<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: web]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/web</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Web Based Malware Emphasizes on Anti-Debugging Features]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/64ebe557625edfe9bcc0cbdc14885fe7</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/64ebe557625edfe9bcc0cbdc14885fe7</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Following the ongoing development of a particular web based malware, always comes handy in terms of assessing the commoditization of anti-debugging features within modern malware. With plain simple,...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqvOQBBJ4I/AAAAAAAACPw/fmDkcbMwPSs/s1600-h/web_based_malware_cc1_.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqvOQBBJ4I/AAAAAAAACPw/1HWDayNG6dU/s200-R/web_based_malware_cc1_.JPG" /></a>Following the ongoing development of a particular web based malware, always comes handy in terms of assessing <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/09/commoditization-of-anti-debugging.html">the commoditization</a> of <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/09/commercialization-of-anti-debugging.html">anti-debugging features</a> within modern malware. With plain simple, "managed binary crypting and firewall bypassing verification" on demand in February, to August's overall anti antivirus software mentality as a key differentiation factor of the malware.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqymqusJ9I/AAAAAAAACP4/oRig4C4IWHo/s1600-h/web_based_malware_cc3_.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqymqusJ9I/AAAAAAAACP4/FyZQV_azx1o/s200-R/web_based_malware_cc3_.JPG" /></a>So what are they working on? Anti tracing and emulation protection, PeiD and PESniffer protection, as well as anti heuristic scanning with a simple junk data adding feature in order to maintain a smaller binary size.<i> <br />
</i><br />
Here's a translated description :<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqzT_QNxpI/AAAAAAAACQA/vMxRy0XpiTc/s1600-h/web_based_malware_cc_new_version1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqzT_QNxpI/AAAAAAAACQA/WCAOc2P-dV8/s200-R/web_based_malware_cc_new_version1.jpg" /></a>"<i>- The binary works under admin and under normal user</i><br />
<i>- The binary is always run as the "current user"</i><br />
<i>- An unlimited number of bots can be loaded and integrated within the command and control, and with the geolocation feature, filters can be applied for a particular country</i><br />
<i>-After successful infection, the binary which is tested against popular firewall and proactive protection security ensures that the actions it takes and their order do not trigger protactive protection mechanisms in place</i><br />
<i>- binary file size is 25k, the size can be reduced once it's crypted<br />
</i><br />
<i></i> <br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqzZmhHaLI/AAAAAAAACQI/PD09GhFmXi4/s1600-h/web_based_malware_cc_new_version2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqzZmhHaLI/AAAAAAAACQI/6VE-Clw7bNk/s200-R/web_based_malware_cc_new_version2.jpg" /></a><i>- Doesn't take advantage of BITS protocol </i><br />
<i>- Doesn't allow an infected host to be infected twice</i><br />
<i>- Bypassing NAT and supporting "always-on" connections</i><br />
<i>- A simple, easy to configure web based admin panel</i>" <br />
<br />
What if the buyer doesn't care about the quality assurance practices applied? <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2007/10/multiple-firewalls-bypassing.html">Managed lower AV detection and firewall bypassing service</a> comes into play.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=W8uJM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=W8uJM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=3ilgM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=3ilgM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=TZaTm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=TZaTm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=msyxm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=msyxm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=YpECM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=YpECM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=1sBzM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=1sBzM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=pqSlm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=pqSlm" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/413578893" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware">malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web based malware">web based malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/binary file">binary file</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/binary">binary</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/simple">simple</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/plain simple">plain simple</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anti">anti</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/simple junk data">simple junk data</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/firewall">firewall</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/413578893/web-based-malware-emphasizes-on-anti.html">Web Based Malware Emphasizes on Anti-Debugging Features</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Fake Windows XP Activation Trojan Wants Your CVV2 Code]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fac8ba92dd4114941015e75bba3149c4</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fac8ba92dd4114941015e75bba3149c4</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[In a self-contradicting social engineering attempt, a malware author is offering to sale a ( updated version of Kardphisher) DIY fake Windows XP activation builder, which despite the fact that it...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqbO7J3tvI/AAAAAAAACPg/YNDy4vo817c/s1600-h/fake_windows_xp_activation1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqbO7J3tvI/AAAAAAAACPg/BYpcW4rkU0o/s200-R/fake_windows_xp_activation1.png" /></a>In a self-contradicting social engineering attempt, a malware author is offering to sale a (<a href="http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2007-042705-0108-99">updated version</a> of Kardphisher) DIY fake Windows XP activation builder, which despite the fact that it claims "<i>We will ask for your billing details, but your credit card will NOT be charged</i>", is requesting and remotely uploading all the credit card details required for a successfully credit card theft.<br />
