<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: valley]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/valley</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Links List 11.17.08]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/85b0ee0a0390b793b97cc896d3067a94</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/85b0ee0a0390b793b97cc896d3067a94</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Wow. I think we all know that we can take or leave surveys numbers dont mean a lot without context. In this case the context is the current economic meltdown. The Society for Information Management...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I think we all know that we can take or leave surveys – numbers don’t mean a lot without context. In this case the “context” is the current economic meltdown. The Society for Information Management (SIM) released the results of their 2008 IT Trends Survey – predicting an “upbeat” forecast for IT jobs; the HUGE caveat here is that the study was conducted before all the recent economic woes. Apparently organizations are using IT to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=10765" target="_blank">drive efficiencies, streamline operations, and cut costs</a> rather than just slashing the IT budget to save money during the downturn. What would be a nice follow-up: a quick second survey comparing responses before and after. Regardless Jerry Luftman, SIM vice president of academic affairs, still says the survey results demonstrate “that the overall state of IT remains very strong.”</p>
<p><img style="margin: 5px" src="http://images.google.com/url?q=http://disney-clipart.com/Chicken-Little/Disney-Chicken-Little.jpg&amp;usg=AFQjCNGA4kajmvy1h_lrcRnuywgV7_X0aQ" alt="" width="198" height="201" align="left" />The sky is falling! Trip Chowdhry, the analyst with Global Equities Research who claimed Red Hat was ‘rubbish and the entire LAMP stack is potty, too’ published some eye-opening predictions, predominantly negative, about tech business in Silicon Valley. Now <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10094221-16.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_blank">Chowdhry claims that “almost every VC funded open-source company</a> is struggling and will run out of money within the next six months.” (Probably not the most unbiased guy about open source) Matt Asay argues that organizations in general are struggling, but open-source companies are not that high on the list. (But are they high on the VC “axe” list??) He notes Alfresco, Pentaho and JasperSoft are some of the players with ‘millions in the bank and growing revenue.’ Asay also says Chowdhry has a responsibility to do real due diligence and not create myths. Take that, Chicken Little! (<a href="http://disney-clipart.com/Chicken-Little/Disney-Chicken-Little.jpg" target="_blank"><em>img from Disney-Clipart</em></a>)</p>
<p>We’re not as far behind as we thought we were. Google presented the results of a study they conducted about how IPv6- capable “ordinary users” are at the RIPE meeting in Dubai a few weeks ago. Turns out Apple Macs drive IPv6 penetration in the US. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081113-google-more-macs-mean-higher-ipv6-usage-in-us.html" target="_blank">Fifty-two percent of all IPv6 users in the U.S. own a Mac</a> and use 6to4 (creating IPv6 addresses from an IPv4 address and tunneling packets) – making the US fifth in the list of countries using IPv6. Russia and France took first and second place with .76 and .65 percent IPv6-enabled traffic . The US is at .45 percent. Worldwide, 0.238 percent of Google users’ systems are IPv6-enabled and prefer to use IPv6 over IPv4.</p>
<p>Obama’s win = Google’s win? Apparently Google <a href="http://blogs.cioinsight.com/biztech30/content/2008_campaign/google_vs_microsoft_the_obama_factor.html?kc=rss" target="_blank">CEO Eric Schmidt and President-Elect Obama are very good buddies</a> and “this terrifies Microsoft”. Now competitors are more on guard against Google’s growing empire and popularity. Although Schmidt was mentioned as a possible candidate for the country’s new national CTO position, he said he would not accept the post if asked. I guess that’s one less thing Microsoft has to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/list">list</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/survey results">survey results</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/results">results</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6 addresses">ipv6 addresses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ipv6">ipv6</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/percent">percent</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/open-source company">open-source company</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/source">source</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/fifty-two percent">fifty-two percent</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/links-list-111708/11/2008">Links List 11.17.08</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hey Kids, How About a Little More Innovation?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/19a96550c3b572502c4e764066dce91f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/19a96550c3b572502c4e764066dce91f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Tim O'Reilly's piece in the LA Times has a lot of people talking

