind Phone Phreak With Intimidating a Verizon Security Official</a> | Wired</li>
<li><a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/Exploiting-VoIP-vulnerabilities-to-steal-confidential-data/article/111091/">Exploiting VoIP vulnerabilities to steal confidential data</a> | SC Magazine</li>
<li><a href="http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Security-holes-in-Linux-kernel-closed--/news/110894">Security holes in Linux kernel closed</a> | Heise</li>
<li><a href="http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/Windows-Server-2008-Firewall-Advanced-Security-Part2.html">Overview of the Windows Server 2008 Firewall with Advanced Security Part 2: Inbound and Outbound Firewall Rules</a> | Windows Security</li>
<li><a href="http://www.fcw.com/online/news/152762-1.html">VA promotes teamwork on cybersecurity</a> <i>(-10 points)</i> | FCW</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1253">Another bug your tools won’t find and your WAF won’t prevent</a> | ZDNet</li>
</ol>
<p> Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/News" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Daily+Links" rel="tag"> Daily Links</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Security+Blog" rel="tag"> Security Blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Information+Security" rel="tag"> Information Security</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Security+News" rel="tag"> Security News</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?a=i8NiCS"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?i=i8NiCS" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=6pnsmI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=6pnsmI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=6g26Ci"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=6g26Ci" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=xTCfWi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=xTCfWi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=IgA12i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=IgA12i" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=Q3Wf1i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=Q3Wf1i" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~4/308882248" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information security">information security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/verizon security official">verizon security official</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security news">security news</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/liquidmatrix security">liquidmatrix security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/news">news</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security blog">security blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security holes">security holes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web security standard">web security standard</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~3/308882248/">Security Briefing: June 10th</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Companies Admit To Reading Email]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ff91d2ecdfb0a3453f760d45640daf9c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ff91d2ecdfb0a3453f760d45640daf9c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[No great shock here. I used to be one of those guys years ago who read employee email. And let me tell you, most non-spam email (try 90%) is trivial crap
From Tech Herald
So who reads your email at...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No great shock here. I used to be one of &#8220;those guys&#8221; years ago who read employee email. And let me tell you, most non-spam email (try 90%) is trivial crap. </p>
<p>From Tech Herald:</p>
<blockquote><p>So who reads your email at the office? Apparently more people than you think. Forty-four percent of the companies responding to the study said that they investigated an email leak of confidential information in the past year. Forty-one percent reported that they employ staff to read or otherwise analyze the contents of outbound email. In addition, twenty-two percent said they employ staff primarily or exclusively for this purpose.</p>
<p>There are several cases where someone has been terminated over the contents of email. Most are fired under a clause in the company’s Internet Usage Policy. The debate is a huge one, with people expecting privacy when they send email, often personal, from a work account or access personal accounts at the office. Simply put, you have no privacy at the office, and if you get any at all, you should expect very little. Some companies will offer some “personal time” and allow internet usage, but mostly everything you send is logged and monitored, and yes even read by someone else.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mostly? Try damn near everything for most firms. Email was read only at the behest of legal or HR. Thankfully, those requests seldom arrived. </p>
<p>When people start a new job more often than not they are handed a copy of the acceptable use policy for their respective firm. It is staggering how often people glance over it while pondering dinner plans Then sign off that they read and accept. It&#8217;s like people that click on EULA&#8217;s mindlessly. </p>
<p>Later, they potentially pay the price for that lack of attention to detail.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/200821/1053/Companies-actually-admit-to-reading-email">Article Link</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?a=T8Kr2c"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?i=T8Kr2c" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=4vMPAH"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=4vMPAH" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=Pw3WTh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=Pw3WTh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=Vd9mJh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=Vd9mJh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=A845vh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=A845vh" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=sjoFUh"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=sjoFUh" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~4/296605760" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email">email</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/outbound email">outbound email</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email leak">email