<br />
Perhaps among the main reasons why such simplistic social engineering attempts never scaled in a "malicious economies of scale" approach, is because sophisticated crimeware kits capable of obtaining the very same data automatically, started leaking for everyone to start taking advantage of - including yesterday's cybercriminals using such DIY fake message builders. <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>Moreover, according to <a href="http://news.ncsu.edu/news/2008/09/wmswogalterfakemessage.php">recently reseased survey results</a>, end users cannot distinguish between fake popups and real ones, and on their way to continue doing what they were doing, click OK on that pesky warning message telling them that they're about to get infected with malware. Taking into consideration the fact that the popup windows the researchers used look like cheap creative compared to the average fake security software's layout high quality GUIs, it is perhaps worth restating your research questions with something in the lines of - <b>What motivates end users to install an antivirus application going under the name of Super Antivirus 2009 or Mega Virus Cleaner 2008?</b> The fact that the fake status bar is telling them that they're infected with 47 spyware cookies, or the fact that they ended up at the fake site while browsing their trusted web services? <br />
<br />
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqf_xbxL7I/AAAAAAAACPo/6uvXj2AuS_A/s1600-h/fake_windows_xp_activation2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wICHhTiQmrA/SOqf_xbxL7I/AAAAAAAACPo/fa1jUBjFGOU/s200-R/fake_windows_xp_activation2.png" /></a>The increase of <a href="http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/2008/09/diverse-portfolio-of-fake-security_30.html">rogue security software domains</a> is happening due to the high payout affiliation based model, the standardized creative allowing the participants to come up with their own fake names if they want to, and due to the fact that the fake security threats scareware approach seems to be perfectly taking advantage of the overall suspicion on the effectiveness of their legitimate security software.<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=mw30M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=mw30M" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=WJFzM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=WJFzM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=jNfpm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=jNfpm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=9lodm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=9lodm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=6go3M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=6go3M" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=TLsPM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=TLsPM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?a=JuYBm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia?i=JuYBm" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~4/413264124" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit card details">credit card details</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit card">credit card</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/credit card theft">credit card theft</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/details">details</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware">malware</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware author">malware author</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/social">social</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/mega virus cleaner">mega virus cleaner</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/creative">creative</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/DanchoDanchevOnSecurityAndNewMedia/~3/413264124/fake-windows-xp-activation-trojan-wants.html">Fake Windows XP Activation Trojan Wants Your CVV2 Code</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Is Google Using Chrome to Index Password Protected Web?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8a63a597e63a81e80a36c5703b5f3e7a</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8a63a597e63a81e80a36c5703b5f3e7a</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[An interesting theory we heard recently is that Google will use Chrome to index the password protected Web. Right now the Chrome Terms of Service prevents Google from indexing private data. But when...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[An interesting theory we heard recently is that Google will use Chrome to index the password protected Web. Right now the Chrome Terms of Service prevents Google from indexing private data. But when you consider that Chrome was initially presented as a browser for applications, instead of just web pages, this theory begins to make more sense.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 07:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chrome">chrome</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web">web</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/service prevents google">service prevents google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/chrome terms">chrome terms</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/theory">theory</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/theory begins">theory begins</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web pages">web pages</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/index">index</category>
