<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: unbreakable]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Quantum Cryptography]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/665acbc2a4e65a38fe46108c2e80bb3b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/665acbc2a4e65a38fe46108c2e80bb3b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Quantum cryptography is back in the news, and the basic idea is still unbelievably cool, in theory, and nearly useless in real life
The idea behind quantum crypto is that two people communicating...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantum cryptography is back in the news, and the basic idea is still unbelievably cool, in theory, and nearly useless in real life.</p>

<p>The idea behind quantum crypto is that two people communicating using a quantum channel can be absolutely sure no one is eavesdropping.  Heisenberg's uncertainty principle requires anyone measuring a quantum system to disturb it, and that disturbance alerts legitimate users as to the eavesdropper's presence.  No disturbance, no eavesdropper -- period.</p>

<p>This month we've seen reports on a new <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7661311.stm">working</a> quantum-key distribution <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10064219-83.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5">network</a> in Vienna, and a new quantum-key distribution <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/09/quantum_crypto_turbo_charged/">technique</a> out of Britain. Great stuff, but headlines like the BBC's "'Unbreakable' encryption unveiled" are a bit much.</p>

<p>The basic science behind quantum crypto was developed, and prototypes built, in the early 1980s by Charles Bennett and Giles Brassard, and there have been <a href="http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~crepeau/CRYPTO/Biblio-QC.html">steady advances</a> in engineering since then. I describe basically how it all works in <cite>Applied Cryptography, 2nd Edition</cite> (pages 554-557). At least one company already <a href="http://www.magiqtech.com/">sells</a> quantum-key distribution products.</p>

<p>Note that this is totally separate from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer">quantum computing</a>, which also has implications for cryptography. Several groups are working on designing and building a quantum computer, which is fundamentally different from a classical computer. If one were built -- and we're talking science fiction here -- then it could factor numbers and solve discrete-logarithm problems very quickly. In other words, it could break all of our commonly used public-key algorithms. For symmetric cryptography it's not that dire: A quantum computer would effectively halve the key length, so that a 256-bit key would be only as secure as a 128-bit key today. Pretty serious stuff, but years away from being practical. I think the best quantum computer today can factor the number 15.</p>

<p>While I like the science of quantum cryptography -- my undergraduate degree was in physics -- I don't see any commercial value in it. I don't believe it solves any security problem that needs solving. I don't believe that it's worth paying for, and I can't imagine anyone but a few technophiles buying and deploying it. Systems that use it don't magically become unbreakable, because the quantum part doesn't address the weak points of the system.</p>

<p>Security is a chain; it's as strong as the weakest link. Mathematical cryptography, as bad as it sometimes is, is the strongest link in most security chains. Our symmetric and public-key algorithms are pretty good, even though they're not based on much rigorous mathematical theory. The real problems are elsewhere: computer security, network security, user interface and so on.</p>

<p>Cryptography is the one area of security that we can get right. We already have good encryption algorithms, good authentication algorithms and good key-agreement protocols.  Maybe quantum cryptography can make that link stronger, but why would anyone bother? There are far more serious security problems to worry about, and it makes much more sense to spend effort securing those.</p>

<p>As I've often said, it's like defending yourself against an approaching attacker by putting a huge stake in the ground. It's useless to argue about whether the stake should be 50 feet tall or 100 feet tall, because either way, the attacker is going to go around it. Even quantum cryptography doesn't "solve" all of cryptography: The keys are exchanged with photons, but a conventional mathematical algorithm takes over for the actual encryption.</p>

<p>I'm always in favor of security research, and I have enjoyed following the developments in quantum cryptography. But as a product, it has no future. It's not that quantum cryptography might be insecure; it's that cryptography is already sufficiently secure.</p>

<p>This essay <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2008/10/securitymatters_1016">previously appeared</a> on Wired.com.</p>

<p>EDITED TO ADD (10/21):  It's amazing; even reporters <a href="http://www.itproportal.com/articles/2008/10/20/can-quantum-computing-be-used-tackle-payment-card-fraud/">responding to my essay</a> get it completely wrong:</p>

<blockquote>Keith Harrison, a cryptographer with HP Laboratories, is quoted by the Telegraph as saying that, as quantum computing becomes commonplace, hackers will use the technology to crack conventional encryption.

