<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: starbucks]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Good to Great, Built to Last Whats Next for Creating Great Companies]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/44891eda13f524e90b0edc481f688e38</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/44891eda13f524e90b0edc481f688e38</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I attended the Inc. 500 conference on Friday and absorbed one of the best conference keynote presentations I have ever witnessed delivered by Jim Collins Author of Built to Last and Good to Great
I...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attended the <a href="http://blog.inc.com/inc5000/2008/09/introduction_blogging_the_inc.html">Inc. 500 conference on Friday</a> and absorbed one of the <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">best</span></strong> conference keynote presentations I have ever witnessed delivered by Jim Collins – Author of “Built to Last” and “Good to Great”.</p>
<p>I have to admit that I was already a fan of <a href="http://blog.inc.com/inc5000/2008/09/three_things_on_jim_collins_st.html" target="_blank">Collins&#8217; quantitative style blended with clever insight</a>, but this was the first time that I had seen him in person, and he was just spectacular. He has a vivid, animated way of telling a story, and had a great sense of humor. This combination of presentation skill was put to immediate use with his first statement drawing a hearty laugh from the audience full of entrepreneurs.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;How many of you in the room are constitutionally unemployable?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Much of his remaining presentation provided interesting stories and insight from the research that he has done to understand the make-up of exceptional companies.</p>
<p>As Jim said, he has spent years studying the contrast between average companies and exceptional companies. They faced the same set of variables… similar economic conditions, similar competition for top human resources, and a similar set of huge unknowns.</p>
<p>What is the single biggest element of difference?</p>
<p>Not a function of the cards you are dealt, or circumstance… it is conscious choice and discipline.</p>
<p>Jim’s key principles &amp; disciplines that have come from the studies we have worked on:</p>
<ol>
<li>Building greatness is a cumulative never ending process! The idea that no matter how exceptional, you are always only relatively as good as to what you can do next.</li>
<li>Most overnight successes are 20 years in the making…. Wal-mart  took 13 years to get to 125 stores. Starbucks required 17 years to get to 38 stores.</li>
</ol>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you start to break Packard’s law, and there are very few laws of business, it is like breaking a law of physics for building great companies.&#8221; - David Packard (Co-founder of HP)</p></blockquote>
<p>If you allow growth to exceed your ability to get enough of the right people to fill the key seats to execute on the growth brilliantly, you will fall as surely as a stone dropped from your hand. This is one of those timeless truths that extends beyond technology and economics.</p>
<p>The number one constraint on growth and sustained success…</p>
<p><strong>An ability to get enough of the right people in the key seats to achieve that sustained growth.</strong></p>
<p>The discipline that WHO comes before WHAT. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_34/b4097032721156.htm?chan=magazine+channel_special+report">Collins always kept coming back to the &#8220;who&#8221; thing</a> over and over again. He said, “The more turbulent the world, (given the great current economic uncertainty of our financial system) the more important this issue is.”</p>
<p>A question from the audience came near the end of his session… How do you figure out who are the right people to put in key seats on the bus?</p>
<p>Collins responded with “Given that I stand here amidst a room full of unmotivated people… the right people are self motivated, self disciplined, self managed, The task is <strong><em>not</em></strong> to motivate unmotivated people, the task is <strong><em>not</em></strong> to have to manage people… self motivated, figured it out from there… self motivated people <strong><em>don’t need tons of management</em></strong> … when you have to start managing, you know that you have the wrong person at the task.”</p>
<p>Final thoughts:</p>
<p>Greatness is not a function of circumstance. Greatness is a function of conscious choice and discipline. It is not a matter of circumstance, it is one of choices.</p>
<p>I believe that every one of the <a href="http://www.inc.com/inc5000/index.html">Inc. 500 companies</a> that I <a href="http://secure.lenos.com/lenos/inc/Inc500WashingtonDC/">met at this conference</a> achieved the list because they did not embrace the status quo. Incredible passion, an unwillingness to accept failure and an excessive and compulsive willingness to solve customer’s problems were key ingredients in the business building formula for the entrepreneurs that were at the conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/companies">companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/collins">collins</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/collins quantitative style">collins quantitative style</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/average companies">average companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/manage people">manage people</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exceptional companies">exceptional companies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/jim collins author">jim collins author</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/conference keynote presentations">conference keynote presentations</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/good-to-great-built-to-last-whats-next-for-creating-great-companies/09/2008">Good to Great, Built to Last Whats Next for Creating Great Companies</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Zune Swoon 2.0]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/162d344e703b51b1f9a309987ebdb786</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/162d344e703b51b1f9a309987ebdb786</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Latest Zune firmware, software allows Wi-Fi music purchases, FM tagging: Microsoft confirmed the 16-Sept-2008 release of new Zune firmware and players, allowing users of old and new devices alike to...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2008/sep08/09-08ZuneFallUpdatePR.mspx"><strong>Latest Zune firmware, software allows Wi-Fi music purchases, FM tagging:</strong></a> Microsoft confirmed the 16-Sept-2008 release of new Zune firmware and players, allowing users of old and new devices alike to purchase music over Wi-Fi from the Zune Marketplace. The new firmware also sports FM tagging that uses information that some broadcasters will embed in their analog programming to tag songs for immediate purchase (single track) or download (Zune Pass subscription) over a Wi-Fi hotspot, or to queue for later download.</p>

