<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: scottish]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Best Western Forced to Play Defense on Breach Disclosure]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/27b346176997536a8a946fea65474769</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/27b346176997536a8a946fea65474769</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A dispute between Best Western and a Scottish newspaper over the scope of a data breach at the hotel chain highlighted the need from companies to get out in front on breach disclosures, rather than...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A dispute between Best Western and a Scottish newspaper over the scope of a data breach at the hotel chain highlighted the need from companies to get out in front on breach disclosures, rather than being forced into damage-control mode.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=E7CyDe"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=E7CyDe" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/380148449" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotel chain">hotel chain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish newspaper">scottish newspaper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/western">western</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/breach disclosures">breach disclosures</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/damage-control mode">damage-control mode</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data breach">data breach</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/front">front</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/companies">companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dispute">dispute</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/380148449/article.do">Best Western Forced to Play Defense on Breach Disclosure</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Best Western forced to play defense on data breach disclosure]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6a5ccb0e491837bbdd64c37c284656ca</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6a5ccb0e491837bbdd64c37c284656ca</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A dispute between Best Western and a Scottish newspaper over the scope of a data breach highlights the need for companies to get out in front on disclosures of data...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A dispute between Best Western and a Scottish newspaper over the scope of a data breach highlights the need for companies to get out in front on disclosures of data breaches.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=4cyEAu"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=4cyEAu" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/377427991" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data breach highlights">data breach highlights</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish newspaper">scottish newspaper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/western">western</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data breaches">data breaches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/front">front</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/companies">companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dispute">dispute</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/disclosures">disclosures</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scope">scope</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/377427991/article.do">Best Western forced to play defense on data breach disclosure</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Best Western says data breach even smaller than first thought]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/70dcdc8a581765f7eeb34845d58b5523</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/70dcdc8a581765f7eeb34845d58b5523</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Best Western hotel chain now says that a system intrusion exposed the data of just 10 guests -- a far cry from the 8 million stolen records reported by a Scottish...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Best Western hotel chain now says that a system intrusion exposed the data of just 10 guests -- a far cry from the 8 million stolen records reported by a Scottish newspaper.
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=LyJmC3"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=LyJmC3" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/375408485" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/western hotel chain">western hotel chain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish newspaper">scottish newspaper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system intrusion">system intrusion</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/million">million</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/records">records</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cry">cry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/guests">guests</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/375408485/article.do">Best Western says data breach even smaller than first thought</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Best Western refutes story claiming 8 million customer records were breached]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a52c01a0e459faa2ba28a74ad715e34d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a52c01a0e459faa2ba28a74ad715e34d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Best Western hotel chain said that a story published by a Scottish newspaper, reporting that it had been hit by a massive system intrusion, was inaccurate and 'grossly...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Best Western hotel chain said that a story published by a Scottish newspaper, reporting that it had been hit by a massive system intrusion, was inaccurate and 'grossly unsubstantiated.'
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=MeSGOj"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=MeSGOj" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/374558277" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/massive system intrusion">massive system intrusion</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/western hotel chain">western hotel chain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish newspaper">scottish newspaper</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/story">story</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/grossly">grossly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hit">hit</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/374558277/article.do">Best Western refutes story claiming 8 million customer records were breached</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Encrypting Disks]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/0412d7c6d75959351f8a0664ef7eaaca</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/0412d7c6d75959351f8a0664ef7eaaca</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The UK is learning : The Scottish Ambulance Service confirmed today that a package containing contact information from its Paisley Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) has been lost by the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The UK is <a href="http://www.scottishambulance.co.uk/MissingDisc/PressRelease.asp">learning</a>:

<blockquote>The Scottish Ambulance Service confirmed today that a package containing contact information from its Paisley Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) has been lost by the courier, TNT, while in transit to one of its IT suppliers.

The portable data disk contained a copy of records of 894,629 calls to the ambulance service's Paisley EMDC since February 2006. It was fully encrypted and password protected and includes the addresses of incidents, some phone numbers and some patient names. Given the security measures and the complex structure of the database it would be extremely difficult to gain access to any meaningful information.</blockquote>

News story <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/7470006.stm">here</a>.