<p>"We have to be thinking about solutions to the problems that quantum computing will pose," he told the Telegraph. "The average consumer is going to want to know their own transactions and daily business is secure.</p>

<p>"One way of doing this is to use a one time pad  essentially lists of random numbers where one copy of the numbers is held by the person sending the information and an identical copy is held by the person receiving the information. These are completely unbreakable when used properly," he explained.</p>

<p>The critical feature of quantum computing is the unique fact that, if someone tampers with an information feed between two parties, then the nature of the quantum feed changes.</p>

<p>This makes eavesdropping impossible.</blockquote></p>

<p>No, it wouldn't make eavesdropping impossible.  It would make eavesdropping <i>on the communications channel</i> impossible unless someone made an implementation error.  (In the 80s, the NSA broke Soviet one-time-pad systems because the Soviets reused the pad.)  Eavesdropping via spyware or Trojan or TEMPEST would still be possible.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=NpW5M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=NpW5M" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=NzQ5M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=NzQ5M" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cryptography">cryptography</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum cryptography">quantum cryptography</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum">quantum</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum-key distribution network">quantum-key distribution network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum channel">quantum channel</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum system">quantum system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum-key distribution technique">quantum-key distribution technique</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum feed">quantum feed</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum crypto">quantum crypto</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/quantum_cryptog.html">Quantum Cryptography</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Quantum Cryptography: As Awesome As It Is Pointless]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/02906355879678e055ed7a962ad11336</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/02906355879678e055ed7a962ad11336</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Quantum cryptography is back in the news, and the basic idea is still unbelievably cool, in theory, and nearly useless in real life
The idea behind quantum crypto is that two people communicating...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Quantum cryptography is back in the news, and the basic idea is still unbelievably cool, in theory, and nearly useless in real life.
</p><p>
The idea behind quantum crypto is that two people communicating using a quantum channel can be absolutely sure no one is eavesdropping.  Heisenberg's uncertainty principle requires anyone measuring a quantum system to disturb it, and that disturbance alerts legitimate users as to the eavesdropper's presence.  No disturbance, no eavesdropper — period.
</p><p>
This month we've seen reports on a new <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7661311.stm">working</a> quantum-key distribution <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10064219-83.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5">network</a> in Vienna, and a new quantum-key distribution <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/09/quantum_crypto_turbo_charged/">technique</a> out of Britain. Great stuff, but headlines like the BBC's "'Unbreakable' encryption unveiled" are a bit much.
 </p><p>
The basic science behind quantum crypto was developed, and prototypes built, in the early 1980s by Charles Bennett and Giles Brassard, and there have been <a href="http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~crepeau/CRYPTO/Biblio-QC.html">steady advances</a> in engineering since then. I describe basically how it all works in <cite>Applied Cryptography, 2nd Edition</cite> (pages 554-557). At least one company already <a href="http://www.magiqtech.com/">sells</a> quantum-key distribution products.
</p><p>
Note that this is totally separate from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computer">quantum computing</a>, which also has implications for cryptography. Several groups are working on designing and building a quantum computer, which is fundamentally different from a classical computer. If one were built — and we're talking science fiction here — then it could factor numbers and solve discrete-logarithm problems very quickly. In other words, it could break all of our commonly used public-key algorithms. For symmetric cryptography it's not that dire: A quantum computer would effectively halve the key length, so that a 256-bit key would be only as secure as a 128-bit key today. Pretty serious stuff, but years away from being practical. I think the best quantum computer today can factor the number 15.
</p><p>
While I like the science of quantum cryptography — my undergraduate degree was in physics — I don't see any commercial value in it. I don't believe it solves any security problem that needs solving. I don't believe that it's worth paying for, and I can't imagine anyone but a few technophiles buying and deploying it. Systems that use it don't magically become unbreakable, because the quantum part doesn't address the weak points of the system.
</p><p>
Security is a chain; it's as strong as the weakest link. Mathematical cryptography, as bad as it sometimes is, is the strongest link in most security chains. Our symmetric and public-key algorithms are pretty good, even though they're not based on much rigorous mathematical theory. The real problems are elsewhere: computer security, network security, user interface and so on.
</p><p>
Cryptography is the one area of security that we can get right. We already have good encryption algorithms, good authentication algorithms and good key-agreement protocols.  Maybe quantum cryptography can make that link stronger, but why would anyone bother? There are far more serious security problems to worry about, and it makes much more sense to spend effort securing those. 
</p><p>
As I've often said, it's like defending yourself against an approaching attacker by putting a huge stake in the ground. It's useless to argue about whether the stake should be 50 feet tall or 100 feet tall, because either way, the attacker is going to go around it. Even quantum cryptography doesn't "solve" all of cryptography: The keys are exchanged with photons, but a conventional mathematical algorithm takes over for the actual encryption. 
</p><p>
I'm always in favor of security research, and I have enjoyed following the developments in quantum cryptography. But as a product, it has no future. It's not that quantum cryptography might be insecure; it's that cryptography is already sufficiently secure.
</p>
<p> 
---
</p> 
<p><em>Bruce Schneier is chief security technology officer of BT. His new book is </em>Schneier on Security<em>.</em> 
