<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: tor]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/tor</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Two Years of Broken Crypto: Debian's Dress Rehearsal for a Global PKI Compromise]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/432d2495bf0e8b9c969c9d8efd4895eb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/432d2495bf0e8b9c969c9d8efd4895eb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A patch to the OpenSSL package maintained by Debian GNU/Linux (an operating system composed of free and open source software that can be used as a desktop or server OS) submitted in 2006 weakened its...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A patch to the OpenSSL package maintained by Debian GNU/Linux (an operating system composed of free and open source software that can be used as a desktop or server OS) submitted in 2006 weakened its pseudo-random number generator (PRNG), a critical component for secure key generation. Unnoticed for two years, the weak PRNG created a crypto-implementation nightmare with wide-ranging consequences that are difficult to repair. Putting both servers and users at risk, this vulnerability affected OpenSSH, Apache (mod_ssl), the onion router (TOR), OpenVPN, and other applications. In this article, I'll examine the issue and its consequences.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=82b45bc2d7e3da625459c51c5bb78bca" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=82b45bc2d7e3da625459c51c5bb78bca" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/prng">prng</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/secure key generation">secure key generation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/weak prng">weak prng</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/critical component">critical component</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/openssl package">openssl package</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/debian gnulinux">debian gnulinux</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/onion router">onion router</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/consequences">consequences</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/source software">source software</category>
      <source url="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?i=82b45bc2d7e3da625459c51c5bb78bca">Two Years of Broken Crypto: Debian's Dress Rehearsal for a Global PKI Compromise</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Metrics for security and performance in low-latency anonymity systems]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fad1cb42a51fdba1643f542416f2a5f3</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fad1cb42a51fdba1643f542416f2a5f3</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In Tor , and in other similar anonymity systems, clients choose a random sequence of computers (nodes) to route their connections through. The intention is that, unless someone is watching the whole...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://www.torproject.org/">Tor</a>, and in other similar anonymity systems, clients choose a random sequence of computers (nodes) to route their connections through. The intention is that, unless someone is watching the whole network at the same time, the tracks of each user&#8217;s communication will become hidden amongst that of others. Exactly how a client chooses nodes varies between system to system, and is important for security.</p>
<p>If someone is simultaneously watching a user&#8217;s traffic as it enters and leaves the network, it is possible to de-anonymise the communication. This could occur if the first and last node for a connection is controlled by the same person. Tor takes some steps to avoid this possibility e.g. no two computers on the same /16 network may be chosen for each connection. However, someone with access to several networks could circumvent this measure.</p>
<p>Not only is route selection critical for security, but it&#8217;s also a significant performance factor. Tor nodes vary dramatically in their capacity, mainly due to their network connections. If all nodes were chosen with equal likelihood, the slower ones would cripple the network. This is why Tor weights the selection probability for a node proportional to its contribution to the network bandwidth.</p>
<p>Because of the dual importance of route selection, there are a number of proposals which offer an alternative to Tor&#8217;s bandwidth-weighted algorithm. Later this week at <a href="http://petsymposium.org/2008/">PETS</a> I&#8217;ll be presenting my paper, co-authored with <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnw24">Robert N.M. Watson</a>, &#8220;<a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/papers/pets08metrics.pdf">Metrics for security and performance in low-latency anonymity systems</a>&#8221;.  In this paper, we examine several route selection algorithms and evaluate their security and performance.</p>
<p>Intuitively, a route selection algorithm which weights all nodes equally appears the most secure because an attacker can&#8217;t make their node count any more than the others. This has been formalized by two measures: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient">Gini coefficient</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_entropy">entropy</a>. In fact the reality is more complex &#8212; uniform node selection resists attackers with lots of bandwidth, whereas bandwidth-weighting is better against attackers with lots of nodes.</p>
