<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: prime]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/prime</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Death Toll of Hotel Bombing in Pakistan Continues to Rise]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d7f9dda0825a1155b2802353af14c9f2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d7f9dda0825a1155b2802353af14c9f2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[It was no coincidence that the bombing in Islamabad which killed more than 40 and injured more than 250 was a popular place for foreigners to meet

U.S. military personnel were attending the Marriott...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[It was no coincidence that the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/Story?id=5846991&page=2">bombing in Islamabad</a> which killed more than 40 and injured more than 250 was a popular place for foreigners to meet. <br /><span id="fullpost"><br />U.S. military personnel were attending the Marriott when the bomb exploded.  The horrific injuries were not limited to foreigners however, as many Muslims were breaking their Ramadan fast and eating there at the time. <br /></span><br />Of course, the terrorists have shown us in the past that they are not opposed to killing other Muslims as was the case in the World Trade Center bombings in 2001<br />The Islamabad Marriott was said to have been well fortified.  If it wasn't afterall, let us hope that Hotel chains like the Marriott review the security of their overseas locations.  <br /><br />One thing is for sure, any overseas location that is considered a gathering place for foreigners, especially Americans in places like Pakistan, India, etc., will continue to be Prime Targets.  Serious surveys need to be conducted and overall security needs to be enhanced.  Vehicular access needs to be closely monitored and controlled in the more hostile regions.  Marriott and all the others need to focus on counter surveillance measures to ensure the safety of their guests.<div class="blogger-post-footer">Visit Sexton Executive Security at www.sextonsecurity.com</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/islamabad">islamabad</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/islamabad marriott">islamabad marriott</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/marriott">marriott</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/marriott review">marriott review</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/counter surveillance measures">counter surveillance measures</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/foreigners">foreigners</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hostile regions">hostile regions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vehicular access">vehicular access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/overseas location">overseas location</category>
      <source url="http://www.thebulletproofblog.com/2008/09/death-toll-of-hotel-bombing-in-pakistan.html">Death Toll of Hotel Bombing in Pakistan Continues to Rise</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hackers Attack Iraq's Vulnerable Computers]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2113173f41adb3ceaaba754bcc542948</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2113173f41adb3ceaaba754bcc542948</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Iraq's government is engaged in a bloody struggle against al-Qaeda, and its computers make a prime target for global terror networks that have added hacking to their...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Iraq's government is engaged in a bloody struggle against al-Qaeda, and its computers make a prime target for global terror networks that have added hacking to their arsenal.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/global terror networks">global terror networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computers">computers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/iraq">iraq</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bloody struggle">bloody struggle</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prime target">prime target</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/government">government</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/al-qaeda">al-qaeda</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/arsenal">arsenal</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Hackers_Attack_Iraq_s_Vulnerable_Computers_2">Hackers Attack Iraq's Vulnerable Computers</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Here come the Yankees!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c5d164a15ccde087d06b825484114417</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c5d164a15ccde087d06b825484114417</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Image by goddam via Flickr
Ah, its almost August. Football training camps are open and the Yankees and Red Sox are battling. Does it get any better? For most of this year I thought the Yankees were...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="zemanta-img" style="DISPLAY: block; FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 1em"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40732559077@N01/2663295426"><img alt="IMG_8903" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3238/2663295426_3cb27b1b5c_m.jpg" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; DISPLAY: block; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a> <p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40732559077@N01/2663295426">goddam</a> via Flickr</p></div>

<p>Ah, its almost August.&nbsp; Football training camps are open and <a class="zem_slink" title="New York Yankees" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm4W1Umjw48" rel="youtube">the Yankees</a> and Red Sox are battling. Does it get any better?&nbsp; For most of this year I thought the Yankees were going to be out of it this year and content to have a rebuilding year.&nbsp; We have several veteran players who past their prime and whose contracts are up after this year.&nbsp; We have a some great young talent that need to grow into their potential.&nbsp; It looked like the Bosox and Tampa Rays were going to run away with the division and wild card this year.</p>

<p>But like inevitable turning of the seasons, sometime after July 4th and then the All Star break, the Yankees beginninng their drive. Those old bones warm up in the heat of the summer and the bats come alive. This year the pitching is carrying them too.&nbsp; Old pros Andy Pettite and Mike Mussina are joined by Jobba Chamberlin.&nbsp; Mariano Rivera is still the best closer in baseball.&nbsp; Just like old times the Yanks went out and fleeced some 2nd division team for a bunch of minor leaguers and added a quality hitter and pitcher right before the trade deadline.&nbsp; Look around and we are one game behind the Red Sox for the wild card slot and only three games behind the Rays for first place!</p>

