<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: swiss]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/swiss</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wired Keyboards Keystrokes Can Be Hijacked From Up To 65 Feet Away]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1859cc1cce20e4299eb111e1ae1201e9</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1859cc1cce20e4299eb111e1ae1201e9</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Swiss researchers from the Security and Cryptography Laboratory at Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne have found a variety of ways to eavesdrop on the sensitive messages computer users type by...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Swiss researchers from the Security and Cryptography Laboratory at Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne have found a variety of ways to eavesdrop on the sensitive messages computer users type by monitoring their wired keyboards. At least 11 models using a wide range of connection types are vulnerable.
The researchers are able to capture keystrokes by monitoring [...]]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wired keyboards">wired keyboards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ecole polytechnique federale">ecole polytechnique federale</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/researchers">researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/swiss researchers">swiss researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wide range">wide range</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/capture keystrokes">capture keystrokes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/connection types">connection types</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cryptography laboratory">cryptography laboratory</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/models">models</category>
      <source url="http://cyberinsecure.com/wired-keyboards-keystrokes-can-be-hijacked-from-up-to-65-feet-away/">Wired Keyboards Keystrokes Can Be Hijacked From Up To 65 Feet Away</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hackers deface Large Hadron Collider Web site]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/eabcd0563860ac1c189e3be9aac1c45c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/eabcd0563860ac1c189e3be9aac1c45c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hackers have broken into the network of the Swiss particle-physics laboratory operating the Large Hadron Collider experiment that has just begun smashing atoms in the hope of finding the theorized...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hackers have broken into the network of the Swiss particle-physics laboratory operating the Large Hadron Collider experiment that has just begun smashing atoms in the hope of finding the theorized Higgs particle, an elementary particle of mass.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hadron collider experiment">hadron collider experiment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/elementary particle">elementary particle</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/higgs particle">higgs particle</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hackers">hackers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laboratory">laboratory</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hope">hope</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mass">mass</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/atoms">atoms</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/091208-hackers.html?fsrc=rss-security">Hackers deface Large Hadron Collider Web site</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DTrace: The Reverse Engineer's Unexpected Swiss Army Knife]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/594df3f05ac0efe38d2eec8416609b2b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/594df3f05ac0efe38d2eec8416609b2b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[David Weston is a security engineer at Science Applications International Corporation. In this video, made at Black Hat Europe, David illustrates his research related to DTrace. Created by SUN and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[David Weston is a security engineer at Science Applications International Corporation. In this video, made at Black Hat Europe, David illustrates his research related to DTrace. Created by SUN and ori...]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/david weston">david weston</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/black hat europe">black hat europe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/david">david</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dtrace">dtrace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security engineer">security engineer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/video">video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/research">research</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ori">ori</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun">sun</category>
      <source url="http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1167">DTrace: The Reverse Engineer's Unexpected Swiss Army Knife</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Most Spammed Country In The World is Switzerland.]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/36c9bfea960776b465bc2b498c47572b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/36c9bfea960776b465bc2b498c47572b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[You may be complaining about the number of spam emails finding their way to your email account every day, but it may come as a surprise to you that the U.S. is actually not the most targeted country...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[You may be complaining about the number of spam emails finding their way to your email account every day, but it may come as a surprise to you that the U.S. is actually not the most targeted country by spammers: According to a report released to today, Swiss users receive 10% more of spam than the average Internet user, and 23% more than U.S. users]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/users">users</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/swiss users receive">swiss users receive</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spam">spam</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/average internet user">average internet user</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spam emails">spam emails</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/country">country</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/email account">email account</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/surprise">surprise</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spammers">spammers</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/The_Most_Spammed_Country_In_The_World_is_Switzerland">The Most Spammed Country In The World is Switzerland.</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[40% of surfers don't bother with browser security updates]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2d8e61b1813dbaaaa2a656ba6403be33</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2d8e61b1813dbaaaa2a656ba6403be33</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A new collaborative study between Google, IBM, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology suggests that users are slower to move between product updates than they should beespecially those using...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A new collaborative study between Google, IBM, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology suggests that users are slower to move between product updates than they should be—especially those using Internet Explorer. The researchers believe that browsers could learn from the food industry, of all things.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/swiss federal institute">swiss federal institute</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/collaborative study">collaborative study</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technology suggests">technology suggests</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet explorer">internet explorer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/food industry">food industry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/move">move</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/researchers">researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ibm">ibm</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/40_of_surfers_don_t_bother_with_browser_security_updates">40% of surfers don't bother with browser security updates</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Top five information security blog posts]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cd09cc1662efb8b5c5bb420167e8efbb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cd09cc1662efb8b5c5bb420167e8efbb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here are my top five information security related blog posts of the moment 1) ID theft Facebook and MSN exploited by Kai Roer. This is a great example of a malware infection resulting in a compromised...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
      Here are my top five information security related blog posts of the moment