<p>Our paper explores the probability of path compromise of different route selection algorithms, when under attack by a range of different adversaries. We find that none of the proposals are optimal against all adversaries, and so summarizing effective security in terms of a single figure is not feasible. We also model the performance of the schemes and show that bandwidth-weighting offers both low latency and high resistance to attack by bandwidth-constrained adversaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/route selection">route selection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/route selection critical">route selection critical</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/route selection algorithms">route selection algorithms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/route">route</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/nodes">nodes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tor nodes vary">tor nodes vary</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/performance">performance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/route selection algorithm">route selection algorithm</category>
      <source url="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/07/21/metrics-for-security-and-performance/">Metrics for security and performance in low-latency anonymity systems</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[An improved clock-skew measurement technique for revealing hidden services]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cf8c25995dfd225667b93b60ff885c6a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cf8c25995dfd225667b93b60ff885c6a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In 2006 I published a paper on remotely estimating a computers temperature, based on clock skew. I showed that by inducing load on a Tor hidden service, an attacker could cause measurable changes in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006 I <a href="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2006/09/04/hot-or-not-revealing-hidden-services-by-their-clock-skew/">published a paper</a> on remotely estimating a computer&#8217;s temperature, based on clock skew. I showed that by inducing load on a <a href="https://www.torproject.org/">Tor</a> hidden service, an attacker could cause measurable changes in clock skew and so allow the computer hosting the service to be re-identified. However, it takes a very long time (hours to days) to obtain a sufficiently accurate clock-skew estimate, even taking a sample every few seconds. If measurements are less granular than the <span class="number">1 kHz</span> TCP timestamp clock source I used, then it would take longer still.</p>
<p>This limits the attack since in many cases TCP timestamps may be unavailable. In particular, Tor hidden services operate at the TCP layer, stripping all TCP and IP headers. If an attacker wants to estimate clock skew over the hidden service channel, the only directly available clock source may be the <span class="number">1 Hz</span> HTTP timestamp. The quantization noise in this case is three orders of magnitude above the TCP timestamp case, making the approach I used in the paper effectively infeasible.</p>
<p>While visiting Cambridge in summer 2007, <a href="http://caia.swin.edu.au/cv/szander/">Sebastian Zander</a> developed an improved clock skew measurement technique which would dramatically reduce the noise of clock-skew measurements from low-frequency clocks. The basic idea, shown below, is to only request timestamps very close to a clock transition, where the quantization noise is lowest. This requires the attacker to firstly lock-on to the phase of the clock, then keep tracking it even when measurements are distorted by network jitter.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/syncvsrandom.png" alt="Synchronized vs random sampling" width="350" height="294" /></p>
<p>Sebastian and I wrote a paper &#8212; <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/papers/usenix08clockskew.pdf">An Improved Clock-skew Measurement Technique for Revealing Hidden Services</a> &#8212; describing this technique, and showing results from testing it on a Tor hidden service installed on <a href="http://www.planet-lab.org/">PlanetLab</a>. The measurements show a large improvement over the original paper, with two orders of magnitude lower noise for low-frequency clocks (like the HTTP case). This approach will allow previous attacks to be executed faster, and make previously infeasible attacks possible.</p>
<p>The paper will be presented at the <a href="http://www.usenix.org/events/sec08/">USENIX Security Symposium</a>, San Jose, CA, US, 28 July &ndash; 1 August 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock-skew measurement technique">clock-skew measurement technique</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock">clock</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock-skew">clock-skew</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock transition">clock transition</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock source">clock source</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/clock skew">clock skew</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magnitude lower noise">magnitude lower noise</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tcp">tcp</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tcp timestamps">tcp timestamps</category>
      <source url="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/06/26/improved-clock-skew-measurement/">An improved clock-skew measurement technique for revealing hidden services</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Circumventing Enterprise Security Policies]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ee620c8e6927c40749a97edb4cba4f1a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ee620c8e6927c40749a97edb4cba4f1a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Interesting article on how employees are circumventing IT Security Department policies

