<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: proof]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/proof</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Blogging from DeepSec 2008 in Vienna]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/295cd975846e9f76da4909bf958b0713</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/295cd975846e9f76da4909bf958b0713</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am already back stateside from DeepSec and I am now flying to CSI 35th in DC; finally I had time to prepare my DeepSec blog post
First, I enjoyed DeepSec conference and I am grateful for the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am already back stateside from <a href="https://deepsec.net/schedule/">DeepSec</a> and I am now flying to <a href="http://www.csiannual.com">CSI 35th</a> in DC; finally I had time to prepare my <a href="https://deepsec.net/schedule/">DeepSec</a> blog post.</p>  <p>First, I enjoyed <a href="https://deepsec.net/schedule/">DeepSec</a> conference and I am grateful for the invitation to speak there. I love European conferences – and not only for having <em>infinitely</em> (with that being an <em>under</em>-statement of the year) superior coffee during breaks :-)&#160; In particular, I liked the audience for my presentation (slides will be posted here soon) and I think the audience liked my material and myself too :-)</p>  <p>What also impressed me a lot was Ivan Ristic speech, which was the second day keynote. He started by simply stating that ‘security industry has failed’ and that ‘a desktop is lost.’ His proof was in typical numbers like “75% of corporate systems are infected with at least 1 malware piece per system”, “1 million of malware types” and “25,000 unique malware samples a day seen.”&#160; However, he then broadened the subject and talked about how not only “a trusted desktop” is gone, but the entire world of “trust everything [on a system], all the time” is gone (his ideas were similar to what I planned to present in <a href="http://chuvakin.blogspot.com/2008/10/on-hitb-2008-conference.html">my HITB 2008 presentation</a> about “the 0wned world”)</p>  <p>I also like how he positioned all those “security user prompts” (in Vista and even before) as a proof that security technologies have failed and now we have to rely on the user to make security decisions (which will obviously fail as well since users are now fully conditioned to “see a chunk of technical mumbo-jumbo, then click OK”)</p>  <p>It was also interesting how he connected a lot of security failures to his “#1 reason: all programs run with all privileges of the user that runs them.”&#160; In fact, he illustrated it by reminding the audience that “everybody runs untrusted code every day today [web browser + Javascript, etc] while nobody did this 30 years ago.”&#160; He also beat up blackisting as an approach to security (but then again, everybody does it today :-)) - what was interesting that he opined that “we will spend the next 10 years proving that whitelisting will fail just as we spent previous 10 years proving that blacklisting fail.” His main point was that global “onslaught” of whitelisting and code signing will kill all sorts of useful things AND provide little security. </p>  <p>He then called for everybody to think about solving the hard, possibly non-sexy problems. This is the part where I could have used more details :-)</p>  <p>So, a fun speech (even though my telling of it is a bit jumbled… check out his slides whenever they are posted) – and a fun conference overall. Worth a 12 hour flight :-)</p>  <div class="blogger-post-footer">About me: http://www.chuvakin.org</div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?a=82qhN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?i=82qhN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?a=zSLaN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?i=zSLaN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?a=UnExN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog?i=UnExN" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog/~4/455651650" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security decisions">security decisions</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deepsec">deepsec</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security industry">security industry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security user prompts">security user prompts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security technologies">security technologies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user">user</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deepsec conference">deepsec conference</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security failures">security failures</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/AntonChuvakinPersonalBlog/~3/455651650/blogging-from-deepsec-2008-in-vienna.html">Blogging from DeepSec 2008 in Vienna</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Pentagon Clears Flying Car Project for Take-Off]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f4c95dc7fa4408ae3530ac9f052608b7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f4c95dc7fa4408ae3530ac9f052608b7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Pentagon mad science division Darpa is helping build thought-controlled robotic limbs, artificial pack mules, real-life laser guns, and &quot;kill-proof&quot; soldiers. So it comes as no surprise, really, that...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Pentagon mad science division Darpa is helping build thought-controlled robotic limbs, artificial pack mules, real-life laser guns, and "kill-proof" soldiers. So it comes as no surprise, really, that the agency is now getting into the flying car business, too.