      <source url="http://digg.com/security/Is_Google_Using_Chrome_to_Index_Password_Protected_Web">Is Google Using Chrome to Index Password Protected Web?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Imperva tailors Web app firewall for midsize businesses]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/670d80bbebfa9aa249eaf5c7ec85acfb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/670d80bbebfa9aa249eaf5c7ec85acfb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Imperva is introducing a scaled-down version of its Web application firewall designed for quick installation in midsize...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Imperva is introducing a scaled-down version of its Web application firewall designed for quick installation in midsize businesses.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web application firewall">web application firewall</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/scaled-down version">scaled-down version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/imperva">imperva</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/businesses">businesses</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/quick installation">quick installation</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/100608-imperva-firewall.html?fsrc=rss-security">Imperva tailors Web app firewall for midsize businesses</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Proxy Caches are a Challenging Threat to Internet Security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/39c5fc50305be98bca63ce241a75ebbd</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/39c5fc50305be98bca63ce241a75ebbd</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Proxy caches, combined with poorly written session management code, can easily leads to serious security flaws similar to what we highlighted in A New Security Breach in Google Docs Revealed
Web...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="entry-body">
<p>Proxy caches, combined with poorly written session management code, can easily leads to serious security flaws similar to what we highlighted in <a href="http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2008/09/serious-securit.html">A New Security Breach in Google Docs Revealed</a>.</p>
<p>Web developers have no control over proxy caches in the Internet. However, developers do have control of the code they write and their admin teams have configuration control of their web servers. Developers must assume the worst case Internet scenario with aggressive Internet cache management policies that serve cached data for economic and performance reasons.</p>
<p>As a consequence, this fact-of-life on the Internet sometimes results in multiple web clients being sent the same Set-Cookie HTTP headers, for example.  Caching proxy servers should obtain a fresh cookie for the each new client request. Ideally, proxy caches should not cache session management cookies and distribute cached cookies to multiple clients. However, application developers cannot assume that proxy caches are well behaved, especially for applications where security and privacy are required.</p>
<p>Web developers cannot know whether their content is consumed directly or via a proxy cache. Developers also cannot assume that the HTTP responses will be delivered to the intended browser. Moreover, developers cannot be sure that the intended browser even receives the intended content.  For example, a session ID issued to a client gets used while it is valid or until abandoned and expired. If it is served and delivered in response to an unencrypted HTTP GET request, there’s no guarantee it will be consumed by the intended web browser.</p>
<p>Ideally, SSL should be used on all web transactions that require confidentiality and privacy, including our recent <a href="http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2008/09/serious-securit.html">Google Docs breach</a>.  On the other hand, even SSL is not foolproof. For example, many web developers do not correctly set the &#8220;Encrypted Sessions Only&#8221; cookie property. These incorrectly configured “secure” servers will send HTTPS cookies in the open, unencrypted.</p>
<p>There be dragons &#8230;</p>
</div>
<hr />Note: Reposted from the <a href="http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2008/09/proxy-caches-ar.html" target="_blank">(ISC)2 blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/proxy caches">proxy caches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web developers">web developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/developers">developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet">internet</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/application developers">application developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security flaws similar">security flaws similar</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/session management code">session management code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/code">code</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/10/05/proxy-caches-are-a-challenging-threat-to-internet-security/">Proxy Caches are a Challenging Threat to Internet Security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Hacking Your VoIP Box From The Net]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/ddef0bbead6572419deccb8cf4914ce6</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/ddef0bbead6572419deccb8cf4914ce6</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Do you do penetration testing of your own network? Is it comprehensive enough? Read this recent blog from McAfee's Avert Labs and you may wonder. An Avert analyst, reading about vulnerabilities in the...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Do you do penetration testing of your own network? Is it comprehensive enough? Read <a href="http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2008/09/29/the-lack-of-attention-in-voip-devices/">this recent blog from McAfee's Avert Labs</a> and you may wonder.

An Avert analyst, reading about vulnerabilities in the Cisco IP phone model 7960 then used Google to try to find publicly-accessible 7960 phones. He found "almost 10" (does that mean 9? awkward turn of phrase). 1 of them had the vulnerable firmware version  And the vulnerability was that the phone's web interface reveals a lot of sensitive network information, so the company that holds that phone has a vulnerable network.

What was revealed by the phone? "...the IP addresses of the TFTP server/router/DNS server/DHCP server/Cisco Call Manager, as well as some application links, internal device configuration, and debugging information. If there are any exploitable vulnerabilities in one of these linked servers, attackers could use this information to stage further attacks."

There's always more to test for, and mistakes you in device configuration can have dire consequences.