He is urging young entrepreneurs and engineers to stop making some of the sillier software that lets Facebook users throw virtual...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim O&#39;Reilly&#39;s <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-oreilly10-2008oct10,0,85246.story">piece</a> in the LA Times has a lot of people talking:</p><br /><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">He is urging young entrepreneurs and engineers to stop making some of &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">the sillier software that lets Facebook users throw virtual sheep at &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">their friends or download virtual beer on iPhones, and instead start &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">making a real difference in the world.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">He says it&#39;s not just the right thing to do, but also the smart thing &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">to do -- especially as the credit crunch spreads to Silicon Valley, &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">venture financing becomes scarce and start-ups have to retrench.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">When this grizzled, 54-year-old tech-industry veteran talks, Silicon &#0160;</span><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">Valley tends to listen, if only to argue with him.</span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></p><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">This is actually about the 6th time I have heard this this year. I have to say I pretty much agree on the face of it. But I wonder if its not so much a generational question as its that computers are just not as challenging as they used to be. Writing PERL shopping carts and online editors were a challenge in 1995, not so much any more. Maybe the issue is that &quot;kids&quot; of today who want to work on enabling technologies and do real innovation have migrated off to biotechs and nanotechs.&#0160;</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">We still have a lot of problems to solve in computers, so don&#39;t get me wrong we can use help from the next generation. But you get the sense the industry is maturing and not this wide open greenfield like biotech and nanotech or early dotcom days. There are a lot of cool things going on, but a lot of it seems like incremental upgrades. Important yes, but earth shattering, not so much. Take for example, </span><a href="http://www.infinera.com/j7/servlet/HomePage">Infinera</a><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">, very cool stuff but its your classic, &quot;we don&#39;t make X, we just make X work better.&quot; product. &#0160;I am not complaining - as an engineer, I like reliability. As a security person, I need better security tools. As a digital citizen, I want things to work better. But you know all of us making better brakes, better airbags, and better seat belts, is not going to be as exciting as the building the first car.&#0160;What was the last computer technology that was mind blowingly innovative to you?</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lot">lot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon valley">silicon valley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/download virtual beer">download virtual beer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cool stuff">cool stuff</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit crunch spreads">credit crunch spreads</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cool">cool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mind blowingly innovative">mind blowingly innovative</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/virtual sheep">virtual sheep</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/seat belts">seat belts</category>
      <source url="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2008/10/hey-kids-leave-those-sheep-alone-1.html">Hey Kids, How About a Little More Innovation?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hey Kids, Leave Those Sheep Alone]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/41e8a9a82701d0c1e97bcf06b21b217d</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/41e8a9a82701d0c1e97bcf06b21b217d</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Tim O'Reilly's piece in the LA Times has a lot of people talking

He is urging young entrepreneurs and engineers to stop making some of
the sillier software that lets Facebook users throw virtual...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim O&#39;Reilly&#39;s <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-oreilly10-2008oct10,0,85246.story">piece</a> in the LA Times has a lot of people talking:</p><br /><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">He is urging young entrepreneurs and engineers to stop making some of &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">the sillier software that lets Facebook users throw virtual sheep at &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">their friends or download virtual beer on iPhones, and instead start &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">making a real difference in the world.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">He says it&#39;s not just the right thing to do, but also the smart thing &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">to do -- especially as the credit crunch spreads to Silicon Valley, &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">venture financing becomes scarce and start-ups have to retrench.</span></p><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">When this grizzled, 54-year-old tech-industry veteran talks, Silicon &#0160;</span><br /><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; ">Valley tends to listen, if only to argue with him.</span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></p><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">This is actually about the 6th time I have heard this this year. I have to say I pretty much agree on the face of it. But I wonder if its not so much a generational question as its that computers are just not as challenging as they used to be. Writing PERL shopping carts and online editors were a challenge in 1995, not so much any more. Maybe the issue is that &quot;kids&quot; of today who want to work on enabling technologies and do real innovation have migrated off to biotechs and nanotechs.</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">We still have a lot of problems to solve in computers, so don&#39;t get me wrong we can use help from the next generation. But you get the sense the industry is maturing and not this wide open greenfield like biotech and nanotech or early dotcom days. There are a lot of cool things going on, but a lot of it seems like incremental upgrades. Important yes, but earth shattering, not so much. Take for example, </span><a href="http://www.infinera.com/j7/servlet/HomePage">Infinera</a><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;">, very cool stuff but its your classic, &quot;we don&#39;t make X, we just make X work better.&quot; product. &#0160;I am not complaining - as an engineer, I like reliability. As a security person, I need better security tools. As a digital citizen, I want things to work better. But you know all of us making better brakes, better airbags, and better seat belts, is not going to be as exciting as the building the first car.&#0160;What was the last computer technology that was mind blowingly innovative to you?</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon">silicon</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/lot">lot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon valley">silicon valley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/download virtual beer">download virtual beer</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cool stuff">cool stuff</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit crunch spreads">credit crunch spreads</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/valley">valley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cool">cool</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mind blowingly innovative">mind blowingly innovative</category>
      <source url="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2008/10/hey-kids-leave-those-sheep-alone.html">Hey Kids, Leave Those Sheep Alone</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: Wi-Fi Robot Attack; Silicon Valley Plan Proceeds]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a73229a533aa9f53897566105f7e6501</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a73229a533aa9f53897566105f7e6501</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The Spykee is a $300 Wi-Fi Skype robot: Lots of strange coolness here. I don't know how I missed hearing about this before, but apparently an actual customer got his hands on the thing and recorded a...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><strong><a href="http://www.robotsrule.com/html/spykee.php">The Spykee is a $300 Wi-Fi Skype robot:</a></strong> Lots of strange coolness here. I don't know how I missed hearing about this before, but apparently an actual customer got his hands on the thing and recorded a video. It's cute. You can access its video through control software or a remote Skype video connection. It's got a speaker and microphone, and can be used for VoIP calls. The control software allows it to move around, play sound effects, and produce music. Like the computer in Superman III (or a Roomba), it craves power, and knows to return to its charger.</p>