<p>Apple added access for iPhone and iPod touch users to a subset of its iTunes Store over Wi-Fi--the awkwardly named iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store--more than a year ago, along with the ability to access that store at no cost from handhelds and laptops <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/starbucks/"><strong>via Starbucks outlets</strong></a> in New York, Seattle, and throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. (Chicago and Los Angeles have been "coming soon" for a year, but the new AT&T/Starbucks deal may have delayed opening up those markets.)</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/zune_tagging.jpg" alt="zune_tagging.jpg" border="0" width="175" height="385" align="right" hspace="5" />Terrestrial AM/FM radio stations would like to figure out how to remain meaningful in a world of streaming Internet radio. Their latest strategy is to embed information that allows a listener to mark a song they want, potentially getting a piece of music sold in this fashion. With FM tagging, Zune players tap into an existing very low-data-rate encoding protocols that allow stations to push out their call letters and current song information. By adding a very short code, broadcasters can allow Zunes to look up the appropriate song.</p>

<p>At launch, 450 stations from major networks, including Clear Channel, Entercom, and others, will broadcast tagging details. Note that Microsoft includes KEXP, a Seattle independent and alternative radio station, in its sample image, for the new models. KEXP, given a boost a few years ago through significant short-term funding by Paul Allen--funding that involved changing its call letters to his Experience Music Project museum initials--has an enormous listenership over the Internet ironically enough. KEXP will be a programming partner creating channels of music for the subscription-based Zune Pass service. (Zune Pass is $15 per month, all you can eat.)</p>

<p>This option could allow Microsoft to ink partnerships with hotspot networks to brand them with Zune compatibility, lets radio stations promote something other than iPods that they would have a direct relationship with (and, potentially, some kind of revenue stream from?), and may be part of breaking Apple's digital music hegemony. <em>May be.</em> Nobody's gotten rich betting against Apple for the last several years. (Details of revenue sharing with radio stations hasn't been discussed.)</p>

<p>Apple opted for a partnership with HD Radio broadcasters and equipment makers that has a relatively elaborate process of tagging songs. HD Radio is digital AM/FM, a patented and licensed method that has provoked a lot of controversy, and has lagged enormously in the marketplace, despite well over 1,000 stations (including many public radio stations) broadcasting in this digital format, some for over three years. </p>

<p>HD Radio tagging requires an HD radio receiver with a Tag button; pressing that button stores the song's tag information. The radio must also have an iPod dock. Docking an iPod syncs the tag information, and the next time the iPod is sync with iTunes, you can see which songs were tagged. Kind of tedious compared to "press a button while listening to an FM station and buy the song over Wi-Fi." (I've been writing about HD Radio for years, and even launched a blog that's gone moribund; the technology is interesting, but Internet radio on mobile devices coupled with on-demand music purchasing over cell and Wi-Fi may simply make HD Radio unnecessary for listeners.)</p>