leak</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/employee email">employee email</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people glance">people glance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/non-spam email">non-spam email</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access personal accounts">access personal accounts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal">personal</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~3/296605760/">Companies Admit To Reading Email</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Little Snitch 2.0.3]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/980bac3e0a23a2d59441e56aa7ee8725</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/980bac3e0a23a2d59441e56aa7ee8725</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[When I reviewed Objective Development Software GmbH's Little Snitch 1.2 for Macworld two years ago, it helpfully filled a gap in the ipfw firewall software Apple provides with Mac OS X. The built-in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[When I reviewed Objective Development Software GmbH's Little Snitch 1.2 for Macworld two years ago, it helpfully filled a gap in the ipfw firewall software Apple provides with Mac OS X. The built-in firewall monitored, and blocked, only incoming network traffic, and Little Snitch was one of the available options for dealing with outbound network traffic. With Little Snitch 2 ($25), Objective Development has delivered a worthy successor, with more-informative alerts to the user, more ways of seeing what traffic is coming from your Mac, and more pre-configured rules for common types of network traffic.<p><A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=82463?">
<IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=82463?" border="0" width="468" height="60"></A>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/traffic">traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/outbound network traffic">outbound network traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network traffic">network traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/snitch">snitch</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mac">mac</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/objective development">objective development</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/built-in firewall">built-in firewall</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/common types">common types</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worthy successor">worthy successor</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/050808-little-snitch.html?fsrc=rss-security">Little Snitch 2.0.3</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Layered Security: Solving the Cube]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a4a1c48d403ecadc46a5225e9fcaf19c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a4a1c48d403ecadc46a5225e9fcaf19c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[We always talk about layered security and defense in depth as strategies for securing the network. And, usually, were talking about these as good strategies. However, with more and more security stuff...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We always talk about <strong>&#8216;layered security&#8217;</strong> and <strong>&#8216;defense in depth&#8217;</strong> as strategies for securing the network. And, usually, we&#8217;re talking about these as <em>good</em> strategies. However, with more and more security &#8216;stuff&#8217; on the market, the layered security solutions are starting to lose some of their value. </p><p><strong>Why?</strong> Well, the problem with layered security is that we tend to assume if Layer X isn&#8217;t providing a particular protection, Layer Y must be&#8230; and we all know what assuming does. </p><p>In the good ol&#8217; days, we relied on&nbsp;firewalls- perhaps nested firewalls, or ones&nbsp;positioned strategically&nbsp;on the LAN as well as the WAN. Because of our network architecture at the time, that was the primary (and probably only <em>required</em>) protection. After years of de-perimeterization and the increase of threats from both remote-access and insiders, we have a much different landscape. </p><p>The addition of resources and availability in the network has lead to the addition of vulnerabilities and threats. </p><p><strong>Now&#8230;</strong> our schools need to protect children from material online. Now&#8230; we need to stop Trojans from sneaking in with VoIP apps. We need to access our corporate network securely from Starbucks.&nbsp;Our corporations need to protect their network from users accessing or publishing&nbsp;illegal content on the Internet. We need to protect our email, make sure its virus-free and not allowing employees to send sensitive information to the outside world. </p><p>All these increased risks and threats lend to the need for more&nbsp;protection in the environment. There&#8217;s just no single silver bullet or cure-all for the problems we&#8217;re facing. </p><p><strong>What does this mean?</strong> It means we&#8217;re adding security products to the network to address these issues. We need content filtering. We need&nbsp;layer-7 visibility on the WAN for inbound/outbound application control. We need data leakage prevention. We need email security. We SSL-VPNs for secure remote access&#8230; the list goes on. </p><p><strong>So, what&#8217;s the problem?</strong> We&#8217;re living in a world of security buzzwords and &#8216;hot topic&#8217; solutions. But the problem is 2-fold. </p><blockquote><p><strong>Problem 1- We forget to&nbsp;KISS IT</strong>. In the frenzy to understand and implement these hot new products, we&#8217;re losing sight of some basic security functions and overlooking some really important security fundamentals. Remember to KISS IT and keep your basic security solutions simple- then layer on top of that. Your hot new NAC or DLP solution won&#8217;t seem so impressive if your basic firewall rules haven&#8217;t been properly configured. </p><p><strong>Problem 2- We&nbsp;forget thy layers.