<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/spykee_1.jpg" alt="spykee_1.jpg" border="0" width="200" height="200" /></p>

<p>The name reveals some of its creepy appeal: Spykee = Spy Camera. I suppose the nanny you're trying to make sure isn't shaking your baby might be freaked out when it suddenly starts emitting Star Wars music, or such like. Made by Meccano under the Erector brand, its control software is Mac and Windows compatible. </p>

<p>I, for one, welcome our new Spykee overlords--on 15-Oct-2008 when it starts to ship generally.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ibd/20080924/bs_ibd_ibd/20080924tech01">Silicon Valley project finally gets underway:</a></strong> It's a still a pilot, small, with no promised outcome. And after all this time, a switch of partners, and new parameters, they've still mounted just 20 of 28 access points.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/control software">control software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spykee">spykee</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/spykee overlords">spykee overlords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/suddenly starts">suddenly starts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/wi-fi skype robot">wi-fi skype robot</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon valley project">silicon valley project</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/star wars music">star wars music</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/play sound effects">play sound effects</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/starts">starts</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008460.html">Wee-Fi: Wi-Fi Robot Attack; Silicon Valley Plan Proceeds</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[DC Young IT Scene Growing]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/cfe7523038453c0b939b3153f29dbc01</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/cfe7523038453c0b939b3153f29dbc01</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[The late 90s IT boom represented everything great about the American dream. If you had a brilliant idea, knew how to put it into production and had some idea on how to market said idea, you could make...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The late 90’s IT boom represented everything great about the American dream.&nbsp; If you had a brilliant idea, knew how to put it into production and had some idea on how to market said idea, you could make it and many were indeed making it big in Silicon Valley.
<p>This chance to “get rich quick” prompted many talented young entrepreneurs and IT specialists to move to the Valley, and in turn helped <a href="http://www.somewhatfrank.com/2008/07/web-20-startups.html" target="_blank">establish the area</a> as a hip young center for the most talented people in the field.&nbsp;
<p>The Beltway, (a.k.a. Washington, DC area) has always been known as a home for those wanting to enter into public service, or at least a career in grand gestures, however with the rapid growth of government-based IT needs, and the <a href="http://www.istrategylabs.com/giving-you-50000-for-office-space-and-lot-of-other-fun-things/" target="_blank">success of many IT companies</a> in the area, it is slowly <a href="http://eastcoastblogging.com/2008/07/28/crossmine-dcs-directory-of-technology-ventures/" target="_blank">transforming into an IT hub of its own</a>.&nbsp;
<p>[Note: Dave and Julia disagree with my perspective on the slow growth of DC as a tech hub. In their opinions, it always has been with many great IT companies founded and run out of the DC area, including AOL, UUnet, and The Motley Fool, to name a few. The area was properly positioned as the “Silicon Valley of the East” in the 90’s and was able to successfully cultivate a large and prominent IT culture. BUT it’s interesting that Silicon Valley dominates in terms of popular perception, as I believe and so do many friends I’ve discussed this with.]