That's what you want to do.  There is no problem if encrypted disks are lost.  You can mail them directly to your worst enemy and there's no problem.  Well, assuming you've implemented the encryption properly and chosen a good key.

This is much better than what the HM Revenue & Customs office <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2910705.ece">did</a> in November.

I <a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-199.html">wrote</a> about disk and laptop encryption previously.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=f7aWrJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=f7aWrJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=sZKK7J"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=sZKK7J" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ambulance service">ambulance service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish ambulance service">scottish ambulance service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/disk">disk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/portable data disk">portable data disk</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/emdc">emdc</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/paisley emdc">paisley emdc</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laptop encryption previously">laptop encryption previously</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meaningful information">meaningful information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worst enemy">worst enemy</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/encrypting_disk.html">Encrypting Disks</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Computer Misuse in Scotland]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fd3f11fc4c2f2d30f7a4e09aff1c2414</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fd3f11fc4c2f2d30f7a4e09aff1c2414</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Last June I explained that the Computer Misuse Act 1990 would not be amended until April 2008 because the amendments introduced in the Police and Justice Act 2006 were themselves to be amended by the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/06/19/hacking-tools-are-legal-for-a-little-longer/">Last June I explained</a> that the <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1990/Ukpga_19900018_en_1.htm">Computer Misuse Act 1990</a> would not be amended until April 2008 &#8212; because the amendments introduced in the <a href="http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2006/ukpga_20060048_en_7#pt5-pb2-l1g35">Police and Justice Act 2006</a> were themselves to be amended by the <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/ukpga_20070027_en_5#pt2-pb5-l1g61">Serious Crime Act 2007</a>, and that was not expected to come into force until then. Also, right at the end of 2007 <a href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/12/31/hacking-tool-guidance-finally-appears/">the CPS published their guidance</a> on how these new offences might be prosecuted.</p>
<p>Now <a href="http://www.davros.org/">Clive Feather</a> draws my attention to a rather significant difference in the way that the law stands in Scotland.</p>
<p>Although on the face of it, both Acts do not extend to Scotland (Computer Misuse is a devolved matter) in practice the Scottish Parliament has used a Sewel motion (<a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/Sewel/HealthBillMotion">here for the Police and Justice Act</a>, and <a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Government/Sewel/SeriousCrime">here for the Serious Crime Act</a>) to keep the law in both jurisdictions the same&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>HOWEVER</strong> &#8212; as Clive points out &#8212; for some currently unknown reason the Scots brought the first version of the amendments into force on 1st October 2007 with <a href="http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/ssi2007/ssi_20070434_en_1">this statutory instrument</a>.</p>
<p>So <a href="http://www.lyricspy.com/k/Killing_Joke/lyrics/North_of_The_Border/">North of the Border</a> the law is currently different: you can prosecuted for denial-of-service attacks and locked up for distributing hacking tools&#8230; whereas in the rest of the country, it&#8217;s 1990 offences only for a few more weeks.</p>
<p>The changes that arrive in April with the Serious Crime Act won&#8217;t make much difference to the people of Scotland, all that happens is that one of the new offences stops being computer-specific and is more broadly drawn instead. Still, it makes you wonder why the denial-of-service offence particularly &#8212; which has been widely welcomed &#8212; has been delayed for over a year; if the Scots can cope with two law changes rather than one.</p>
<p>BTW: Clive has <a href="http://www.davros.org/legal/cma.html">a marked up copy of the Computer Misuse Act</a> on his website, with pretty colours to show the current form of the Act (it&#8217;s been amended a number of times now) and how it will soon look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/act">act</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer misuse act">computer misuse act</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer misuse">computer misuse</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/justice act">justice act</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/crime act">crime act</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scotland">scotland</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/law">law</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/law stands">law stands</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/offences stops">offences stops</category>