This of course as we know exposes the company to IT GRC concerns (Governance, Risk &amp; Compliance). A couple hard...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=150112">Interesting article</a> on how employees are circumventing IT Security Department policies. <br /><br />This of course as we know exposes the company to IT GRC concerns (Governance, Risk &amp; Compliance).  A couple hard numbers that jumped out at me.<br /><br /><span><span>"80 percent of the enterprises are supporting proxy applications, such as KProxy or CGI proxies, which mask the user's identity and surfing habits from IT monitoring tools."<br /><br /></span></span><span><span>:...half of the enterprises studied by Palo Alto are supporting Tor or other methods for encrypted "tunneling" through the corporate network. Tunneling enables the user to bypass IT traffic enforcement mechanisms."<br /><br />A comprehensive security policy starts from the top down with an IT-GRC solution.  It then incorporates all the scoring, controls and assessment automation products into a unified view to help expose situations like those identified in this study.  Once exposed and the risks understood, the priorities can be set to help quickly resolve these issues.<br /></span></span><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PracticalRiskManagement/~4/266541149" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security department policies">security department policies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/assessment automation products">assessment automation products</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/traffic enforcement mechanisms">traffic enforcement mechanisms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/grc concerns">grc concerns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cgi proxies">cgi proxies</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/user">user</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/palo alto">palo alto</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/enterprises">enterprises</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quickly resolve">quickly resolve</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PracticalRiskManagement/~3/266541149/circumventing-enterprise-security.html">Circumventing Enterprise Security Policies</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Terror on the Internet - Conflict of Interest]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/4d84e41b4c977b7092f8d353c8e6895e</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/4d84e41b4c977b7092f8d353c8e6895e</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Insightful article by Greg Goth, discussing various aspects of the pros and cons of monitoring cyber jihadist sites next to shutting them down, as well as mentioning my analysis of the Mujahideen...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/R9G7dU-0F6I/AAAAAAAABcQ/1bS4lvI4w-M/s1600-h/terrorist_database_hoax.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5175123559348180898" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; float: left;" alt="" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/R9G7dU-0F6I/AAAAAAAABcQ/1bS4lvI4w-M/s200/terrorist_database_hoax.jpg" border="0" /></a>Insightful article by Greg Goth, discussing various aspects of the pros and cons of monitoring cyber jihadist sites next to shutting them down, as well as mentioning <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/01/mujahideen-secrets-2-encryption-tool.html">my analysis</a> of the <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/04/mujahideen-secrets-encryption-tool.html">Mujahideen Secrets encryption tool v1.0</a> and v2.0. <a href="http://dsonline.computer.org/portal/pages/dsonline/2008/03/o3003news.html">Terror on the Internet: A Complex Issue, and Getting Harder</a> :</div><br />"<em>Indeed, politicians around the world call at regular intervals for terrorist websites to be removed from their host sites’ servers or for search engines to block access to them. They also call for laws that would make posting instructions on how to kill or maim people or destroy property punishable by law. Franco Frattini, the European Commission’s Vice President for Freedom, Justice, and Security, </em><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/07/505&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en"><em>called for a prohibition on websites that post bomb-making instructions in September 2007</em></a><em>. And just as quickly, he rushed to announce that in doing so he was not trying to impinge on freedom of speech or information access or to inhibit law enforcement agencies from monitoring sites.</em>"<br /><br /><div>There're three perspectives related to cyber jihad, should the virtual communities be shut down, monitored, or censored so that they cannot be accessed by people who would potentially get radicalized and brainwashed by the amazingly well created propaganda in the form of interactive multimedia? Given the different mandates given to different intelligence services and independent researchers, is where the conflict of interest begins. Moreover, don't forget that independent researchers sometimes come up with the final piece of the puzzle to have an intelligence agency come up with the big picture in a cost-effective and timely manner, given they actually believe in OSINT and trust the source of the intell data of course. Now, picture the situation where an intelligence agency is shutting down cyber jihadist sites on a large scale not believing in the value that the intelligence data they they could provide, another one given a mandate to censor cyber jihadist communities compiling reports stating that someone's shutting them down before they could even censor them, and a third one who would have to again play cat and mouse game the locate them once they've shut down by the first intel agency already. Ironic or not, different mandates and empowerment is where the contradiction begins. Let's discuss the three mandates and go in-depth into the pros and cons of each of them to come up with a philosophic solution to the problem, as I belive it's perhaps the only way to provoke some thought on the best variant.