<p>But perhaps that is changing. Dave wrote an earlier post about the <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/whats-up-with-the-washington-posts-biz-section-coverage-of-local-business/05/2008" target="_blank">lack of local tech coverage in the Washington Post</a>. Recently, however, we’re seeing more relevant articles in the paper that highlight the growing DC young IT scene. Case in point, this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/10/AR2008081002026.html?wpisrc=newsletter" target="_blank">article</a> about LaunchBox, a DC tech incubator that will hopefully only serve to grow and enrich the community with more <a href="http://technosailor.com/2008/07/25/andrew-feinberg-to-join-technosailorcom/" target="_blank">talented young IT professionals and big thinkers</a>.&nbsp;
<p>The question that remains is <a href="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/a-new-generation-of-tech-in-dc/07/2008" target="_blank">how the culture</a> in this <a href="http://www.gottabemobile.com/Mobile+Tech+And+Social+Tools+Upset+Some+Congress+Folk.aspx" target="_blank">very traditional area</a> will change with this growth.&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/valley">valley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/silicon valley">silicon valley</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/slow growth">slow growth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/growth">growth</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/washington post">washington post</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brilliant idea">brilliant idea</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/washington">washington</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/idea">idea</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/hub">hub</category>
      <source url="http://blog.sciencelogic.com/dc-young-it-scene-growing/09/2008">DC Young IT Scene Growing</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Wee-Fi: Meraki Modifies, Drops Standard; Tempe's Phoenix?; Remote Wake, Wi-Fi Need Not Apply]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/a930349b033e6f56c6098e0b152daddf</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/a930349b033e6f56c6098e0b152daddf</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Meraki reworks product line, drops new sales of community flavor: The cheap mesh router company has mutated slightly once again. The partly-Google-backed firm founded by MIT RoofNet &quot;graduates&quot; built...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://wifinetnews.com/images/weefi.jpg" align="right" border="0" hspace="5" /><a href="http://meraki.com/"><strong>Meraki reworks product line, drops new sales of community flavor:</strong></a> The cheap mesh router company has mutated slightly once again. The partly-Google-backed firm founded by MIT RoofNet "graduates" built the company on the notion that they could sell $50 routers that could mesh with each other, and use a robust central management system they developed. Over time, the $50 price didn't hold up for commercial networks of scale. Last October, the <a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007973.html"><strong>company mishandled a change</strong></a> in its business model when they abruptly announced a $100 increase in price for newly purchased nodes under their Meraki Pro level for any network that wanted to control whether or not ads appeared, have user accounts, and charge for service. (They eventually <a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007979.html"><strong>recovered, apologized, and reworked</strong></a> some of the transition details.) <img src="http://wifinetnews.com//images/2008/meraki_indoor.jpg" alt="meraki_indoor.jpg" border="0" width="175" height="111" align="right" />The company continued to offer a $50 indoor and $100 outdoor Standard level nodes for networks that required ads and had other limits. As of a few days ago, Standard is dead, and the Meraki mini has been upgraded to the <a href="http://meraki.com/products_services/hardware/indoor/"><strong>Meraki Indoor</strong></a> ($150). The Indoor has signal strength LEDs on the side for better help in placing units, an internal antenna, and better resilience against power fluctuations. The company <a href="http://meraki.com/support/faq/"><strong>explains its move</strong></a> in eliminating Standard by noting that most customers moved to Pro. It's not precisely the end of idealism (nor did that happen last October), as Meraki is still one of the major commercial mesh vendors, and their products are still vastly easier and a fraction of the cost of higher-end competitors.<br clear="all"></p>