</p><br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=c1b0ca00ac0f95597bf221ad5e5c5153" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=c1b0ca00ac0f95597bf221ad5e5c5153" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=UswCM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=UswCM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=wtl5m"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=wtl5m" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=Lo9gm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=Lo9gm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?a=TTT2M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/wired/politics/privacy?i=TTT2M" border="0"></img></a>
 <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=FO1rM"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=FO1rM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=gniBm"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=gniBm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=XHBrm"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=XHBrm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?a=nRLbM"><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~f/wired/politics/security?i=nRLbM" border="0"></img></a> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired/politics/privacy/~4/422243670" height="1" width="1"/><img src="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~4/422243671" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum">quantum</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum cryptography">quantum cryptography</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cryptography">cryptography</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum-key distribution technique">quantum-key distribution technique</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum-key distribution network">quantum-key distribution network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum crypto">quantum crypto</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum channel">quantum channel</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/computer security">computer security</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/politics/security/~3/422243671/securitymatters_1016">Quantum Cryptography: As Awesome As It Is Pointless</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Scientists launch new, 'unbreakable' encryption system]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/dd3e6fc99b7fee02196afd08c7eeecfa</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/dd3e6fc99b7fee02196afd08c7eeecfa</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC announced.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/encryption system">encryption system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable">unbreakable</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scientists">scientists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/test">test</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wednesday">wednesday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vienna">vienna</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/creators">creators</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Scientists_launch_new_unbreakable_encryption_system">Scientists launch new, 'unbreakable' encryption system</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Scientists launch new, 'unbreakable' encryption system]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/72d0449a3a07aaf70cb94319dc8ec92c</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/72d0449a3a07aaf70cb94319dc8ec92c</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A new encryption system, which its creators say is unbreakable, got its first test run Wednesday in Vienna, scientists from the European Union project SECOQC announced.<img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/digg/topic/security/popular/~4/MJLnQvd0Y5g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/encryption system">encryption system</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable">unbreakable</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scientists">scientists</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/test">test</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wednesday">wednesday</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vienna">vienna</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/creators">creators</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.digg.com/~r/digg/topic/security/popular/~3/MJLnQvd0Y5g/Scientists_launch_new_unbreakable_encryption_system">Scientists launch new, 'unbreakable' encryption system</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Exposing Indias CAPTCHA Solving Economy]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ad0c8efa28ec8caf66f9be4e96ae79f0</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ad0c8efa28ec8caf66f9be4e96ae79f0</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Are you a Human?&quot; - once asked the CAPTCHA, and the question got answered by, well, a human, thousands of them to be precise. Speculations around one of the main weaknesses of CAPTCHA based...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLhSbUhErdI/AAAAAAAACI0/6poURrjAkGI/s1600-h/india_captcha_breakers9.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SLhSbUhErdI/AAAAAAAACI0/HZ5BF3hc6nY/s200-R/india_captcha_breakers9.JPG" /></a>"Are you a Human?" - once asked the CAPTCHA, and the question got answered by, well, a human, thousands of them to be precise. Speculations around one of the main weaknesses of CAPTCHA based authentication in the face of human CAPTCHA solvers, seems to have evolved into a booming economy in India during the past 12 months, with thousands of people involved.<br />
<br />
The following article - "<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1835">Inside India’s CAPTCHA solving economy</a>" aims to expose legitimate data entry workers, whose business models and techniques are in fact used by Russian cybercriminals not only for personal phishing, spamming and malware spreading purposes, but also, to resell the bogus accounts and earn a premium in the process :<br />
<br />
"<i>No CAPTCHA can survive a human that’s receiving financial incentives for solving it, and with an army of low-wagedIndia CAPTCHA breakers human CAPTCHA solvers officially in the business of “data processing” while earning a mere $2 for solving a thousand CAPTCHA’s, I’m already starting to see evidence of consolidation between India’s major CAPTCHA solving companies. The consolidation logically leading to increased bargaining power, is resulting in an international franchising model recruiting data processing workers empowered with do-it-yourself CAPTCHA syndication web based kits, API keys, and thousands of proxies to make their work easier, and the process more efficient.</i>"<br />
<br />
Cybercrime is just as outsourceable as CAPTCHA breaking is these days.<br />
<br />