<p><a href="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/KqezZ8B5wlQOthXrTY4hSBEoKXo/a"><img src="http://feedads.googleadservices.com/~a/KqezZ8B5wlQOthXrTY4hSBEoKXo/i" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~4/sIcbcZ5FSGQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/sensitive network information">sensitive network information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/information">information</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/network">network</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/device configuration">device configuration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internal device configuration">internal device configuration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/phone model">phone model</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/phone">phone</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/exploitable vulnerabilities">exploitable vulnerabilities</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/vulnerable network">vulnerable network</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.ziffdavisenterprise.com/~r/RSS/cheap_hack/~3/sIcbcZ5FSGQ/hacking_your_voip_box_from_the_net.html">Hacking Your VoIP Box From The Net</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[AntiVirus XP ads on Google?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fbe1e948b35797683a6cb1847cb24142</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fbe1e948b35797683a6cb1847cb24142</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[So, If I had clicked on this ad, and dnloaded this awful program and my puter was infected,,,, Would Google be responsible


clipped from www.2-spyware.com

Time for vengeance: AntiVirus XP...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div > So, If I had clicked on this ad, and dnloaded this awful program and my puter was infected,,,,<br/>Would Google be responsible? </div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/0591D79E-5625-46DF-A69C-648E98927C9D/" title="go to this clipmark"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_icon/24356b93-5430-4d1c-8b56-02ef5d918cb2/0591D79E-5625-46DF-A69C-648E98927C9D/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post428.html" href="http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post428.html" style="font-size: 11px;">www.2-spyware.com</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post428.html -->
<div style="margin: 4px 0px; color: #000000; font-size: 20px;">Time for vengeance: AntiVirus XP distributors sued</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%" style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;">
<tr>
<td valign="top"><!-- CLIPPED FROM: http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post428.html --><P>Malware vendors hide well, however they do make mistakes. Distributors of Antivirus XP were bold enough and dumb enough to buy advertisements on Google Adwords! You get it right: someone looking for anti-virus software on Google search engine was offered Antivirus XP by official adds from Google. The scam was noticed pretty soon. Security experts all over the web guess that this mistake was the one that revealed names of AntivirusXP vendors. Victims of Antivirus XP can start celebrating as the distributors won’t get away easily.</P></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;">
<table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td>
<td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/0591D79E-5625-46DF-A69C-648E98927C9D/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<BR/><MAP name="bdv_RSS_Ad_031008031203"><AREA alt="Feed Ads By BidVertiser.com" shape="poly" coords="0,0,467,0,467,45,315,45,315,59,0,59" href="http://secure.bidvertiser.com/performance/bdv_rss_rd.dbm?pid=165886&amp;bid=400950&amp;PHS=031008031203&amp;click=1" target="_blank" /><AREA alt="Feed Ads By BidVertiser.com" shape="rect" coords="315,45,467,59" href="http://www.bidvertiser.com/bdv/bidvertiser/bdv_ref.dbm?Ref_PID=165886&amp;Ref_Option=main&amp;source=90614506" target="_blank" /></MAP><P><a href="http://secure.bidvertiser.com/performance/bdv_rss_rd.dbm?pid=165886&amp;bid=400950&amp;PHS=031008031203&amp;click=1" target="_blank"><IMG src="http://bdv.bidvertiser.com/BidVertiser.dbm?pid=165886&amp;bid=400950&amp;PHS=031008031203&amp;rssimage=1&amp;rSRC=2" border="0" usemap="#bdv_RSS_Ad_031008031203" /></a></P>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google">google</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/antivirus">antivirus</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/google adwords">google adwords</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/distributors">distributors</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/distributors sued">distributors sued</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/malware vendors hide">malware vendors hide</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/anti-virus software">anti-virus software</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security experts">security experts</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/awful program">awful program</category>
      <source url="http://spywarebiz.com/spywarebizblog/?p=637">AntiVirus XP ads on Google?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[OWASP AppSec Asia 2008: Proxy Caches and Web Application Security]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/6d5703cf99293c1caf631a9f5bc73906</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/6d5703cf99293c1caf631a9f5bc73906</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Back to travelling a bit, I have accepted an invitation from Wayne Huang, Chapter Leader, OWASP Taiwan , to give the following presentation at OWASP AppSec Asia 2008, October 27 - 28, 2008, in Taipei...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back to travelling a bit, I have accepted an invitation from Wayne Huang, Chapter Leader, <a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Taiwan" target="_blank">OWASP Taiwan</a>,  to give the following presentation at <a href="http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_AppSec_Conference" target="_blank">OWASP AppSec</a> Asia 2008, October 27 - 28, 2008, in Taipei:</p>