1) <a href="http://www.roer.com/security/archive/2008/april/id_theft_facebook_and_msn_exploited">ID theft – Facebook and MSN exploited </a> by Kai Roer. This is a great example of a malware infection resulting in a compromised Facebook account and the resulting damage that can be done. There are plenty of other Facebook related stories around at the moment including <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/7375772.stm">this one</a> from the BBC who were able to create their own malware for compromising private data.

2) <a href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/stopping_at_compliance">Stopping at compliance</a> by Michael Farnham. Michael hits the nail on the head when he says "compliancy does NOT equal security." I couldn't have put it so well myself.

3) <a href="http://riskmanagementinsight.com/riskanalysis/?p=350">Evolving Schneier’s Security Mindset </a>. An interesting discussion on the perception of risk. <em>The question the risk analyst must answer however, is really “What is *probable*?”.   And we should really belabor the point that “What is probable?” is not just a “Can it be done?” question. </em>

4) <a href="http://identityblog.burtongroup.com/">Swiss Army Knife – The Personal Portable Security Device</a> posted by Mark Diodati. This discusses what is, from my point of view, an exciting new class of authentication product for the corporate network. Well worth reading about.

5) <a href="http://www.bloginfosec.com/2008/03/10/rosi-security-returns/">ROSI - Security Returns?</a> by C Warren Axelrod. Interesting because I'm more likely to take an opposite stance and argue against trying to demonstrate an ROI for security related investments. Frankly, I don't think you can prove it. 