<b>Related posts:</b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/unbreakable-captcha.html">The Unbreakable CAPTCHA</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1514">Spam coming from free email providers increasing </a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1418">Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail’s CAPTCHA broken by spammers</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1232">Microsoft’s CAPTCHA successfully broken</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/03/vladuzs-ebay-captcha-populator.html">Vladuz's Ebay CAPTCHA Populator</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/spammers-and-phishers-breaking-captchas.html">Spammers and Phishers Breaking CAPTCHAs</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/diy-captcha-breaking-service.html">DIY CAPTCHA Breaking Service</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/which-captcha-do-you-want-to-decode.html">Which CAPTCHA Do You Want to Decode Today?</a><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=HJ3QtK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=HJ3QtK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=m6hgDK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=m6hgDK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=0TXeOk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=0TXeOk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=4jwe6k"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=4jwe6k" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=9clPFK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=9clPFK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=JCXayK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=JCXayK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=5ic3Pk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=5ic3Pk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/378395296" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/captcha">captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/microsofts captcha">microsofts captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/indias major captcha">indias major captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hotmails captcha">hotmails captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable captcha">unbreakable captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/human captcha solvers">human captcha solvers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/human">human</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/inside indias captcha">inside indias captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/captcha based authentication">captcha based authentication</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/378395296/exposing-indias-captcha-solving-economy.html">Exposing Indias CAPTCHA Solving Economy</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Lasers Could Send World's Most Secure Messages Through Space]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/799bc9e5bae4ece924f39e72c7f3f84b</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/799bc9e5bae4ece924f39e72c7f3f84b</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[New experiments using Heisenberg's uncertainty principle extend the range of quantum cryptography, an advanced method of communicating in unbreakable code. Finding a way to keep snoops from tapping...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[New experiments using Heisenberg's uncertainty principle extend the range of quantum cryptography, an advanced method of communicating in unbreakable code.  Finding a way to keep snoops from tapping into other people's information is a challenge that has gone to the subatomic level. First proposed in 1984, quantum cryptography (QC) promises to send]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quantum cryptography">quantum cryptography</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/uncertainty principle extend">uncertainty principle extend</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/subatomic level">subatomic level</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable code">unbreakable code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/promises">promises</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/range">range</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/people">people</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/challenge">challenge</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Lasers_Could_Send_World_s_Most_Secure_Messages_Through_Space">Lasers Could Send World's Most Secure Messages Through Space</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Summarizing July's Threatscape]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2860027a1eaa69350d814429c3bf6070</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2860027a1eaa69350d814429c3bf6070</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[July's threatscape -- consider going through June's summary as well -- once again demonstrated that nothing is impossible, the impossible just takes a little longer where the incentive would be the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="text-align: center; clear: both;"></div><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJLdSTaizDI/AAAAAAAAB_E/WogqT88LBdc/s1600-h/ddanchev_july.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="border: 0pt none ; background-color: transparent; clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; margin-right: 1em;"><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SJLdSTaizDI/AAAAAAAAB_E/Bb9z-K3ib7c/s200-R/ddanchev_july.jpg" style="border: 0pt none ;" /></a>July's threatscape -- consider going through <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/summarizing-junes-threatscape.html">June's summary</a> as well -- once again demonstrated that nothing is impossible, the impossible just takes a little longer where the incentive would be the ultimate monetization of the process.<br />
<br />
Russian hacktivists attacking Lithuania and Georgia, several Storm Worm campaigns, a couple of new malware tools, Neosploit team abandoning support for their web malware exploitation kit, CAPTCHA for several of the most popular free email providers getting efficiently attacked in order to resell the bogus accounts registered in the process, several copycat SQL injects next to the evasion techniques applied by the copycats, botnets continuing to commit click fraud and generate revenue for those who own or have rented them, an infamous money mule recruitment service taking advantage of the fast-fluxed network provided by the ASProx botnet - pretty interesting month indeed.<br />
<br />
<b>01.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/decrypting-and-restoring-gpcode.html">Decrypting and Restoring GPcode Encrypted Files</a> -<br />
The GPcode authors read the news too, and are catching up with the major weaknesses pointed out in their previous release in order to come with a virtually unbreakable algorithm. And since more evidence of <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/06/whos-behind-gpcode-ransomware.html">who's behind the GPcode ransomware</a> was gathered, vendors and independent researchers realized that the latest release is also susceptible to a plain simple flaw, namely the encrypted files were basically getting deleting and not securely erased making them fairly easy to recover.<br />
<br />
<b>02.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/chinese-bloggers-bypassing-censorship.html">Chinese Bloggers Bypassing Censorship by Blogging Backward</a> -<br />
When you know how it works, you can either improve, abuse or destroy it in that very particular order. Chinese bloggers are always very adaptive in respect to spreading their message by obfuscating their messages in a way that common keywords filtering software wouldn't be able to pick them.<br />