</strong> After you KISS IT, you need to start layering <em>responsibly</em>. That means having a CLEAR understanding of what each solution does- <em>or does not</em>- do. You wouldn&#8217;t believe how many customers call and want to hear about Widget A for a certain solution that Widget A is not designed to fix. I deal with it daily and I blame (for the most part) vendors for mis-advertising their product as a fix-all. Whether its hardware or software- know what each piece of your security solution is designed to do, what it&#8217;s actually doing, and keep that information documented. <em>Documented</em>- I&#8217;m going to say it again. Your firewall/UTM may offer content filtering and gateway AV, but are you using it? Are you using a WAN optimization product to stop prohibited applications, or is your web filter doing that? Do you even know?</p></blockquote><p><strong><span class="full-image-float-right"><img style="width: 237px; height: 199px" alt="rubiks2.jpg" src="http://www.securityuncorked.com/storage/rubiks2.jpg" /></span>Solving the Cube.</strong> Layered security is like solving a Rubik&#8217;s Cube. You may think you&#8217;re on the right track after you get one side solved&#8230; but the other 5 are just a huge mess. There are patterns and algorithms&nbsp;you must&nbsp;follow to solve all sides together. Your layered security solution is no different. Understand what each piece is doing, how it fits in, and when to twist one layer here to implement a solution as part of a different layer over there. </p><p># # #</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email security">email security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security products">security products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security solutions">security solutions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/solution">solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/solution does-">solution does-</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security fundamentals">security fundamentals</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security solution">security solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/basic security functions">basic security functions</category>
      <source url="http://www.securityuncorked.com/security-uncorked/2008/5/4/layered-security-solving-the-cube.html">Layered Security: Solving the Cube</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Helping to Deliver at Interop, One Flashing Light at a Time!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/5882cde382c7029ca957a6c787430ce8</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/5882cde382c7029ca957a6c787430ce8</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Technical Opportunities for increasing the EM7 visibility at Interop
I have been manning the NOC help desk for the past week and it has been a complete blast working with a world class team of...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Technical Opportunities for increasing the EM7 visibility at Interop.</em></p>
<p>I have been manning the NOC help desk for the past week and it has been a complete blast working with a world class team of engineers to set-up the &#8220;largest Temporary network in the world!&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>First you start with the problem.</strong></p>
<p>The problem was how to collect and real-time graph the aggregate inbound and outbound bandwidth from 4 Enterasys core network routers (Enterasys XSR 3250 Routers) on 42&#8221; &amp; 52&#8221; flat screens used in the NOC at Interop Las Vegas.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/bandwidth-consumption-graph.png"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="165" alt="Bandwidth Consumption Graph" src="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/bandwidth-consumption-graph-thumb.png" width="391" border="0" /></a></p>
<p> <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/helping-to-deliver-at-interop-one-flashing-light-at-a-time/05/01/2008/#more-76" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.3&amp;publisher=f8a81d13-50d0-4a5c-833d-8e5f2341e305&amp;title=Helping+to+Deliver+at+Interop%2C+One+Flashing+Light+at+a+Time%21&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.sciencelogic.com%2Fhelping-to-deliver-at-interop-one-flashing-light-at-a-time%2F05%2F01%2F2008%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/interop">interop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/world">world</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/world class team">world class team</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/interop las vegas">interop las vegas</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/noc">noc</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/real-time graph">real-time graph</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/em7 visibility">em7 visibility</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/past week">past week</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technical opportunities">technical opportunities</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/helping-to-deliver-at-interop-one-flashing-light-at-a-time/05/01/2008/">Helping to Deliver at Interop, One Flashing Light at a Time!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[12 Signs that Your Company is Already in the Cloud]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a94cc4fdd9f7e59addfde334e0a08d2a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a94cc4fdd9f7e59addfde334e0a08d2a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[What are the telltale signs that your company is already Computing in the Cloud
Is it when the CIO makes a big announcement at the monthly IT meeting
Is it when the IT newsletter drops a reference to...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="building_gap" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/74471232@N00/506202234/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/227/506202234_636bc16be9_m.jpg" border="0" alt="building_gap" /></a></p>
<p>What are the telltale signs that your company is already Computing in the Cloud?</p>
<p>Is it when the CIO makes a big announcement at the monthly IT meeting?</p>
<p>Is it when the IT newsletter drops a reference to pilot testing of some &#8216;web based&#8217; software?</p>
<p>Or, is it when the secretary whips out the boss&#8217;s Corporate Credit Card and <a href="http://www.mindtouch.com/blog/2008/04/07/">signs up</a> to a Cloud Service?</p>
<p>Here are 12 indicators that your company is *already* part of the Cloud:</p>
<ol>
<li>Your internal helpdesk reports fewer password resets.</li>
<li>Finance contacts you to confirm all the DVD readers are disabled - they are puzzled by the number of recurring credit card charges for Amazon (are the secretaries spreading out their orders for &#8220;Lost&#8221; DVDs again?).</li>