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=b16f5ab1eb540c8488f27d5fd8e67493" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=b16f5ab1eb540c8488f27d5fd8e67493" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=cctLN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=cctLN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=60vAn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=60vAn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=BrbJn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=BrbJn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=ztXfN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=ztXfN" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=LNnEN"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=LNnEN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=sJryn"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=sJryn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=vhASn"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=vhASn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=c6BWN"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=c6BWN" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/451846886" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/451846888" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/real-life laser guns">real-life laser guns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/artificial pack mules">artificial pack mules</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/robotic limbs">robotic limbs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/car business">car business</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/kill-proof">kill-proof</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/soldiers">soldiers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/agency">agency</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/surprise">surprise</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/451846888/darpas-flying-c.html">Pentagon Clears Flying Car Project for Take-Off</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Recently Patched Adobe Reader Flaw Used By Miscreants To Hijack PCs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1289ed628a574f8354bd00c4e024e44a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1289ed628a574f8354bd00c4e024e44a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Three days after Adobe rushed out a critical update, miscreants are actively exploiting a security flaw to execute malicious code on vulnerable machines. According to SANS Internet Storm Center,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Three days after Adobe rushed out a critical update, miscreants are actively exploiting a security flaw to execute malicious code on vulnerable machines. According to SANS Internet Storm Center, researchers have spotted infected PDF files being circulated online. The discovery comes on the heels of the public release of proof-of-concept code exploiting CVE-2008-2992. According to [...]]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/code">code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/execute malicious code">execute malicious code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerable machines">vulnerable machines</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security flaw">security flaw</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/miscreants">miscreants</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/public release">public release</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/adobe">adobe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pdf files">pdf files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/heels">heels</category>
      <source url="http://cyberinsecure.com/recently-patched-adobe-reader-flaw-used-by-miscreants-to-hijack-pcs/">Recently Patched Adobe Reader Flaw Used By Miscreants To Hijack PCs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[5 Recession-Proof Tactics to Unlock Revenue Using Marketing Automation]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0a6d7941f40d514e3ab429db126f924b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0a6d7941f40d514e3ab429db126f924b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[WHEN: Thursday, November 131 PM PT / 4 PM ET Join us now! SPONSORED BY: Microsoft Dynamics CRM OnlineLearn the top 5 recession-proof tactics to unlock revenue using marketing...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[WHEN: Thursday, November 131 PM PT / 4 PM ET&nbsp;&nbsp; Join us now!&nbsp;SPONSORED BY: Microsoft Dynamics CRM OnlineLearn the top 5 recession-proof tactics to unlock revenue using marketing automati...]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recession-proof tactics">recession-proof tactics</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unlock revenue">unlock revenue</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/top">top</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thursday">thursday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/november">november</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/automati">automati</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/join">join</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/itsecurity/~3/443709743/">5 Recession-Proof Tactics to Unlock Revenue Using Marketing Automation</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Links List 10.24.08]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8e899f9ef46d0a44116f8be8a4a6e8a3</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8e899f9ef46d0a44116f8be8a4a6e8a3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Ah a mystery. In The strange case of the slow server , Jack Hughes at The Tech Teapot had problems with internet presence slow website loading, problems logging in and slow emails. Sound familiar? In...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah a mystery. In “<a href="http://www.openxtra.co.uk/blog/the-strange-case-of-the-slow-server/" target="_blank">The strange case of the slow server</a>”, Jack Hughes at The Tech Teapot had problems with internet presence – slow website loading, problems logging in and slow emails. Sound familiar? In Jack’s case, the culprit was his main download site but the real issue was lack of visibility across multiple tools that provided much info but not in a way that was really usable. “The main lesson I take away from this is to make sure you’re creating meaningful stats for everything you’ve got because you never know what may be causing you a problem.”</p>
<p>Information Week’s new blog, Plug Into the Cloud, is already in the thick of the controversy on the emerging cloud computing trend. A recent post <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/cloud-computing/blog/archives/2008/10/cloud_computing_4.html" target="_blank">lists a bunch of highly opinionated comments on the topic</a> by site visitors, running the gamut from “Cloud computing is kind of like the Emperor’s New Clothes” to “cloud software can actually be more expensive than the software I load onto my hard drive.”</p>
<p>Jeff Doyle writes an interesting post about <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34103" target="_blank">resistance to IPv6</a> adoption (what, you think <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/times-up-ipv6-omb-mandate/06/2008" target="_blank">we forgot</a>?). Instead of the usual focus on IPv6 as an application issue, he points out that it’s actually an infrastructure thing. Would you wait to upgrade routers, switches, software, or servers until you can find a way to make the newer systems profitable? Would you wait to increase bandwidth only after you have customers waiting to use it? If you’ve answered these questions “no”, then why are you waiting to upgrade to IPv6?</p>
