<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: tpms]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/tpms</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Tracking Vehicles through Tire Pressure Monitors]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ea4a8e1bfa995f8478cd0aed2d932fb0</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ea4a8e1bfa995f8478cd0aed2d932fb0</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Just another example of our surveillance future: Each wheel of the vehicle transmits a unique ID, easily readable using off-the-shelf receiver. Although the transmitters power is very low, the signal...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just <a href="http://www.hexview.com/sdp/node/44">another</a> example of our surveillance future:</p>

<blockquote>Each wheel of the vehicle transmits a unique ID, easily readable using off-the-shelf receiver. Although the transmitter’s power is very low, the signal is still readable from a fair distance using a good directional antenna.

<p>Remember the paper that discussed how Bluetooth radios in cell phones can be used to track their owners? The problem with TPMS is incomparably bigger, because the lifespan of a typical cell phone is around 2 years and you can turn the Bluetooth radio off in most of them. On the contrary, TPMS cannot be turned off. It comes with a built-in battery that lasts 7 to 10 years, and the battery-less TPMS sensors are ready to hit the market in 2010. It does not matter how long you own the vehicle ­ transportation authorities keep up-to-date information about vehicle ownership.</blockquote></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=QD1puEG"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=QD1puEG" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=9nJZo7G"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=9nJZo7G" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/battery-less tpms sensors">battery-less tpms sensors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tpms">tpms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vehicle transportation authorities">vehicle transportation authorities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/easily readable">easily readable</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/typical cell phone">typical cell phone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/readable">readable</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fair distance">fair distance</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/built-in battery">built-in battery</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/transmitters power">transmitters power</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/04/tracking_vehicl.html">Tracking Vehicles through Tire Pressure Monitors</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[One of the cool things about my job]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3372f123f88a9791907eeb178545164c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3372f123f88a9791907eeb178545164c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Like anyone else there are some days where I just ask myself what am I doing. Daily frustrations, the world not moving at my speed, my atrocious spelling and grammar mistakes all serve to have me ask...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Like anyone else there are some days where I just ask myself what am I doing.&nbsp; Daily frustrations, the world not moving at my speed, my atrocious spelling and grammar mistakes all serve to have me ask myself if there is not a better way. However, there are other moments when I positively love what I do.&nbsp; I think the key is making sure those moments outweigh the times you just feel like packing it in.&nbsp; If not, it is probably time to pack it in.<br /><br />Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, one of the cool things I like about my job is talking to the various analysts and talking shop about the industry.&nbsp; You know the kind of chit-chat, did you hear about this one or that?&nbsp; I enjoy the give and take and have made some great friends over the years with the analysts I meet. Today I had the chance to speak with Derek Brink over at the Aberdeen Group, who are conducting research on how companies enhance their enterprise security based on the principles of trusted computing and the use of Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs). If you’re interested in this topic and want to contribute to the research by taking the survey (here is the link: <a title="http://www.aberdeen.com/survey/tctpm" href="http://www.aberdeen.com/survey/tctpm">http://www.aberdeen.com/survey/tctpm</a>), you’ll be able to see how your experiences in this area compare with those of your peers, benchmark your performance, and see how you can achieve “Best-in-Class” results.End-user participation is a vital part of their research process, and serves as the foundation of Aberdeen’s reports. They’ll even provide you with complimentary access to the final benchmark report when it publishes at the end of February.<br /><br />Derek is a very nice guy and very interested in what is happening with the NAC and 802.1x market.&nbsp; If you want to help shape policy and public opinion this survey is a great way to do it.&nbsp; I am going to try and get together with Derek in person.&nbsp; In the meantime speaking to him today was enough to remind me why I love what I do!</p></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=0xx0z8"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=0xx0z8" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=h6G4ugD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=h6G4ugD" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=rgkW2aD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=rgkW2aD" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=TwndktD"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=TwndktD" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=8uy5KED"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=8uy5KED" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=H0gTK5d"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=H0gTK5d" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=4PoR2k"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=4PoR2k" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/226817034" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/final benchmark report">final benchmark report</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/derek">derek</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/research">research</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/derek brink">derek brink</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/research process">research process</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/benchmark">benchmark</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/achieve best-in-class results">achieve best-in-class results</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/positively love">positively love</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/moments">moments</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/226817034/one-of-the-cool.html">One of the cool things about my job</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Article: Analytics Brief: Securing The New Data Center]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/f08a96f33de6471b20490b3b52fc3bc2</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/f08a96f33de6471b20490b3b52fc3bc2</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Analytics Brief: Securing The New Data Center