<p>I still think Tampa is going to stumble and it will come down to the Sox and the Yanks. Just the way it is supposed to be. I am heading up to NY next Friday, taking my sons to the shrine that is Yankee Stadium to see it in person in its last year.&nbsp; The rest of the baseball season is going to be very exciting.&nbsp; Again, just the way it is supposed to be!</p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/40345-yankees-edge-closer-in-east-win-sixth-straight">Yankees Edge Closer In East, Win Sixth Straight</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/38427-red-sox-yankeesis-the-rivalry-back-on">Red Sox - Yankees...Is the rivalry back on?</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/3bc70bcf-4de5-4666-9635-86bee4228f89/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3bc70bcf-4de5-4666-9635-86bee4228f89" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees">yankees</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees edge closer">yankees edge closer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/closer">closer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sox">sox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/red sox">red sox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wild card slot">wild card slot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees beginninng">yankees beginninng</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wild card">wild card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/2nd division team">2nd division team</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/here-come-the-y.html">Here come the Yankees!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Here come the Yankees!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/33ab87e029883188b279cb6ee1867db9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/33ab87e029883188b279cb6ee1867db9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Image by goddam via Flickr
Ah, its almost August. Football training camps are open and the Yankees and Red Sox are battling. Does it get any better? For most of this year I thought the Yankees were...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="zemanta-img" style="DISPLAY: block; FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 1em"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40732559077@N01/2663295426"><img alt="IMG_8903" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3238/2663295426_3cb27b1b5c_m.jpg" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; DISPLAY: block; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a> <p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/40732559077@N01/2663295426">goddam</a> via Flickr</p></div>

<p>Ah, its almost August.&nbsp; Football training camps are open and <a class="zem_slink" title="New York Yankees" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm4W1Umjw48" rel="youtube">the Yankees</a> and Red Sox are battling. Does it get any better?&nbsp; For most of this year I thought the Yankees were going to be out of it this year and content to have a rebuilding year.&nbsp; We have several veteran players who past their prime and whose contracts are up after this year.&nbsp; We have a some great young talent that need to grow into their potential.&nbsp; It looked like the Bosox and Tampa Rays were going to run away with the division and wild card this year.</p>

<p>But like inevitable turning of the seasons, sometime after July 4th and then the All Star break, the Yankees beginninng their drive. Those old bones warm up in the heat of the summer and the bats come alive. This year the pitching is carrying them too.&nbsp; Old pros Andy Pettite and Mike Mussina are joined by Jobba Chamberlin.&nbsp; Mariano Rivera is still the best closer in baseball.&nbsp; Just like old times the Yanks went out and fleeced some 2nd division team for a bunch of minor leaguers and added a quality hitter and pitcher right before the trade deadline.&nbsp; Look around and we are one game behind the Red Sox for the wild card slot and only three games behind the Rays for first place!</p>

<p>I still think Tampa is going to stumble and it will come down to the Sox and the Yanks. Just the way it is supposed to be. I am heading up to NY next Friday, taking my sons to the shrine that is Yankee Stadium to see it in person in its last year.&nbsp; The rest of the baseball season is going to be very exciting.&nbsp; Again, just the way it is supposed to be!</p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/40345-yankees-edge-closer-in-east-win-sixth-straight">Yankees Edge Closer In East, Win Sixth Straight</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/38427-red-sox-yankeesis-the-rivalry-back-on">Red Sox - Yankees...Is the rivalry back on?</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/3bc70bcf-4de5-4666-9635-86bee4228f89/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3bc70bcf-4de5-4666-9635-86bee4228f89" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=K9tB2S"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=K9tB2S" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=r3rqcJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=r3rqcJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=2TVsfJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=2TVsfJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=CKKL1J"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=CKKL1J" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=SPH5LJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=SPH5LJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=jzwncj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=jzwncj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Ab2Ojj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Ab2Ojj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/347449598" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees">yankees</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees edge closer">yankees edge closer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/closer">closer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sox">sox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/red sox">red sox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wild card slot">wild card slot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/yankees beginninng">yankees beginninng</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wild card">wild card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/2nd division team">2nd division team</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/347449598/here-come-the-y.html">Here come the Yankees!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Case of the Stolen Blackberry and the Awesome Chinese Hacking Skills]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d2eac32f957ee076996ff3cc5f4bb5a2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d2eac32f957ee076996ff3cc5f4bb5a2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A high-level British government employee had his Blackberry stolen by Chinese intelligence: The aide, a senior Downing Street adviser who was with the prime minister on a trip to China earlier this...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A high-level British government employee had his Blackberry <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4364353.ece">stolen</a> by Chinese intelligence:

<blockquote>The aide, a senior Downing Street adviser who was with the prime minister on a trip to China earlier this year, had his BlackBerry phone stolen after being picked up by a Chinese woman who had approached him in a Shanghai hotel disco. 