<p><a href="http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/123037"><strong>New life for dead Tempe network?</strong></a> Another firm has expressed interest in buying the pennies on the dollar assets that remain of the former Kite Networks installation in Tempe from the firm that financed the venture as long as they can negotiate a new, more favorable deal with the city for mounting and removal rights. CTC, Inc., which the East Valley Tribune reports runs networks in the Kansas City, Mo., area, thinks there's an opportunity. The article notes that reception problems were due in part to the prevalence of stucco in Tempe, common in the southwest. Stucco walls layer plaster or other materials on a wire mesh for strength that turns a house into a bit of an accidental <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage"><strong>Faraday cage</strong></a>, partially shielding the home from electromagnetic radiation. (Could I go so far to say that Tempe's network could be a phoenix? Ouch.)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/2008-08-14-intel-wake-up-pcs_N.htm"><strong>Wake up, you darn computer:</strong></a> Intel's new Remote Wake motherboards won't work with Wi-Fi, it's important to note. The feature, announced today, will let an incoming VoIP call (the articles all say "phone call over the Internet") to wake a computer, as long as the call comes from a particular source. Of course, the standard SIP protocol for VoIP doesn't have the kind of security and integrity that would allow this; Intel has to overcome the problem with network address translation that renders most computer unreachable from outside the local network without a separate service like GoToMyPC or LogMeIn; and it will only work for computers connected via Ethernet to a local network, because Wi-Fi is off when a computer sleeps, while Ethernet can remain lightly active. I don't have the protocol details yet, but there's long been a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wake-on-LAN"><strong>Wake on LAN protocol</strong></a> that required support in a router, operating system, and Ethernet card; Intel may be leveraging this.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki">meraki</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network address translation">network address translation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dead tempe network">dead tempe network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dead">dead</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/tempe">tempe</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/standard">standard</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki indoor">meraki indoor</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/meraki mini">meraki mini</category>
      <source url="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008420.html">Wee-Fi: Meraki Modifies, Drops Standard; Tempe's Phoenix?; Remote Wake, Wi-Fi Need Not Apply</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[As They Say: When in Rome, Do as the Romans.]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/624f835f95a4530197ae74e67f88feb4</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/624f835f95a4530197ae74e67f88feb4</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Recently I had a nice conversation with the head of Asia-Pacific of an international company about how to succeed in Thailand. I explained how businesses in Thailand do not respond well to companies...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had a nice conversation with the head of Asia-Pacific of an international company about how to succeed in Thailand.   I explained how businesses in Thailand do not respond well to companies that come to Thailand with no experience, track record or support infrastructure here in the Kingdom.  I also explained how Thailand has a strong cultural tradition around &#8220;the teacher culture,&#8221; where teachers are considered much higher than mere consultants and integrators.</p>
<p>The conversation went well, I thought, until I received a call from another person in the company who proceeded to tell me how to do business in Thailand and how to determine the target market, and how to set up sales.   Now mind you, I had already explained that there would be no immediate sales opportunities for a few years, realistically, and that this was a long term initiative, designed around a solid education and training program - build infrastructure first.  From a strong education and training program, the market would become clear.</p>
<p>This is such a simple win-win-win situation, but companies do not seem to understand it.  They just want to exploit every contact, event situation, for a quarterly sell.   Why not take the long view as well, since it does not cost you any money?</p>
<p>The guy on the other end of the phone would have nothing to do with our way of thinking in Thailand.  He seemed to be  pushing to insure pre-sales contact immediately.   Instead of supporting us, he wanted to manage us from overseas!!  We asked for support to build their brand, what they seemed to offer was management by proxy!</p>
<p>Folks, this will not work in Thailand (or most Asia countries).</p>
<p>If you want to tap into the fast growing Asia market, leave behind your aggressive New York or Silicon Valley sales guns and forceful presale tactics, where you are content to find an opening, exploit it, make a sale, and report the sale on your quarterly report.  You can get aggressive when you have built a sustainable infrastructure.   The same is true in Japan, not only Thailand.</p>
<p>In Asia, do as the Asians.  In Rome, do as the Romans.  In Thailand, do as the Thais.  In Japan, do as the Japanese.</p>
<p>It is easy to make money in Thailand (and other Asia countries) if you follow their way of business.   Educate, teach, build a workforce, build a sustainable infrastructure on the ground, and then sell, sell, sell.</p>
<p>Granted, many companies do not have  resources to do this overseas.  In that case, enable your partners to do it and let them build the business; don&#8217;t manage them, support them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/asia">asia</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/asia market">asia market</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/thailand">thailand</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/support">support</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/support infrastructure">support infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/infrastructure">infrastructure</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/asia countries">asia countries</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/market">market</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sustainable infrastructure">sustainable infrastructure</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/08/07/as-they-say-when-in-rome-do-as-the-romans/">As They Say: When in Rome, Do as the Romans.</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Ah, the joys of blogging!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/2e21442e3f94142ee989877a5ea060c4</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/2e21442e3f94142ee989877a5ea060c4</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[People ask why do you blog? In the final analysis I blog because I like to. Every once in a while though you get a comment from a reader that reminds you why it is all worth while. Here is one I...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>People ask why do you blog?&nbsp; In the final analysis I blog because I like to. Every once in a while though you get a comment from a reader that reminds you why it is all worth while.&nbsp; Here is one I received today from a person alleging to be a Julie Peterson:</p><blockquote><p><em>Julie Peterson commented on </em><a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/04/safe-access-win.html"><em>Safe Access wins SC Magazine Award Reader Trust Award, again!</em></a><em>: </em></p>