</div><br /><div></div><strong>Shutting the communities down</strong> -<br /><div>Before shuting them down you need to know where they are, their neighbourhood of supporters who will indirectly tip you on the their latest location once they have their previous domain shut down. Personal experience and third party research indicates that over 90% of the cyber jihadist communities/blogs are hosted by U.S based not owned companies. And with the lack of real-time intell sharing between the agencies themselves, the first who picks up the community will be responsible for its faith, literally. But in reality, preserving the integrity of a cyber jihadist community, and convincing the right people that balanced monitoring next to shutting it down is more beneficial, remains an idea yet to be considered. Back in 2007, I did an experiment, namely I <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/analyses-of-cyber-jihadist-forums-and.html">crawled ten cyber jihadist forums and blogs and extracted all the outgoing links from these communities</a> to see their preferred choice for online video and files hosting. A couple of months later, the communities got shut down, so when the same thing happened while I was crawling the Global Islamic Media Front's, and Inshallahshaheed's web presence, it became clear that while some are crawling, and others censoring, third parties are shutting them down.</div><br /><div> </div>The bottom line - shutting them down doesn't mean that they'll dissapear and will never come back, exactly the opposite. Personal experience while handling the Global Islamic Media Front is perhaps the perfect and best hands-on experience on the benefits of shutting them down, given you've built enough convidence in your abilities to locate their new location. If you think that the cyber jihadist site or community you're currently monitoring is a star, look above, it's full of starts everywhere, once you start drawing the lines between them, a figure of something known emerges, in this case once a cyber jihadist community is shut down, its most loyal and closely connected cyber jihadist communities will expose their intimate connection not by just starting to promote their new location online, but even better, you'll have them use the second cyber jihadist community to directly reach their audience by the time they set up the new location and resume the propaganda and radicalization.<br /><div> </div><br /><div>There's no shortage of cyber jihadist blogs, forums and sites, and personal experience shows that upon having a cyber jihadist community shut down, they re-appear at another location. It's shut down again, it re-appears for a second time. I've seen this situation with Instahaleed and GIMF, and each and every time they had their blogs and sites removed from their hosting providers, mainly because it's rather disturbing that the majority of such communities are hosted on U.S servers, it's this short time frame which will either lead you to their new location, you risk loosing their tracks. However, the vivid supporters of PSYOPs are logically visionary enough to understand what does undermining their audiences' confidence in the community's capability to remain online means.</div><br /><div> </div><strong>Monitoring the communities</strong> -<br /><div>In order to reach the "shut it down or monitor it" stage in your analysis process, you really need to know where the cyber jihadists forums and sites are, else, you will be wasting your time, money and energy to create <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/03/cyber-traps-for-wannabe-jihadists.html">fake cyber jihadist communities in the form of web honeypots for jihadist communication</a>. Monitoring is tricky, especially when you don't know what you're looking for, don't prioritize, don't have a contingency plan or an offline copy of the communitiy and wrongly building confidence in its ability to remain online. Moreover, <a href="http://cryptome.org/able-danger-ig-02.jpg">monitoring for too long</a> results in terrabytes of noise, and from a psychological perspective sometimes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger">the rush for yet another fancy social networking graph</a> to better communicate <a href="http://cryptome.org/able-danger-ig-01.jpg">the collected data</a>, ends up in the worst possible way - you miss the tipping point moment.</div><br /><div> </div><strong>Censoring the communities -</strong><br /><div>I often come across wishful comments in the lines of "blocking access to bomb and poison making tutorials", missing a very important point, namely, that these very same manuals, and jihadist magazines are not residing in a cyber-jihad.com/bomb-making-guide.zip domain and file extension form, making the process a bit more complex to realize. Unless of course the censorship systems figures out ways to detect the content in password encrypted archive files served with random file names and hosted on one of the hundreds free web space providers. Then again, given the factual evidence that cyber jihadists are encouraging the use of Internet anonymization services and software, your censorship efforts will remain futile.