<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: remarkably]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/remarkably</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Game on!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/811075c6e59d5ec00b606569ae49ba5d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/811075c6e59d5ec00b606569ae49ba5d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In my last blog, we looked at increasing complexity on the part of both the good guys who are building legitimate businesses and on the part of the bad guys who are building a dark network of sorts...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last blog, we looked at  increasing complexity on the part of both the &ldquo;good&rdquo; guys who are building  legitimate businesses and on the part of the &ldquo;bad guys&rdquo; who are building a  &ldquo;dark network&rdquo; of sorts that is remarkably like the first.&nbsp; Today, I&rsquo;d like to dig into that and look at  a system for explaining this; and I thought I&rsquo;d use the phrase we used playing  street hockey in my youth in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada">Canada</a> when the cars cleared the road, and  the game got serious again: <B>game on!</b>...</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/game">game</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bad guys">bad guys</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/guys">guys</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dark network">dark network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/street hockey">street hockey</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/youth">youth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/complexity">complexity</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cars">cars</category>
      <source url="http://www.rsa.com/blog/blog_entry.aspx?id=1380">Game on!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Ed Felten on e-voting: What can go wrong]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/95ab05eafbfa35d55bdaf6015fcff266</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/95ab05eafbfa35d55bdaf6015fcff266</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Voting machines of all stripes have remarkably similar flaws and though geographically scattered, inaccurate tallies of votes are not likely to flip a whole presidential election, there is a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Voting machines of all stripes have remarkably similar flaws and though geographically scattered, inaccurate tallies of votes are not likely to flip a whole presidential election, there is a "nightmare scenario" that could. Meanwhile on the state level, security issues have already popped up in the wake of various states' deployments of direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machines.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remarkably similar flaws">remarkably similar flaws</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security issues">security issues</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nightmare scenario">nightmare scenario</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/presidential election">presidential election</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/machines">machines</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tallies">tallies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/flip">flip</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dre">dre</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/deployments">deployments</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/110308-ed-felten-on-e-voting-what.html?fsrc=rss-security">Ed Felten on e-voting: What can go wrong</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DNA Matching and the Birthday Paradox]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f1e349e060d1381314c908f1cb4ac391</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f1e349e060d1381314c908f1cb4ac391</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Nice essay : Is it possible that the F.B.I. is right about the statistics it cites, and that there could be 122 nine-out-of-13 matches in Arizona's database
Perhaps surprisingly, the answer turns out...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/are-the-fbis-probabilities-about-dna-matches-crazy/">Nice essay</a>:</p>

<blockquote>Is it possible that the F.B.I. is right about the statistics it cites, and that there could be 122 nine-out-of-13 matches in Arizona's database?

<p>Perhaps surprisingly, the answer turns out to be yes. Let's say that the chance of any two individuals matching at any one locus is 7.5 percent. In reality, the frequency of a match varies from locus to locus, but I think 7.5 percent is pretty reasonable. For instance, with a 7.5 percent chance of matching at each locus, the chance that any 2 random people would match at all 13 loci is about 1 in 400 trillion. If you choose exactly 9 loci for 2 random people, the chance that they will match all 9 is 1 in 13 billion. Those are the sorts of numbers the F.B.I. tosses around, I think.</p>

<p>So under these same assumptions, how many pairs would we expect to find matching on at least 9 of 13 loci in the Arizona database? Remarkably, about 100. If you start with 65,000 people and do a pairwise match of all of them, you are actually making over 2 billion separate comparisons (65,000 * 64,999/2). And if you aren't just looking for a match on 9 specific loci, but rather on <i>any</i> 9 of 13 loci, then for each of those pairs of people there are over 700 different combinations that are being searched.</p>

