<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: thin]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/thin</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/faa1c491c2560f03d26087ce540dd0ef</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/faa1c491c2560f03d26087ce540dd0ef</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: 3PAR) The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: 3PAR)</b> The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI, enables end users or their hosting providers to provision and manage hundreds of individual, virtual desktops from a set of centrally administered, consolidated servers. This approach delivers a number of potential benefits, including lower administrative and maintenance costs, higher levels of security, and increased user mobility and flexibility. 3PAR has introduced Thin Copy Desktop for VMware VDI, a storage solution designed for virtualized desktop infrastructures. This offering meets all the requirements for a VDI Optimized Storage solution, which we have outlined in this document. 3PAR Thin Copy Desktop significantly decreases physical disk space requirements for virtual desktop images and enables the rapid, simultaneous booting of hundreds  or even thousands  of virtual machines (VMs).
<p><a href="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?a=OqJXst"><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~a/Computerworld/Security/News?i=OqJXst" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~4/383300985" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vdi">vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storage solution">storage solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop infrastructure">virtual desktop infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vmware vdi">vmware vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thin copy desktop">thin copy desktop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/3par">3par</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/manage hundreds">manage hundreds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop images">virtual desktop images</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hundreds">hundreds</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/~r/Computerworld/Security/News/~3/383300985/whitepapers.do">3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/16989dfab02bffbda4d73e938dc0852d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/16989dfab02bffbda4d73e938dc0852d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Source: 3PAR) The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>(Source: 3PAR)</b> The advent of Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) holds great promise in corporate, government, and service provider environments. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, such as VMware VDI, enables end users or their hosting providers to provision and manage hundreds of individual, virtual desktops from a set of centrally administered, consolidated servers. This approach delivers a number of potential benefits, including lower administrative and maintenance costs, higher levels of security, and increased user mobility and flexibility. 3PAR has introduced Thin Copy Desktop for VMware VDI, a storage solution designed for virtualized desktop infrastructures. This offering meets all the requirements for a VDI Optimized Storage solution, which we have outlined in this document. 3PAR Thin Copy Desktop significantly decreases physical disk space requirements for virtual desktop images and enables the rapid, simultaneous booting of hundreds - or even thousands - of virtual machines (VMs).<br style="clear: both;"/>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:f4f34ae1a56fad240bc637717ae98a3e:Q0uxw8yNx8poQ%2FQKxJQtAycZkRBw4pO4%2F2AGV5i1QMLMpEg2wgSl974RKBrmsuGEkQ5WWxAA3cO0rmN8tY2Dc8t9mmhNJA%2BfmXpVhaXj9Wc%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to digg' alt='Add to digg' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/digg.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:2f92a7c011d256cf733e878cbfad9e42:zmYgYG2YKzzlSqg0dKBU4vOJ6SzSo2bX5p2jt5xYGjnjyCfcQrfayiFgom7WLp%2BcZVbH3mNXyPHe0ntOxt6o17HTWmmqsd4nmzytBBrlCiA%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to StumbleUpon' alt='Add to StumbleUpon' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/stumbleit.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:2686fa7fc02e8dc83fc49f23561537a8:7HFkUgKP22vzQQhW%2BPfraFFlO08ySGGz%2FvdMs1d9Yi%2FVBWxq9bNZDFJuucs1na7awgkKYmUxiPuHMq%2FNWwlgnbmxz50Ko9%2Bdgq7tudSyk6w%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Twitter' alt='Add to Twitter' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/twitter.png'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v2:03149008a954edb6eaba5c5cab76cee9:Y%2F7m6%2BnHXo6F8t5s1q5N10fSXIUjiQ6dP8bwkLrOfzikRIkKy%2Br8XNGAK6%2F1FF8LUtdQNIBbHyx84L%2Fpv0CIYzHFSmkdR1qeozC7xPY7aSM%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Slashdot' alt='Add to Slashdot' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/slashdot.png'/></a>
<br style="clear: both;"/>  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vdi">vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/storage solution">storage solution</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop infrastructure">virtual desktop infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vmware vdi">vmware vdi</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thin copy desktop">thin copy desktop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/3par">3par</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/manage hundreds">manage hundreds</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual desktop images">virtual desktop images</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hundreds">hundreds</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/click.phdo?i=f871915fc679b17cbf8fb0103b3574aa">3PAR Thin Copy Desktop: A VDI-Optimized Storage Solution</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Keeping MacBooks snug at security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/66e61f8cb2c803ad21ded26d6eedb296</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/66e61f8cb2c803ad21ded26d6eedb296</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Apple's laptops have had some interesting encounters at airport security checkpoints. The wafer-thin design of the MacBook Air befuddled one security officer earlier this year in the U.S., who asked...