</div><br /><div> </div>As I'm posting this overview of various ways of handling cyber jihadist communities, yet another community is starting to attract cyber jihadists, thanks to their understanding of noise generation by teaching the novice cyber jihadists on the basics of running and maintaing such a community. What's perhaps most important to keep in mind is that, what you're currently analyzing, trying to shut down or censor whatsoever, is the public web, the Dark Web, the one closed behind authentication and invite-only access yet remains to be located and properly analyzed. If cyber jihad is really a priority, then there's nothing more effective than the combination of independent researchers and intelligence analysts.<br /><div> </div><br /><div><strong>Related posts:<br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/12/inshallahshaheed-come-out-come-out.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Inshallahshaheed - Come Out, Come Out Wherever You Are</span></a><br /></strong><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/07/gimf-switching-blogs.html">GIMF Switching Blogs</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/gimf-now-permanently-shut-down.html">GIMF Now Permanently Shut Down</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/gimf-we-will-remain.html">GIMF - "We Will Remain"</a><br /><strong><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/wisdom-of-anti-cyber-jihadist-crowd.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Wisdom of the Anti Cyber Jihadist Crowd</span></a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/cyber-jihadist-blogs-switching.html"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Cyber Jihadist Blogs Switching Locations</span></a><br /></strong></div><div><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/09/internet-psyops-psychological.html">Internet PSYOPS - Psychological Operations</a><br /><div><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/electronic-jihad-v30-what-cyber-jihad.html">Electronic Jihad v3.0 - What Cyber Jihad Isn't</a></div><div><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/electronic-jihads-targets-list.html">Electronic Jihad's Targets List</a></div><div><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/teaching-cyber-jihadists-how-to-hack.html">Teaching Cyber Jihadists How to Hack</a></div><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/botnet-of-infected-terrorists.html">A Botnet of Infected Terrorists?</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/infecting-terrorist-suspects-with.html">Infecting Terrorist Suspects with Malware</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/dark-web-and-cyber-jihad.html">The Dark Web and Cyber Jihad</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/12/cyber-jihadist-hacking-teams.html">Cyber Jihadist Hacking Teams</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2005/12/cyberterrorism-dont-stereotype-and-its.html">Cyberterrorism - don't stereotype and it's there</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/06/tracking-down-internet-terrorist.html">Tracking Down Internet Terrorist Propaganda</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/05/arabic-extremist-group-forum-messages.html">Arabic Extremist Group Forum Messages' Characteristics</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/08/cyber-terrorism-communications-and_22.html">Cyber Terrorism Communications and Propaganda</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/05/techno-imperialism-and-effect-of.html">Techno Imperialism and the Effect of Cyberterrorism</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/10/cost-benefit-analysis-of-cyber.html">A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Cyber Terrorism</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/12/current-state-of-internet-jihad.html">Current State of Internet Jihad</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/02/characteristics-of-islamist-websites.html">Characteristics of Islamist Websites</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/09/hezbollahs-dns-service-providers-from.html">Hezbollah's DNS Service Providers from 1998 to 2006</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/12/full-list-of-hezbollahs-internet-sites.html">Full List of Hezbollah's Internet Sites</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/03/cyber-traps-for-wannabe-jihadists.html">Cyber Traps for Wannabe Jihadists</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/04/mujahideen-secrets-encryption-tool.html">Mujahideen Secrets Encryption Tool</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/12/analysis-of-technical-mujahid-issue-one.html">An Analysis of the Technical Mujahid Issue One</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/06/analysis-of-technical-mujahid-issue-two.html">An Analysis of the Technical Mujahid Issue Two</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/07/terrorist-groups-brand-identities.html">Terrorist Groups' Brand Identities</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/06/list-of-terrorists-blogs.html">A List of Terrorists' Blogs</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/05/jihadists-anonymous-internet-surfing.html">Jihadists' Anonymous Internet Surfing Preferences</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/05/sampling-jihadists-ips.html">Samping Jihadist IPs</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/07/cyber-jihadists-and-tor.html">Cyber Jihadists' and TOR</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/cyber-jihadist-dos-tool.html">A