<p>Microsoft has a more compelling "marketing story" for this feature than Apple, that's for sure. On the other hand, do you really need to tag songs from stations that play only the most popular music in a given format?</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/public radio stations">public radio stations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/stations">stations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/radio stations promote">radio stations promote</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/radio">radio</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/radio unnecessary">radio unnecessary</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/radio receiver">radio receiver</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet radio">internet radio</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/radio stations">radio stations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi music purchases">wi-fi music purchases</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008432.html">Zune Swoon 2.0</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: iPhone Penetration, Hotspots Undercounted, Warballoon, Cincy Bus-Fi]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/e40f33339b59735e12dc94589ccb5479</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/e40f33339b59735e12dc94589ccb5479</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[iPhone sleeper cell: Security researchers demonstrated the use of an iPhone with an external battery pack as a method of sniffing networks from a mailroom, to find information that a business might...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/lock.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38814/108/"><strong>iPhone sleeper cell:</strong></a> Security researchers demonstrated the use of an iPhone with an external battery pack as a method of sniffing networks from a mailroom, to find information that a business might not feel that it has to secure in the heart of its operations. Errata Security performed distant penetration testing for a client in this way, and found most of their wireless networks unprotected. This is sort of absurd, and I'll be curious what Errata posts on their own site about this project--the scope sounds wrong in the reporting on their talk--because every firm of any scale has some kind of encryption on their internal networks. If they don't, you have concerns at a much higher level than penetration testing. </p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/149620/2008/08/.html?tk=rss_news"><strong>Four chains, four Wi-Fi pay policies:</strong></a> CIO magazine looks at Borders, McDonald's, Panera, and Starbucks, and how they're offering Wi-Fi. I'd like to suggest you read this article, but the author writes, "Right now, according to <a href="http://www.hotspot-locations.com/"><strong>Hotspot Locations</strong></a>, there are more than 33,000 WLAN hotspots worldwide, and more than 10,000 in the United States alone." I don't know who "Hotspot Locations" is, and I need to disclose that I have a financial interest in what must be their competitor, JiWire, but any hotspot finder that calls them "WLAN Hotspots" and reports 11,712 in the U.S. and 33,106 worldwide just isn't working very hard. JiWire <a href="http://www.jiwire.com/search-hotspot-locations.htm"><strong>lists over 230,000 hotspots worldwide</strong></a>, and notes over 60,000 in the U.S., while <a href="http://boingo.com/what-is-boingo.php?btn_learn_more="><strong>Boingo</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.ipassconnect.com/main"><strong>iPass</strong></a> each resell access to over 100,000 hotspots worldwide.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/081008-covert-operation-floats-network-sniffing.html?hpg1=bn"><strong>Up, up, and away in my beautiful, my beautiful warballoon:</strong></a> Defcon hackers deployed a balloon with Wi-Fi receivers on it 150 feet in the air to scan for network vulnerabilities in Las Vegas last week. They found 1/3rd of networks had no encryption--although I always wonder if they're using passive scanning where 802.1X allows a limited connection for authentication and appears "open" in some ways, or if they were actively scanning, in which case 802.1X networks would be unavailable.</p>