<p>So all told, you end up doing about 1.4 trillion searches! If 1 in 13 billion searches yields a positive match as noted above, this leads to roughly 100 expected matches on 9 of 13 loci in a database the size of Arizona's. (The way I did the calculations, I am allowing for 2 individuals to match on different sets of loci; so to get 100 different pairs of <i>people</i> who match, I need a match rate of slightly higher than 7.5 percent per locus.)</blockquote></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=oJwCL"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=oJwCL" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=L9RTL"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=L9RTL" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/match">match</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/match varies">match varies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/positive match">positive match</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/specific loci">specific loci</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pairwise match">pairwise match</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/percent chance">percent chance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chance">chance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/loci">loci</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/09/dna_matching_an.html">DNA Matching and the Birthday Paradox</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Opinion: Better than locks: A security approach to "free"]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/794dd1318f966ab86d355357157209fe</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/794dd1318f966ab86d355357157209fe</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly's &quot;Better Than Free&quot; essay has been burning up the Internet for months as readers debate which concepts hold value online (and how to monetize those values). Geoff Leeming tackles the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly's "Better Than Free" essay has been burning up the Internet for months as readers debate which concepts hold value online (and how to monetize those values). Geoff Leeming tackles the question from the security point of view... and comes up remarkably optimistic.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=NKme4t"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=NKme4t" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/300986838" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/kevin kelly">kevin kelly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free">free</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remarkably optimistic">remarkably optimistic</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/concepts hold">concepts hold</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/values">values</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/essay">essay</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/geoff">geoff</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/300986838/article.do">Opinion: Better than locks: A security approach to "free"</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Free Wi-Fi for AT&T Laptop Mobile Broadband Subscribers]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6154df3604e3991a1c823cbcd3edfecc</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6154df3604e3991a1c823cbcd3edfecc</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[AT&amp;T extends its free Basic Wi-Fi package to laptop-based mobile broadband subscribers, but not to smartphone users, including iPhones: This is a logical move, vastly overdue, because it's a better...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=25723"><strong>AT&T extends its free Basic Wi-Fi package to laptop-based mobile broadband subscribers, but not to smartphone users, including iPhones:</strong></a> This is a logical move, vastly overdue, because it's a better experience for a laptop user to have access in a Wi-Fi hotspot, while simultaneously removing load from AT&T's 3G network. This was predicted many years ago--as early as 2001 by EarthLink, Boingo Wireless, and Helio founder Sky Dayton--that 3G spectrum was scarce enough and expensive enough to operate that using Wi-Fi like a local heat sink to bleed usage off would keep 3G usable.</p>

<p>The other advantage, of course, is that 3G laptop users that find themselves out of the HSPA coverage area offered by AT&T don't fall back to EDGE or GPRS as long as they can find an AT&T-included hotspots. No hotspot operator likes to guarantee a particular local network speed, but I know that Wayport--which has or will build nearly all of the 17,000 locations in question here--aims for T-1 speed (1.5 Mbps each way) and quality (guaranteed uptime), depending on availability.</p>

<p>Windows laptop users with AT&T's Communication Manager software (version 6.8) installed will be automatically logged onto hotspots--and, I would guess, logged <em>off</em> 3G whether the user wants that or not! I'll be curious about reports from the field. <br />
 <br />
A 5G/month ($60/month or greater) plan is requierd for free Wi-Fi service.</p>