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's laptops have had some interesting encounters at airport security checkpoints. The wafer-thin design of the MacBook Air befuddled one security officer earlier this year in the U.S., who asked to give some "special attention" to the "fine piece of machinery," according to Bob, who blogs for the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA). After inspection, the laptop was returned to the owner.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/airport security checkpoints">airport security checkpoints</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/transportation security administration">transportation security administration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/macbook air">macbook air</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/special attention">special attention</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wafer-thin design">wafer-thin design</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fine piece">fine piece</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security officer">security officer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/laptop">laptop</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tsa">tsa</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/082308-keeping-macbooks-snug-at.html?fsrc=rss-security">Keeping MacBooks snug at security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Fog of the Future: Cloud Computings on the Horizon]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/b0444080036cffd2f313acaf1bcf9b99</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/b0444080036cffd2f313acaf1bcf9b99</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[If you trust the media and are looking to the future, you might be thinking a good deal about Cloud Computing according to ComputerWorld, this could be the next big movement
Ive heard the buzzwords...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you trust the media and are looking to the future, you might be thinking a good deal about <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://blogs.computerworld.com/forecast_calls_for_clouds_are_we_ready">Cloud Computing</a> &#8212; according to ComputerWorld, this could be the next big movement.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard the buzzwords but wasn&#8217;t exactly sure what they meant&#8211;luckily, when there&#8217;s media hype, there are definitions, too. According to <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/08/04/quicker-path-clouds">this article</a>, cloud computing is exemplified by Software as a Service &#8212; outsourced, hosted platforms and software that perform services for companies. </p>
<p>Another <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&#038;articleId=9111689">article </a>puts it slightly differently:</p>
<blockquote><p>OK, let us look at what form of computing in being provided via the cloud. In this model, all IT applications and facilities (i.e. compute, storage and network) are provided as a service rather than dedicated infrastructure. This is intended to allow any user, independent of client platform, to access IT services without knowledge or concern of their location or form. Sound familiar &#8212; it&#8217;s a service-oriented architecture (SOA)!</p>
<p>In addition, cloud computing incorporates almost every computing manifestation within the IT world: distributed, grid, utility, on-demand, open-source, Web services, P2P, Web 2.0 and, last but not least, software as a service.</p>
<p>It also accommodates thin, thick and mobile clients and allows integration of corporate, commercial and service provider cloud-accessed resources. As an example, in this model, storage is a service resource that is accessed via the cloud, not a dedicated user resource.</p></blockquote>
<p>Honestly I read that last one first and found the definition a bit dense. It sounds like a summation of everything that makes up our Internet infrastructure already, so how is that different than the Internet itself? Well, cloud computing isn&#8217;t about what service or devices are being supported &#8212; it&#8217;s more about how it&#8217;s being provided&#8211; it is a location-independent style of computing. The first article calls it &#8220;platform as a service.&#8221;</p>
<p>Have you heard better definitions of what cloud computing is and does? Share them in the comments below. Thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service">service</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service provider">service provider</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service resource">service resource</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/services">services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/perform services">perform services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web services">web services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet infrastructure">internet infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/itsecurity/~3/365101308/">Fog of the Future: Cloud Computings on the Horizon</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Java Droppings On My PC]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/5f26c7873099213ae4ab937b0047f49f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/5f26c7873099213ae4ab937b0047f49f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks to Susan and her Small Business Server blog for reminding me of one of the most wasteful programming practices we PC users suffer from: Sun's Java update program . If you've been using and...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks to Susan and her Small Business Server blog for reminding me of <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/08/07/dear-scott.aspx">one of the most wasteful programming practices we PC users suffer from: Sun's Java update program</a>.

If you've been using and updating Java for a while and you check Add/Remove Programs (Programs and Features on Vista) you'll see more than one copy of Java installed. Susan's PC shows quite a few, a situation I've seen myself in the past. When you install an update, Sun leaves all of the previous versions on the system.

If I remember correctly, the rationale for this is that there may be applications on the system that require that version of Java, but this seems like a thin basis on which to leave 136MB of useless stuff on the computer. And is Java really that vulnerable to version dependencies? So if I install a new system with a new copy of Java the app won't work because it required last week's version?