The aide agreed to return to his hotel with the woman. He reported the BlackBerry missing the next morning.</blockquote>

That can't look good on your annual employee review.

But it's this part of the article that has me confused:

<blockquote>Experts say that even if the aide’s device did not contain anything top secret, it might enable a hostile intelligence service to hack into the Downing Street server, potentially gaining access to No 10’s e-mail traffic and text messages.</blockquote>

Um, what?  I assume the IT department just turned off the guy's password.  Was this nonsense peddled to the press by the UK government, or is some "expert" trying to sell us something?  The article doesn't say.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=r8ldBJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=r8ldBJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=eMhlgJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=eMhlgJ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blackberry">blackberry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shanghai hotel disco">shanghai hotel disco</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blackberry phone">blackberry phone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotel">hotel</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hostile intelligence service">hostile intelligence service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/10s e-mail traffic">10s e-mail traffic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/woman">woman</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/annual employee review">annual employee review</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese woman">chinese woman</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/the_case_of_the.html">The Case of the Stolen Blackberry and the Awesome Chinese Hacking Skills</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Indiana State University professor's laptop is stolen]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ac01a165449e657f832374db2c405cad</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ac01a165449e657f832374db2c405cad</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: Security Breach

Date Reported
7/15/08

Organization
Indiana State University

Contractor/Consultant/Branch
None

Victims
students who took economics classes from 1997 through the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Technorati Tag: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/security+breach" rel="tag">Security Breach</a><br><br>
<img src="http://breachblog.com/images/95781-88451/indianastate.jpg" width="137" align="right" height="48"><font size="2"><b>Date Reported: </b><br>7/15/08<br><br><b>Organization: </b><br><a href="http://www.indstate.edu/home.htm">Indiana State University</a> <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Contractor/Consultant/Branch:</span><br>None<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Victims:</span><br>"students who took economics classes from 1997 through the spring semester 2008"<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Number Affected:</span><br>"more than 2,500"<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Types of Data:</span><br>"names, grades, e-mail addresses and student identification numbers"*<br><br><font size="1">*Until 2003, student identification numbers were the equivalent of each student’s Social Security number.</font><br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Breach Description:</span><br>"A password-protected laptop computer containing personal information for current and former Indiana State University students was stolen during the weekend, the university reported Tuesday."<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Reference URL:</span><br><a href="http://www1.indstate.edu/laptopsecurity/">Indiana State University</a> <br><a href="http://www.wthitv.com/Global/story.asp?S=8684098&amp;nav=menu593_1">Associated Press via WTHI Channel 10 News</a> <br><a href="%20http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-in-isu-stolenlaptop,0,1255776.story">Associated Press via Chicago Tribune</a><br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Report Credit:</span><br>Indiana State University<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Response:</span><br>From the online sources cited above:<br><br>A password-protected laptop computer containing personal information for current and former Indiana State University students was stolen during the weekend, the university reported Tuesday.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] What do you suppose the purpose of the "password-protected" mention is?&nbsp; I hope it is not meant to reassure anyone that the information is safe.&nbsp; For those of you that do not know, password-protection is easily bypassed and in the opinion of many information security professionals (this one included), does NOT provide adequate protection for confidential information.</span><br><br>While there is no evidence to suggest that password security was breached, the university is taking the precaution of notifying all affected students for whom it has current contact information.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] If someone were to breach the "password security", what evidence would the school see?&nbsp; None.&nbsp; There would be no evidence (except locally on the laptop) if the local password store had been compromised.&nbsp; The school no longer has possession of the laptop, so the school would have no evidence.</span><br><br>The laptop contained data for students who took economics classes from 1997 through the spring semester 2008, estimated at more than 2,500 individuals.<br><br>If you took an economics class during this time period, but did not receive a letter, please call the Registrar’s Office to verify that you were on the list, and to update your address so that we may send you a letter.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] Contact information for the Registrar's Office, click </span><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www1.indstate.edu/registrar/">here</a><span style="font-style: italic;">.</span><br><br>The information includes names, grades, e-mail addresses and student identification numbers.