<li>You are asked to authorise a network change ticket to send all outbound network traffic via the perimeter firewall, before being routed back to the internal server room (for performance reasons). </li>
<li>You walk into the Data Center and it feels cooler than usual.</li>
<li>When the builders next door accidentally saw through the company Internet connection, people complain there must be a DoS attack going on as they can&#8217;t get to their files.</li>
<li>During physical inspections, you notice unexplained gaps in server cabinets.</li>
<li>Login failures go down, in fact login &#8220;attempts&#8221; in general go down but the company car park is full.</li>
<li>As you walk through the office, you notice all the &#8220;Security Awareness&#8221; posters have been replaced with pictures of <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/mz/04/51/0451_18innova.jpg">Jeff Bezos</a> (!)</li>
<li>You are asked to authorise a visit from the local environment group.  Fearing protesters, you are surprised to learn that your company has won a prize for reducing its Carbon Footprint</li>
<li>Your Intrusion Prevention System is preventing the call center from uploading contracts stored as GIF files.</li>
<li>You detect the presence of &#8216;malware&#8217; in the form of unexplained &#8216;Machine Images&#8217; on IT&#8217;s desktops.</li>
<li>You stop finding Windows passwords under keyboards, instead you find random hex digits next to the words &#8216;Access Key&#8217; and &#8216;Secret Key&#8217;.  You sigh, but at least they are setting difficult to guess passwords now!</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are charged with IT security in your company, you may want to start checking your web proxy logs for telltale signs that people are talking to the Cloud&#8230;or just talk to finance.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~4/277808874" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company">company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company car park">company car park</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/signs">signs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company internet connection">company internet connection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/telltale signs">telltale signs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit card">credit card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit card charges">credit card charges</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~3/277808874/">12 Signs that Your Company is Already in the Cloud</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A Guide to Evaluating E-mail Security Solutions]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bac53333ed38c1e6d13ecca65fd7da92</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bac53333ed38c1e6d13ecca65fd7da92</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: SonicWALL) New e-mail protections are now available to ensure the safety, privacy and security of corporate networks, data and personnel. The increased sophistication, versatility and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: SonicWALL)</b> New e-mail protections are now available to ensure the safety, privacy and security of corporate networks, data and personnel. The increased sophistication, versatility and effectiveness of e-mail security solutions have been paired with improved ease-of- use, providing a transparent, simply managed barrier against spam, phishing and other inbound e-mail-based attacks as well as outbound compliance.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=8CLAAz"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=8CLAAz" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/250911350" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/e-mail security solutions">e-mail security solutions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/e-mail protections">e-mail protections</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/outbound compliance">outbound compliance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/source">source</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attacks">attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ensure">ensure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/barrier">barrier</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/safety">safety</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/250911350/whitepapers.do">A Guide to Evaluating E-mail Security Solutions</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Regulations Shift Focus on Outbound Email Security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0f3279eb07c958453bddc6442a30b5aa</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0f3279eb07c958453bddc6442a30b5aa</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: Proofpoint) Outbound email poses a data loss and leakage risk. Mitigating risk is becoming important and complex with new information privacy and data protection regulations for internally and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: Proofpoint)</b>  Outbound email poses a data loss and leakage risk. Mitigating risk is becoming important and complex with new information privacy and data protection regulations for internally and externally exchanged information. Regulations like Personally Identifiable Information Guidelines place additional constraints on how data is stored, processed, and transmitted. Regulation compliance involves encrypting confidential corporate and private personal data.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=qSmPu8"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=qSmPu8" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/249002426" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data protection regulations">data protection regulations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/regulations">regulations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/identifiable information guidelines">identifiable information guidelines</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal data">personal data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data loss">data loss</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/leakage risk">leakage risk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/regulation compliance involves">regulation compliance involves</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/249002426/whitepapers.do">Regulations Shift Focus on Outbound Email Security</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