Virtualization changes the rules for how companies secure their data and their computing infrastructure

By Original analysis by Joe Hernick, summary by...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="storyDek" style="background-color: white; margin-left: 0px" align="center"><b>Analytics Brief: Securing The New Data Center</b></div>
<div class="storyDek" style="background-color: white; margin-left: 0px"></div>
<div class="storyDek" style="background-color: white; margin-left: 0px"><b>Virtualization changes the rules for how companies secure their data and their computing infrastructure.</b></div>
<div class="storyDek" style="background-color: white; margin-left: 0px"></div>
<div align="left"><!-- / teaser (dek) copy -->  <i><span class="byLine" style="margin-left: 2px"> By Original analysis by Joe Hernick, summary by Art Wittmann<span id="courtesyOf" style="margin-left: 2px"><!-- remove http:// substring (if present) from the url --> <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/;jsessionid=K1QTZYZJPICXQQSNDLPSKHSCJUNN2JVN" target="_blank"> InformationWeek </a> </span> </span></i><br />
<i> <span class="storyDate" style="margin-left: 2px; line-height: 20px"> <nobr> December 1, 2007 12:01 AM (From the December 3, 2007 issue) </nobr> </span></i>  <br clear="all" /></div>
<p><!--body--> <span id="articleBody"></span></p>
<div class="IntelliTXT"> In a recent <i>InformationWeek</i> poll, 70% of respondents report they&#8217;re running at least one virtualized server, yet less than 12% have a security strategy tailored to their virtual environment. Given the relative nascence of virtualization offerings for the x86 platform, this doesn&#8217;t come as a shock, but that also doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s acceptable. Of those without a security plan in place, almost half believe that virtual machines are as secure as traditional servers, while another 18% admit they don&#8217;t know whether virtualization changes the rules of the game for security (see chart below of responses filtered for &#8220;no plan in place&#8221;).</div>
<p>There&#8217;s little doubt that virtualization is an important and disruptive technology that will, in a relatively short period, change the face of the data center. Because virtualization is so disruptive, it also will clearly change the rules for how enterprises secure their data and their computing infrastructure. And, while we don&#8217;t believe that virtualization should remain off limits until a security strategy is fully nailed down, smart organizations will develop security and management strategies as they develop deployment plans for virtualization.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/1165/IWEEK_VIRT_9.gif" style="width: 259.816px; height: 98.0217px" alt="chart: Confidence Level -- In your opinion, how do virtual servers compare with conventional server environments for information protection and security?" border="0" height="166" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="440" /></center> New threats to security come on two fronts. The first and most obvious is the additional software footprint represented by virtualization. On the desktop, virtualization is often implemented as an &#8220;application&#8221; that runs as a process under a desktop operating system, like Windows. For servers, hypervisors have emerged as the preferred method for introducing a hardware virtualization layer between the &#8220;bare metal&#8221; hardware and general-purpose operating systems.As such, hypervisors represent a relatively slim attack vector as they&#8217;re often implemented in less than 100,000 lines of code. When compared with the millions of lines that make up a general-purpose operating system, creating a bulletproof hypervisor is a more realistic goal, but flaws will still exist, and exploits will be created. All the major players report that building a secure hypervisor is a top priority. VMware&#8217;s CTO, Mendel Rosenblum, goes so far as to boast that no security holes will show up in VMware&#8217;s ESX product because of design flaws&#8211;of course, that leaves open the possibility of implementation errors. Unfortunately, the enterprise is left with little other than vendor assurances to work with. While tools exist to detect rootkits and other compromises on conventional operating systems, no tools exist to detect their presence in the hypervisor.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/1165/IWEEK_VIRT_1.gif" style="width: 259.816px; height: 98.6121px" alt="chart: Confidence Level -- In your opinion, how do virtual servers compare with conventional server environments for information protection and security?" border="0" height="167" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="440" /></center>   <span id="articleBody"></p>
<div class="IntelliTXT"><b>ETTING SECURE</b><br />
Help will probably come in two forms. First, it&#8217;s likely that as virtualization becomes more mainstream, hardware vendors will design end-user systems from the ground up to provide administrator-controlled VM partitions and hypervisor layers, making it harder for malware to enter systems.</div>