<p>The Boy Genius Report <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2008/05/19/att-launching-free-wifi-for-laptop-connect-all-smartphones-later-in-2008/"><strong>quotes</strong></a> what appears to be an internal AT&T memo about today's launch that free Wi-Fi for smartphones is coming later in 2008. Boy Genius has a remarkably good track record for a rumor/leak site, so I'm inclined to believe their report.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 05:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi service">free wi-fi service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi">free wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att">att</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi hotspot">wi-fi hotspot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internal att memo">internal att memo</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mobile broadband subscribers">mobile broadband subscribers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att extends">att extends</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laptop users">laptop users</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008326.html">Free Wi-Fi for AT&amp;T Laptop Mobile Broadband Subscribers</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hacker posts Chilean government data on 6 million]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f0d3678aeea6d452063329ccfaa0c877</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f0d3678aeea6d452063329ccfaa0c877</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Chile's remarkably lax data and privacy protections are in the spotlight as a hacker -- looking to do exactly that -- posts personal data on around six million...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Chile's remarkably lax data and privacy protections are in the spotlight as a hacker -- looking to do exactly that -- posts personal data on around six million Chileans.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=xIUgsd"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=xIUgsd" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/289301016" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remarkably lax data">remarkably lax data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/posts personal data">posts personal data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/million chileans">million chileans</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hacker">hacker</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy protections">privacy protections</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chile">chile</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spotlight">spotlight</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/289301016/article.do">Hacker posts Chilean government data on 6 million</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The United Nations Serving Malware]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d1d822ed6374f6c7f294fed616ac7d76</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d1d822ed6374f6c7f294fed616ac7d76</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Yet another massive SQL injection attack is making its rounds online, and this time without the SEO poisoning as an attack tactic , has managed to successfully infect the United Nations events page,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5b7NDpi2I/AAAAAAAABm4/XilLYHXJoSs/s1600-h/united_nations_malicious_injection.JPG"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5192188493080136546" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" alt="" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5b7NDpi2I/AAAAAAAABm4/XilLYHXJoSs/s200/united_nations_malicious_injection.JPG" border="0" /></a>Yet another massive SQL injection attack is making its rounds online, and this time without the <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/03/massive-iframe-seo-poisoning-attack.html">SEO poisoning as an attack tactic</a>, has managed to successfully infect the United Nations events page, which is now also marked as malware infected page, and with a reason since both the malicious URl and the injection are still active. <a href="http://securitylabs.websense.com/content/Alerts/3070.aspx">According to WebSense</a> :<br /><br />"<span style="font-style: italic;">This mass injection is remarkably similar to the attack we saw earlier this month. When a </span><span style="font-style: italic;">user browses to a compromised site, the injected JavaScript loads a file named 1.js which is ho</span><span style="font-style: italic;">sted on http://www.nihao[removed].com The JavaScript code then redirects the user to 1.htm (also hosted on the same server). Once loaded, the file attempts 8 different exploits (the attack last April utilised 12). The exploits target Microsoft applications, specifically browsers not patched against the VML exploit MS07-004 as well as other applications. Ominously files named McAfee.htm and Yahoo.php are also called by 1.htm but are no longer active at the time of writing. There are further similarities too between the two mass attacks. Resident on the latest malici</span><span style="font-style: italic;">ous domain is a tool used in the execution of the attack. An analysis of that tool can be found in the ISC diary entry here. Mentioned in that diary entry is http://www.2117[removed].net. Our blog on that attack can be found here. It appears that same tool was used to orchestrate this attack too. </span>"<br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5rltDpi6I/AAAAAAAABnQ/73aOsN1uYy0/s1600-h/another_massive_injection.JPG"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5192205715898993570" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5rltDpi6I/AAAAAAAABnQ/73aOsN1uYy0/s200/another_massive_injection.JPG" border="0" /></a>Let's assess the malicious injection. <span style="font-weight: bold;">nihaorr1.com/ 1.js</span> (219.153.46.28) is attempting to load <span style="font-weight: bold;">nihaorr1.com/ 1.htm</span>, where several other internal exploit serving URLs and javascript obfuscations load through IFRAMES, such as :<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">nihaorr1.com/ Real.gif</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />niha</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">orr1.com/ Yahoo.php</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ cuteqq.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Ms07055.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Ms07033.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Ms07018.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Ms07004.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Ajax.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1</span><span style="font-weight: bold;">.com/ Ms06014.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Bfyy.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Lz.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ Pps.htm</span> <span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />nihaorr1.com/ XunLei.htm</span><br /><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5rwtDpi7I/AAAAAAAABnY/BGvEieF0v0s/s1600-h/another_massive_injection_2.JPG"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5192205904877554610" style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SA5rwtDpi7I/AAAAAAAABnY/BGvEieF0v0s/s200/another_massive_injection_2.JPG" border="0" /></a>and finally serve the malware, by also taking us out of the point and loading another malicious IFRAME farm at <span style="font-weight: bold;">gg.haoliuliang.net/one/ hao8.htm?036</span> (222.73.44.162) :<br /><br />Scanners Result: 18/<span id="porcentaje"><span style="color:red;"></span>32 (56.25%) :<br />W32/PWStealer1!Generic; PWS:Win32/Lineage.WI.dr<br /></span>File size: 24667 bytes<br />MD5...: 4b913be127d648373e511974351ff04e<br />SHA1..: 0ab703c93e3ad7c03d1aae5ea394d7db3b89bfd2<br /><span id="porcentaje"><br />Another internal IFRAME serving exploits is also loading at </span><span style="font-weight: bold;">haoliuliang.net</span>, <span style="font-weight: bold;">gg.haoliuliang.net/wmwm/ new.htm</span> where a new piece of malware is served :<br /><br />Scanners Result: 26/32 (81.25%)<br />Trojan-PSW.Win32.OnLineGames.ppu; Trojan.PSW.Win32.OnlineGames.GEN<br />File size: 7205 bytes<br />MD5...: af05c777700b338f428463e56f316a05<br />SHA1..: bd68f621ec6c9796afa8b766c6cf4167afbd4703<br /><br />As it appears, everyone's a victim of web application vulnerabilities discovered automatically, and either filtered based on high-page rank, or trying to take advantage of the long-tail of SQL injected sites to compensate for the lack of vulnerable high profile sites.