      <source url="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/02/14/computer-misuse-in-scotland/">Computer Misuse in Scotland</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mike Rothman - The 419]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cf6cf72068f89700ac14e97f4b73e3b5</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cf6cf72068f89700ac14e97f4b73e3b5</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I do get some random stuff in my email, but this one takes the cake. Evidently, someone calling themselves Mike Rothman is running a 419 scam . Here is the message, then we can decompose it to see the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_hafMI9V8sC8/R6xBqe-somI/AAAAAAAAAFE/uIC8Fkuplxw/s1600-h/scam-truck.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_hafMI9V8sC8/R6xBqe-somI/AAAAAAAAAFE/uIC8Fkuplxw/s400/scam-truck.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5164575070813463138" border="0" /></a><br />I do get some random stuff in my email, but this one takes the cake. Evidently, someone calling themselves Mike Rothman is running a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_fee_fraud">419 scam</a>. Here is the message, then we can decompose it to see the typical "tells" that indicate that there is a REALLY high likelihood the message is bogus.<br /><br /><blockquote> From: XXXXX<br />To: mike_rothman@XXXXXX<br />Subject: RE: Att.<br />Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 22:36:52 +0100<br /><br /><br />Dear mr Rothman,<br /><br />I do not know you either, so I will send you some pictures of my estate in Germany, you can look at it at google earth from above. Sended you the adress before.<br /><br />XXXXXX<br />Barendorf<br />Germany<br /><br />#############<br /><br />My age is 50, married with a German Lady, having two Sons.<br /><br /><br />Further, I 'am not interested in the company you are working for, only how to get the money to Germany. <strong>BUSINESS</strong> ! ! !<br /><br />Now it's your turn.<br /><br /><br />Sincerely<br /><br />XXXXXXXXXXX<br /><br /><br /><br /><hr /> From: mike_rothman@XXXXXX<br />To:<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> XXXXXXXXX</span><a href="mailto:multimodis_hoeksema@hotmail.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)"></a><br />Subject: Att.<br />Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:25:38 +0100<br /><br />Att. XXXXX,<br />I received your quick response to my proposal. To formally introduce my self to you, I am an old top banker and have worked with Scottish Investment Trust for so many as one of their fund manager. I am an international staff, presently in Scotland office.<br />Scottish Investment Company is registered in Scotland number 1651. I started work with SIT 2004 and I am responsible for the European Jurisdiction Equity. I was with Abbey National Asset mangers before I moved to SIT, and a member of CFA institute.<br />I graduated from University of Dundee and Edinburgh where I got my BSc and MBA in civil engineering respectively.<br />First, I believe it is necessary for me to express my profound gratitude to you for even responding to my email with interest. I am obliged to you for your gracious concern and I hope your assistance is really genuine, although through your email I would know if I could count on you at least to an extent. <script><!-- D(["mb","\u003cbr\u003eI sincerely, appreciate your interest to assist me in this project. I need a reliable foreigner who would be of assistance to me in order to have the funds transferred. \u003cbr\u003eHowever, I would like to be convinced of your willingness, commitment and most of all your trustworthiness to execute this deal with me. I certainly cannot compromise any of these virtues, you know what I mean, and I have my principles.\u003cbr\u003eWithout doubt, you will eventually earn the benefits or our partnership if we are able to work things out and have the funds relocated within couple of weeks or thereabout and thereafter disbursed to your other respective accounts. \u003cbr\u003eIndeed, it is necessary for me to be certain of the person to whom I will be entrusting this deal, my trust will definitely not be given out lightly, I need to be fully convinced that you are a matured person with some integrity, we should at least have respect for each other, this I would say is very essential. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eScottish Investment Trust (SIT) was founded in 1887; The Scottish Investment Trust (SIT) today is one of the world’s oldest and largest independent, self-managed investment trusts with assets of over £45 billion at 30 September 2007.\u003cbr\u003eWe have been working to provide solid returns for investors for over 115 years - through a number of bull and bear markets and the most volatile conditions. Our approach has generated real long term growth in both capital and income.\u003cbr\u003eWhen you invest in SIT you are buying shares in a company that invests in the stocks and shares of companies on the world\u0026#39;s major stockmarkets. Your investment has the potential to grow both through incomes from dividends and through capital growth from increases in share price.