<br />
<b>03.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/gmail-yahoo-and-hotmails-captcha-broken.html">Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail’s CAPTCHA Broken</a> -<br />
This has been an urban legend for a while, but with more services starting to offer hundreds of thousands of pre-registered accounts at these providers, it's surprising that <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1514">spam and phishing emails coming from legitimate email providers is increasing</a>. The "vendors" behind these propositions are naturally starting to "vertically integrate" by offering value-added services for extra payments, namely, scripts to automatically abuse the pre-registered accounts for automatic registration of splogs and anything else malicious or blackhat SEO related.<br />
<br />
<b>04.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/antivirus-industry-in-2008.html">The Antivirus Industry in 2008</a> -<br />
If it were anyone else but a security vendor to come up with such a realistic cartoon aiming to stimulate innovation by emphasizing on how prolific and sophisticated malware groups have become, it would have been a biased cartoon. However, this one is courtesy of a security vendor, and it's pretty objective.<br />
<br />
<b>05.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/lithuania-attacked-by-russian.html">Lithuania Attacked by Russian Hacktivists, 300 Sites Defaced</a> -<br />
This attack is a good example of a decent PSYOPS operation. Of course they have already build the capabilities to deface and even execute DDoS attacks against Lithuania, so why not put them in a "stay tuned" mode, by speculating on the upcoming attack and then executing it making it look like they delived what they've promised? This a lone gunman mass defacement given that the sites were all hosted on a single ISP, with no indication of any kind of coordination whatsoever. The same for the <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1533">Georgia President’s web site which was under DDoS attack from Russian hackers</a> later this month. Despite that the hacktivists behind it dedicated a separate C&amp;C for the attack, one that hasn't been used in any type of previous attacks so far, they did a minor mistake by using a secondary command and control location that's known to have been connected with a particular "botnet on demand" service in the past. The second attack once again proves that you don't need to build capacity when you can basically outsource the process to someone else.<br />
<br />
<b>06.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/icann-responds-to-dns-hijacking-its.html">The ICANN Responds to the DNS Hijacking, Its Blog Under Attack</a> -<br />
The ICANN finally issued a statement concerning the DNS hijacking of some of their domains, which is in fact what Comcast.net and Photobucket.com should have done as well, next to stating it was a "glitch". The ICANN also took advantage of the moment and also pointed out that their blog has also been under attack during the month. There's no better example of how the combination of <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/06/icann-and-ianas-domain-names-hijacked.html"> tactics can result in the hijacking of the domains</a> of the organizations implementing procedures aiming to protect against these very same attacks. And while Photobucket.com remained silent during the entire incident, the hosting provider that was used by the Netdevilz team in the two attacks, since they were also responsible for the ICANN and IANA DNS hijackings, <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/06/update-to-photobuckets-dns-hijacking.html">technological and social engineeringissued a statement</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>07.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/risks-of-outdated-situational-awareness.html">The Risks of Outdated Situational Awareness</a> -<br />
Security vendors are often in a "catch-up mode" and if I were an average Internet user not knowing that real-time situational awareness speaks for the degree to which my vendor knows what going on online, I'd be pretty excited. However, I'm not. <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1085">Prevx were catching up with a service which I covered approximately two months ago</a>, I even had the chance to constructively confront with one of the affected sites on how despite their security measures in place, this attack was still possible. Recently <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/18/limbo_trojan/">Prevx have once again demonstrated an outdated situational awareness</a> by coming across a banking malware in July 2008, whereas the malware has been around since July 2007, and earlier depending on which version you're referring to.<br />
<br />
<b>08.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/fake-porn-sites-serving-malware-part.html">Fake Porn Sites Serving Malware - Part Two</a> -<br />
Yet another domain portfolio of fake porn sites serving rogue codecs and live exploit URLs, just the tip of the iceberg as usual, however their centralization is greatly assisting in tracking them down.<br />
<br />
<b>09.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/storm-worms-us-invasion-of-iran.html">Storm Worm's U.S Invasion of Iran Campaign</a> -<br />
Stormy Wormy is once again making the headlines with their ability to actually make up the headlines on their own.<br />
<br />
<b>10.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/mobile-malware-scam-isexplayer-wants.html">Mobile Malware Scam iSexPlayer Wants Your Money</a> -<br />
The best scams are the ones to which you've personally agreed to be scammed with without even knowing it. Like this one, which was tracked down and analyzed a couple of hours once a uset tipped on it.<br />
<br />
<b>11.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/template-ization-of-malware-serving.html">The Template-ization of Malware Serving Sites</a> -<br />
The increase of fake porn and celebrity sites is due to the overall template-ization of these, with the people behind them basically implementing several malicious doorways to ensure that the domains get rotated on the fly. Despite that they all look the same, they all sever different type of malware, and zero porn of celebrity content at all except the thumbnails.<br />
<br />
<b>12.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/violating-opsec-for-increasing.html">Violating OPSEC for Increasing the Probability of Malware Infection</a> -<br />
No better way to expose your affiliations and several unknown bad netblocks so far, by adding the netblocks and the malicious domains as trusted sites upon infecting a PC with the malware. Of course, the usual suspects lead the "trusted netblocks".<br />
<br />
<b>13.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/monetizing-compromised-web-sites.html">Monetizing Compromised Web Sites</a> -<br />
Several years ago, a script kiddie would install Apache on a mail server, they claim that they defaced it. Today, these amusing situations are replaced by monetization of the compromised sites, by reselling the access to them to blackhat SEO-ers, malware authors, phishers, or personally starting to manage a scammy infrastructure on them, by earning money on an affiliate based model, like this particular attack.<br />