<p>We posted about whether or not there were <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/are-there-recession-proof-it-products/10/2008" target="_blank">recession proof products in IT yesterday</a>. Network World Management Maven Denise Dubie also writes about <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/nsm/2008/102008nsm2.html?nlhtnsm=ts_102208&amp;nladname=102208networksystemsmanagemental" target="_blank">readers weighing in on IT and the economy</a> – from having to do even more with less to seeing the economic downtown as an opportunity to highlight IT’s true value to the business.</p>
<p><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" src="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/clip-image002.jpg" border="0" alt="clip_image002" hspace="hspace" width="299" height="196" align="left" />And finally, on the lighter side: What would we do without crazy billionaires and their crazy purchases? According to a New York Times article, a company controlled by Google’s top execs just added a <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/a-new-fighter-jet-for-googles-founders/" target="_blank">fighter jet</a> to their roster. “Presumably no attacks on Microsoft are planned at this time.” <em>(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Alpha_jet_zj646_arp.jpg" target="_blank">image from Wikipedia</a>)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud software">cloud software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/jeff doyle writes">jeff doyle writes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6 adoption">ipv6 adoption</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post">post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recent post lists">recent post lists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/writes">writes</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/links-list-102408/10/2008">Links List 10.24.08</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Are There Recession-Proof IT Products?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/14ee1965cb0a5c1de3818f96fa79e8c8</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/14ee1965cb0a5c1de3818f96fa79e8c8</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[You have to live under a rock not to know that the financial crisis is having (and will continue to have for some time yet) a major impact on buying decisions, both corporate and personal. Gartner cut...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to live under a rock not to know that the financial crisis is having (and will continue to have for some time yet) a major impact on buying decisions, both corporate and personal. <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/With-the-Financial-Crisis-Looming-Gartner-Forrester-Trim-IT-Spending-Forecasts/?kc=EWWHNEMNL10232008STR1" target="_blank">Gartner cut its 2009 IT spending growth forecast</a> to 2.3%, less than half of the 5.8% it originally predicted just in August. And in <a href="http://www.crncanada.ca/index.php/VARBusiness/Gartner-lowers-2009-IT-spending-outlook.html?np=2" target="_blank">North America</a>, even more drastic cuts – growth will be only 0.5%, way down from the original 5.3% predicted.
<p>“Developed economics, especially in the United States and Western Europe, will be the worst affected, but emerging regions will not be immune,” said Peter Sondergaard, the global head of research at Gartner. “Europe will experience negative growth in 2009, the United States and Japan will be flat.”
<p>Forrester is more optimistic (so far). Back in September, the analyst firm revised their prediction downward to an <a href="http://www.techcareers.com/articles/i/ad3910/blogs/information-technology/wall-street-crisis-not-deterring-it-spending-forecasts.htm" target="_blank">increase of 6.1%</a> instead of the original 9.4%.
<p>But both firms agree that the first IT purchases to feel the cut are in hardware – PCs, servers, storage devices, communications equipment, etc. Next up, software purchases and IT servers.
<p>So are <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/branch/2008/102008branch1.html" target="_blank">MSPs immune to the economic slow down</a>? With expected layoffs and certainly hiring freezes across the board, turning to MSPs to pick up part of the load is starting to look better and better. At the recent MSP Alliance conference in Chicago, attending MSPs had a rosy view about growth in their industry, with sales cycles actually shortening from 6-12 months down to 2-6 months and 25% of them actually increasing prices in the past six months. It’s a good time to be a MSP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/growth">growth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/experience negative growth">experience negative growth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/drastic cuts growth">drastic cuts growth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/msps immune">msps immune</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/immune">immune</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/msps">msps</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gartner cut">gartner cut</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cut">cut</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/purchases">purchases</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/are-there-recession-proof-it-products/10/2008">Are There Recession-Proof IT Products?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ID Cards for Port Workers]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/7b89a23c7ef2b33e78ba95e3a665da45</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/7b89a23c7ef2b33e78ba95e3a665da45</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[While I am strongly opposed to a national ID, I have consistently said that giving strongly secured ID cards to groups like port workers is a good idea. It's happening in New England: The scannable...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am <a href="http://www.schneier.com/testimony-realid.html">strongly opposed</a> to a national ID, I have consistently said that giving strongly secured ID cards to groups like port workers is a good idea.  <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/10/06/high_tech_id_cards_rolling_out_at_ports/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+Massachusetts+news">It's happening</a> in New England:</p>