Cyber Jihadist DoS Tool</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/08/gimf-now-permanently-shut-down.html">GIMF Now Permanently Shut Down</a><br /><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2006/08/steganography-and-cyber-terrorism.html">Steganography and Cyber Terrorism Communications</a><br /></div><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=9ODTvnF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=9ODTvnF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=glFBi8F"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=glFBi8F" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=D198AFf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=D198AFf" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=z0vTnMf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=z0vTnMf" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=sALMAMF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=sALMAMF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=LlGGhJF"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=LlGGhJF" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=GIrrUWf"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=GIrrUWf" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/253973814" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyber jihadist">cyber jihadist</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyber jihadist communities">cyber jihadist communities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/novice cyber jihadists">novice cyber jihadists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/jihadists">jihadists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyber jihadist forums">cyber jihadist forums</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyber jihadist sites">cyber jihadist sites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attract cyber jihadists">attract cyber jihadists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyber jihadists">cyber jihadists</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/253973814/terror-on-internet-conflict-of-interest.html">Terror on the Internet - Conflict of Interest</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Relay attacks on card payment: vulnerabilities and defences]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d08cf7bd9282a6cf8b71e3c50b96c653</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d08cf7bd9282a6cf8b71e3c50b96c653</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[At this years Chaos Communication Congress ( 24C3 ), I presented some work Ive been doing with Saar Drimer : implementing a smart card relay attack and demonstrating that it can be prevented by...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this year&#8217;s Chaos Communication Congress (<a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/">24C3</a>), I presented some work I&#8217;ve been doing with <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sd410/">Saar Drimer</a>: implementing a smart card relay attack and demonstrating that it can be prevented by distance bounding protocols.  My talk (<a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2289.en.html">abstract</a>) was filmed and the video can be found below. For more information, we produced a <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/banking/relay/">webpage</a> and the details can be found in <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/papers/usenix07bounding.pdf">our paper</a>.</p>
<p><embed style="width:440px; height:358px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=2340296170477218761&#038;hl=en-GB" flashvars=""> </embed></p>
<p>[ <a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sjm217/talks/ccc07relayattacks.pdf">slides</a> (PDF 9.6M) | <a href="https://berlin.ccc.de/~24c3_torrents/24c3-2289-en-card_payment.mp4.torrent">video</a> (BitTorrent &#8212; MPEG4, 106M) ]</p>
<p>The CCC is a great conference to attend and a good source of ideas for papers. There were many <a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events.en.html">excellent talks</a>, but here are a few I can particularly recommend (I&#8217;m still working though the videos of talks I couldn&#8217;t attend in person):</p>
<dl>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2325.en.html">Current events in Tor development</a></dt>
<dd>Roger Dingledine gives Tor-related news, including anti-censorship features and interaction with law enforcement</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2258.en.html">Design Noir</a></dt>
<dd>ladyada talks about controversial electronics projects, including the TV-B-Gone and her own cellphone jammer</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2393.en.html">DNS Rebinding And More Packet Tricks</a></dt>
<dd>Dan Kaminsky describes the DNS Rebinding attack and demonstrates tunneling arbitrary TCP streams over a browser</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2378.en.html">Mifare</a></dt>
<dd>Karsten Nohl and Henryk Plötz describe how they reverse-engineered the Mifare encryption algorithm, Crypto1, and the weaknesses they discovered</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2338.en.html">Steam-Powered Telegraphy</a></dt>
<dd>Jens Ohlig et al. demonstrate their Internet connected (but not quite steam-powered) Telex machine</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2293.en.html">What can we do to counter the spies?</a></dt>
<dd>Annie Machon describes her work with MI5, why she left and her life on the run</dd>
<dt><a href="http://events.ccc.de/congress/2007/Fahrplan/events/2279.en.html">Why Silicon-Based Security is still that hard: Deconstructing Xbox 360 Security</a></dt>