<br><br>Beginning in 2003, use of social security numbers as student ID numbers was discontinued in favor of university-specific identification numbers.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] A sound security decision by the university would have been to follow up with a project to identify and remove Social Security numbers already held as student IDs.&nbsp; Maybe it was, but the information on this laptop was missed.</span><br><br>The theft occurred Saturday while the professor was traveling in southern Indiana<br><br>the professor was traveling with his family and briefly left the computer unattended<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] A laptop can grow legs in a flash.&nbsp; A person doesn't need to leave a laptop unattended for very long for it to disappear.</span><br><br>The incident occurred on July 12, 2008 and was reported to university officials on July 14, 2008.<br><br>The incident was reported immediately to the appropriate law enforcement agency and early Monday to university officials.<br><br>The extent of the information contained on the computer was not determined until Monday night.<br><br>Faculty and staff are being reminded that university policy prohibits the storage of private, sensitive data on portable computers.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] Excellent policy provision.&nbsp; Policy does little if it is not communicated, enforced, audited against, and improved.&nbsp; Where was the failure in the breach?&nbsp; Was the policy not communicated to this professor, and thus he/she was not aware?</span><br><br>In addition, laptops provided to faculty are equipped with several security measures including encryption and a bio-metric fingerprint reader to prevent access by anyone other than the assigned user.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] An excellent standard (or procedure).</span><br><br>Approximately 500 ISU faculty members have laptop computers.<br><br>The university is reviewing its procedures to ensure compliance with existing policies, said Interim President C. Jack Maynard, the university’s provost and vice president for academic affairs<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">From the FAQs:</span><br><br>Q: What can someone do with a stolen SSN?<br>A: "With just a SSN there is little anyone can do in the way of setting up a false identity or securing credit. Generally an identity thief would need more information and documentation to set up false credit.<br><span style="font-style: italic;">[Evan] A SSN needs to be held in strict confidentiality in today's financial, employment, health, and other systems.&nbsp; It is often used for identification and authentication.&nbsp; Once an identity thief has a SSN, the owner of that SSN is now a prime target because the thief has the most confidential piece of information (ingredient) in the identity theft recipe.&nbsp; The rest of the information is typically easier to come by, i.e. name, address, employer, etc.&nbsp; It is true that an SSN alone is not enough information to commit identity theft, but it is an EXCELLENT start.</span><br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Commentary:</span><br>We can assume that the school knows the risks involved in storing confidential information on a poorly protected laptop.&nbsp; Otherwise, they probably wouldn't have policy and procedure against it.&nbsp; The school's statements that are meant to minimize the risk, seemingly without fact, are disappointing. <br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Past Breaches:</span><br>Unknown<br></font><br>
<script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Es/breachblog?i=http://breachblog.com/2008/07/17/indianastate.aspx" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/university">university</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal information">personal information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information includes names">information includes names</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/university students">university students</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/confidential information">confidential information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laptop">laptop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/evan contact information">evan contact information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/university policy prohibits">university policy prohibits</category>
      <source url="http://breachblog.com/2008/07/17/indianastate.aspx">Indiana State University professor's laptop is stolen</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is fear the only think stopping you from telling your security vendor to take a hike?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/9626e919c9ab8f75e1e3b74fa2349637</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/9626e919c9ab8f75e1e3b74fa2349637</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A blog with one of the biggest followings on the SBN is the GNUCitizen blog. Today in a post called &quot;Fear&quot; the author states, &quot;The entire information security industry today is based on fear .&quot; He...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/20/yinyanimage.gif"><img class="image-full" title="Yinyanimage" alt="Yinyanimage" src="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/20/yinyanimage.gif" border="0" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px 5px" /></a>A blog with one of the biggest followings on the <a href="http://networks.feedburner.com/Security-Bloggers-Network">SBN</a> is the <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/">GNUCitizen</a> blog. Today in <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/fear/">a post called &quot;Fear&quot;</a> the author states, &quot;The entire information security industry today is based on <strong>fear</strong>.&quot; He then goes on to say, &quot;This is what gives security vendors the power to sell you useless products which you don???t really need.&quot;&nbsp; So of course I don't agree with the later statement, not all of those products are useless, but is it really fear that is motivating buyers?</p>