<p><em>Dressed in a tuxedo and chewing those rubber chicken breasts at the award ceremony is your idea of fun? Aren't you the same mentally retarded idiot who said in 2007 that you hated SC awards and that anyone can buy the SC awards with a sponsorship? Why do you think people give over $10k as sponsorship for the SC awards? Who is watching the awards except other vendors? By the way you suck big time with your rubbish blogs. Didn't networld magazine give you the boot within 3 months? Think before you write Mr. mental. Well done on winning, but please, dont give the impression that you cant buy an award from SC! And don't forget to eat your medication pills tonight, otherwise from your hair it is obvious you ran away from a mental hospital.</em> </p></blockquote><p>First of all Julie, let me thank you for your kind words! You made the statement and let me answer your questions for you.</p>

<p>1. Is dressing in a tuxedo and chewing rubber chicken breasts my idea of fun?&nbsp; Actually, I do enjoy dressing up in a tuxedo once in a while.&nbsp; The food at the awards ceremony was actually pretty good, if not diet friendly, as were the cocktails.&nbsp; The entertainment at the awards show was pretty good as well. Catching up with friends you had not seen for a while and networking with industry peers was pretty worthwhile too.&nbsp; Maybe your idea of a good time is putting on a bowling shirt and swilling a couple of beers and pretzels before going home and undressing into your dirty ripped underwear. Hey I say to each his own.</p>

<p>2. I am not the idiot who in 2007 said that I hated the SC awards and that anyone can buy the SC awards with a sponsorship.&nbsp; I am the idiot who <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2007/08/ssaaty-blog-win.html">said that about the InfoSec Products Guide</a> award by the folks at Silicon Valley Communications.&nbsp; In contrast I have always said nice things about the SC awards. I actually have a lot of respect for them.&nbsp; Also for the record, StillSecure has never been a sponsor of the SC Magazine awards. I have seen sponsors who did not win awards as well.&nbsp; So looks like you got that one wrong Julie, but it happens.</p>

<p>3. ???Networld??? magazine didn???t give me the boot within 3 months.&nbsp; They never had the chance, as I never wrote for ???networld, network world or any other magazine. Maybe you have me confused with Mike Rothman or Mitchell Ashley, who do and did write for Network World. But let me assure you that I do try and think before I write.</p>

<p>4. Regarding what medication pills I take and does my hair make it obvious I ran away from a mental hospital. I don???t take any medication, maybe I should.&nbsp; Better living through chemistry you know ;-)&nbsp; As to my hair, what can I say.&nbsp; At this stage I am happy I have any hair at all.&nbsp; My wife always says when I get my haircut it looks like a Buzz Lightyear style, but no one ever mentioned a mental hospital look to it.&nbsp; In any event sorry it doesn???t appeal to you.</p>

<p>So who is this troll Julie Peterson?&nbsp; Could it be Richard Stiennon in drag?&nbsp; Maybe his wife striking out?&nbsp; Maybe another one of my fans?&nbsp; Who knows, but these sort of comments keep me juiced about blogging and remind me of how much fun I have doing it.&nbsp; Thanks again Julie!</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/troll julie peterson">troll julie peterson</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/julie peterson">julie peterson</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networld magazine">networld magazine</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magazine">magazine</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awards">awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/win awards">win awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magazine awards">magazine awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awards ceremony">awards ceremony</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/julie">julie</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/ah-the-joys-of.html">Ah, the joys of blogging!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Ah, the joys of blogging!]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/822d1a6ac16159dd85108200273bf839</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/822d1a6ac16159dd85108200273bf839</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[People ask why do you blog? In the final analysis I blog because I like to. Every once in a while though you get a comment from a reader that reminds you why it is all worth while. Here is one I...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>People ask why do you blog?&nbsp; In the final analysis I blog because I like to. Every once in a while though you get a comment from a reader that reminds you why it is all worth while.&nbsp; Here is one I received today from a person alleging to be a Julie Peterson:</p><blockquote><p><em>Julie Peterson commented on </em><a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/04/safe-access-win.html"><em>Safe Access wins SC Magazine Award Reader Trust Award, again!</em></a><em>: </em></p>