<p><a href="http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080809/NEWS01/808090335"><strong>Cincinnati Metro service has Wi-Fi on 20 buses:</strong></a> The free service supplied by AT&T in an ads-for-access deal with the authority was placed after a couple years of testing on a relatively long commuter run. The authority spends $15,000 per bus to setup a connection, which seems rather pricey. Other authorities are paying in the low thousands, from what I've seen, so I'm not sure what their particular case is.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wlan hotspots worldwide">wlan hotspots worldwide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wlan hotspots">wlan hotspots</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotspots worldwide">hotspots worldwide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worldwide">worldwide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/iphone">iphone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wireless networks">wireless networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networks">networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/penetration">penetration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internal networks">internal networks</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008416.html">Wee-Fi: iPhone Penetration, Hotspots Undercounted, Warballoon, Cincy Bus-Fi</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Starbucks Canada Frees Wi-Fi in Its Stores]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/9e0592f1bfaf004a664f648ddd3a1c24</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/9e0592f1bfaf004a664f648ddd3a1c24</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Canadian branch of the coffee giant has secured a free Wi-Fi deal for customers: Just as Starbucks American stores are offering limited but free Wi-Fi in about 8,000 stores for its customers...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/August2008/08/c2573.html"><strong>The Canadian branch of the coffee giant has secured a free Wi-Fi deal for customers:</strong></a> Just as Starbucks American stores are offering limited but free Wi-Fi in about 8,000 stores for its customers through a partnership with provider AT&T, Starbucks's northern brethren are opening its 650 company-operated locations that have Bell hotspots to free use by customers. Terms appear the same as in the states: 2 hours of free use per day with the regular use of a Starbucks Card.</p>

<p>And, as with the AT&T deal, Bell's Internet customers get unlimited access in Starbucks's stores. The deal starts up immediately, as Bell is the current operator. AT&T is transitioning to running Starbucks in the U.S., taking over by the end of 2008 from T-Mobile.<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks">starbucks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi">free wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free">free</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/stores">stores</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks card">starbucks card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks american stores">starbucks american stores</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi deal">free wi-fi deal</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att">att</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet customers">internet customers</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008414.html">Starbucks Canada Frees Wi-Fi in Its Stores</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Nikon Adds Wi-Fi with S610c with Wayport Uploads, WPS Security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/80e982b2d2ee8f86f98456b1d7e568ea</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/80e982b2d2ee8f86f98456b1d7e568ea</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Nikon announces new Wi-Fi camera with Wayport hotspot link, WPS: The S610c with Wi-Fi inside, shipping in September for $330 (MSRP), supports Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) for single button connections...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://press.nikonusa.com/2008/08/nikon_continues_leadership_in.php"><strong>Nikon announces new Wi-Fi camera with Wayport hotspot link, WPS:</strong></a> The S610c with Wi-Fi inside, shipping in September for $330 (MSRP), supports Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) for single button connections to home networks, and a two year subscription to Wayport's hotspot network for uploading photos. This is nearly 10,000 McDonald's and 1,000 hotels, and doesn't include the Starbucks locations Wayport is building out for AT&T. The camera has a 10-megapixel sensor, 3.6x zoom lens, and 3-inch LCD screen, as well as vibration reduction, and up to an effective 3200 ISO.</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/s610c.jpg" alt="s610c.jpg" border="0" width="250" height="188" /></p>

<p>Oddly, Nikon also announced the <a href="http://www.nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/Product/Digital-Camera/26135/COOLPIX-P6000.html"><strong>$500 P6000</strong></a> with a built-in GPS receiver, 13.5 MP sensor, 4x zoom, and effective 6400 ISO--and a built-in Ethernet jack. Which is a very weird choice. I know Wi-Fi adds cost and reduces battery life-span, but I would think that GPS plus Wi-Fi would allow assisted GPS for faster coordinated lookups (if the Wi-Fi tapped into Skyhook's system and cached some location information), as well as offering automated uploads, and Wi-Fi positioning when GPS signals couldn't be reached.</p>

<p>Seems like a missed ship here.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wayport">wayport</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/camera">camera</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi camera">wi-fi camera</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi inside">wi-fi inside</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/gps">gps</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wayport hotspot link">wayport hotspot link</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/built-in gps receiver">built-in gps receiver</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/supports wi-fi">supports wi-fi</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008413.html">Nikon Adds Wi-Fi with S610c with Wayport Uploads, WPS Security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[AT&T Says Fie on Free Fi for iPhone (Again)]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/c84fd9442e73e1966af2122db450f069</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/c84fd9442e73e1966af2122db450f069</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The latest chapter in the ongoing flirtation between AT&amp;T's Wi-Fi hotspot network and the iPhone ends in rejection: The cellular giant is apparently a bit overexcited, and keeps releasing information...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/old_dial_att.jpg" alt="old_dial_att.jpg" border="0" width="125" height="167" align="right" /><strong>The latest chapter in the ongoing flirtation between AT&T's Wi-Fi hotspot network and the iPhone ends in rejection:</strong> The cellular giant is apparently a bit overexcited, and keeps releasing information about putative, future, free Wi-Fi access at 17,000 domestic Wi-Fi hotspots (McDonald's and Starbucks, mostly) for the iPhone. The page went up on their site promoting the program, a thousand articles bloomed on blogs, and then AT&T spokespeople said, sorry, false alarm. The page should be gone by now. AT&T said that it's "our intention to make [Wi-Fi] available to as many customers as possible, but we have no announcement at this time."</p>