Susan is right, this is something that Sun needs to fix. We complain about a lot of other companies, we need to put some heat on Sun.<img src="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/359008170" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/java">java</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun">sun</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun leaves">sun leaves</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version dependencies">version dependencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/check addremove programs">check addremove programs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/programs">programs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version">version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/susan">susan</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/359008170/java_droppings_on_my_pc.html">Java Droppings On My PC</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Java Droppings on My PC]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/73f8644cded5a45f56ca3c1938cadb54</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/73f8644cded5a45f56ca3c1938cadb54</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Thanks to Susan and her Small Business Server blog for reminding me of one of the most wasteful programming practices from which we PC users suffer: Sun's Java update program . If you've been using...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks to Susan and her Small Business Server blog for reminding me of <a href="http://msmvps.com/blogs/bradley/archive/2008/08/07/dear-scott.aspx">one of the most wasteful programming practices from which we PC users suffer: Sun's Java update program</a>.

If you've been using and updating Java for a while and you check Add/Remove Programs (Programs and Features on Vista), you'll see more than one copy of Java installed. Susan's PC shows quite a few, a situation I've seen myself in the past. When you install an update, Sun leaves all of the previous versions on the system.

If I remember correctly, the rationale for this is that there may be applications on the system that require that version of Java, but this seems like a thin basis on which to leave 136MB of useless stuff on the computer. And is Java really that vulnerable to version dependencies? So if I install a new system with a new copy of Java, the app won't work because it required last week's version?

Susan is right, this is something that Sun needs to fix. We complain about a lot of other companies; we need to put some heat on Sun.<img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/KHFJWurkp44" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/java">java</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun">sun</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sun leaves">sun leaves</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version dependencies">version dependencies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/check addremove programs">check addremove programs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/programs">programs</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version">version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/susan">susan</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/system">system</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/KHFJWurkp44/java_droppings_on_my_pc.html">Java Droppings on My PC</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Assessing the Security Benefits of Cloud Computing]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/1e09e5c89f15d3a4df4ea921f9230c2d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/1e09e5c89f15d3a4df4ea921f9230c2d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[With all this talk and reporting about security concerns, lets change the channel for a moment and assess the potential security benefits of Cloud Computing
In my view, there are some strong technical...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Is the glass half empty or half full?" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/94094843@N00/2292559560/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" style="border: 0; float: right; margin: 3px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3004/2292559560_378f226531_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Is the glass half empty or half full?" /></a></p>
<p>With all this <a href="http://cloudsecurity.org">talk</a> and <a href="http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=685308">reporting</a> about security concerns, lets change the channel for a moment and assess the <strong>potential security benefits</strong> of Cloud Computing.</p>
<p>In my view, there are some strong technical security arguments in favour of Cloud Computing - assuming we can find ways to manage the risks.</p>
<p>With this new paradigm come challenges <strong>and </strong>opportunities.  The challenges are getting plenty of attention - I&#8217;m regularly afforded the opportunity to <a href="http://www.gridtoday.com/grid/2422309.html">comment</a> on them, plus obviously I cover them on this blog.  However, lets not lose sight of the potential upside.</p>
<p>In this post, I walk through seven technical security benefits.  Some are immediate, others may arise over time and have conditions attached (some unstated for the sake of brevity).  However, I&#8217;m including the longer-range benefits now to raise awareness.  Some of the outcomes listed are available today without the Cloud, but they are either complex and slow to implement (and thus less likely to happen) or prohibitive for capital cost reasons.  I don&#8217;t claim this is a definitive list - it reflects where my thinking is today.</p>
<p>Some benefits depend on the Cloud service used and therefore do not apply across the board.  For example; I see no solid forensic benefits with SaaS.  Also, for space reasons, I&#8217;m purposely not including the &#8216;flip side&#8217; to these benefits, however if you read this blog regularly you should <a href="http://cloudsecurity.org/2008/04/24/cloud-stacks-please-mind-the-gap/">recognise some</a>.</p>
<p>On a sidenote, I believe the Cloud offers Small and Medium Businesses major potential security benefits.  Frequently SMBs struggle with limited or non-existent in-house INFOSEC resources and budgets.  The caveat is that the Cloud market is still very new - security offerings are somewhat foggy - making selection tricky.  Clearly, not all Cloud providers will offer the same security.</p>