<p>Fear of what is a good first question. The blog post talks about fear of being hacked, fear of harm to reputation.&nbsp; To that we can add fear of jail or fines and by doing so cover the compliance issue. So yeah, at first blush it does appear that fear is the prime motivator in security.&nbsp; But think a bit deeper on this and you come to the conclusion that fear is a primary driver for so much of what we do besides security.&nbsp; Fear of failure, fear of loss, fear, fear, fear. Is there anything besides fear that motivates people?</p>

<p>For me it comes down to the carrot or the stick.&nbsp; The carrot being the reward.&nbsp; So making money or however you measure success is certainly motivating.&nbsp; The stick is failure.&nbsp; Their are consequences of failure.&nbsp; But really isn't success and failure two heads of the same coin.&nbsp; Aren't the rewards of success and the consequences of failure a Zoroastic type of Yin and Yang?&nbsp; </p>

<p>So if in the final analysis, success and failure are intrinsically linked. There really is nothing wrong with saying security sales are motivated by fear, because by the same token they are motivated by success.&nbsp; Now as to useless security products, lets discuss that a bit later. All of this philosophy is hurting my head. </p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/fb70e484-4862-4e66-8e60-112bdb9941e0/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=fb70e484-4862-4e66-8e60-112bdb9941e0" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fear">fear</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless products">useless products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/products">products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vendors">security vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless security products">useless security products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless">useless</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/failure">failure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/success">success</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/is-fear-the-onl.html">Is fear the only think stopping you from telling your security vendor to take a hike?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is fear the only think stopping you from telling your security vendor to take a hike?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f320794fad447ce315e9db853c5f48a6</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f320794fad447ce315e9db853c5f48a6</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A blog with one of the biggest followings on the SBN is the GNUCitizen blog. Today in a post called &quot;Fear&quot; the author states, &quot;The entire information security industry today is based on fear .&quot; He...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/20/yinyanimage.gif"><img class="image-full" title="Yinyanimage" alt="Yinyanimage" src="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/06/20/yinyanimage.gif" border="0" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 5px 5px" /></a>A blog with one of the biggest followings on the <a href="http://networks.feedburner.com/Security-Bloggers-Network">SBN</a> is the <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/">GNUCitizen</a> blog. Today in <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/fear/">a post called &quot;Fear&quot;</a> the author states, &quot;The entire information security industry today is based on <strong>fear</strong>.&quot; He than goes on to say, &quot;This is what gives security vendors the power to sell you useless products which you don’t really need.&quot;&nbsp; So of course I don't agree with the later statement, not all of those products are useless, but is it really fear that is motivating buyers?</p>

<p>Fear of what is a good first question. The blog post talks about fear of being hacked, fear of harm to reputation.&nbsp; To that we can add fear of jail or fines and by doing so cover the compliance isssue. So yeah, at first blush it does appear that fear is the prime motivator in security.&nbsp; But think a bit deeper on this and you come to the conclusion that fear is a primary driver for so much of what we do besides security.&nbsp; Fear of failure, fear of loss, fear, fear, fear. Is there anything besides fear that motivates people?</p>

<p>For me it comes down to the carrot or the stick.&nbsp; The carrot being the reward.&nbsp; So making money or however you measure success is certainly motivating.&nbsp; The stick is failure.&nbsp; Their are consequences of failure.&nbsp; But really isn't success and failure two heads of the same coin.&nbsp; Aren't the rewards of success and the consequences of failure a zoroastic type of Yin and Yang?&nbsp; </p>

<p>So if in the final analysis, success and failure are intrinsically linked there really is nothing wrong with saying security sales are motivated by fear, because by the same token they are motivated by success.&nbsp; Now as to useless security products, lets discuss that a bit later. </p>

<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/fb70e484-4862-4e66-8e60-112bdb9941e0/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=fb70e484-4862-4e66-8e60-112bdb9941e0" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=dccJdG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=dccJdG" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=p5tj3I"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=p5tj3I" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=0wh3yI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=0wh3yI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=gFlh2I"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=gFlh2I" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=OwiVJI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=OwiVJI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=kLOIdi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=kLOIdi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ST4jBi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ST4jBi" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/316487375" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fear">fear</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless products">useless products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/products">products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vendors">security vendors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless security products">useless security products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/useless">useless</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/failure">failure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/success">success</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/316487375/is-fear-the-onl.html">Is fear the only think stopping you from telling your security vendor to take a hike?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Dynamic vulnerability assessment]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/309d2a70126b92b32ee6bbcdc8526758</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/309d2a70126b92b32ee6bbcdc8526758</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A few weekes ago I wrote about the current state of vulnerability assessment being like a parody of an Obama/Hillary commerical. Who answers the phone at 3am? For vulnerability assessment, the results...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A few weekes ago <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/05/are-current-vul.html">I wrote</a> about the current state of vulnerability assessment being like a parody of an Obama/Hillary commerical.&nbsp; Who answers the phone at 3am?&nbsp; For vulnerability assessment, the results are only as good as who answers the scan.&nbsp; This has been a problem for security managers and vulnerability assessors for some time.&nbsp; Balancing scanning during prime time and impacting network performance versus scanning during down times when the devices you need to scan may not be available.</p>