<p>Some day, the company will officiate at the wedding of its Wi-Fi service and the iPhone, but the blessed day has been postponed again.</p>

<p><span class="posted">[<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/aussiegall/279804967/">Photo by Louise Docker</a>. Used under <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en">Creative Commons license</a>.]</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/domestic wi-fi hotspots">domestic wi-fi hotspots</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free wi-fi access">free wi-fi access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/iphone">iphone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi service">wi-fi service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att">att</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att spokespeople">att spokespeople</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi hotspot network">wi-fi hotspot network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/creative commons license">creative commons license</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008400.html">AT&amp;T Says Fie on Free Fi for iPhone (Again)</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[T-Mobile, AT&T, Starbucks Make Nice about Wi-Fi]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/60919a9cb82e31cad0f852bf9779cf61</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/60919a9cb82e31cad0f852bf9779cf61</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Starbucks informed me that it, AT&amp;T, and T-Mobile have signed a memorandum of understanding about the free Wi-Fi kerfuffle: T-Mobile filed a lawsuit a few days ago against Starbucks stating it wasn't...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Starbucks informed me that it, AT&T, and T-Mobile have signed a memorandum of understanding about the free Wi-Fi kerfuffle:</strong> T-Mobile filed a lawsuit a few days ago against Starbucks stating it wasn't involved in discussions about its network carrying free loyalty-awarded Wi-Fi via AT&T's authentication system. Now the three companies are apparently making nice. </p>

<p>The statement from Starbucks reads: "T-Mobile, AT&T and Starbucks have entered into a memorandum of understanding to resolve their disputes and are committed to providing a high quality WiFi experience for customers, including Starbucks Rewards Customers, at Starbucks locations nationwide."</p>

<p>My interpretation is Starbucks said, oops, our bad, and they're figuring out the dollars and cents. Sometimes companies move too rapidly. T-Mobile is a quasi-jilted suitor, although they get something out of AT&T transition, too, so they're not likely to cut any slack.</p>

<p>Reuters <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080611/bs_nm/starbucks_tmobile_deal_dc"><strong>confirms</strong></a> that AT&T confirms the statement. I separately confirmed with T-Mobile that the statement is accurate as well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks">starbucks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks reads">starbucks reads</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile">t-mobile</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks rewards customers">starbucks rewards customers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi">wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starbucks locations nationwide">starbucks locations nationwide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att">att</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att confirms">att confirms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile filed">t-mobile filed</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008351.html">T-Mobile, AT&amp;T, Starbucks Make Nice about Wi-Fi</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[What do you think of Zemanta?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/baec9e39e3f13ba1c276ce62bb7d16cd</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/baec9e39e3f13ba1c276ce62bb7d16cd</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am such a nerd/geek (for a good discussion on what the difference is, check out Brad Feld's article here ), that I read this post in Fred Wilson's blog on Zemanta and had to check it out for myself....]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I am such a nerd/geek (for a good discussion on what the difference is, check out Brad Feld's article <a href="http://www.feld.com/blog/archives/2008/05/nerd_or_geek.html">here</a>), that I read this post in <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/06/trying-zemanta.html">Fred Wilson's blog</a> on <a href="http://www.zemanta.com/">Zemanta</a> and had to check it out for myself. I am using it on this post and the <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/t-mobile-wants.html">previous one on Starbucks</a> being sued by <a class="zem_slink" title="T-Mobile" href="http://www.t-mobile.net/" rel="homepage">T-Mobile</a>. </p>