<h4>Seven Technical Security Benefits of the Cloud</h4>
<h4>1. Centralised Data</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduced Data Leakage</strong>: this is the benefit I hear most from Cloud providers - and in my view they are right.  How many laptops do we need to lose before we get this?  How many backup tapes?  The data &#8220;landmines&#8221; of today could be greatly reduced by the Cloud as thin client technology becomes prevalent.  Small, temporary caches on handheld devices or Netbook computers pose less risk than transporting data buckets in the form of laptops.  Ask the CISO of any large company if all laptops have company &#8216;mandated&#8217; controls consistently applied; e.g. full disk encryption.  You&#8217;ll see the answer by looking at the whites of their eyes.  Despite best efforts around asset management and endpoint security we continue to see embarrassing and disturbing misses.  And what about SMBs?  How many use encryption for sensitive data, or even have a data classification policy in place?</li>
<li><strong>Monitoring benefits</strong>: central storage is easier to control and monitor.  The flipside is the nightmare scenario of <a href="http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/most-attractive-targets-saas/">comprehensive data theft</a>.  However, I would rather spend my time as a security professional figuring out smart ways to protect and monitor access to data stored in one place (with the benefit of situational advantage) than trying to figure out all the places where the company data resides across a myriad of thick clients!  You can get the benefits of Thin Clients today but Cloud Storage provides a way to centralise the data faster and potentially cheaper.  The logistical challenge today is getting Terabytes of data to the Cloud in the first place.</li>
</ul>
<h4>2. Incident Response / Forensics</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Forensic readiness</strong>: with Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) providers, I can build a dedicated forensic server in the same Cloud as my company and place it offline, ready for use when needed.  I would only need pay for storage until an incident happens and I need to bring it online.  I don&#8217;t need to call someone to bring it online or install some kind of remote boot software - I just click a button in the Cloud Providers web interface.  If I have multiple incident responders, I can give them a copy of the VM so we can distribute the forensic workload based on the job at hand or as new sources of evidence arise and need analysis.  To fully realise this benefit, commercial forensic software vendors would need to move away from archaic, physical dongle based licensing schemes to a network licensing model.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease evidence acquisition time</strong>: if a server in the Cloud gets compromised (i.e. broken into), I can now clone that server at the click of a mouse and make the cloned disks instantly available to my Cloud Forensics server.  I didn&#8217;t need to &#8220;find&#8221; storage or have it &#8220;ready, waiting and unused&#8221; - its just there.</li>
<li><strong>Eliminate or reduce service downtime</strong>: Note that in the above scenario I didn&#8217;t have to go tell the COO that the system needs to be taken offline for hours whilst I dig around in the RAID Array hoping that my physical acqusition toolkit is compatible (and that the version of RAID firmware isn&#8217;t supported by my forensic software).  Abstracting the hardware removes a barrier to even doing forensics in some situations.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease evidence transfer time</strong>: In the same Cloud, bit fot bit copies are super fast - made faster by that replicated, distributed filesystem my Cloud provider engineered for me.  From a network traffic perspective, it may even be free to make the copy in the same Cloud.  Without the Cloud, <strong>I </strong>would have to a lot of time consuming and expensive provisioning of physical devices.  I only pay for the storage as long as I need the evidence.</li>
<li><strong>Eliminate forensic image verification time</strong>: Some Cloud Storage implementations expose a cryptographic checksum or hash.  For example, Amazon S3 generates an MD5 hash <a href="http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/index.html?RESTObjectPUT.html">automagically</a> when you store an object.  In theory you no longer need to generate time-consuming MD5 checksums using external tools - its already there.</li>
<li><strong>Decrease time to access protected documents</strong>: Immense CPU power opens some doors.  Did the suspect password protect a document that is relevant to the investigation?  You can now test a wider range of candidate passwords in less time to speed investigations.</li>
</ul>
<h4>3. Password assurance testing (aka cracking)</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Decrease password cracking time</strong>: if your organisation regularly tests password strength by running password crackers you can use Cloud Compute to decrease crack time and you only pay for what you use.  Ironically, your cracking costs go up as people choose better passwords ;-).</li>
<li><strong>Keep cracking activities to dedicated machines</strong>: if today you use a distributed password cracker to spread the load across non-production machines, you can now put those agents in dedicated Compute instances - and thus stop mixing sensitive credentials with other workloads.</li>
</ul>
<h4>4. Logging</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>&#8220;Unlimited&#8221;, pay per drink storage</strong>: logging is often an afterthought, consequently insufficient disk space is allocated and logging is either non-existant or minimal.  Cloud Storage changes all this - no more &#8216;guessing&#8217; how much storage you need for standard logs.</li>
<li><strong>Improve log indexing and search</strong>: with your logs in the Cloud you can leverage Cloud Compute to index those logs in real-time and get the benefit of <a href="http://blogs.splunk.com/thewilde/2008/06/24/splunk-ninja-inside-the-cloud/">instant search results.</a> What is different here?  The Compute instances can be plumbed in and scale as needed based on the logging load - meaning a true real-time view.</li>