<dd>Michael Steil and Felix Domke demonstrate the clever techniques they developed to install Linux on the XBox360</dd>
</dl>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dns">dns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cellphone jammer dns">cellphone jammer dns</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security michael steil">security michael steil</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/talks">talks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/henryk pltz describe">henryk pltz describe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chaos communication congress">chaos communication congress</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/annie machon describes">annie machon describes</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/arbitrary tcp streams">arbitrary tcp streams</category>
      <source url="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/01/09/relay-attacks-on-card-payment-vulnerabilities-and-defences/">Relay attacks on card payment: vulnerabilities and defences</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Personal Privacy Programs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/51600a29122002845c55aaaad4012e0f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/51600a29122002845c55aaaad4012e0f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on DBAN , Eraser , CCleaner , TrueCRYPT and Tor . I hope to have one on...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users 
maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/using-dban-to-wipe-a-drive">
DBAN</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
Eraser</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
CCleaner</a>, <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/truecrypt1">
TrueCRYPT</a> and <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/tor-1">Tor</a>. 
I hope to have one on PGP/GPG/FireGPG up soon. What other must have privacy 
software do you recommend I cover? Let me know via my
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=contact">contact page</a>, to which 
I've recently added my OpenPGP key.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy">privacy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy software">privacy software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/helps users maintain">helps users maintain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/openpgp key">openpgp key</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/contact page">contact page</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pgpgpgfiregpg">pgpgpgfiregpg</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recommend">recommend</category>
      <source url="http://irongeek.com/">Personal Privacy Programs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Personal Privacy Programs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2cda696c1e24c5caf9573cd1b87a519b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2cda696c1e24c5caf9573cd1b87a519b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on DBAN , Eraser , CCleaner , TrueCRYPT and Tor . I hope to have one on...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users 
maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/using-dban-to-wipe-a-drive">
DBAN</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
Eraser</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
CCleaner</a>, <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/truecrypt1">
TrueCRYPT</a> and <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/tor-1">Tor</a>. 
I hope to have one on PGP/GPG/FireGPG up soon. What other must have privacy 
software do you recommend I cover? Let me know via my
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=contact">contact page</a>, to which 
I've recently added my OpenPGP key.
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/IrongeeksSecuritySite?a=778Ze5"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/IrongeeksSecuritySite?i=778Ze5" border="0"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~4/297640153" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy">privacy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy software">privacy software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/helps users maintain">helps users maintain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/openpgp key">openpgp key</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/contact page">contact page</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pgpgpgfiregpg">pgpgpgfiregpg</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recommend">recommend</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~3/297640153/">Personal Privacy Programs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Personal Privacy Programs]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fc73333f0065d45d2af9e158e990e11a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fc73333f0065d45d2af9e158e990e11a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on DBAN , Eraser , CCleaner , TrueCRYPT and Tor . I hope to have one on...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi all. I've decided it's time to start focusing on software that helps users 
maintain their privacy. I've already done videos on
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/using-dban-to-wipe-a-drive">
DBAN</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
Eraser</a>,
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/selective-file-shredding-dod-5220-22-m-with-eraser-and-ccleaner-to-thwart-forensics-tools">
CCleaner</a>, <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/truecrypt1">
TrueCRYPT</a> and <a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=videos/tor-1">Tor</a>. 