      
   ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information security">information security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/equal security">equal security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/schneiers security mindset">schneiers security mindset</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/facebook">facebook</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/facebook account">facebook account</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/blog posts">blog posts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/theft facebook">theft facebook</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security returns">security returns</category>
      <source url="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/stuart_king/2008/05/top-five-information-security.html">Top five information security blog posts</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[InfoGuard battles optical hacks with encryption]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a1740c9ac92859e731ca946ad88e0cbe</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a1740c9ac92859e731ca946ad88e0cbe</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Fiber optic networks can be eavesdropped upon using equipment costing as little as $1,000, Swiss encryption specialist InfoGuard warned at this week's Infosecurity Europe...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Fiber optic networks can be eavesdropped upon using equipment costing as little as $1,000, Swiss encryption specialist InfoGuard warned at this week's Infosecurity Europe Show.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fiber optic networks">fiber optic networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/infosecurity europe">infosecurity europe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/week">week</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/equipment">equipment</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/042408-infosec-infoguard-battles-optical-hacks.html?fsrc=rss-security">InfoGuard battles optical hacks with encryption</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mac Hacked in 2 Minutes, Apple is a lame patcher]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/702d26987c9e923151037df77436e140</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/702d26987c9e923151037df77436e140</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[At the CanSec West conference Charlie Miller wins the PWN 2 OWN contest. I think these contest are kinda lame as they do not prove much, other than Charlie Miller was most likely sitting on a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the CanSec West conference Charlie Miller wins the PWN 2 OWN contest. I think these contest are kinda lame as they do not prove much, other than Charlie Miller was most likely sitting on a vulnerability waiting until the contest. I still think it is some what cool that there are people that are still interested in OS vulnerabilities.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html" target="_blank"> Link </a></p>
<p>In other news <a href="http://www.arch.ethz.ch/" target="_blank">some swiss guys</a> (P.S. I LOVE your pancakes!) did a pretty good analysis of the time it takes for <a href='http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-affiliate-pro.php?id=3' onmouseover="top.window.status='http://www.apple.com'; return true" onmouseout="top.window.status=''; return true" target="_blank">Apple</a> and Microsoft to patch there disclosed vulnerabilities.  <a href='http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-affiliate-pro.php?id=3' onmouseover="top.window.status='http://www.apple.com'; return true" onmouseout="top.window.status=''; return true" target="_blank">Apple</a> sadly has a ways to go. I think they are still at the Microsoft in 1999 phase. Hopefully they wake up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132730/2008/03/zero_day_blackhat.html" target="_blank"> Link</a></p>
<p class="a2a_link"><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/?sitename=Grumpy Security Guy&amp;siteurl=http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com&amp;linkname=Mac Hacked in 2 Minutes, Apple is a lame patcher&amp;linkurl=http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/mac-hacked-in-2-minutes-apple-is-a-lame-patcher/&amp;type=page"><img src="http://www.addtoany.com/bookmark.gif" width="91" height="17" border="0" title="Add to any service" alt="Add to any service"/></a>
</p><div class="aizattos_related_posts"><span class="aizattos_related_posts_header" >Related Posts</span><ul><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title"><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/open-social-app-hacked-45-minutes-after-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Open Social App hacked 45 minutes after release" >Open Social App hacked 45 minutes after release</a></span><div class="aizattos_related_posts_excerpt">This TechCrunch article outlines how some exploited a vulnerability in a Open Social application  to...</div></li><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title"><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/mr-jobs-get-serious-about-security/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Mr. Jobs, get serious about security!" >Mr. Jobs, get serious about security!</a></span><div class="aizattos_related_posts_excerpt">With the release of the details behind last years mysterious wireless driver OS X exploit we can fin...</div></li><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title"><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/worst-security-i-have-seen-in-a-long-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Worst Security I Have Seen in a Long Time" >Worst Security I Have Seen in a Long Time</a></span><div class="aizattos_related_posts_excerpt">When the clueless are on the intarwebs this is what happens:

http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/So-Y...</div></li><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title"><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/apple-cant-search-applescript/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Apple blocks the word script" >Apple blocks the word script</a></span></li><li><span class="aizattos_related_posts_title"><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/os-x-leopard-security-concerns/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: OS X Leopard security concerns" >OS X Leopard security concerns</a></span></li></ul></div><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com">Grumpy Security Guy</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.grumpysecurityguy.com/mac-hacked-in-2-minutes-apple-is-a-lame-patcher/">Mac Hacked in 2 Minutes, Apple is a lame patcher</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=tvjfqZ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=tvjfqZ" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=4ImrWXF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=4ImrWXF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=oPO7XsF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=oPO7XsF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=F9zLtDf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=F9zLtDf" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=cAVTlaf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=cAVTlaf" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=dwzZdPF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=dwzZdPF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=3ZnT1wF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=3ZnT1wF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=tZ8jiMF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=tZ8jiMF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=P1u1IRf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=P1u1IRf" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?a=1acTjnf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/GrumpySecurityGuy?i=1acTjnf" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GrumpySecurityGuy/~4/259255254" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple">apple</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/leopard security concerns">leopard security concerns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lame patcher">lame patcher</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lame">lame</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple sadly">apple sadly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/worst security">worst security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple blocks">apple blocks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/minutes">minutes</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GrumpySecurityGuy/~3/259255254/">Mac Hacked in 2 Minutes, Apple is a lame patcher</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Mac OS X Security - Reality Check #1]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8f487384988cb36d914fcb8df05606bc</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8f487384988cb36d914fcb8df05606bc</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[As anyone who reads my blog knows, I like to shine a light on areas of common security misperceptions. I am even happier when others do it
I think Apple has really taken a playbook from Oracle (ie,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who reads my blog knows, I like to shine a light on areas of common security misperceptions.&nbsp; I am even happier when others do it.&nbsp; </p> <p>I think Apple has really taken a playbook from Oracle (ie, "Unbreakable marketing") with respect to security in the past year with unsupported security claims in their marketing, drawing the attention of security researchers.&nbsp; </p> <p>At Black Hat today, researchers from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology looked at Apple and Microsoft vendor responsiveness to zero-day vulnerabilities and found ... surprise, Apple consistently has more unpatched issues.</p> <p>Read about the findings in ComputerWorld at <a href="http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=spam__malware_and_vulnerabilities&amp;articleId=9072498&amp;taxonomyId=85" target="_blank">Microsoft vs. Apple: Who patches zero-days faster?</a></p> <p>If you don't want to do that, here is a key quote from the article:</p> <blockquote> <p><em>What they found is that, contrary to popular belief that Apple makes more secure products, Apple lags behind in patching. </em> <p><em>"Apple was below 20 [unpatched vulnerabilities at disclosure] consistently before 2005," Frei said. "Since then, they are very often above. So if you have Apple and compare it to Microsoft, the number of unpatched vulnerabilities are higher at Apple."</em></p></blockquote><img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3022296" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple">apple</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple lags">apple lags</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/apple consistently">apple consistently</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security researchers">security researchers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security claims">security claims</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft">microsoft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsoft vendor responsiveness">microsoft vendor responsiveness</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/common security misperceptions">common security misperceptions</category>
      <source url="http://blogs.technet.com/security/archive/2008/03/27/mac-os-x-security-reality-check-1.aspx">Mac OS X Security - Reality Check #1</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[NSA Backdoors in Crypto AG Ciphering Machines]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1a60159596edfc262cf2de2acead7fe1</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1a60159596edfc262cf2de2acead7fe1</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[This story made the rounds in European newspapers some years ago -- mostly stories in German, if I remember -- but it wasn't covered much here in the U.S. For half a century, Crypto AG, a Swiss...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.inteldaily.com/?c=169&a=4686">This story</a> made the rounds in European newspapers some years ago -- mostly stories in German, if I remember -- but it wasn't covered much here in the U.S.</p>

<blockquote>For half a century, Crypto AG, a Swiss company located in Zug, has sold to more than 100 countries the encryption machines their officials rely upon to exchange their most sensitive economic, diplomatic and military messages. Crypto AG was founded in 1952 by the legendary (Russian born) Swedish cryptographer Boris Hagelin. During World War II, Hagelin sold 140,000 of his machine to the US Army.

<p>"In the meantime, the Crypto AG has built up long standing cooperative relations with customers in 130 countries," states a prospectus of the company. The home page of the company Web site says, "Crypto AG is the preferred top-security partner for civilian and military authorities worldwide. Security is our business and will always remain our business."</p>

<p>And for all those years, US eavesdroppers could read these messages without the least difficulty. A decade after the end of WWII, the NSA, also known as No Such Agency, had rigged the Crypto AG machines in various ways according to the targeted countries. It is probably no exaggeration to state that this 20th century version of the "Trojan horse" is quite likely the greatest sting in modern history.</blockquote></p>

<p>We don't know the truth here, but the article lays out the evidence pretty well.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=aLALRMD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=aLALRMD" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=SMPrtyD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=SMPrtyD" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=PoHQgUD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=PoHQgUD" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/crypto">crypto</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/machines">machines</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company">company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/swiss company">swiss company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/company web site">company web site</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/century">century</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/20th century version">20th century version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/military messages">military messages</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/countries">countries</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/nsa_backdoors_i.html">NSA Backdoors in Crypto AG Ciphering Machines</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