\u003cbr\u003eSIT has a diversified equity portfolio and invests in a broad spread of international equities. Although there is always an element of risk involved in any stockmarket investment, we aim to lower this by spreading investment over numerous companies and sectors around the world, while actively searching for opportunities to benefit our investors and maximise returns.",1] );  //--></script><br />I sincerely, appreciate your interest to assist me in this project. I need a reliable foreigner who would be of assistance to me in order to have the funds transferred.<br />However, I would like to be convinced of your willingness, commitment and most of all your trustworthiness to execute this deal with me. I certainly cannot compromise any of these virtues, you know what I mean, and I have my principles.<br />Without doubt, you will eventually earn the benefits or our partnership if we are able to work things out and have the funds relocated within couple of weeks or thereabout and thereafter disbursed to your other respective accounts.<br />Indeed, it is necessary for me to be certain of the person to whom I will be entrusting this deal, my trust will definitely not be given out lightly, I need to be fully convinced that you are a matured person with some integrity, we should at least have respect for each other, this I would say is very essential.<br /><br />Scottish Investment Trust (SIT) was founded in 1887; The Scottish Investment Trust (SIT) today is one of the world’s oldest and largest independent, self-managed investment trusts with assets of over £45 billion at 30 September 2007.<br />We have been working to provide solid returns for investors for over 115 years - through a number of bull and bear markets and the most volatile conditions. Our approach has generated real long term growth in both capital and income.<br />When you invest in SIT you are buying shares in a company that invests in the stocks and shares of companies on the world's major stockmarkets. Your investment has the potential to grow both through incomes from dividends and through capital growth from increases in share price.<br />SIT has a diversified equity portfolio and invests in a broad spread of international equities. Although there is always an element of risk involved in any stockmarket investment, we aim to lower this by spreading investment over numerous companies and sectors around the world, while actively searching for opportunities to benefit our investors and maximise returns.<script><!-- D(["mb","\u003cbr\u003eWe aim to provide steady growth in both capital and income, whilst prudently spreading investment risk. We consider these to be the key requirements for anyone seeking a solid core holding for their investment planning. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, in my First Email Proposal to you, I stated that the said funds came out as a result of the following: \u003cbr\u003e\u0026quot;\u0026quot;I handle all our Investor\u0026#39;s Direct Capital Funds and secretly extract 1.3% Excess Maximum Return Capital Profit (EMRCP) per annum on each of the Investor\u0026#39;s Magellan Capital Funds. \u003cbr\u003eAs an expert, I have made over £27.4m from the Investor\u0026#39;s EMRCP and hereby looking\u003cbr\u003efor someone to trust who will stand as an Investor to receive the funds as Annual Investment Proceeds from Scottish Magellan Capital Funds. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eEXPLANATION: I have more than 158 Corporate Investors attached to my PORTFOLIO who’s Capital Investment Funds are been managed and administered by me alone.\u003cbr\u003eThis Capital Investment Funds has a value of US$5.4Billion FIXED. The $5.4billion is been used for trading in Stock Market, Crude Oil and Lending with Profit Returns. \u003cbr\u003eEvery Year, each Corporate Investor is expected to receive 20% interest from his total Investment Capital Funds which is paid to the Investor annually as their Excess Maximum Return Capital Profit (EMRCP). However, I made average of 21.3% from the Investor\u0026#39;s Investment Capital Funds annually, which have exceeded our targeted 20% of Total Investment Capital Funds. On this note, I retained the extra 1.3% from the 21.3% as my personal profits for managing the Capital Investment which is this £27.4m. On the other hands, I cannot claim this funds without presenting someone to stand as an Investor otherwise our Establishment will convert the funds into the Company\u0026#39;s Treasury. This is why I came to you for the deal to take place. \u003cbr\u003eDURATION: If you are very serious as I am, we will have this transaction concluded with 25 Banking days from the date of start. \u003cbr\u003eHowever, for such a business of lofty magnitude, I think the most important thing is for us to build a strong association between each other so that I can be able to trust you because I have been betrayed by so many people even by my co workers that I have now decided to play my cards very close to my chest. I will like this deal to be secret and confidential. No third party. Just between you and me. Do not discuss it with any Scottish Investment staff to avoid jeopardizing my work and position.",1] );  //--></script><br />We aim to provide steady growth in both capital and income, whilst prudently spreading investment risk. We consider these to be the key requirements for anyone seeking a solid core holding for their investment planning.<br /><br />However, in my First Email Proposal to you, I stated that the said funds came out as a result of the following:<br />""I handle all our Investor's Direct Capital Funds and secretly extract 1.3% Excess Maximum Return Capital Profit (EMRCP) per annum on each of the Investor's Magellan Capital Funds.<br />As an expert, I have made over £27.4m from the Investor's EMRCP and hereby looking<br />for someone to trust who will stand as an Investor to receive the funds as Annual Investment Proceeds from Scottish Magellan Capital Funds.