<br />
<b>14.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/malware-and-office-documents-joining.html">Malware and Office Documents Joining Forces</a> -<br />
A recent DIY malware kit, sold as a proprietary tool basically crunching out malware infected office documents, whose built-in obfuscation makes them harder to detect. It will sooner or later leak out, turning into a commodity tool, a process that's been pretty evident for web malware exploitation kits as well.<br />
<br />
<b>15.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/are-stolen-credit-card-details-getting.html">Are Stolen Credit Card Details Getting Cheaper?</a> -<br />
Depends on who you're buying them from, and whether or not they offer discounts on a volume basis, namely the more you buy the cheaper the price of a card is supposed to get. With the current oversupply of stolen credit card details, what used to be an exclusive good once where they could enjoy a higher profit-margin, is today's commodity good.<br />
<br />
<b>16.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/neosploit-malware-kit-updated-with.html">The Neosploit Malware Kit Updated with Snapshot ActiveX Exploit</a> -<br />
Since alll the web malware exploitation kits are open source, and leaked in the wild at large, their modularity allows everyone to easily embed any type of exploit that they want to, resulting in Neosploit's single most beneficial feature, the fact that certain versions include all the publicly available exploits targeting Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera. Moreover, the open source nature of the kit is resulting in a countless number of modified versions yet to be detected and analyzed, therefore keeping track of the exploits included in a malware kit can only be realistic if you take into considered the exploits that come with the default installation.<br />
<br />
<b>17.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/obfuscating-fast-fluxed-sql-injected.html">Obfuscating Fast-fluxed SQL Injected Domains</a> -<br />
Now that's a very good example of different tactics combined to attack, ensure survivability, and apply a certain degree of evasion in between.<br />
<br />
<b>18.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/unbreakable-captcha.html">The Unbreakable CAPTCHA</a> -<br />
There's never been a shortage of ideas, there's always been an issue of usability.<br />
<br />
<b>19.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/ayyildiz-turkish-hacking-group-vs.html">The Ayyildiz Turkish Hacking Group VS Everyone</a> -<br />
That's a pretty inspiring mission if you are to ensure your future in the next couple of years, by targeting everyone, everywhere that has ever publicly stated their disagreement with the Turkish foreign policy.<br />
<br />
<b>20.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/money-mule-recruiters-use-asproxs-fast.html">Money Mule Recruiters use ASProx's Fast Fluxing Services</a> -<br />
A true multitasking in action with a botnet that's been crunching out phishing emails, SQL injecting and now hosting a well known money mule recruitment service. <br />
<br />
<b>21.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/sql-injecting-malicious-doorways-to.html">SQL Injecting Malicious Doorways to Serve Malware</a> -<br />
Constantly switching tactics and combining different ones to achive an objective that used to be accomplished by plain simple techniques, is only starting to take place. In this case, instead of a hard coded SQL injected domain, we have the typical malicious doorways the result of the converging traffic management tools with web malware exploitation kits.<br />
<br />
<b>22.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/impersonating-stopbadwareorg-to-serve.html">Impersonating StopBadware.org to Serve Fake Security Warnings</a> -<br />
Typosquatting popular security vendors and services is nothing new, by having HostFresh providing the hosting for the parked domains promoting the rogue security software, is a privilege and flattery for the success of the Stopbadware initiative.<br />
<br />
<b>23.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/coding-spyware-and-malware-for-hire.html">Coding Spyware and Malware for Hire</a> -<br />
Customerization -- not customization -- has been taking place for a while, that's the process of tailoring your upcoming products to the needs of your future customers, compared to the product concept myopia where the malware coder would code something that he believes would be valuable to the potential customers. End user agreements, issuing licenses for the malware tool, as well as forbidding the reverse engineering of the malware so that no remotely exploitable flaws could be, are among the requirements the coder assists on.<br />
<br />
<b>24. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/lazy-summer-days-at-ukrtelegroup-ltds.html">Lazy Summer Days at UkrTeleGroup Ltd</a><b> -</b><br />
Taking a random snapshot of the current malicious activity at a well known provider of hosting services for rogue security applications, live exploit URLs and botnet command&amp;control locations, always provides an insight into what are their customers up to. In this case, centralization of their scammy ecosystem, and parking a countless number of rogue domains on the same server.<br />
<br />
<b>25. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/email-hacking-going-commercial.html">Email Hacking Going Commercial</a> -<br />
Cybercrime is in fact getting easier to outsource, and while the number of scammers trying to offer non-existent services, or at least services where they cannot deliver the goods, the business model of this service that is that you only pay once they show you a proof that they've managed to hack the email address you game them. How are they doing it? Social engineering and enticing the user to click on live exploit URL from where they'll infect the PC and obtain the email password, of course, next to definitely abusing it for many other purposes in the process.<br />
<br />
<b>26.</b> <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/vulnerabilities-in-antivirus-software.html">Vulnerabilities in Antivirus Software - Conflict of Interest</a> -<br />
You can easily twist the number of vulnerabilities found in your antivirus solution, but not recognizing them as vulnerabilities at the first place. It's all a matter of what you define as a vulnerability, or perhaps what you admit as a serious vulnerability - remote code execution through a security software, or a flaw that's allowing malware to bypass the security solution itself.<br />
<br />
<b>27. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/counting-bullets-on-malware-front.html">Counting the Bullets on the (Malware) Front</a> -<br />
Emphasizing on the number of malware/threats/viruses/worms/slugs your solution detects may be marketable in the short-term, but is damaging the end user's understanding of the threatscape in the long-term. So, by the time he catches up with what exactly is going on, he'll recall the moment in time where he was using the number of threats his solution was detecting as the main benchmark for its usefulness. In reality through, the number is irrelevant from a pro-active point of view, with zero day malware like the one coded for hire undermining the signatures based scanning model.<br />