I hope to have one on PGP/GPG/FireGPG up soon. What other must have privacy 
software do you recommend I cover? Let me know via my
<a href="http://www.irongeek.com/i.php?page=contact">contact page</a>, to which 
I've recently added my OpenPGP key.<img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~4/On2VAf-OVeQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy">privacy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/privacy software">privacy software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/software">software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/helps users maintain">helps users maintain</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/openpgp key">openpgp key</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/contact page">contact page</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pgpgpgfiregpg">pgpgpgfiregpg</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/time">time</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/recommend">recommend</category>
      <source url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IrongeeksSecuritySite/~3/On2VAf-OVeQ/">Personal Privacy Programs</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Covert channel vulnerabilities in anonymity systems]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a8e4ce98b29f630ce91adb27a2cce6d7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a8e4ce98b29f630ce91adb27a2cce6d7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[My PhD thesis Covert channel vulnerabilities in anonymity systems has now been published
The spread of wide-scale Internet surveillance has spurred interest in anonymity systems that protect users...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My PhD thesis &#8212; &#8220;<a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-706.html">Covert channel vulnerabilities in anonymity systems</a>&#8221; &#8212; has now been published:</p>
<blockquote style="font-style: normal"><p>
The spread of wide-scale Internet surveillance has spurred interest in anonymity systems that protect users’ privacy by restricting unauthorised access to their identity. This requirement can be considered as a flow control policy in the well established field of multilevel secure systems. I apply previous research on covert channels (unintended means to communicate in violation of a security policy) to analyse several anonymity systems in an innovative way.</p>
<p>One application for anonymity systems is to prevent collusion in competitions. I show how covert channels may be exploited to violate these protections and construct defences against such attacks, drawing from previous covert channel research and collusion-resistant voting systems.</p>
<p>In the military context, for which multilevel secure systems were designed, covert channels are increasingly eliminated by physical separation of interconnected single-role computers. Prior work on the remaining network covert channels has been solely based on protocol specifications. I examine some protocol implementations and show how the use of several covert channels can be detected and how channels can be modified to resist detection.</p>
<p>I show how side channels (unintended information leakage) in anonymity networks may reveal the behaviour of users. While drawing on previous research on traffic analysis and covert channels, I avoid the traditional assumption of an omnipotent adversary. Rather, these attacks are feasible for an attacker with limited access to the network. The effectiveness of these techniques is demonstrated by experiments on a deployed anonymity network, Tor.</p>
<p>Finally, I introduce novel covert and side channels which exploit thermal effects. Changes in temperature can be remotely induced through CPU load and measured by their effects on crystal clock skew. Experiments show this to be an effective attack against Tor. This side channel may also be usable for geolocation and, as a covert channel, can cross supposedly infallible air-gap security boundaries.</p>
<p>This thesis demonstrates how theoretical models and generic methodologies relating to covert channels may be applied to find practical solutions to problems in real-world anonymity systems. These findings confirm the existing hypothesis that covert channel analysis, vulnerabilities and defences developed for multilevel secure systems apply equally well to anonymity systems.
</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Steven J. Murdoch, Covert channel vulnerabilities in anonymity systems, Technical report UCAM-CL-TR-706, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, December 2007.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/covert">covert</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/covert channel vulnerabilities">covert channel vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerabilities">vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network covert channels">network covert channels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/covert channels">covert channels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/channels">channels</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/covert channel">covert channel</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anonymity systems">anonymity systems</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/systems">systems</category>
      <source url="http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2007/12/10/covert-channel-vulnerabilities-in-anonymity-systems/">Covert channel vulnerabilities in anonymity systems</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