<p><em>Dressed in a tuxedo and chewing those rubber chicken breasts at the award ceremony is your idea of fun? Aren't you the same mentally retarded idiot who said in 2007 that you hated SC awards and that anyone can buy the SC awards with a sponsorship? Why do you think people give over $10k as sponsorship for the SC awards? Who is watching the awards except other vendors? By the way you suck big time with your rubbish blogs. Didn't networld magazine give you the boot within 3 months? Think before you write Mr. mental. Well done on winning, but please, dont give the impression that you cant buy an award from SC! And don't forget to eat your medication pills tonight, otherwise from your hair it is obvious you ran away from a mental hospital.</em> </p></blockquote><p>First of all Julie, let me thank you for your kind words! You made the statement and let me answer your questions for you.</p>

<p>1. Is dressing in a tuxedo and chewing rubber chicken breasts my idea of fun?&nbsp; Actually, I do enjoy dressing up in a tuxedo once in a while.&nbsp; The food at the awards ceremony was actually pretty good, if not diet friendly, as were the cocktails.&nbsp; The entertainment at the awards show was pretty good as well. Catching up with friends you had not seen for a while and networking with industry peers was pretty worthwhile too.&nbsp; Maybe your idea of a good time is putting on a bowling shirt and swilling a couple of beers and pretzels before going home and undressing into your dirty ripped underwear. Hey I say to each his own.</p>

<p>2. I am not the idiot who in 2007 said that I hated the SC awards and that anyone can buy the SC awards with a sponsorship.&nbsp; I am the idiot who <a href="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2007/08/ssaaty-blog-win.html">said that about the InfoSec Products Guide</a> award by the folks at Silicon Valley Communications.&nbsp; In contrast I have always said nice things about the SC awards. I actually have a lot of respect for them.&nbsp; Also for the record, StillSecure has never been a sponsor of the SC Magazine awards. I have seen sponsors who did not win awards as well.&nbsp; So looks like you got that one wrong Julie, but it happens.</p>

<p>3. “Networld” magazine didn’t give me the boot within 3 months.&nbsp; They never had the chance, as I never wrote for “networld, network world or any other magazine. Maybe you have me confused with Mike Rothman or Mitchell Ashley, who do and did write for Network World. But let me assure you that I do try and think before I write.</p>

<p>4. Regarding what medication pills I take and does my hair make it obvious I ran away from a mental hospital. I don’t take any medication, maybe I should.&nbsp; Better living through chemistry you know ;-)&nbsp; As to my hair, what can I say.&nbsp; At this stage I am happy I have any hair at all.&nbsp; My wife always says when I get my haircut it looks like a Buzz Lightyear style, but no one ever mentioned a mental hospital look to it.&nbsp; In any event sorry it doesn’t appeal to you.</p>