<br /><br /><strong>Related posts:</strong><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/04/unicef-too-iframe-injected-and-seo.html">UNICEF Too IFRAME Injected and SEO Poisoned</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/03/embedded-malware-at-bloggies-awards.html">Embedded Malware at Bloggies Awards Site</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/03/embedding-malicious-iframes-through.html">Embedding Malicious IFRAMEs Through Stolen FTP Accounts</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/yet-another-massive-embedded-malware.html">Yet Another Massive Embedded Malware Attack</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/12/mdac-activex-code-execution-exploit.html">MDAC ActiveX Code Execution Exploit Still in the Wild</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/01/malware-serving-exploits-embedded-sites.html">Malware Serving Exploits Embedded Sites as Usual</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/01/massive-realplayer-exploit-embedded.html">Massive RealPlayer Exploit Embedded Attack</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/syrian-embassy-in-london-serving.html">Syrian Embassy in London Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/bank-of-india-serving-malware.html">Bank of India Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/us-consulate-st-petersburg-serving.html">U.S Consulate St. Petersburg Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/01/dutch-embassy-in-moscow-serving-malware.html">The Dutch Embassy in Moscow Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/uks-feta-serving-malware.html">U.K's FETA Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/anti-malware-vendors-site-serving.html">Anti-Malware Vendor's Site Serving Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/02/new-media-malware-gang-part-three.html">The New Media Malware Gang - Part Three</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/12/new-media-malware-gang-part-two.html">The New Media Malware Gang - Part Two</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-media-malware-gang.html">The New Media Malware Gang</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/portfolio-of-malware-embedded-magazines.html">A Portfolio of Malware Embedded Magazines</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/another-massive-embedded-malware-attack.html">Another Massive Embedded Malware Attack</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/i-see-alive-iframes-everywhere.html">I See Alive IFRAMEs Everywhere</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/i-see-alive-iframes-everywhere-part-two.html">I See Alive IFRAMEs Everywhere - Part Two</a></div><br /><div> </div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=h2szloG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=h2szloG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=Jh8d9YG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=Jh8d9YG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=TZyIhPg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=TZyIhPg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=DQqL6Mg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=DQqL6Mg" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=tPC4aNG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=tPC4aNG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=nWuC8GG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=nWuC8GG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=3djJeCg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=3djJeCg" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/276225903" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware">malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attack">attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware attack">malware attack</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anti-malware vendor">anti-malware vendor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/media malware gang">media malware gang</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/htm">htm</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nihaorr1">nihaorr1</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/load nihaorr1">load nihaorr1</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attack tactic">attack tactic</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/276225903/united-nations-serving-malware.html">The United Nations Serving Malware</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Malicious microprocessor opens new doors for attack]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8c8ac4b8dccb94876db8a0c78019ad71</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8c8ac4b8dccb94876db8a0c78019ad71</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A team of security researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign demonstrated on Tuesday a hack that, by compromising a remarkably small number of circuits on a microprocessor, gave...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A team of security researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign demonstrated on Tuesday a hack that, by compromising a remarkably small number of circuits on a microprocessor, gave them back-door access to the machine in which the chip was running. It's a lot of work to execute... for the moment.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=8WFdrT"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=8WFdrT" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/271336819" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/back-door access">back-door access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security researchers">security researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microprocessor">microprocessor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/university">university</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lot">lot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/circuits">circuits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tuesday">tuesday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/execute">execute</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chip">chip</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/271336819/article.do">Malicious microprocessor opens new doors for attack</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[1967 Article on Data Privacy and Security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c1f205ffafc71ce589b8802895c386f2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c1f205ffafc71ce589b8802895c386f2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[An eerily prescient article from The Atlantic in 1967 about the future of data privacy. It presents all of the basic arguments for strict controls on data collection of personal information, and it's...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An eerily prescient <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/31/the-national-data-center-and-personal-privacy/">article</a> from <i>The Atlantic</i> in 1967 about the future of data privacy.  It presents all of the basic arguments for strict controls on data collection of personal information, and it's remarkably accurate in it's predictions of the future development and importance of computers as well all of all of the ways the government would abuse them.</p>

<p>Well worth reading.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=S0UcBEG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=S0UcBEG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=oatPwCG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=oatPwCG" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data privacy">data privacy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/future development">future development</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/eerily prescient article">eerily prescient article</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/future">future</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data collection">data collection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/strict controls">strict controls</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/personal information">personal information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/basic arguments">basic arguments</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/government">government</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/04/1967_article_on.html">1967 Article on Data Privacy and Security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Apple issues mega-monster security update]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ab0383a82417144e12aba589174e88c9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ab0383a82417144e12aba589174e88c9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Just a day after a remarkably large Safari update, Apple released a &quot;frighteningly large&quot; security update that patched nearly 90 vulnerabilities in both its own code and the third-party applications...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Just a day after a remarkably large Safari update, Apple released a "frighteningly large" security update that patched nearly 90 vulnerabilities in both its own code and the third-party applications it bundles with its Tiger and Leopard operating systems.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=m2dLWf"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=m2dLWf" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/254122023" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/third-party applications">third-party applications</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple">apple</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/leopard">leopard</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/frighteningly">frighteningly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tiger">tiger</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/bundles">bundles</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/systems">systems</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remarkably">remarkably</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/254122023/article.do">Apple issues mega-monster security update</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