<br />
<b>28. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/smells-like-copycat-sql-injection-in.html">Smells Like a Copycat SQL Injection In the Wild</a> -<br />
It was pretty obvious that copycats seeing the success of SQL injections the the huge number of sites susceptible to exploitation, would also starting taking advantage of the practice. Some are, however, targeting local communities and trying to avoid detection by using targeted SQL injections.<br />
<br />
<b>29. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/click-fraud-botnets-and-parked-domains.html">Click Fraud, Botnets and Parked Domains - All Inclusive</a> -<br />
The scheme is nothing new, what's new is that the botnet masters are trying to limit the revenues that used to go out to affiliate networks they were participating in, and are trying to own or rent the entire infrastructure on their own.<br />
<br />
<b>30. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/over-80-percent-of-storm-worm-spam-sent.html">Over 80 percent of Storm Worm Spam Sent by Pharmaceutical Spam Kings</a><b> -</b><br />
With access to Storm Worm sold and resold, and new malware introduced on Storm Worm infected hosts used as foundation for the propagation of the new malware in this case, it's questionable whether or not the Storm Worm-ers themselves are sending out the junk emails, or are they people who've rented access to the botnet doing it. <br />
<br />
<b>31. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/neosploit-team-leaving-it-underground.html">Neosploit Team Leaving the IT Underground</a> -<br />
Pretty surprising at the first place, but in reality it clearly demonstrates that when you cannot enforce the end user agreement on your crimeware kit, but continue seeing it used in a very profitable malware operations, you basically shut down the support for the public version. The team is not going to stop innovating for their own purposes, and in the long-term they may in fact re-appear with an updated malware kit that's converging different services next to the product itself.<br />
<br />
<b>32. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/dissecting-managed-spamming-service.html">Dissecting a Managed Spamming Service</a> - <br />
Managed spamming services using botnets as the foundation for the campaigns are starting to introduce improved metrics for the delivery, as well as experienced customer support ensuring the spam messages make it through spam filters, or at least increase the probability of making the happen. This is an example of a random service emphasizing on the improved metrics they're capable of delivering.<br />
<br />
<b>33. </b><a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/07/storm-worms-lazy-summer-campaigns.html">Storm Worm's Lazy Summer Campaigns</a> -<br />
Looks like a "cybercrime intern" launched this campaign, lacking any of the usual Storm Worm evasive practices, no exploitation of client side vulnerabilities, as well as no survivability offered by their usual fast-flux nodes.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=dMjxcK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=dMjxcK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=IC3AVK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=IC3AVK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=d2XWZk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=d2XWZk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=vRFZyk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=vRFZyk" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=6ZdeKK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=6ZdeKK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=jVlXIK"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=jVlXIK" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=W4mAWk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=W4mAWk" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/352993637" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware">malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/profitable malware operations">profitable malware operations</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware authors">malware authors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware tools">malware tools</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware coder">malware coder</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware kit">malware kit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware infection">malware infection</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/neosploit malware kit">neosploit malware kit</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spam">spam</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/352993637/summarizing-julys-threatscape.html">Summarizing July's Threatscape</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[The Unbreakable CAPTCHA]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cf831127130ad30863bfa7ff5a541746</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cf831127130ad30863bfa7ff5a541746</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In response to the continuing evidence of how spammers are efficiently breaking the CAPTCHAs of popular free email service providers in order to abuse their clean IP reputation, and already validated...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="text-align: center; clear: both;"></div><a href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SH-3Z3zTabI/AAAAAAAAB7E/cnASmnXUWwk/s1600-h/unbreakable_CAPTCHA.png" imageanchor="1" style="border: 0pt none ; background-color: transparent; clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; float: left; margin-right: 1em;"><img src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SH-3Z3zTabI/AAAAAAAAB7E/52ZPm-J-iYo/s200-R/unbreakable_CAPTCHA.png" style="border: 0pt none ;" /></a>In response to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1232">the continuing evidence</a> of how spammers are efficiently <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1418">breaking the CAPTCHAs of popular free email service providers</a> in order to abuse their clean IP reputation, and already validated authenticity through the use of <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1473">DomainKeys and SenderID frameworks</a>, someone has finally came up with an unbreakable CAPTCHA.<br />
<br />
If it only weren't a hoax, it would have even solved the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/nov/23/comment.comment2">human CAPTCHA solvers problem</a>, whose <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/14/captcha_serfs/">sessions would have probably expired</a> due to their inability to solve it.<br />
<br />
<b>Related posts:</b><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/03/vladuzs-ebay-captcha-populator.html">Vladuz's Ebay CAPTCHA Populator</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/09/spammers-and-phishers-breaking-captchas.html">Spammers and Phishers Breaking CAPTCHAs</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/diy-captcha-breaking-service.html">DIY CAPTCHA Breaking Service</a><br />
<a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/11/which-captcha-do-you-want-to-decode.html">Which CAPTCHA Do You Want to Decode Today?</a><b> <br />