<br /><br />EXPLANATION: I have more than 158 Corporate Investors attached to my PORTFOLIO who’s Capital Investment Funds are been managed and administered by me alone.<br />This Capital Investment Funds has a value of US$5.4Billion FIXED. The $5.4billion is been used for trading in Stock Market, Crude Oil and Lending with Profit Returns.<br />Every Year, each Corporate Investor is expected to receive 20% interest from his total Investment Capital Funds which is paid to the Investor annually as their Excess Maximum Return Capital Profit (EMRCP). However, I made average of 21.3% from the Investor's Investment Capital Funds annually, which have exceeded our targeted 20% of Total Investment Capital Funds. On this note, I retained the extra 1.3% from the 21.3% as my personal profits for managing the Capital Investment which is this £27.4m. On the other hands, I cannot claim this funds without presenting someone to stand as an Investor otherwise our Establishment will convert the funds into the Company's Treasury. This is why I came to you for the deal to take place.<br />DURATION: If you are very serious as I am, we will have this transaction concluded with 25 Banking days from the date of start.<br />However, for such a business of lofty magnitude, I think the most important thing is for us to build a strong association between each other so that I can be able to trust you because I have been betrayed by so many people even by my co workers that I have now decided to play my cards very close to my chest. I will like this deal to be secret and confidential. No third party. Just between you and me. Do not discuss it with any Scottish Investment staff to avoid jeopardizing my work and position.<script><!-- D(["mb","\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBefore we go into this deal, I will like to know about you.\u003cbr\u003eFollowing this mail, send me your telephone number so I can call you to discuss on the modalities of the transaction. You may as well call me on my number +44 704 571 0649 so that we can discuss on the modalities of the transaction. \u003cbr\u003eSincerely \u003cbr\u003eMike Rothman\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003cblockquote\u003e\n\u003chr\u003e\nFrom: \u003ca href\u003d\"mailto:multimodis_hoeksema@hotmail.com\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003emultimodis_hoeksema@hotmail.com\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003eTo: \u003ca href\u003d\"mailto:mike_rothman@live.com.au\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003emike_rothman@live.com.au\u003c/a\u003e\u003cbr\u003eSubject: \u003cbr\u003eDate: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:09:36 +0100\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\n \u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eDear mr. Rothman,\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eI\u0026#39;am a businessman, Dutch, living and working in Germany have several companies.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eoff course I\u0026#39;am interested for the 30%.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eWhen this is phishing I\u0026#39;am not interested and can you better try to find someone else.\u003cbr\u003eI will not pay any money for taxes, transport, lawyers, barristers or others.\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003eSincerely\u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003e \u003cbr\u003edrs. J.Hoeksema\u003cbr\u003e0049 173 2433 759\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003chr\u003e\nBlijf onderweg online met Windows Live for Mobile! \u003ca href\u003d\"http://www.windowslivemobile.msn.com/nl/\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003eDownload \u0026#39;t nu op jouw mobiele telefoon.\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/blockquote\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003chr\u003e\nExpress yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! \u003ca href\u003d\"http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003eMSN Messenger\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/blockquote\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\u003chr\u003e\nIn 2 tellen je eigen webpagina voor al je foto\u0026#39;s! \u003ca href\u003d\"http://spaces.live.com/\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003eMakkelijk en gratis met Windows Live Spaces\u003c/a\u003e \u003c/blockquote\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003chr\u003eExpress yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! \u003ca href\u003d\"http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/\" target\u003d\"_blank\" onclick\u003d\"return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)\"\u003e",1] );  //--></script><br /><br />Before we go into this deal, I will like to know about you.<br />Following this mail, send me your telephone number so I can call you to discuss on the modalities of the transaction. You may as well call me on my number +4XXXX so that we can discuss on the modalities of the transaction.<br />Sincerely<br />Mike Rothman<br /><br /><br /><hr /> From: XXXX<br />To: <a href="mailto:mike_rothman@live.com.au" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">mike_rothman@XXXXX</a><br />Subject:<br />Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:09:36 +0100<br /><br /><br /><br />Dear mr. Rothman,<br /><br />I'am a businessman, Dutch, living and working in Germany have several companies.<br /><br />off course I'am interested for the 30%.