<p>So far I am really impressed with how <a class="zem_slink" title="Zemanta ltd." href="http://www.zemanta.com/" rel="homepage">Zemanta</a> works. It gives you a whole bunch of content related that you can use on your blog.&nbsp; Pictures, related articles, links and tags. It also makes it easy to reblog.&nbsp; It works right in my <a class="zem_slink" title="TypePad" href="/" rel="homepage">Typepad</a> blog editor.&nbsp; The only thing I can think of is that I would like to see it work in <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft Windows" href="http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/default.mspx" rel="homepage">Windows</a> LiveWriter and Scribefire, the two blog editor that I use for most of my stuff.&nbsp; But <a class="zem_slink" title="Zemanta ltd." href="http://www.zemanta.com/" rel="homepage">Zemanta</a> is good enough that I don't mind using the <a class="zem_slink" title="TypePad" href="/" rel="homepage">Typepad</a> editor to get this functionality!</p>

<p>So what do you think?&nbsp; It is more noise or does it add value?&nbsp; Leave a comment and let me know</p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend>Related articles</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/06/trying-zemanta.html">Trying Zemanta</a> [via Zemanta] </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zementa_brings_a_semantic_layer_to_blogs.php">Zementa Brings a Semantic Layer to Your Blog</a> [via Zemanta] </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.alwaysbcmom.com/2008/05/have-you-tried-zemanta.html">Have You Tried Zemanta?</a> [via Zemanta]</li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/98f5c43e-ae72-429c-b219-12708aceef17/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=98f5c43e-ae72-429c-b219-12708aceef17" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/zemanta">zemanta</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog editor">blog editor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/typepad blog editor">typepad blog editor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog">blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post">post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/zementa brings">zementa brings</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/semantic layer">semantic layer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/check">check</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/articles">articles</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/what-do-you-thi.html">What do you think of Zemanta?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[T-Mobile wants you to still pay for that access with your latte]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ef9940ab65fae46a2f4a48b5f510aed1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ef9940ab65fae46a2f4a48b5f510aed1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia
According to this article T-Mobile is none to happy about Starbucks and ATT offering free wi-fi to customers. They have filed suit against Starbucks, claiming that according an...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="zemanta-img" style="DISPLAY: block; FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 1em"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Starbucksdesk.jpg"><img alt="Starbucks, Cathedral Square, Peterborough, UK. A typical sales area in a Starbucks coffeehouse. Showing the till, preparation areas and sales displays." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Starbucksdesk.jpg/202px-Starbucksdesk.jpg" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; DISPLAY: block; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a> <p class="zemanta-img-attribution">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Starbucksdesk.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></p></div>

<p>According to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080607/wr_nm/t_mobile_suit_dc_1">this article</a> <a class="zem_slink" title="T-Mobile" href="http://www.t-mobile.net/" rel="homepage">T-Mobile</a> is none to happy about <a class="zem_slink" title="Starbucks" href="http://www.starbucks.com/" rel="homepage">Starbucks</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="American Tobacco Trail" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Tobacco_Trail" rel="wikipedia">ATT</a> offering free <a class="zem_slink" title="Wi-Fi" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi" rel="wikipedia">wi-fi</a> to customers.&nbsp; They have filed suit against Starbucks, claiming that according an agreement between the three companies, the transition from T-Mobile's pay for access to the ATT free access was supposed to go at a much slower rate, only it seems ATT and Starbucks have rushed things through and T-Mobile is suing mad about the lost revenue.</p>

<p>T-Mobile should have seen this coming. The day the ATT deal was signed, any more revenue T-Mobile ground out of their Starbucks relationship was froth on the coffee.&nbsp; It is hard to beat free. </p>