<li><strong>Getting compliant with Extended logging</strong>: most modern operating systems offer extended logging in the form of a C2 audit trail.  This is rarely enabled for fear of performance degradation and log size.  Now you can &#8216;opt-in&#8217; easily - if you are willing to pay for the enhanced logging, you can do so.  Granular logging makes compliance and investigations easier.</li>
</ul>
<h4>5. Improve the state of security software (performance)</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Drive vendors to create more efficient security software</strong>: Billable CPU cycles get noticed.  More attention will be paid to inefficient processes; e.g. poorly tuned security agents.  Process accounting will make a comeback as customers target &#8216;expensive&#8217; processes.  Security vendors that understand how to squeeze the most performance from their software will win.</li>
</ul>
<h4>6. Secure builds</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Pre-hardened, change control builds</strong>: this is primarily a benefit of virtualization based Cloud Computing.  Now you get a chance to start &#8217;secure&#8217; (by your own definition) - you create your Gold Image VM and clone away.  There are ways to do this today with bare-metal OS installs but frequently these require additional 3rd party tools, are time consuming to clone or add yet another agent to each endpoint.</li>
<li><strong>Reduce exposure through patching offline</strong>: Gold images can be kept up securely kept up to date.  Offline VMs can be conveniently patched &#8220;off&#8221; the network.</li>
<li><strong>Easier to test impact of security changes</strong>: this is a big one.  Spin up a copy of your production environment, implement a security change and test the impact at low cost, with minimal startup time.  This is a big deal and removes a major barrier to &#8216;doing&#8217; security in production environments.</li>
</ul>
<h4>7. Security Testing</h4>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduce cost of testing security: </strong>a SaaS provider only passes on a portion of their security testing costs.  By sharing the same application as a service, you don&#8217;t foot the expensive security code review and/or penetration test.  Even with Platform as a Service (PaaS) where your developers get to write code, there are potential cost economies of scale (particularly around use of code scanning tools that sweep source code for security weaknesses).</li>
</ul>
<h4>Your Thoughts?</h4>
<p>What benefits do you see that I haven&#8217;t included in the above list?  Where do you agree/disagree and importantly, why?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~4/341289594" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/benefits">benefits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud">cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/technical security benefits">technical security benefits</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/based">based</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtualization based cloud">virtualization based cloud</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/efficient security software">efficient security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security software">security software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cloud market">cloud market</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CloudSecurity/~3/341289594/">Assessing the Security Benefits of Cloud Computing</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[A thin line between blog theft and promotion - another opinion]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8db8f65e1fa8fce8c11d7b631ccf2157</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8db8f65e1fa8fce8c11d7b631ccf2157</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Rich Mogull has been writing a bit about his disagreement with a the SecurityRatty site posting his content (original posts here and here ). These posts have set off a rash of comments and other...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Mogull has been writing a bit about his disagreement with a the <a href="http://securityratty.com/">SecurityRatty</a> site posting his content (original posts <a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/securityratty-is-slimey-content-stealing-thief/">here</a> and <a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/i-win/">here</a>). These posts have set off a rash of comments and other articles on both sides of this issue. Finally Rich wrote his <a href="http://securosis.com/2008/07/02/defining-blog-content-theft/">defining post on this topic here</a>. Rich's position is that he owns his words. Ratty took them without his permission, ads nothing to the conversation or commentary at all and actually hosts the content rather than just linking to it. Now for those who don't know, SecurityRatty is a site allegedly owned and operated by some Russian CISSP dude. Basically, they claim they are an RSS aggregator and they just republish blog posts in their entirety. A couple of things to note though:<br><br>1. SecurityRatty does not usually add any content of their own or edit the posts in any way<br>2. They link back to the blogs or articles which are aggregated<br>3. They do appear to sell some advertising on the site<br>4. You can search their aggregated content on their site<br>5. At least recently they are removing content and feeds from their site if you request it.<br>6. They did not ask anyones permission that I know of before posting content<br><br>OK, now that the groundwork is laid, let me give my Shimel view on this. I disagree with Rich. Hey it is a big world and I think there is room for a dissenting opinion here. The reasons I disagree with Rich are:<br><br>1. Though Ratty plainly posts up others content, he does not hold it out as his own. He plainly gives credit to those who actually created the words and in fact links back to their sites.<br>2. Rich is publishing his data under a creative commons license, I am not sure if the meager ad on Ratty would qualify this as a commercial site.<br>3. Rich distinguishes what Ratty does from Google and other search engines (who clearly profit from Rich's content) by the fact that they just point to it. Not all together true. They also keep a cached copy of the content that you can go to as well.