<blockquote>The scannable card serves as proof that a background check has been performed and it contains features aimed at preventing misuse. In addition to a photograph, the card contains a smart chip that carries a copy of the holder's fingerprint. Port and delivery workers, cargo handlers, and other employees who must venture into sensitive or secure areas will be required to submit to a fingerprint scan before entering those locations. The scanning machine will automatically perform a match analysis with the fingerprint embedded in the smart chip.</blockquote>

<p>This is a great application for these cards.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=Dl3LM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=Dl3LM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=hOCgM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=hOCgM" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/port">port</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/port workers">port workers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fingerprint">fingerprint</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fingerprint scan">fingerprint scan</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/card">card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/smart chip">smart chip</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scannable card serves">scannable card serves</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cards">cards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/features aimed">features aimed</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/id_cards_for_po.html">ID Cards for Port Workers</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[SecurityNow]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/9bbb559d2faf9742a8b2abb04416fa13</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/9bbb559d2faf9742a8b2abb04416fa13</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[We have just posted the first of a series of articles about a proof of concept called SecurityNow that we built at work....]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
We have just posted the first of a series of articles about a proof of concept called SecurityNow that we built at work. 
http://blogs.msdn.com/cisg/
&#160;

&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;     ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/securitynow">securitynow</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blogs">blogs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/articles">articles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/msdn">msdn</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/comcisg">comcisg</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/concept">concept</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/proof">proof</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/series">series</category>
      <source url="http://securitybuddha.com/2008/10/17/securitynow/">SecurityNow</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Taser-Proof Clothing]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8f1dabaf1892bdaf697ebb998571c6b6</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8f1dabaf1892bdaf697ebb998571c6b6</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Now why didn't I think of...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now why didn't I <a href="http://technology.newscientist.com/article/mg19626296.400">think of that</a>?</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=ibPLM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=ibPLM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=F38mM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=F38mM" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/taser-proof_clo.html">Taser-Proof Clothing</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[6 Months And Counting For Microsoft On CVE-2008-1436]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/630af6ad6042b9974b3ce04fba8e2039</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/630af6ad6042b9974b3ce04fba8e2039</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In April of this year Microsoft issued what seemed to be a rather serious security advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (951306) . Microsoft never provides gory...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[In April of this year Microsoft issued what seemed to be <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/951306.mspx">a rather serious security advisory: Vulnerability in Windows Could Allow Elevation of Privilege (951306)</a>.

Microsoft never provides gory details to vulnerabilities even after they've been patched, but by following <a href="http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1436">the CVE entry from it</a> you can get links to sites like <a href="http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/41880">IBM's ISS</a> which are willing to say more, or even to get <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/data/vulnerabilities/exploits/28833.zip">proof-of-concept exploit code from SecurityFocus</a>. The vulnerability allows authenticated attackers potentially to elevate privileges to LocalSystem.

Here we are, 6 months later, and Microsoft still has not patched this vulnerability. What's up with that? "Dustin" from the Microsoft Security Response Center <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2008/10/13/questions-about-microsoft-security-advisory-951306.aspx">recently addressed the question in a blog on Technet</a>, following an update to the advisory to note the availability of the proof-of-concept code.

It's worth noting that this vulnerability isn't really near the top of the scare list. Most of those 3rd parties you see linked on the CVE page rank it down a few notches. Even the usually hyperbolic Secunia calls it "Less Critical" (2 out of 5, 1 step up from "Not Critical"). Furthermore, back in April Microsoft provided workarounds which it says are effective against the proof-of-concept, at the cost of some administrative burden. They also say that they are unaware of any real-world attacks on this vector. You can find more details from Microsoft on the bug <a href="http://blogs.iis.net/nazim/archive/2008/10/14/token-kidnapping-in-windows.aspx">in Nazim's IIS Security Blog</a> and <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/swi/archive/2008/10/13/service-isolation-explanation.aspx">the Security Vulnerability Research & Defense blog</a>.

Still, 6 months! What Dustin said was "...we began our investigation and immediately realized it would not be trivial to address this issue without introducing new risks." They're still testing and developing a fix. 6 months later. It would seem that the obvious fixes all cause some serious problem, perhaps breaking 3rd party code.

Is this inherently unreasonable? It's getting there. The list of affected software includes most of the important versions of Windows. It may be that some of the time this has taken has gone to working with my speculative 3rd parties to update their own software, so that the fix won't have the same impact.

But let's not forget that this is not an easily exploitable bug. It's not wormable in any way and by the time it's invoked other serious breaches of security have to have happened. So I guess it's worth it for Microsoft to take their time doing it right.
<p><a href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/RrBOYL-vi28uTXzJfQn7Myh9IXc/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/RrBOYL-vi28uTXzJfQn7Myh9IXc/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/YD0XPCfBCKk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/defense blog">defense blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog">blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/iis security blog">iis security blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security vulnerability research">security vulnerability research</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/april microsoft">april microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/april">april</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerability">vulnerability</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/YD0XPCfBCKk/6_months_and_counting_for_microsoft_on_cve20081436.html">6 Months And Counting For Microsoft On CVE-2008-1436</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