<p>In my mind, taking Starbucks out of the T-mobile hotspot world, what is left?&nbsp; Some airports perhaps, but increasingly T-mobile is a 2nd or 3rd tier carrier in the US anyway. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend>Related articles</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/06/06/t-mobile-files-suit-against-starbucks-over-wifi-transition-to-at/">T-Mobile files suit against Starbucks over WiFi transition to AT&amp;T</a> [via Zemanta]</li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9958942-7.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news">AT&amp;T; offers free Wi-Fi at Starbucks</a> [via Zemanta]</li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.livecrunch.com/2008/06/03/starbucks-and-att-free-wireless-internet-scam/">Starbucks and ATT Free Wireless Internet Scam</a> [via Zemanta]</li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2e7ea1b7-4fd9-4b92-8790-edd8f26a0926/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=2e7ea1b7-4fd9-4b92-8790-edd8f26a0926" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile">t-mobile</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access">access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/free">free</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/offers free wi-fi">offers free wi-fi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile hotspot world">t-mobile hotspot world</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att free access">att free access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/revenue t-mobile ground">revenue t-mobile ground</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/t-mobile files suit">t-mobile files suit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/att">att</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/t-mobile-wants.html">T-Mobile wants you to still pay for that access with your latte</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[What do you think of Zemanta?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ca4d4832c9caf7e4dfbd59ac09041e3a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ca4d4832c9caf7e4dfbd59ac09041e3a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I am such a nerd/geek (for a good discussion on what the difference is, check out Brad Felds article here ), that I read this post in Fred Wilson's blog on Zemanta and had to check it out for myself....]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I am such a nerd/geek (for a good discussion on what the difference is, check out Brad Felds article <a href="http://www.feld.com/blog/archives/2008/05/nerd_or_geek.html">here</a>), that I read this post in <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/06/trying-zemanta.html">Fred Wilson's blog</a> on <a href="http://www.zemanta.com/">Zemanta</a> and had to check it out for myself. I am using it on this post and the <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/06/t-mobile-wants.html">previous one on Starbucks</a> being sued by <a class="zem_slink" title="T-Mobile" href="http://www.t-mobile.net/" rel="homepage">T-Mobile</a>. </p>

<p>So far I am really impressed with how <a class="zem_slink" title="Zemanta ltd." href="http://www.zemanta.com/" rel="homepage">Zemanta</a> works. It gives you a whole bunch of content related that you can use on your blog.&nbsp; Pictures, related articles, links and tags. It also makes it easy to reblog.&nbsp; It works right in my <a class="zem_slink" title="TypePad" href="/" rel="homepage">Typepad</a> blog editor.&nbsp; The only thing I can think of is that I would like to see it work in <a class="zem_slink" title="Microsoft Windows" href="http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/default.mspx" rel="homepage">Windows</a> LiveWriter and Sribefire, the two blog editor that I use for most of my stuff.&nbsp; But <a class="zem_slink" title="Zemanta ltd." href="http://www.zemanta.com/" rel="homepage">Zemanta</a> is good enough that I don't mind using the <a class="zem_slink" title="TypePad" href="/" rel="homepage">Typepad</a> editor to get this functionality!</p>

<p>So what do you think?&nbsp; It is more noise or does it add value?&nbsp; Leave a comment and let me know</p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend>Related articles</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/06/trying-zemanta.html">Trying Zemanta</a> [via Zemanta]</li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zementa_brings_a_semantic_layer_to_blogs.php">Zementa Brings a Semantic Layer to Your Blog</a> [via Zemanta]</li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://www.alwaysbcmom.com/2008/05/have-you-tried-zemanta.html">Have You Tried Zemanta?</a> [via Zemanta]</li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/98f5c43e-ae72-429c-b219-12708aceef17/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=98f5c43e-ae72-429c-b219-12708aceef17" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=AFiY84"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=AFiY84" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Tp2eFI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Tp2eFI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ZtlRkI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ZtlRkI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=FqrFBI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=FqrFBI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=Wg7tII"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=Wg7tII" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=gqAPLi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=gqAPLi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=E9BX5i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=E9BX5i" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/306836091" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/zemanta">zemanta</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog editor">blog editor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/typepad blog editor">typepad blog editor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog">blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brad felds article">brad felds article</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/post">post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/zementa brings">zementa brings</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/semantic layer">semantic layer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/check">check</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/306836091/what-do-you-thi.html">What do you think of Zemanta?</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
