<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[[SecurityRatty] tag: xsd]]></title>
    <link>http://securityratty.com/tag/xsd</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>iRatty Engine</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Upcoming Talks and Training]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/d68ebfdb5917f37e9c36ff618bc2fbcb</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/d68ebfdb5917f37e9c36ff618bc2fbcb</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Here is my current list of talks and training


Breaking Web Services,&quot; Monday July 7: OWASP Twin Cities - &quot; SOA and Web services promise wonderful interoperability, but distributed systems create...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my current list of talks and training</p><br><div><ul>
<li>"Breaking Web Services," Monday July 7: <a href="https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Minneapolis_St_Paul">OWASP Twin Cities</a>  - "<span style="font-family: -webkit-sans-serif; line-height: 19px; ">SOA and Web services promise wonderful interoperability, but distributed systems create lots of room for fantastic failures. This session will explore the gory details of unique vulnerabilities at each layer of the SOA stack - from the WSDL interfaces to XML processing (XSD, XPath and XQuery), to the implementation languages liike Java and C#, to new security standards like WS-Security and SAML.<p style="margin-top: 0.4em; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 1.5em; ">I gave a version of  this talk with Brian Chess at the <a href="https://cm.rsaconference.com/US08/catalog/controller/catalog" class="external text" title="https://cm.rsaconference.com/US08/catalog/controller/catalog" rel="nofollow" style="text-decoration: none; background-image: none; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: initial; color: #3366bb; background-position: initial initial; ">2008 RSA Conference</a>.</p></span></li>
<li><span> "Web Services and SSO: There and Back Again" at Ping's <a href="http://www.ssosummit.com/program/Agenda-at-a-Glance.cfm">SSO Summit</a>. July 25, Keystone, CO - "<span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; "><font size="2">What happens to your identity information and business data after you press "SUBMIT" on a website? These bits have a journey as dangerous as Frodo Baggins' travels through Mordor. This talk traces the path from the website through the perils that lurk in the enterprise and legacy systems. We will explore what threats are encountered along the way, and how to design a cost effective security architecture with Security Token Servers using open standards</font><em><font size="2">."</font></em></span> <span> </span> </span></li>
<li><span> "SOA, web services, and XML Security" 1 day training at <a href="http://www.usenix.org/events/sec08/training/tutonefile.html#t3">Usenix Security</a></span> July 29. This is a public 1 day version of my <a href="http://arctecgroup.net/training.htm">training</a> see the link for details</li>
</ul>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security">security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/usenix security july">usenix security july</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/ws-security">ws-security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xml security">xml security</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/july">july</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/web services">web services</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/day version">day version</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/security standards">security standards</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/soa">soa</category>
      <source url="http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2008/07/upcoming-talks-and-training.html">Upcoming Talks and Training</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/8033cdd726347c87fc67beb5f4537b71</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/8033cdd726347c87fc67beb5f4537b71</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in no namespace, Intellisense seemed to work.</p> <p>In VS 2008, Intellisense for config files was working great for me until recently, and now, regardless of whether I have the namespace or not, it appears hopelessly broken. I checked under XML|Schemas to see if the schema was in place, and indeed I have DotNetConfig.xsd listed in there for an empty namespace, and it's got the little green checkmark by it, which makes me think VS recognizes that this is the schema it's supposed to use, but still no joy. There are a few other schemas listed here (DotNetConfig30.xsd, for example), but none of those have checks by them - only DotNetConfig.xsd is checked.</p> <p>Has anyone else seen this?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=51024" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/intellisense">intellisense</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace">namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace declaration">namespace declaration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/empty namespace">empty namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/config files">config files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xsd">xsd</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/schema">schema</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xml">xml</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dotnetconfig">dotnetconfig</category>
      <source url="http://pluralsight.com/community/blogs/keith/archive/2008/05/22/51024.aspx">Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/fa8d76815a54d766f52448ceda8c69cf</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/fa8d76815a54d766f52448ceda8c69cf</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in no namespace, Intellisense seemed to work.</p> <p>In VS 2008, Intellisense for config files was working great for me until recently, and now, regardless of whether I have the namespace or not, it appears hopelessly broken. I checked under XML|Schemas to see if the schema was in place, and indeed I have DotNetConfig.xsd listed in there for an empty namespace, and it's got the little green checkmark by it, which makes me think VS recognizes that this is the schema it's supposed to use, but still no joy. There are a few other schemas listed here (DotNetConfig30.xsd, for example), but none of those have checks by them - only DotNetConfig.xsd is checked.</p> <p>Has anyone else seen this?</p><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=51024" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/intellisense">intellisense</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace">namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace declaration">namespace declaration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/empty namespace">empty namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/config files">config files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xsd">xsd</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/schema">schema</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xml">xml</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dotnetconfig">dotnetconfig</category>
      <source url="http://www.pluralsight.com/community/blogs/keith/archive/2008/05/22/51024.aspx">Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?</source>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?]]></title>
      <link>http://securityratty.com/article/9f2d99c5d10eb1662f5022afbda678c4</link>
      <guid>http://securityratty.com/article/9f2d99c5d10eb1662f5022afbda678c4</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in...]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember having trouble in VS 2005 with Intellisense not working - the trick back in those days was to remove the namespace declaration that was added by various tools. As long as the content was in no namespace, Intellisense seemed to work.</p> <p>In VS 2008, Intellisense for config files was working great for me until recently, and now, regardless of whether I have the namespace or not, it appears hopelessly broken. I checked under XML|Schemas to see if the schema was in place, and indeed I have DotNetConfig.xsd listed in there for an empty namespace, and it's got the little green checkmark by it, which makes me think VS recognizes that this is the schema it's supposed to use, but still no joy. There are a few other schemas listed here (DotNetConfig30.xsd, for example), but none of those have checks by them - only DotNetConfig.xsd is checked.</p> <p>Has anyone else seen this?</p><img src ="http://pluralsight.com/blogs/keith/aggbug/51024.aspx" width = "1" height = "1" />]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/intellisense">intellisense</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace">namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/namespace declaration">namespace declaration</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/empty namespace">empty namespace</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/config files">config files</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xsd">xsd</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/schema">schema</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/xml">xml</category>
      <category domain="http://securityratty.com/tag/dotnetconfig">dotnetconfig</category>
      <source url="http://pluralsight.com/blogs/keith/archive/2008/05/22/51024.aspx">Intellisense for XML config files broken in VS 2008?</source>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