<br /><br />When this is phishing I'am not interested and can you better try to find someone else.<br />I will not pay any money for taxes, transport, lawyers, barristers or others.<br /><br /><br />Sincerely<br /><br /><br />XXXXXXX</blockquote>To be clear, I haven't called the numbers to truly verify it's a phishing scheme. Who has time for that? But this message would have been on the express train to the circular bin for a couple of reasons:<br /><ol><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">The complicated story</span> - The scammer uses a fairly complicated story, which would really require an investment professional to figure out whether it's kosher or not. But all that complicated vernacular contributes to building a credible front in the form of the Scottish Investment Trust, which is a global and well known investment house.<br /><br /></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">The request for "confidentiality"</span> - The fact that this guy is claiming that he's got some additional funds because he "out-performed" sound like a hoax to me. Also the fact that he's requested confidentiality, even from other SIT personnel means this is a ruse.<br /><br /></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">The fact that he needs a "foreigner" to place the money</span> - Again, this just sounds funky. If he outperformed the expectation, I'm sure he'd be due a nice bonus from SIT. Not an illicit $35 million dollar payout that he needs to get out of the country.<br /><br /></li><li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Other inconsistencies</span> - You can't see the domain (I removed it), but it's a public email service in Australia. Yet the phone number he provided (I removed that also) is in the UK. These are inconsistencies that you need to catch.</li></ol>But most of all USE YOUR HEAD. Seriously. Even if you play the lottery, you need to take action to buy the ticket. Beware of strangers offering gifts in the millions of dollars. If it sounds too good to be true, it pretty much is.<br /><br />Instead the victim shared information about his life and family. He attached pictures of his house and put in addresses and phone numbers (which I removed to protect the idiotic). It's just ridiculous.<br /><br />As Barnum said, there is a sucker born every minute. Don't you be one of them.<br /><br /><span style="font-size:78%;">Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jepoirrier/2046188221/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/jepoirrier/2046188221/</a></span><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?a=60MjZyE"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?i=60MjZyE" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?a=5Eii5Ie"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?i=5Eii5Ie" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?a=W3C8LSe"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/SecurityMike?i=W3C8LSe" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SecurityMike/~4/231561418" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/capital investment funds">capital investment funds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/capital investment">capital investment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/funds">funds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/capital">capital</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magellan capital funds">magellan capital funds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/direct capital funds">direct capital funds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/investment">investment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/stockmarket investment">stockmarket investment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish investment staff">scottish investment staff</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SecurityMike/~3/231561418/mike-rothman-419.html">Mike Rothman - The 419</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Vianet offers 3G-based monitoring service]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8f23d35de7f29321ed7224ac76a6eadb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8f23d35de7f29321ed7224ac76a6eadb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A Scottish mobile-to-mobile (M2M) communications provider, Vianet, has launched a wireless CCTV service that uses 3G technology, to allow businesses to remotely monitor their...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A Scottish mobile-to-mobile (M2M) communications provider, Vianet, has launched a wireless CCTV service that uses 3G technology, to allow businesses to remotely monitor their premises.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless cctv service">wireless cctv service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/remotely monitor">remotely monitor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/communications provider">communications provider</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vianet">vianet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/businesses">businesses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/premises">premises</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scottish">scottish</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology">technology</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/m2m">m2m</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/122107-vianet-offers-3g-based-monitoring.html?fsrc=rss-security">Vianet offers 3G-based monitoring service</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