<br>4. The fact is that I have a tough time seeing any harm to Rich here. In fact if Ratty were not pointing back to Rich's site, if he did not make it as easy to see that it is just an aggregate feed or if Ratty were adding his own comments and not clearly delineating his from Rich's, I would feel differently. Some of this is directly in contrast to Rich who says that if Ratty did add his own views to Rich's, that would make it right by him.<br>5. Finally, I would go even further than Rich not being harmed by Ratty. I think Rich actually benefits from Ratty. It is yet another outlet for Rich's content and though not everyone reading it at Ratty may go back to Rich's site, they do know it is him and can go back easily. In fact if Rich did advertise at his site, I could understand him losing hits at his site. Otherwise if Ratty just pointed back, one could say the more hits Ratty generates, it could cost Rich more money. Much like people who link to graphics hosted elsewhere.<br><br>So, Rich I see that Ratty has stopped aggregating your content so that should be enough of a victory for you. In the long run though I think it is a Pyrrhic victory and you would have been better off with Ratty publicizing your words.</p><blockquote></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=HqzgQX"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=HqzgQX" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=URCj2J"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=URCj2J" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=LcKVkJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=LcKVkJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=d4OmHJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=d4OmHJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=uX21WJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=uX21WJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=4Efv2j"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=4Efv2j" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=RwzMJj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=RwzMJj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/326305454" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 18:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/posts">posts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ratty plainly posts">ratty plainly posts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rich distinguishes">rich distinguishes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rich">rich</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/rich mogull">rich mogull</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cost rich">cost rich</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plainly">plainly</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ratty">ratty</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/securityratty">securityratty</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/326305454/a-thin-line-bet.html">A thin line between blog theft and promotion - another opinion</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[ShoutPro Vulnerability Currently Causing Issues For Websites]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/77978134a7222749f8b7a165f0a09e27</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/77978134a7222749f8b7a165f0a09e27</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I've seen a few sites mention that they had to remove a Shoutbox recently due to people exploiting it in some way, shape or fashion. Curiously, while wading through the recent batch of 419 scams I...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
        I've seen a few sites mention that they had to <a href="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/doa11.html">remove a Shoutbox</a> recently due to people exploiting it in some way, shape or fashion. Curiously, while wading through the recent batch of 419 scams I happened to come across an IRS Phish which seemed strangely out of place.<br /><br />Here's what the Phish mail looked like (promising a tax refund of $600+, naturally):<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/irsphish.html" onclick="window.open('http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/irsphish.html','popup','width=461,height=435,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/irsphish-thumb-361x340.jpg" alt="irsphish.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="340" width="361" /></a></span></div><br /> <div><br /><div align="center">Click to Enlarge<br /></div><br />Clicking the link doesn't take you to a fake IRS page - instead, you see this:<br /><br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="irsphish2.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/irsphish2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="229" width="301" /></span></div><br /></div><div><br />I decided to contact the site owner and see if he had any further information on what happened. A portion of his response said:<br /><br /><i>I was using ShoutPro 1.5.2. It looks like the attacker was able to exploit the shoutbox in some way because he created (or uploaded?) a number of files to the server. The most dangerous of these was a script called nsTView, which gave the attacker full access to all my files as well as the ability to run unix commands on my server. I got lucky.. since he was running the script from a subdomain, he was only able to actually access files within [URL REMOVED], though he was able to view file lists of files from any directory on my site, and maybe view them using shell commands.</i><br /><br />...ouch. You can see an example of NSTView at work <a href="http://www.mnin.org/write/2006_uploadscripts.html">here</a>, complete with screenshots (scroll down). As for the type of Shoutbox used, the version number given is significant.<br /><br />The reason? Well, ShoutPro 1.5.2 has a <a href="http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/3758">known issue</a> that was discovered back in 2007 which could allow potential attackers to inject and execute arbitrary code:<br /><br /><i><b>Description:</b><br /><br />ShoutPro 1.5.2 fails to fully sanitize user input ($shout) that it writes<br />to the shouts.php file when adding a new message, this can result in the<br />injection and execution of arbitrary php code.