<p><strong>Proxy Caches and Web Application Security</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Abstract:  <em>Proxy caches, combined with poorly written session management code, can easily lead to serious Internet security breaches. Web application developers cannot know whether their content is consumed directly or via a proxy cache. Developers cannot assume that the HTTP responses will be delivered to the intended browser. Moreover, developers cannot be sure that the intended browser even receives the intented content. Consequently, proxy caches are a serious theat to web application security.  In the presentation, we will discuss the recent <a href="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/09/15/a-new-security-breach-in-google-docs-revealed/" target="_blank">security breach Tim found in Google Docs </a>and review <a href="http://blog.isc2.org/isc2_blog/2008/09/proxy-caches-ar.html" target="_blank">web application security and session management topics related to proxy caching.</a></em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/proxy caches">proxy caches</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/proxy">proxy</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web application security">web application security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/owasp appsec asia">owasp appsec asia</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web application developers">web application developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/developers">developers</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/session management topics">session management topics</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/session management code">session management code</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/internet security breaches">internet security breaches</category>
      <source url="http://www.thecepblog.com/2008/10/03/owasp-appsec-asia-2008-proxy-caches-and-web-application-security/">OWASP AppSec Asia 2008: Proxy Caches and Web Application Security</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Grand jury indicts two Europeans over denial-of-service attacks in 2003]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/746ea869cb23e52f443868e7e8ddec4f</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/746ea869cb23e52f443868e7e8ddec4f</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[A federal grand jury has indicted two European men for allegedly orchestrating denial-of-service attacks against a pair of U.S.-based Web sites in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[A federal grand jury has indicted two European men for allegedly orchestrating denial-of-service attacks against a pair of U.S.-based Web sites in 2003.<br style="clear: both;"/>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:f85d136f3c383fcc0bb6cef7ba9ee9ae:TrVdwOzJ%2BXZk4RgsHL8bBLAuBfkaUILcaLXZ8ehJQ44fn%2BQjbNFzDCieyDWtMkINdsqDg31SSPMo'><img border='0' title='Add to digg' alt='Add to digg' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/digg.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:f840a05c9f30e6fe170bd39fd3551e4b:0St0BMx0VLvl2n23HvIXfVH0yoQcjfb13vo87SH%2Bnphc%2B9H6eWGb%2F%2B4PV2MQfKMh6HiEJ0Pi%2FjSA3Q%3D%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to StumbleUpon' alt='Add to StumbleUpon' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/stumbleit.gif'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:c93e9d6076b4f6880572da02c83bb360:sKJCDqZTyQqC8oGliOwKGnETpY1aFhjcABSgwqzeEDSJSqxCNFhNhHZlmYs7raBFu3SOI4RtnB2CGQ%3D%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Twitter' alt='Add to Twitter' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/twitter.png'/></a>
    <a style='font-size: 10px; color: maroon;' href='http://www.pheedo.com/hostedMorselClick.php?hfmm=v3:a7e72d9e85acd5a116649b0e399297f8:5vR%2FYBwkJYIKDzW5RVSCLx35HjlJqofFX4xGhhDsN6SCRdmapAJW%2BgnDol%2FRReeCgtOWqoUcLtcuMA%3D%3D'><img border='0' title='Add to Slashdot' alt='Add to Slashdot' src='http://www.pheedo.com/images/mm/slashdot.png'/></a>
<br style="clear: both;"/>      <a href="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=c&amp;i=c8ede97a6557e2e70e7f0aca3b2a2704"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/ht.php?t=v&amp;i=c8ede97a6557e2e70e7f0aca3b2a2704" border="0" /></a>
  <img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=c8ede97a6557e2e70e7f0aca3b2a2704" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/federal grand jury">federal grand jury</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attacks">attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web sites">web sites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/pair">pair</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/european">european</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/allegedly">allegedly</category>
      <source url="http://feeds.computerworld.com/click.phdo?i=c8ede97a6557e2e70e7f0aca3b2a2704">Grand jury indicts two Europeans over denial-of-service attacks in 2003</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Two Europeans charged in U.S. over DDoS attacks]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/50344ed7143e5c88fdce42097172b5ee</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/50344ed7143e5c88fdce42097172b5ee</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Two European men have been indicted for allegedly orchestrating cyberattacks against two Web sites, a continuation of the first successful U.S. investigation ever into distributed denial-of-service...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Two European men have been indicted for allegedly orchestrating cyberattacks against two Web sites, a continuation of the first successful U.S. investigation ever into distributed denial-of-service attacks, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.<p><A href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=17978?">
<IMG src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/idg.us.nwf.rss/security;sz=468x60;ord=17978?" border="0" width="468" height="60"></A>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/attacks">attacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web sites">web sites</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/department">department</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/cyberattacks">cyberattacks</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/successful">successful</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/continuation">continuation</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/justice">justice</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/european">european</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/investigation">investigation</category>
      <source url="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/100308-two-europeans-charged-in-us.html?fsrc=rss-security">Two Europeans charged in U.S. over DDoS attacks</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