<p>Today StillSecure <a href="http://stillsecure.com/news_events/prdetails.php?id=446">announced</a> our reponse to ending this problem. We call it Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment (DVA).&nbsp; With DVA you will have vulnerability and compliance data as of at least the last time a device logged on the network.&nbsp; This closes the loophole and gives organizations a much more comprehensive and secure assessment of who is on the network and what they look like.</p>

<p>To accomplish this we are using some of our NAC technology from Safe Access. This allows us to detect devices as they come on the network. We can also use the purpose built Safe Access testing engine to deep compliance checks to supplement the tradtional vulnerability checks.&nbsp; We think this is a big step up in vulnerability assessment and management.&nbsp; Am interested in what others think.</p> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/22fb0815-34f1-4155-b7b6-d163817220fd/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=22fb0815-34f1-4155-b7b6-d163817220fd" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability assessment">vulnerability assessment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dynamic vulnerability assessment">dynamic vulnerability assessment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tradtional vulnerability checks">tradtional vulnerability checks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network performance versus">network performance versus</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/safe access">safe access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prime time">prime time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/dynamic-vulnera.html">Dynamic vulnerability assessment</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Dynamic vulnerability assessment]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/bb77e1c8113060b122c368b2e0250f98</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/bb77e1c8113060b122c368b2e0250f98</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A few weekes ago I wrote about the current state of vulnerability assessment being like a parody of an Obama/Hillary commerical. Who answers the phone at 3am? For vulnerability assessment, the results...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A few weekes ago <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/05/are-current-vul.html">I wrote</a> about the current state of vulnerability assessment being like a parody of an Obama/Hillary commerical.&nbsp; Who answers the phone at 3am?&nbsp; For vulnerability assessment, the results are only as good as who answers the scan.&nbsp; This has been a problem for security managers and vulnerability assessors for some time.&nbsp; Balancing scanning during prime time and impacting network performance versus scanning during down times when the devices you need to scan may not be available.</p>

<p>Today StillSecure <a href="http://stillsecure.com/news_events/prdetails.php?id=446">announced</a> our reponse to ending this problem. We call it Dynamic Vulnerability Assessment (DVA).&nbsp; With DVA you will have vulnerability and compliance data as of at least the last time a device logged on the network.&nbsp; This closes the loophole and gives organizations a much more comprehensive and secure assessment of who is on the network and what they look like.</p>

<p>To accomplish this we are using some of our NAC technology from Safe Access. This allows us to detect devices as they come on the network. We can also use the purpose built Safe Access testing engine to deep compliance checks to supplement the tradtional vulnerability checks.&nbsp; We think this is a big step up in vulnerability assessment and management.&nbsp; Am interested in what others think.</p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend>Related articles</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/webcast.do?command=viewWebCastDetail&amp;contentId=9057900&amp;source=rss_topic85">Addressing Compliance Challenges with Automated Vulnerability Management</a> [via Zemanta]</li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/22fb0815-34f1-4155-b7b6-d163817220fd/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=22fb0815-34f1-4155-b7b6-d163817220fd" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=wDvfBs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=wDvfBs" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Mmh29I"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Mmh29I" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=DYkFuI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=DYkFuI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=0pzoGI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=0pzoGI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ExZ6TI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ExZ6TI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=hA7Roi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=hA7Roi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=5JxCRi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=5JxCRi" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/308139432" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability assessment">vulnerability assessment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tradtional vulnerability checks">tradtional vulnerability checks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dynamic vulnerability assessment">dynamic vulnerability assessment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability management">vulnerability management</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network performance versus">network performance versus</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/safe access">safe access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prime time">prime time</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/308139432/dynamic-vulnera.html">Dynamic vulnerability assessment</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