<p></span> A better fix uses the Trusted Platform Module found in most new x86 based systems. Using the TPM, software authenticity can be tested and inter-VM traffic can more easily be encrypted. Using the TPM&#8217;s ability to sign software makes it easier to determine that a system image has been altered and that it should be assumed to be compromised. Since the TPM is designed to be a tamper-proof hardware approach to encryption and software signing, it should help substantially in validating that software of all stripes hasn&#8217;t been corrupted by malware or by other means.The other substantive threat is a byproduct of how multiple virtual machines communicate with each other on the same system; that, along with the ability to move running VMs from machine to machine, renders most network-based security products much less effective.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/1165/IWEEK_VIRT_10.gif" style="width: 259.816px; height: 106.879px" alt="chart: Security Strategy -- Does your organization have a formal security/information protection strategy for virtualization server environments?" border="0" height="181" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="440" /></center> One of the first production uses for x86 virtualization has been server consolidation. The idea is that a single powerful server running a number of VMs can replace potentially dozens of older, lightly loaded individual servers. With so many VMs running on a system, the amount of communication between them can be significant. For intraserver communication between VMs, all virtualization products create a virtual switch, which is then shared by all VMs on the server. External network security tools from firewalls to intrusion detection and prevention systems to anomalous behavior detectors are all, by definition, blind to network traffic that never leaves the physical server.One approach to securing multiple VMs on a single server is to ensure that all the VMs are running similar operating systems and that each has been properly patched. The notion is that if all systems running on a given server are similarly secure, their communications will be, too. Security products like host-based firewalls should be in place to provide what security they can.</p>
<p>A better solution is to use tools that are specifically intended to improve the security of virtualized environments.</p>
<p>Virtual appliances are, as the name suggests, VMs with a minimized and hardened operating system that&#8217;s been configured to precisely meet the needs of the appliance&#8217;s one application. The idea is to minimize or eliminate any operating system configuration work on the part of the end user, permitting rapid and consistent deployment with relatively little expertise required from the installer. Applications for virtual appliances range from grid computing to SaaS to security.</p>
<p><center><img src="http://i.cmpnet.com/infoweek/1165/IWEEK_VIRT_11.gif" style="width: 236.196px; height: 111.012px" alt="chart: VM Volume -- What fraction of your servers are virtualized?" border="0" height="188" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="400" /></center> Though a virtual appliance can be created for any virtualization environment, VMware is ahead of the field and has created a marketplace along with a try-before-you-buy Web site. More than 100 security-related virtual appliances are listed on the site. Only a fraction of those are from commercial vendors. The rest are applications created by internal groups or open source collaborations.Among the vendors listed are Astaro, with a unified threat management appliance; Blue Lane, with a virtual patching appliance; Catbird, with a security agent; and Reflex, with an intrusion prevention appliance. As this group indicates, virtual appliances, much as their physical-world kin do for the legacy data center, can fill many of the security gaps created by a virtualized environment.</p>
<div style="float: right; width: 210px; padding-left: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px">
<div style="border-style: solid; border-color: #000000; border-width: 4px 1px 1px; padding: 10px; width: 180px; background-color: #f7ecd3; line-height: 1.2em; text-align: left">
<div style="text-align: center; font-size: 1.4em; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 0.8em">Also In This Report</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-weight: bold">&gt;&gt;</span> Chipset futures: We look at the latest offerings from Intel and AMD and analyze how their architectures affect security</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em"><span style="color: #ff0000; font-weight: bold">&gt;&gt;</span> From the experts: Insights from Intel&#8217;s Steve Grobman, Citrix&#8217;s Simon Crosby, and VMware&#8217;s Mendel Rosenblum</div>
<p><center><b>Get the full-length report at <a href="http://businessinnovation.cmp.com/governance">businessinnovation.cmp.com/<br />
governance</a></b></center></div>
</div>
<p>While the tools to create a secure virtualized environment are now showing up, it would be a mistake to think that virtualization security is just about buying a different set of security tools. Greg Shipley, CTO of security research company Neohapsis, offers this advice: &#8220;Take a hard look at what threats you actually think you&#8217;re facing, and what tools or techniques (which might not involve a technology purchase!) are out there to help mitigate them.&#8221; Shipley maintains a healthy skepticism of security software vendors. He &#8220;can&#8217;t help but wonder if some of the vendors out there are simply looking at all the virtualization going on and saying, &#8216;Hey, how do I sell security to all these VMware shops?&#8217; I think part of the burden on us users/consumers of the technology is to discuss what the true threat vectors are and then look to at tools.&#8221; Virtualization will change the face of computing from the desktop to the data center. Getting security right requires reassessing the approach to and goals for security. Platform and network security, which have been the mainstay of most security efforts to date, will give way to securing data and restricting its use to only those who are, by policy, allowed to use it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=204301246&amp;pgno=1&amp;queryText=">Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual environment">virtual environment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/environment">environment</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual appliances range">virtual appliances range</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual appliances">virtual appliances</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tools">tools</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security tools">security tools</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/develop security">develop security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security holes">security holes</category>
      <source url="http://securityratty.com/blog/?p=10">Article: Analytics Brief: Securing The New Data Center</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