</b><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=dJUeeJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=dJUeeJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=UYQiNJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=UYQiNJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=8lhkLj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=8lhkLj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=NcjwSj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=NcjwSj" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=dl73nJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=dl73nJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=nLd5CJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=nLd5CJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=NPsLMj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=NPsLMj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/338437510" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/captcha">captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ebay captcha populator">ebay captcha populator</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/human captcha solvers">human captcha solvers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/unbreakable captcha">unbreakable captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/diy captcha">diy captcha</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spammers">spammers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/captchas">captchas</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/senderid frameworks">senderid frameworks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/solve">solve</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/338437510/unbreakable-captcha.html">The Unbreakable CAPTCHA</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Unbreakable Fighting Umbellas]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/928adb4b9e7d35ae63e425bb6d4775fb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/928adb4b9e7d35ae63e425bb6d4775fb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Impressive . Be sure to watch the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/07/unbreakable-fig.html">Impressive</a>.  Be sure to watch the video.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=SS6zvJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=SS6zvJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?a=GZARBJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/schneier/fulltext?i=GZARBJ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/video">video</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/impressive">impressive</category>
      <source url="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/07/unbreakable_fig.html">Unbreakable Fighting Umbellas</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Security Briefing: June 4th]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/3cc1b2f241a9ed0300c1492a538ee666</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/3cc1b2f241a9ed0300c1492a538ee666</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Its a hump day miracle. Ive made it half way through the week and Im not completely psychotic from a lack of REM sleep
Click here to subscribe to Liquidmatrix Security Digest
And now, the news
UK...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src='http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/newspapera.jpg' alt='newspapera.jpg' /></center></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a hump day miracle. I&#8217;ve made it half way through the week and I&#8217;m not completely psychotic from a lack of REM sleep. </p>
<p>Click here to <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Liquidmatrix">subscribe to Liquidmatrix Security Digest!</a></p>
<p>And now, the news&#8230;</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/04/direct_gov_web_kit_slip_up/">UK citizens&#8217; portal exposes edit kit interface</a> | The Register</li>
<li><a href="http://www.scmagazineus.com/Setting-the-stage-for-the-latest-PCI-deadline/article/110843/">Setting the stage for the latest PCI deadline</a> | SC Magazine</li>
<li><a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/blogs/securifythis/soa/Banks-are-confusing-consumers-on-PC-security/0,139033343,339289568,00.htm">Banks are confusing consumers on PC security</a> | ZDNet Australia</li>
<li><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080604.wrsecurity04/BNStory/Technology/home">Watchdog urges firms to lock up customer digital data</a> | The Globe and Mail</li>
<li><a href="http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1218422">Secret Bits: How Codes Became Unbreakable</a> | InformIT</li>
<li><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/security/new-security-frontier-is-all-about-data/2008/06/02/1212258735804.html">New security frontier is all about data</a> | The Sydney Morning Herald</li>
<li><a href="http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/internet/2008/0806041100.asp?A=SEC&#038;S=Security&amp;O=FPLEAD">Worm hits several SA sites</a>  | ITWeb South Africa</li>
<li><a href="http://travel.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/travel/news/article4064215.ece">US raises entry bar with online database for visitors</a> | Times Online</li>
</ol>
<p> Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/News" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Daily+Links" rel="tag"> Daily Links</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Security+Blog" rel="tag"> Security Blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Information+Security" rel="tag"> Information Security</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Security+News" rel="tag"> Security News</a></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?a=7zM5hI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Liquidmatrix?i=7zM5hI" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=8rEDOI"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=8rEDOI" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=nkec7i"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=nkec7i" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=5C8qXi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=5C8qXi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=ElVsqi"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=ElVsqi" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?a=aujOei"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Liquidmatrix?i=aujOei" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~4/304531170" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 09:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information security">information security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security news">security news</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/liquidmatrix security">liquidmatrix security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/news">news</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security blog">security blog</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/customer digital data">customer digital data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/data">data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/raises entry bar">raises entry bar</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Liquidmatrix/~3/304531170/">Security Briefing: June 4th</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