<br /><br /><b>Scope:</b><br /><br />The vulnerability will in most cases allow an attacker to execute commands<br />on the system, the issue may be further perpetuated if the user has followed<br />the official documentation and chmoded the base folder to '777'</i><br /><br />The question is, are the attackers responsible for the current crop of Shoutbox attacks using the above exploit, or something new? It seems odd that a whole bunch of people would suddenly decide to start using a year old vulnerability, but more information is thin on the ground at the moment.<br /><br />A further complication is that <a href="http://www.shoutpro.com/">ShoutPro</a> is no longer maintained - all you can do is download the files and install as needed. Worse, if you go to the Download page, the current version available is.....you guessed it....<br /><br /><div align="center"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="shoutno.jpg" src="http://blog.spywareguide.com/images/shoutno.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" height="83" width="376" /></span></div><br /></div><div><br />........whoops. If everyone is still downloading this version and there's potentially fresh exploits in circulation (with nobody to fix the issue in the ShoutPro code that's causing these hijacks), it's clear why so many people are currently being hit by this.<br /><br />As the individual I contacted said:<br /><br /><i>Since the shoutbox caused the security hole, the only way to prevent further damages was to completely delete it.<br /><br /></i>To me, given the fact that there's no support for this product anymore, I think I'd have to heartily endorse that advice. If you're running a Shoutbox, make sure you know what kind of Shoutbox you're running, what version and if you consider the risk of what's happening above taking place on your website or server to be acceptable or not...<i><br /></i></div>
        
    ]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shoutpro">shoutpro</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shoutbox">shoutbox</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shoutbox recently due">shoutbox recently due</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shoutbox attacks">shoutbox attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access">access</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/access files">access files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/files">files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/shoutpro code">shoutpro code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/version">version</category>
      <source url="http://blog.spywareguide.com/2008/06/shoutphish.html">ShoutPro Vulnerability Currently Causing Issues For Websites</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Weak Evidence Links Congressmens Computer Attacks to China]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2cba8a5040454673c693bd00808edcd7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2cba8a5040454673c693bd00808edcd7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Me thinks the congressman doth protest too much
Based solely on an IP address they drew the conclusion that the attacker was actually Chinese. That, is pretty thin
From Network World
The Chinese...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Me thinks the congressman doth protest too much.</i></p>
<p>Based solely on an IP address they drew the conclusion that the attacker was actually Chinese. That, is pretty thin.</p>
<p>From Network World:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Chinese Foreign Ministry has denied any connection to the attacks, according to reports. An FBI spokeswoman declined to comment on the matter late Thursday.</p>
<p>However, computer security experts said that the evidence that the two congressmen provided to back up their claims simply does not prove that the Chinese government, or even Chinese nationals, were involved.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s so very hard to conclude that something came from someplace if all you&#8217;re going from is an IP address,&#8221; said Marcus Sachs, director of the SANS Internet Storm Center, a volunteer-run effort that tracks emerging computer threats. &#8220;Those of us who have done this for a living, we know that you can&#8217;t prove that it was a Chinese person on the keyboard if you have a Chinese IP address,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Without making some of the evidence public … you leave everybody else guessing.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>And the beat goes on.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/061208-weak-evidence-links-congressmens-cyber-attacks.html">Article Link</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?a=vDhCiz"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?i=vDhCiz" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=a5ETlI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=a5ETlI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=9u9t0i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=9u9t0i" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=aQEnJi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=aQEnJi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=yokR3i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=yokR3i" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=kKH3ti"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=kKH3ti" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~4/311193588" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese">chinese</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese nationals">chinese nationals</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese government">chinese government</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese person">chinese person</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/evidence">evidence</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chinese foreign ministry">chinese foreign ministry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/evidence public">evidence public</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/address">address</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer security experts">computer security experts</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~3/311193588/">Weak Evidence Links Congressmens Computer Attacks to China</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