<p>So who is this troll Julie Peterson?&nbsp; Could it be Richard Stiennon in drag?&nbsp; Maybe his wife striking out?&nbsp; Maybe another one of my fans?&nbsp; Who knows, but these sort of comments keep me juiced about blogging and remind me of how much fun I have doing it.&nbsp; Thanks again Julie!</p></div>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=SHtn9x"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=SHtn9x" border="0"></img></a></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=6lQ41J"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=6lQ41J" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=wHd2XJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=wHd2XJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=ubGPNJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=ubGPNJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=19TqYJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=19TqYJ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=DScy2j"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=DScy2j" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?a=D7Fxhj"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears?i=D7Fxhj" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~4/349857433" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/troll julie peterson">troll julie peterson</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/julie peterson">julie peterson</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/networld magazine">networld magazine</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magazine">magazine</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awards">awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/win awards">win awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awards ceremony">awards ceremony</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/magazine awards">magazine awards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/julie">julie</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/StillsecureAfterAllTheseYears/~3/349857433/ah-the-joys-of.html">Ah, the joys of blogging!</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Foundry Networks - Brocade's 3 billion dollar baby]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/da6b0b3ea9868c8cef5c92bbfb027515</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/da6b0b3ea9868c8cef5c92bbfb027515</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[By now you have probably heard that Brocade is making a big push from storage networking switches into Ethernet switches by buying Foundry Networks for almost 3 billion in cash. Actually the deal is...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>By now you have probably heard that <a class="zem_slink" title="Brocade Communications Systems" href="http://www.brocade.com/" rel="homepage">Brocade</a> is making a big push from storage networking switches into Ethernet switches by buying <a class="zem_slink" title="Foundry Networks" href="http://www.foundrynet.com/" rel="homepage">Foundry Networks</a> for almost 3 billion in cash.&nbsp; Actually the deal is valued at about 2.8 billion.&nbsp; However, Foundry has about 800 million or so in cash and liquid assets.&nbsp; So taking that into account, the deal is for about 2 billion really, <a href="http://origin.mercurynews.com/business/ci_9950668">according to the San Jose Mercury News</a>. Still that is quite a number when you consider that $18.50 of the $19.25 price per share is in cash.&nbsp; That works out to about 2.7 billion.&nbsp; Considering Brocade only had about 700 to 800 million in cash itself, that means someone is lending them about a billion and half.&nbsp; Again according the Mercury News, it is Bank of America and Morgan Stanley. This is a 41% premium over Foundry's closing price.&nbsp; Pretty sweet!</p>

<p>The real question is what does Brocade do with this.&nbsp; With all of that debt, do they have what it takes to go on and take on Cisco now?&nbsp; The highways and byways of Silicon Valley are littered with companies that have tried to take Cisco out of this market.&nbsp; What about the 7 dwarfs who currently compete in this market.&nbsp; Companies like HP <a class="zem_slink" title="ProCurve" href="http://www.procurve.com/" rel="homepage">ProCurve</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Extreme Networks" href="http://www.extremenetworks.com/" rel="homepage">Extreme Networks</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Nortel" href="http://www.nortel.com/" rel="homepage">Nortel</a>, Enterasys, <a class="zem_slink" title="Alcatel-Lucent" href="http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/" rel="homepage">Alcatel-Lucent</a> and Force 10 are not small little companies. These are companies with 100's of millions, if not billions of dollars of market cap themselves.&nbsp; They are not going to roll over and die here. Will this set off a round of consolidation for these players to bulk up in order to compete in this brave new world of networking? I think so. What about next gen secure switches like ConSentry, Nevis and Napera? Or some of the other smaller switch vendors like D-link?&nbsp; Do they view this a a good opportunity to get bought by one of the giants or do they think they can run through the legs of these giants?&nbsp; I don't know but it is going to be a high barrier of entry into this market.</p>

<p>Ultimately though I don't think Cisco will lose its place of dominance very easily. Brocade will be another competitor among the other switch vendors fighting over 25% of the market. But it sure will be interesting in the switch market for a while. </p>

<fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</legend><ul class="zemanta-article-ul"><li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-9996033-94.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Brocade swinging for the fences with switching</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www10.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/technology/22brocade.html?_r=5&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">Brocade to Acquire Foundry for $3 Billion</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-9995947-94.html?hhTest=1&amp;part=rss&amp;subj=news">Brocade to acquire Foundry Networks</a> </li>

<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry/">Brocade Buying Foundry for $3 Billion</a></li></ul></fieldset> <div class="zemanta-pixie" style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px; HEIGHT: 15px"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/6108c14f-0d05-4b69-af32-d08ae1a43192/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Zemanta Pixie" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6108c14f-0d05-4b69-af32-d08ae1a43192" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FLOAT: right; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none" /></a></div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/foundry">foundry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/foundry networks">foundry networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acquire foundry networks">acquire foundry networks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/acquire foundry">acquire foundry</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/brocade">brocade</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/billion">billion</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/market">market</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/switch market">switch market</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/market cap">market cap</category>
      <source url="http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/07/foundry-network.html">Foundry Networks - Brocade's 3 billion dollar baby</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
